本研究問題意識起於科技性別化社會中，科技女性如何形塑性別氣質、或從其家庭、學校、社會脈絡中獲致其性別化主體。茲以12位國立綜合大學科技女教授為研究對象，探索高等教育中性別與科技的複雜關係，藉由回顧科技女性個人特質、家庭社經地位與父母教養方式、學校教育、社會文化因素對其科技學習心路歷程的影響，以探討成功論述與性別氣質之關聯。結果發現，科技女性如魚得水的成功論述整合了陽剛個人、平權家庭、女校教育與融入主流社會等四個優勢因素。其最基本的成功論述是以濃厚的科技興趣作為生涯發展的基礎，進而能一路抵抗眾多父權體制下的性別不平等條件。科技女性具有陽剛特質，喜愛閱讀、探索、操作與挑戰；享有平權家庭充足教育資源並受家族科技楷模啟發；在學校受女性科技教師楷模影響並獲益於男女分校與高中文理分流制度；在社會得利於大學聯考分數決定熱門科系並融入主流社會享有母校與同儕的社會資源。本研究呼應Wells（1980）陽剛女性在現代社會中較具發展優勢，此提供科技女性成功論述之參照，然其科技專業發展仍受限於科研領域的父權心態，反映出科技性別化的結構問題。科學教師宜批判察覺社會文化中的性別符碼與規範，實踐性別平等教學，增加女性主體性以利科技領域中的性別平衡發展。

» 展開更多

1. 大紀元訊（2006，10月14日）。電視頻道明播臺灣傑出女性科學家。大紀元電子日報。取自http://news.epochtimes.com.tw/6/10/14/38771.htm【EpochTimes. (2006, October 14). Taiwan’s outstanding women scientists on tomorrow’s TV channel. The Epoch Times. Retrieved from http://news. epochtimes.com.tw/6/10/14/38771.htm】
2. 于曉平、林幸台（2010）。角色楷模課程對高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，55（1），27-61。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010035501002【Yu, H.-P., & Lin, H.-T. (2010). The effects of a mentoring curriculum on gender roles, career self-efficacy, and career development in a high school class for gifted girls in math and science. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(1), 27-61. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010035501002】
3. 王文欽（1998）。近代中國傑出科技人才的成長環境與學習歷程之研究（未出版碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。【Wang, W.-C. (1998). Research on growing environment and learning process of Chinese elite technological professionals (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.】
4. 王雅玄（2012）。主宰性別主宰科技？科技性別化現象分析。科學教育學刊，20（3），241-265。【Wang, Y.-H. (2012). The dominant sex dominates technology? An interpretation of the gendered-technology phenomenon. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 241-265.】
5. 史倩玲（2008，10月23日）。刻板性別意識　扼殺女科學家。台灣立報。取自http://www.lihpao. com/?action-viewnews-itemid-9793【Shih, C.-L. (2008, October 23). Stereotyped gender ideology strangled women scientists. Lihpao Daily. Retrieved from http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-9793】
6. 何英奇（1981）。大學生性別角色與自我概念的關係。教育心理學報，14，221-230。doi:10.6251/ BEP.19810601.15【Ho, Y.-C. (1981). The relationship of sex role to self-concept in college students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 14, 221-230. doi:10.6251/BEP.19810601.15】
7. 吳怡瑄、葉玉珠（2003）。主題統整教學、年級、父母社經地位與國小學童科技創造力之關係。師大學報：教育類，48（2），239-260。doi:10.3966/2073753X2003104802006【Wu, Y.-S., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2003). The relationship between thematic integrated instruction, grade level, parental socio-economic status and pupil’s technological creativity. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 48(2), 239-260. doi:10.3966/2073753X2003104802006】
8. 吳淑敏（2009）。傑出女性科學家生涯發展歷程之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，34（1），75-103。doi:10.6172/BSE200903.3401004【Wu, S.-M. (2009). The career development of eminent female scientists in Taiwan. Bulletin of Special Education, 34(1), 75-103. doi:10.6172/BSE200903.3401004】
9. 沈清松（1998）。解除世界魔咒。臺北市：臺灣商務。【Shen, Q.-S. (1998). The disenchantment of the world. Taipei, Taiwan: The Commercial Press.】
10. 岳修平、劉伊霖、胡秋帆（2004）。數位學習中的性別差異。婦研縱橫，71，35-43。doi:10.6256/ FWGS.2004.71.35【Yueh, H.-P., Liu, Y.-L., & Hu, C.-F. (2004). Gender differences in e-learning. Forum in Women’s and Gender Studies, 71, 35-43. doi:10.6256/FWGS.2004.71.35】
11. 林立婷（2008）。高中資優班性別少數學生學習經驗之探究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。【Lin, L.-T. (2008). Research on the learning experiences of gender minority students in talented class of high schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
12. 林唯芳（2008，5月）。女性科技人的社會責任與義務。台灣女科技人電子報，5。取自http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~tfst/005FST/forum/social%20consceince.pdf【Su, W.-F. (2008, May). The social duties and obligations of women scientists and technologists. Taiwanese Female Scientists & Technologists, 5. Retrieved from http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~tfst/005FST/forum/social%20consceince. pdf】
13. 洪榮昭、康鳳梅、林展立（2003）。傑出科技創作學童創造特質分析－以機器人競賽為例。師大學報：科學教育類，48（2），239-254。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2003.48(2).05【Hong, J.-C., Kang, F.-M., & Lin, C.-L. (2003). An analysis of technological creativity in Taiwan’s primary school students. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 48(2), 239-254. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2003. 48(2).05】
