Journal of Research in Education Sciences - Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(4)】December (Special Issue: Quality management and assurance in education)

Search by article title, author,
keywords, and DOI

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

[Style for Thesis Writing]

[Review of Research Papers]

[The Copyright]

[Flow of Review System]

[Regulations Governing]

[Editorial Board]

[Advisory Board]

[Form Download]

Call for papers for the special issue “Prevention and Treatment of Addictive Behaviors on Campus” (Final submission deadline: 2021/8/31) The Journal of Research in Education Sciences will no longer provide printed copies Call for papers for the special issue “Educational Research Related to Southeast Asian Countries” (Final submission deadline: 2018/12/31)

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(4)】December (Special Issue: Quality management and assurance in education)

Back

(Special Issue) Analyses and Changing Models of School Governance in Japan: School Council Cases
Author: Yung-Chih Lin(Division of Study on Education, Tokyo Gakugei University, JAPAN), Ching-Shan Wu(K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 58, No. 4
Date：December 2013
Pages：103-131
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).04

Abstract：

Because of the influence of educational reforms sweeping the western hemisphere and domestic political movements advocating governmental decentralization, the educational systems in Japan have been evolving for years. The most prominent change implemented in response to educational decentralization is the authority transfer, in which decision making power was transferred from the central government to county governments and, subsequently, to the schools. As a result, school management systems must be adapted to localization and decentralization movements, and the optimal operational models for schools have been extensively discussed. Numerous changes, such as strengthening the autonomy of school management, electing independents to the school board, and establishing school councils to replace traditional decision-making mechanisms, have fundamentally altered the power structures in schools.
In contrast to the enthusiastic movements in Japan, the topic of school operation models has rarely been discussed in Taiwan. To address this gap, we investigated the governance history, current status of, and potential changes among Japanese schools. By analyzing the school governance evolution of Japan, the authors use the experiences of Japan to provide alternative options for school innovation in Taiwan. Therefore, this paper begins with an introduction to the concepts and changing models of school governance; subsequently, the conditions and frameworks of school councils in Japan are described, and school governance models and school council operation are analyzed. Finally, recommendations are provided for applying the educational changes implemented in Japan to the education system in Taiwan.

Keywords：

Japan, school governance, school council

《Full Text》

References：

王麗雲（2007）。地方教育治理模式分析。教育政策論壇，10（1），189-228。【Wang, L.-Y. (2007). Three models of local educational governance compared: Experiences from the U.S. and Taiwan. Educational Policy Forum, 10(1), 189-228.】
吳清山（2011）。學校革新研究。臺北市：高等教育。【Wu, C.-H. (2011). Research in school innovation. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
李柏佳（2006）。國民教育法的解構與建構。全國律師雜誌，95年10月號，12-25。【Li, B.-J. (2006). The deconstruction and construction of primary education law. Taiwan Bar Journal, 2006(10), 12-25.】
周志宏（2003）。教育法與教育改革。臺北市：高等教育。【Zhou, Z.-H. (2003). Education law and educational reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
林雍智（2010a）。教育的自治、分權與學校經營改革─日本案例評析及對我國之啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊，9，59-80。【Lin, Y.-C. (2010a). Autonomy, decentralization and school management reform in education: An analysis of Japan case. Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, 9, 59-80.】

