This study analyzed the learning effectiveness of emotion management for college students through the application of a multimedia mobile learning system combined with classroom teaching. We used the Moodle platform, which is compatible with the Android operating system, and added several functional modules to the platform to enable students to learn effectively. The modules that constituted the emotion-management learning system comprised multimedia, instant messaging, learning materials, and a Facebook discussion forum. A multistage fuzzy system was used to assess students’ qualitative reflections at various stages of the emotion-management learning process. A quasi-experimental design was used to investigate 72 college students. They were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The questionnaires on learning effectiveness and the students’ satisfaction with the multimedia mobile learning system were statistically analyzed. According to the results: (1) the proposed multimedia mobile learning system combined with classroom teaching effectively improved the learning of emotion management; (2) the overall satisfaction of college students with the multimedia mobile learning system was between satisfied and very satisfied; and (3) we develop a multistage fuzzy system to reduce the burden of elasticity proportion assessment of the students learning emotion management through situational reflection.

» More

1. 王育文、羅智耀、藍天雄（2009）。行動學習暨成效評量系統之研究。管理科學研究，5（2），81-96。【Wang, Y.-W., Lou, J.-Y., & Land, T.-S. (2009). The study of mobile learning and the effectiveness of evaluation system. Research Journal of Management Science, 5(2), 81-96.】
2. 王春展（2004）。台灣地區大學生情緒智慧、憂鬱傾向與情緒調整策略之研究。嘉南學報（人文類），30，443-460。【Wang, C.-C. (2004). A study of the emotional intelligence, depression and emotional regulation strategy of college student in Taiwan. Chia Nan Annual Bulletin: Humanity, 30, 443-460.】
3. 王嬿惠、羅承浤、鮑惟豪、謝秉叡（2011）。數位動態與靜態影像之輔助學習成效比較－以英語學習為例。工程科技與教育學刊，8（3），343-350。【Wang, Y.-H., Luo, C.-H., Bau, W.-H., & Shie, B.-R. (2011). Compared the learning effectiveness assisted by dynamic digital and still images－In English learning as an example. Journal of Engineering Technology and Education, 8(3), 343-350.】
4. 江承曉（2008）。以同儕輔導團體介入活動對提昇大學生情緒管理生活技能之成效研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報，29，1-26。【Chiang, C.-H. (2008). Effects of emotional management peer counseling group program on the university students’ emotional management life skills. Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education, 29, 1-26.】
5. 吳瑞源、吳慧敏（2008）。動畫教材之學習者控制播放模式與多媒體組合形式對學習成效與學習時間影響之研究。師大學報：科學教育類，53（1），1-26。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2008.53 (1).01【Wu, R.-Y., & Wu, H.-M. (2008). The impact of animated instructional material’s learner control modes and multimedia modality combinations on learning effectiveness and learning time. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 53(1), 1-26. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2008.53(1).01】
6. 張菀珍（2012）。新移民女性應用無所不在學習系統進行古蹟學習成效之研究。成人及終身教育學刊，20，71-118。【Chang, W.-J. (2012). A study of applying ubiquitous learning system for historical sites learning of new immigrant women. Journal of Adult and Lifelong Education, 20, 71-118.】
7. 張菀珍、陳景章、范植然、郭裔辰、葉榮木（2010，10月）。應用即時互動傳訊於生命教育體驗學習之設計與實作。論文發表於2010年臺灣網際網路研討會（TANET 2010），臺南市。【Chang, W.-J., Chen, J.-J., Fan, J.-R., Guo, Y.-C., & Yeh, Z.-M. (2010, October). A design and implementation of instant message in life education experiential learning. Paper presented at the 2010 Taiwan Internet Symposium (TANET 2010), Tainan, Taiwan.】
8. 張學善（2004）。情緒管理課程對提昇教育學程學生情緒智慧之成效研究。彰師大輔導學報，26（2），37-56。【Chang, H.-S. (2004). Effects of emotional management program on the future teachers’ emotional intelligence. The Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 26(2), 37-56.】
9. 張瓊珠、簡秀芬、林宜美（2009）。情緒管理團體對護專學生之憂鬱與焦慮情緒之成效分析。崇仁學報，3，35-53。【Chang, C.-C., Jian, S.-H., & Lin, I.-M. (2009). The effectiveness of emotion management group for depression and anxiety in nursing students. Journal of Chung Jen College of Nursing, Health Sciences and Management, 3, 35-53.】
10. 教育部訓育委員會（2005）。教育部推動校園學生憂鬱與自我傷害三級預防工作計畫。取自http://www.edu.tw/Default.aspx?WID=65cdb365.-af62-48cc-99d9-.f9e2646b5b70【Ministry of Education, Students Affairs Committee. (2005). The tertiary prevention program to promote the campus student depression and self-harm of Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/ Default.aspx?WID=65cdb365.-af62-48cc-99d9-.f9e2646b5b70】
11. 陳姚真、吳宇穎（2008）。多媒體組合方式與知覺偏好對學習結果的影響。教育學刊，30，29-60。【Chen, Y.-J., & Wu, Y.-Y. (2008). The effect of multimedia presentation modes and learner’s perceptual preferences on learning outcomes. Educational Review, 30, 29-60.】
12. 陳彥廷（2012）。非同步網路數學教學案例討論之互動歷程研究。教育科學研究期刊，57（1），79-111。doi:10.3966/2073753X2012035701004【Chen, Y.-T. (2012). Communication of elementary school teachers in an asynchronous discussion net environment. Journal of Research in Education Science, 57(1), 79-111. doi:10.3966/2073753X2012035701004】
13. 潘文福（2008）。提升學習動機：網路多媒體的形成性評量方案。台灣圖書館管理季刊，4（3），22-31。【Pan, W.-F. (2008). The project of formative evaluation with hypermedia for promotion of learning motivation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Taiwan Library Administration, 4(3), 22-31.】