14. 秦夢群（2004）。大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究。教育政策論壇，7（2），59-84。【Chin, Joseph M. (2004). Better or worse: Examining the feasibility of the college multiple entrance program. Educational Policy Forum, 7(2), 59-84.】
15. 陳昭儀（1999）。傑出理化科學家之創造力特性及開發科學創造力模式之研究。科技部專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC87-2511-S-003-059）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。【Chen, C.-Y. (1999). Research on creativity characteristics of outstanding scientists for constructing the creativity development model: An exploration in the physics-chemistry areas. Ministry of Science and Technology project report (NSC87-2511-S-003-059). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.】
16. 黃幸美（1995）。數理與科學教育的性別差異之探討。婦女與兩性學刊，6，95-135。doi:10.6255/ JWGS.1995.6.95【Huang, H.-M. (1995). Gender difference in mathematics and science education. Journal of Women and Gender Studies, 6, 95-135. doi:10.6255/JWGS.1995.6.95】
17. 黃菁瑩（1999）。台灣地區父母對子女教育期望之差異－性別角色觀和學校功能觀的中介影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺東師範學院，臺東市。【Huang, C.-Y. (1999). Parents’ educational expectation of boys and girls in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taitung Teachers’ College, Taitung, Taiwan.】
18. 黃增新（2004）。新竹縣國中學生家庭結構及家長社經地位對其性別角色影響之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。【Hwang, T.-S. (2004). Investigating the impact of secondary school students’ parental STS and family structures on gender roles in Hsinchu (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
19. 楊巧玲（2008）。學校中的性別政權－學生校園生活與教師工作文化之性別分析。臺北市：高等教育。【Yang, C.-L. (2008). The gender regime in school: A gender analysis of students’ life and teachers’ work culture. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
20. 楊淑萍、林煥祥（2010）。由家庭經濟資源及文化資源探討我國學生在PISA科學、數學素養的表現。科學教育學刊，18（6），547-562。【Yang, S.-P., & Lin, H.-S. (2010). Analyses of science and mathematics literacy of students with different economic assets and cultural assets. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 547-562.】
21. 葉玉珠（2005）。影響國小學童科技創意發展的因素之量表發展。師大學報：科學教育類，50（2），29-54。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2005.50(2).02【Yeh, Y.-C. (2005). The development of inventories for determining factors that influence pupils’ technological creativity. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 50(2), 29-54. doi:10.6300/JNTNU. 2005.50(2).02】
22. 劉盈秀（2007）。解讀汽車廣告中的性別與科技（未出版碩士論文）。國立中山大學，高雄市。【Liu, Y.-H. (2007). Decipher gender and technology in car advertisement (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaosung, Taiwan.】
23. 蔡麗玲、王秀雲、吳嘉苓（2007）。性別化的科學與科技。載於黃淑玲、游美惠（主編），性別向度與台灣社會（pp. 201-224）。臺北市：巨流。【Tsai, L.-L., Wang, H.-Y., & Wu, C.-L. (2007). Gendered science and technology. In S.-L. Hwang & M.-H. You (Eds.), Gender dimensions in Taiwanese society (pp. 201-224). Taipei, Taiwan: Chuliu.】
24. 簡晉龍、任宗浩（2011）。邁向科學之路？臺灣中學生性別對科學生涯選擇意向之影響。科學教育學刊，19（5），461-481。【Chien, C.-L., & Jen, T.-H. (2011). Investigating the impact of secondary school students’ gender on science-related career choice intentions in Taiwan－The case in PISA 2006. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 461-481.】
25. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.（2003）。敘說探究：質性研究中的經驗與故事（蔡敏玲、余曉雯，譯）。臺北市：心理。（原著出版於2000年）【Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2003). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research (M.-L. Tsai & H.-W. Yu, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological. (Original work published 2000)】
26. Adams, D. K. (1988). Extending the educational planning discourse: Conceptual and paradigmatic explorations. Comparative Education Review, 32(4), 400-415. doi:10.1086/446793
27. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162. doi:10.1037/h0036215
28. Bem, S. L. (1976). Yes: Probing the promise of androgyny. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), The psychology of women: Ongoing debates (pp. 209-245). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Berila, B. (2011). Queer masculinities in higher education. In J. A. Laker & T. Davis (Eds.), Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations (pp. 97-110). New York, NY: Routledge.
30. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Chapman, A. (2001). Maths talk is boy’s talk: Constructing masculinity in school mathematics. In W. Martino & B. Meyenn (Eds.), What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools (pp. 199-210). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
32. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Davies, B. (1997). Gender theories in education. In L. J. Saha (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the sociology of education (pp. 62-67). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
34. Kimmel, M. S., & Davis, T. (2011). Mapping guyland in college. In J. A. Laker & T. Davis (Eds.), Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Routledge.
35. Lawson, T., Jones, M., & Moores, R. (2000). Advanced sociology through diagrams. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. McCarthy, R. (2009). Beyond smash and crash: Gender-friendly Tech Ed. Technology Teacher, 69(2), 16-21.
37. McCarthy, R. R., & Berger, J. (2008). Moving beyond cultural barriers: Successful strategies of female technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 65-79.
38. O’Neil, J. M., & Crapser, B. (2011). Using the psychology of men and gender role conflict theory to promote comprehensive service delivery for college men: A call to action. In J. A. Laker & T. Davis (Eds.), Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations (pp. 16-49). New York, NY: Routledge.
39. Paechter, C. (2007). Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
40. Phipps, A. (2008). Women in science, engineering and technology: Three decades of UK initiatives. London, UK: Trentham Books.
41. Vaerting, M. (1923). The dominant sex: A study in the sociology of sex differentiation (E. Paul & C. Paul, Trans.). Retrieved from http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/VaeDomi.html
42. Wagner, R. (2011). Embracing liberatory practice: Promoting men’s development as a feminist act. In J. A. Laker & T. Davis (Eds.), Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations (pp. 210-223). New York, NY: Routledge.
43. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44. Wang, Y.-H. (2012). Still gender boundary? Exploring woman university technology students’ doing gender and doing technology. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(1), 34-39.
45. Wells, K. (1980). Gender-role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9(1), 59-73. doi:10.1007/BF02088380

中文APA引文格式	王雅玄(2014)。如魚得水？科技女性成功論述之研究。教育科學研究期刊，59(4)，137-164。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).05
APA Format	Wang, Y.-H. (2014). The Discourse of Success by Women Scientists and Technologists. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(4), 137-164. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).05

    This study is focused on how women scientist and technologists shape their gender subjectivity in the social context of gendered technology. Individual interviews were conducted with 12 women scientists and technologists from 3 national universities in Taiwan. Situating them back to their life experiences of individuality, family, schooling and society, this paper explores their gender role construction and how they articulated the formation of gendered technology. In conclusion, women scientists and technologists simultaneously co-constructed and deconstructed gendered technology and this construction subtly corresponded to changing schooling and societal expectation. The discourse of success by women scientists and technologists was exemplified by gender boundary crossings and self empowerment instigated by personal interest, masculinity, family support, women role models in single-sex schools, and social support from universities. This research corresponded to Wells’ (1980) theory that masculine women have developed favorably in modern society. However, gender mobility of elite women has been enabled by patriarchal men, allowing women to survive in social structures with a strict gender boundary.