» More

王麗雲（2007）。地方教育治理模式分析。教育政策論壇，10（1），189-228。【Wang, L.-Y. (2007). Three models of local educational governance compared: Experiences from the U.S. and Taiwan. Educational Policy Forum, 10(1), 189-228.】
吳清山（2011）。學校革新研究。臺北市：高等教育。【Wu, C.-H. (2011). Research in school innovation. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
李柏佳（2006）。國民教育法的解構與建構。全國律師雜誌，95年10月號，12-25。【Li, B.-J. (2006). The deconstruction and construction of primary education law. Taiwan Bar Journal, 2006(10), 12-25.】
周志宏（2003）。教育法與教育改革。臺北市：高等教育。【Zhou, Z.-H. (2003). Education law and educational reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
林雍智（2010a）。教育的自治、分權與學校經營改革─日本案例評析及對我國之啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊，9，59-80。【Lin, Y.-C. (2010a). Autonomy, decentralization and school management reform in education: An analysis of Japan case. Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, 9, 59-80.】
林雍智（2010b）。教育分權改革與官僚體制之變貌：日本案例評析。教育研究與發展期刊，6（3），1-29。【Lin, Y.-C. (2010b). Decentralization reform and changing of bureaucracy in education: A Japan case. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 6(3), 1-29.】
林雍智（2011）。日本民主黨政府的教改政策及其啟示。教育研究月刊，209，130-140。【Lin, Y.-C. (2011). Policies and relevant of educational reform of Japan’s Democracy Party Government. Journal of Education Research, 209, 130-140.】
林雍智、吳清山（2013）。學校經營變革的日本案例分析：學校治理、分權及學校參與。教育政策論壇，16（2），93-122。doi:10.3966/156082982013051602004【Lin, Y.-C., & Wu, C.-S. (2013). Analyses of school management reforms in Japan: School governance, decentralization and participation. Educational Policy Forum, 16(2), 93-122. doi:10.3966/15608298201 3051602004】
謝文全（2004）。比較教育行政。臺北市：五南。【Hsieh, W.-C. (2004). Comparative educational administration. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
三鷹市教育委員（2013）。みたかの教育。取自http://www.city.mitaka.tokyo.jp/kyouiku/2013/ 20130414/01.pdf【Education Board of Mitaka City. (2013). Mitaka’s education. Retrieved from http://www.city.mitaka.tokyo.jp/ kyouiku/2013/20130414/01.pdf】
大桃敏行（2005）。ガバナンス改革と校運協議の課題。教育研究，72（1），80-83。【Omomo, T. (2005). Governance reform and issues of community schools. Educational Research, 72(1), 80-83.】
小川正人（2010）。教育改革のゆくえ―国から地方へ。東京都：ちくま新書。【Ogawa, M. (2010). The future of education reform: From nation to country. Tokyo, Japan: Chikuma New Books.】
小松郁夫（2011）。「新しい公共」型校とは。載於天笠茂、小松郁夫（編），「新しい公共」型校づくり（pp. 1-21）。東京都：ぎょうせい。【Komatsu, I. (2011). What are “new public common” schools? In S. Amagasa & I. Komatsu (Eds.), Building the “new public common” type schools (pp. 1-21). Tokyo, Japan: Gyosei.】
小島弘道（2007）。時代の転換と校経営改革―校のガバナンスとマネジメント。東京都：文社。【Kojima, H. (2007). Changing of times and reforms on school management: School governance and management. Tokyo, Japan: Gakubunsha.】
小島弘道（2010）。校経の思想とリーダーシップ論。載於小島弘道、淵上克義、露口健司（編），スクールリーダーシップ（pp. 7-44）。東京都：文社。【Kojima, H. (2010). Thoughts of school management and leadership theories. In H. Kojima, K. Fuchigami, & K. Roguchi (Eds.), School leadership (pp. 7-44). Tokyo, Japan: Gakubunsha.】
文部科省（2004）。公立校における校評価の実施状況及び校評議員の設置状況（文部科広報，46号）。東京都：作者。【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2004). The present conditions of implementing school evaluations and school counselors in public schools (The Monthly Journal of MEXT, 46). Tokyo, Japan: Author.】
文部科省（2008）。コミュニティ‧スクール事例集。東京都：作者。【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2008). Case collections of community schools. Tokyo, Japan: Author.】
文部科省（2013）。コミュニティ‧スクール（学校運営協議制度）の指定状況（平成25年4月1日現在）。取自http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/community/school/detail/ 1335832.htm【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2013). The designation conditions of community school (community school systems)(at the stage of Apr. 1, 2013). Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/ a_menu/shotou/community/school/detail/1335832.htm】
木岡一明（2011）。公教育の規範性と校組織マネジメント。載於堀內孜（編），公教育経営の展開（pp. 108-126）。東京都：東京書籍。【Kioka, K. (2011). The norms of public education and school organization management. In T. Horiuchi (Ed.), The development of public education management (pp. 108-126). Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Shoseki.】
水本徳明（2011）。公教育経の意思決定システム―政策‧行政‧経。載於堀內孜（編），公教育経営の展開（pp. 56-72）。東京都：東京書籍。【Mizumoto, T. (2011). Decision making systems of public education management: Policies, administration, and management. In T. Horiuchi (Ed.), The development of public education management (pp. 56-72). Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Shoseki.】
