Journal of Research in Education Sciences - Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(1)】March

Search by article title, author,
keywords, and DOI

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

[Style for Thesis Writing]

[Review of Research Papers]

[The Copyright]

[Flow of Review System]

[Regulations Governing]

[Editorial Board]

[Advisory Board]

[Form Download]

Call for papers for the special issue “Prevention and Treatment of Addictive Behaviors on Campus” (Final submission deadline: 2021/8/31) The Journal of Research in Education Sciences will no longer provide printed copies Call for papers for the special issue “Educational Research Related to Southeast Asian Countries” (Final submission deadline: 2018/12/31)

Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(1)】March

Back

Geometry Content of Middle School Textbooks in Taiwan, the United States, and Singapore Author:
Der-Ching Yang(Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Chiayi University), Ting-Yun Cheng(Chiayi City Pei Shin Public Junior High School)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 60, No. 1
Date：March 2015
Pages：33-72
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02

Abstract：

This study applied the content analysis method to compare the differences in the geometry problems, problem-posing methods, representational types, and characteristics of geometry content of middle school mathematics textbooks among Kang Hsuan (KH) in Taiwan, Connected Mathematics Program (CMP) in the United States, and New Syllabus Mathematics (NSM) in Singapore. The results reveal significant differences in the total geometry problems and problem-posing methods among the three textbooks. The CMP included approximately one-third open-ended problems; however, the KH and NSM textbooks included more than 95% closed-ended problems. Regarding representation types, all three textbooks presented combined problems and verbal problems. In addition, the results show that the three textbooks have different characteristics. The findings of this study can serve as a reference for designing mathematics textbooks in the future.

Keywords：middle school, Connected Mathematics Program, geometry, New Syllabus Mathematics

《Full Text》

References：

左台益、梁勇能（2001）。國二學生空間能能力與van Hiele幾何思考層次相關性研究。師大學報：科學教育類，46（1, 2），1-20。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2001.46.01【Tso, T.-Y., & Liang, Y.-N. (2001). The study of interrelationship between spatial abilities and van Hiele levels of thinking in geometry of eighth-grade students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 46(1, 2), 1-20. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2001.46.01】
吳德邦、馬秀蘭、藍同利（2006）。小青的三角形概念－從Duval理論的觀點探究一位國小五年級視覺型兒童之個案研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，42，78-116。【Wu, D.-B., Ma, S.-L., & Lan, T.-L. (2006). A study of the cognitive development of visual type child on triangle conception in geometry－Analysis from the viewpoint of duval theory. Research and Development in Science Education, 42, 78-116.】
徐偉民、林美如（2009）。台灣、中國與香港國小數學教科書幾何教材之內容分析。彰化師大教育學報，16，49-75。【Shiu, W.-M., & Lin, M.-R. (2009). The content analysis of geometry material in the elementary mathematic textbooks of Taiwan, Chinese and Hong Kong. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 16, 49-75.】
康軒文教事業（主編）（2009a）。康軒國中數學課本（第三冊）。臺北市：康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. III). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
康軒文教事業（主編）（2009b）。康軒國中數學課本（第四冊）。臺北市：康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. IV). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】