14. 衛生福利部國民健康署（2013）。民國91年至102年全國自殺死亡統計暨95年至102年自殺通報統計。取自http://www. mohw.gov.tw/MOHW_Upload/doc/Deaths%20in%20Taiwan%20 %202011-20130207.xlsx【Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2013). Table 13 No. of Deaths and Crude Death Rates for Intentional Self-Harm (Suicide) by Mortality List. Retrieved from http://www.mohw.gov.tw/ MOHW_Upload/doc/Deaths%20in%20Taiwan%20%202011-20130207.xlsx】
15. 龔旭陽、黃菁雅、鍾文凱（2007）。行動學習評量與成效分析－以高職電腦軟體應用乙級課程為例。資訊科學應用期刊，2（2），1-20。【Gung, S.-Y., Huang, J.-Y., & Jung, W.-K. (2007). The assessment and effect analyses for mobile learning－The case of class B of computer software application technicians for the senior vocational school. Journal of Computer Science and Application, 2(2), 1-20.】
16. Babson Survey Research Group. (2012). Survey reports. Retrieved from http://www.babson.edu/ Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Pages/babson-surveyresearch-group.aspx
17. Birgit, B. (2005). Adaptation of learning spaces: Supporting ubiquitous learning in higher distance education. Retrieved from http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/371
18. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school, expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., Rapp, D. N., & Spiro, A. B. (2006). Learning procedures: The role of working memory in multimedia learning experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(7), 917-940. doi:10.1002/acp.1236
20. Cain, J., & Policastri, A. (2011). Using Facebook as an informal learning environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(10), 1-8. doi:10.5688/ajpe7510207
21. Cook, J., & Pachler, N. (2012). Online people tagging: Social (mobile) network(ing) services and work-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 711-725. doi:10.1111/j. 1467-8535.2012.01346.x
22. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet & Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
23. Earl, L. M. (2002). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24. Facebook. (2013). Facebook statistics. Retrieved from http://www.newsroom.fb.com/content/default. aspx?NewsAreaId=22
25. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
26. Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662-676. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020
27. Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (1998). The theory and practice of learning. London, UK: Kogan Page.
28. Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 31-43. doi:10.1002/ ace.117
29. Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187-198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026
30. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite: The challenge and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
31. Leung, C.-H., & Chan, Y.-Y. (2003). Mobile learning: A new paradigm in electronic learning. Retrieved from http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~mlearning/intranet/m-learning/Mobile%20learning%20- %20a%20new%20paradigm%20in%20electronic%20learning.pdf
32. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
34. Ng, W., & Nicholas, H. (2007). Conceptualizing the use of online technologies for gifted secondary students. Roeper Review, 29(3), 190-196. doi:10.1080/02783190709554408
35. Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, & evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
37. Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 1-30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017./CBO9780511615771.002
38. Ralph, M., & Ralph, L. (2013). Weapons of mass instruction: The creative use of social media in improving pedagogy. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 10, 449-460.
39. Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., & Caruso, D. R. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267-298. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00016-1
40. So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
41. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
42. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument, updated edition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CB09780511840005.001
43. Worm, B. S. (2013). Learning from simple ebooks, online cases or classroom teaching when acquiring complex knowledge－A randomized controlled trial in respiratory physiology and pulmonology. PLOS ONE, 8(9), 1-5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073336
44. Yeh, Z.-M., & Li, K.-H. (2004). A systematic approach for designing multistage fuzzy control systems’. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 143(2), 251-273. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(03)00203-3
45. Zhao, X., & Okamoto, T. (2011). Adaptive multimedia content delivery for context-aware u-learning. International Journal Mobile Learning and Organization, 5(1), 46-63. doi:10.1504/IJMLO.2011.038691

APA Format	Chang, W.-J., & Yeh, Z.-M. (2014). Exploration of Learning Effectiveness and Assessment of Emotion Management for College Students by Using a Multimedia Mobile Learning System. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(4), 99-136. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).04