布藤勇（2008）。教育自治論の理論的課題―諸主体の連構造の整理を通して―。名古屋大大学院教育発達科学研究科教育科学専攻「教育論叢」，51，49-59。【Fudou, I. (2008). Theoretical issues of educational autonomy theories－Through the arrangement on related structures of various entities. “Educational Forum” of the graduate school of education and human development, Nagoya University, Japan, 51, 49-59.】
平井貴美代（2005）。地方分権時代の校経の課題―「校ガバナンス」を手がかりに。校経営研究，30，21-30。【Hirai, K. (2005). Topics of school management under local decentralization era－Clues to the school governance. Bulletin of School Administration, 30, 21-30.】
平田淳（2008）。「学校協議」の教育効果に関する研究。東京都：東信堂。【Hirada, J. (2008). Do school councils empower students? Two Japanese case studies. Tokyo, Japan: Toshindo.】
民主党（2010）。元気な日本を復活させる－民主党の政権政策Manifesto。取自http://www. dpj.or.jp/special/manifesto2010/data/manifesto2010.pdf【The Democratic Party of Japan. (2010). Reviving the vigorously Japan: The manifesto of Democratic Party government’s policy. Retrieved from http://www.dpj.or.jp/special/manifesto2010/data/ manifesto2010.pdf】
伊藤りさ（2006）。校運協議制度における評価と支援のあり方を巡って―ニュージーランドの制度を参考に―。レファレンス，2006（3），84-98。【Ito, R. (2006). Around the way of evaluation and support of community school systems－Referring to the system of New Zealand. Reference, 2006(3), 84-98.】
西東克介（2007）。近年のアメリカにおける都市教育委員‧教育長制度の傾向。取自http://www.clair.or.jp/j/forum/series/pdf/h19-1.pdf【Saitou, K. (2007). Trends of urban school board and superintendent systems in the recent United States of America. Retrieved from http://www.clair.or.jp/j/forum/series/pdf/h19-1.pdf】
佐藤晴雄（2010a）。コミュニティ‧スクール制度に対する期待と成果。載於佐藤晴雄（編著），コミュニティ‧スクールの研究―学校運営協議の成果と課題（pp. 39-54）。東京都：風間書房。【Sato, H. (2010a). The expectations and results for the community school system. In H. Sato (Ed.), A research of community schools: The outcomes and issues of school running conference (pp. 39-54). Tokyo, Japan: Kazamashobo.】
佐藤晴雄（2010b）。コミュニティ‧スクール制度の成果にする分析的考査。載於佐藤晴雄（編著），コミュニティ‧スクールの研究―学校運営協議の成果と課題（pp. 145- 154）。東京都：風間書房。【Sato, H. (2010b). The analytical examination on the results of the community school system. In H. Sato (Ed.), A research of community schools: The outcomes and issues of school running conference (pp. 145-154). Tokyo, Japan: Kazamashobo.】
佐藤晴雄（2011）。「新しい公共」と校改善。教職研修，2011（6），106-108。【Sato, H. (2011). “New public common” and school improvement. Kyosyokukensyu, 2011(6), 106-108.】
佐藤博志（2005）。現代校経改革におけるガバナンスの展開。教育学研究，72（1），77-80。【Sato, H. (2005). Development of governance in the modern school management reforms. Educational Research, 72(1), 77-80.】
志水宏吉（2008）。公立学校の底力。東京都：ちくま新書。【Shimizu, K. (2008). The potential energies of public schools. Tokyo, Japan: Chikuma Shinsho.】
京都市教育委員（2008）。コミュニティ‧スクール通信＠京都，VOL.1。取自http://www. city.yoto.lg.jp/kyoiku/cmsfiles/contents/0000038/38884/comitu.pdf【Board of education, Kyoto City. (2008). Community school communications @ Kyoto, VOL.1. Retrieved from http://www.city.kyoto.lg.jp/kyoiku/cmsfiles/contents/0000038/38884/comitu.pdf】
金子郁容（2008）。日本で「一番いい」学校－地域連携のイノベーション。東京都：岩波書店。【Kaneko, I. (2008). The “best” school in Japan－Innovations of school and community alliances. Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami Shoten.】
貞広斎子（2009）。校評議員制度の機能要因にする実証的研究―校ガバナンス構築に向けた校評議員の意識分析―。千葉大学教育学部研究紀要，57，145-149。【Sadahiro, S. (2009). Empowering Japanese-style school councils－Towards school governance in Japanese public schools. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Chiba University, 57, 145-149.】
重松克也（2009）。公立校の挑戦。載於江川玟成、高橋勝、葉養正明、望月重信（編），最新教育キーワード（第13版，pp. 16-17）。東京都：時事通信社。【Shigematsu, K. (2009). Challenges of public schools. In B. Egawa, K. Takahashi, M. Hayo, & S. Mochiduki (Eds.), The newest educational keywords (13th ed., pp. 16-17). Tokyo, Japan: Jiji Press.】
宮脇淳（2004）。ガバナンスの意味とNPM。PHP政策研究レポート，7（85），1。【Miyawaki, J. (2004). Meaning of governance and NPM. PHP Policy Research Report, 7(85), 1.】
浜田博文（2009）。校長のリーダーシップと校ガバナンス。載於江川玟成、高橋勝、葉養正明、望月重信（編），最新教育キーワード（第13版，pp. 74-75）。東京都：時事通信社。【Hamada, H. (2009). Principals’ leadership and school governance. In B. Egawa, K. Takahashi, M. Hayo, & S. Mochiduki (Eds.), The newest educational keywords (13th ed., pp. 74-75). Tokyo, Japan: Jiji Press.】
馬場健一（1997）。社の自律領域と法（1）－校教育と法とのかかわりを素材として―。神戶法学，127（5），65。【Baba, K. (1997). Autonomous areas of society and laws (1) – As a material with the school education and law relationships. Kobe Law Journal, 127(5), 65.】