» More

左台益、梁勇能（2001）。國二學生空間能能力與van Hiele幾何思考層次相關性研究。師大學報：科學教育類，46（1, 2），1-20。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2001.46.01【Tso, T.-Y., & Liang, Y.-N. (2001). The study of interrelationship between spatial abilities and van Hiele levels of thinking in geometry of eighth-grade students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 46(1, 2), 1-20. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2001.46.01】
吳德邦、馬秀蘭、藍同利（2006）。小青的三角形概念－從Duval理論的觀點探究一位國小五年級視覺型兒童之個案研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，42，78-116。【Wu, D.-B., Ma, S.-L., & Lan, T.-L. (2006). A study of the cognitive development of visual type child on triangle conception in geometry－Analysis from the viewpoint of duval theory. Research and Development in Science Education, 42, 78-116.】
徐偉民、林美如（2009）。台灣、中國與香港國小數學教科書幾何教材之內容分析。彰化師大教育學報，16，49-75。【Shiu, W.-M., & Lin, M.-R. (2009). The content analysis of geometry material in the elementary mathematic textbooks of Taiwan, Chinese and Hong Kong. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 16, 49-75.】
康軒文教事業（主編）（2009a）。康軒國中數學課本（第三冊）。臺北市：康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. III). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
康軒文教事業（主編）（2009b）。康軒國中數學課本（第四冊）。臺北市：康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. IV). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
康軒文教事業（主編）（2009c）。康軒國中數學課本（第五冊）。臺北市：康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. V). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
張守波（2011）。新加坡中學數學教材的特色與啟示。外國中小學教育，4，31-35。【Chang, S.-P. (2011). Characteristics and enlightenment of mathematics textbook in Singapore junior high school. Elementary & Secondary Schooling Abroad, 4, 31-35.】
張奠宙（2007）。中華文化對今日數學教育之影響。基礎教育學報，6（1），45-55。【Zhang, D.-Z. (2007). The affect of Chinese culture to current mathematics education. Journal of Basic Education, 6(1), 45-55.】
教育部（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域修正草案對照表。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2008). Mathematics fields of study draft amendments table in general guidelines of grade 1-9 curriculum of elementary and junior high school education. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
陳仁輝、楊德清（2010）。台灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊，18（1），43-61。【Chen, R.-H., & Yang, D.-C. (2010). Comparing 7^th grade algebra textbooks used in Taiwan, U.S.A. and Singapore. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 43-61.】
陳宜良、單維彰、洪萬生、袁媛（2005）。中小學數學科課程綱要評估與發展研究。臺北市：教育部。【Chen, I.-L., Shan, W.-C., Hong, W.-S., & Yuan, Y. (2005). The study for assessment and development mathematics curriculum syllabus of elementary and junior high school education. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
黃光雄、簡茂發（1993）。教育研究法。臺北市：師大書苑。【Huang, K.-H., & Jian, M.-F. (1993). Methods for educational research. Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Book Store.】
楊德清、陳仁輝（2011）。台灣、美國和新加坡三個七年級代數課程發展學生數學能力方式之研究。科學教育學刊，19（1），43-61。【Yang, D.-C., & Chen, R.-H. (2011). A study of the methods for developing 7th-graders’ mathematical ability in selected algebra textbooks from Taiwan, U.S.A. and Singapore. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 43-61.】
楊龍立（1994）。科學教育理念之影響因素的探討。初等教育學刊，3，315-331。【Yang, L.-L. (1994). To investigate the factors affecting educational philosophy of science. Journal of Elementary Education, 3, 315-331.】
廖雅玉（2010，3月2日）。「小四課本反光」　康軒教材爆爭議。TVBS新聞。取自http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/84254【Lia, Y.-Y. (2010, March 2). Grade 4 students’ textbooks reflective. Kang Hsuan textbooks had explosive controversy. TVBS News. Retrieved from http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/84254】
謝佩珍（2009）。台灣與中國國中數學教科書之內容分析研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。【Shieh, P.-C. (2009). The content analysis of junior high mathematics textbooks in Taiwan and China (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural psychological and contextual influence (pp. 45-68). Hong Kong, China: Comparative Education Research Centre.
Brenner, M. E., Herman, S., Ho, H., & Zimmer, J. M. (1999). Cross-national comparison of representational competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 541-557. doi:10.2307/749773
Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48. doi:10.2307/749317
Cai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph series 7). Reston, VA: NCTM. doi: 10.2307/749940
Cai, J. (2001). Improving mathematics learning: Lessons from cross-national studies of U.S. and Chinese students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 400-404. doi:10.1177/003172170108200511
Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57-69. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
Cai, J., Wang, N., Moyer, J. C., & Nie, B. (2011). Longitudinal investigation of the curriculum effect: An analysis of student learning outcomes from the LieCal project in United States. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 117-136. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.006
Cain, J. S. (2002). An evaluation of the connected mathematics project. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 224-233. doi:10.1080/00220670209596595
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. doi:10.1080/10986060903460070
Cifarelli, V. V., & Cai, J. (2005). The evolution of mathematical explorations in open-ended problem-solving situations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 302-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.007
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Connected Mathematics Program. (2009). Connected mathematics project. Retrieved from http:// connectedmath.msu.edu/
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S. (2010). States of matter explanations in Slovenian textbooks for students aged 6 to 14. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 217-235.
Ding, M., & Li, X. (2010). A comparative analysis of the distributive property in U.S. and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 146-180. doi:10.1080/ 07370001003638553
Duval, R. (1995). Geometrical pictures: Kinds of representation and specific processing. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 142-127). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/ 978-3-642-57771-0_10