堀內孜（2000）。地方分権と教育委員制度。東京都：ぎょうせい。【Horiuchi, T. (2000). Local decentralization and systems of board of education. Tokyo, Japan: Gyosei.】
望月國南（2011）。コミュニティ‧スクールをめぐる校長の意識。教職研修，2011（6），108-110。【Mochiduki, K. (2011). Awareness of principals over community schools. Kyosyokukensyu, 2011(6), 108-110.】
結城忠（2010）。教育の自治‧分権と学校法制。東京都：東信堂。【Yugi, M. (2010). Autonomy, decentralization of education and school laws. Tokyo, Japan: Toshindo.】
喜多明人（2011）。Q36：開かれた校づくりと校評議員、校運評議。載於姉崎洋一、荒牧重人、小川正人、金子征史、喜多明人、戶波江二…吉岡直子（編），ガイドブック教育法（pp. 206-207）。東京都：三省堂書店。【Kita, A. (2011). Q36: Building the community-based schools with school counselors and community schools. In Y. Anezaki, S. Aramaki, M. Ogawa, M. Kaneko, A. Kita, K. Tonami, …N. Yoshioka (Eds.), Guidebook of educational laws (pp. 206-207). Tokyo, Japan: Books Sanseido.】
菱村幸彦（2008）。やさしい教育法規の読み方。東京都：教育開発研究所。【Hishimura, Y. (2008). How to read educational laws easily. Tokyo, Japan: Kyoikukaihatu Kenkyuzyo.】
黒崎勳（2004）。新しいタイプの公立学校。東京都：同時代社。【Kurosaki, I. (2004). The new type of public schools. Tokyo, Japan: Doujidaisha.】
新潟県教育総合研究センター（編）（2002）。イギリスの教育改革と学校理事。東京都：アドバンテージサーバー。【Kyoiku Souken Center of Niigata Prefecture, Japan. (Ed.). (2002). Educational innovations in the United Kingdom and school councils. Tokyo, Japan: Advantage Server.】
葉養正明（2000）。学校評議員ガイド。東京都：ぎょうせい。【Hayo, M. (2000). The guideline of school counselors. Tokyo, Japan: Gyosei.】
葉養正明（2006）。よみがえれ公立学校：地域の核としての新しい学校づくり。神奈川県：紫峰図書。【Hayo, M. (2006). Reviving the public schools: Building new schools as cores of community. Kanagawa, Japan: Sihohtosyo.】
露口健司（2009）。校長の民間人登用。載於江川玟成、高橋勝、葉養正明、望月重信（編），最新教育キーワード（第13版，pp. 84-85）。東京都：時事通信社。【Roguchi, K. (2009). Appointment of a principal from outside the school. In B. Egawa, K. Takahashi, M. Hayo, & S. Mochiduki (Eds.), The newest educational keywords (13th ed., pp. 84-85). Tokyo, Japan: Jiji Press.】
Canadian Urban Institute. (2006). An overview of Canada’s elementary and secondary education systems. Toronto, Canada: Author.
Fowler, F. C. (2008). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hatcher, R. (1996). The limitations of the new social democratic agendas: Class, equality and agency. In R. Hatcher, K. Jones, B. Regan, & C. Richards (Eds.), Education after the conservatives: The response to the new agenda of reform (pp. 3-12). Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29-45. doi:10.1111/1468-2451. 00107
Jessop, B. (2000). Governance failure. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new politics of British local governance (pp. 11-32). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management: A review. Educational Policy, 12(3), 325-346. doi:10.1177/0895904898012003006
Murphy, J., & Beck, L. G. (1995). School-based management as school reform: Taking stock. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (Ed.). (2008). Improving school leadership: Vol. 1. Policy and practice. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264044715-en
Raab, C. D. (2000). The devolved management of schools and its implications for governance. In M. A. Arnott & C. D. Raab (Eds.), The governance of schooling: Comparative studies of devolved management (pp. 15-42). London, UK: Routledge.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press

APA Format	Lin, Y.-C., & Wu, C.-S. (2013). Analyses and Changing Models of School Governance in Japan: School Council Cases. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(4), 103-131. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).04

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(4)】December (Special Issue: Quality management and assurance in education) Back

(Special Issue) Analyses and Changing Models of School Governance in Japan: School Council Cases Author: Yung-Chih Lin(Division of Study on Education, Tokyo Gakugei University, JAPAN), Ching-Shan Wu(K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education)

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(4)】December (Special Issue: Quality management and assurance in education)

Back

(Special Issue) Analyses and Changing Models of School Governance in Japan: School Council Cases
Author: Yung-Chih Lin(Division of Study on Education, Tokyo Gakugei University, JAPAN), Ching-Shan Wu(K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education)