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9069-6
Fan, L., Zhu, F., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633-646. doi:10.1007/s11858-013- 0539-x
Ginsburg, A., Leinwand, S., Anstrom, T., & Pollock, E. (2005). What the United States can learn from Singapore’s world-class mathematics system (and what Singapore can learn from the United States): An exploratory study. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED491632)
Hall, P. P. (2009). Guiding principle: Student learning: Rationale for a problem centered curriculum. Retrieved from http://connectedmath.msu.edu/
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “Voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344-369.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Wagner, D. (2005). In the middle of nowhere: How a textbook can position the mathematics learner. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED496900)
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jacobs, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2014). A comparison of Korean and American secondary school textbooks: The case of quadratic equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 241-263. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9512-4
Huang, R., & Cai, J. (2011). Pedagogical representations to teach linear relations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms: Parallel or hierarchical? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 149-165. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.01.003
Jones, K. (2010). Linking geometry and algebra in the school mathematics curriculum. In Z. Usiskin, K. Andersen, & N. Zotto (Eds.), Future curricular trends in school algebra and geometry: Proceedings of a conference (pp. 203-215). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Kim, O.-K. (2007). Teacher knowledge and curriculum use. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic. com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/9/4/6/5/pages194653/p194653-1.php
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006a). Connected mathematics: Looking for Pythagoras. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006b). Connected mathematics: Covering and surrounding. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2006c). Connected mathematics: Shapes and designs. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Leung, F. K.-S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35-51. doi:10.1023/A:1017936429620
Leung, F. K.-S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? Mathematics education in different cultural traditions－A comparative study of east asia and the west (pp. 21-46). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-29723-5_2
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241. doi:10.2307/749754
Marascuilo, L. A. (1966). Large-sample multiple comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 65(5), 280-290. doi:10.1037/h0023189
Michael, N. (2002, October). Inside the PISA: Comparing two high achieving countries from the west (Finland) and from the east (Japan). Paper presented in the ICMI Comparative Study Conference 2002, Hong Kong, China.
Ministry of Education in Singapore. (n.d.). Secondary education. Retrieved from http://www.moe. gov.sg/education/secondary
Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/ 39725224.pdf
Park, K., & Leung, F. K.-S. (2006). A comparative study of the mathematics textbooks of China, England, Japan, Korea, and the United States. In F. K.-S. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions－A comparative study of East Asia and the West (New ICMI Study Series) (pp. 227-238). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10. 1007/0-387-29723-5_14
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
Rivette, K., Grant, Y., Ludema, H., & Rickard, A. (2003). Connected mathematics project: Research and evaluation summary. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
SGBox. (2009). New syllabus math for 7th grade/secondary 1 package: Product benefits. Retrieved from http://www.sgbox.com/s1nsm.html
Show-Me Center. (2002). CMP implementation map. Retrieved from http://www.math.msu.edu/cmp/ Overview/ImplementationMap.htm
Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith M. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Gweenwich, CT: Information Age.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12-17.
Tarr, J. E., Reys, B. J., Barker, D. D., & Billstein, R. (2006). Selecting high quality mathematic textbooks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(1), 50-54.
Tarr, J. E., Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., Chavez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. (2008). The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 247-280.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2007a). New syllabus mathematics 1 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore: Shinglee.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2007b). New syllabus mathematics 2 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore: Shinglee.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2008a). New syllabus mathematics 3 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore: Shinglee.
Teh, K.-S., & Loh, C.-Y. (2008b). New syllabus mathematics 4 (6th ed.). Singapore City, Singapore: Shinglee.
Treffers, A. (1991). Realistic mathematics education in the Netherlands 1980-1990. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 11-20). Utrecht, the Netherlands: CD-b Press/Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Yang, D.-C., Reys, R. E., & Wu, L.-L. (2010). Comparing the development of fractions in the fifth-and-sixth grades’ textbook of Singapore, Taiwan, and the U.S.A. School Science and Mathematics, 110(3), 118-127. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00015.x
Yang, D.-C., & Wu, W.-R. (2010). The study of number sense: Realistic activities integrated into third-grade math classes in Taiwan. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 379-392. doi:10.1080/00220670903383010
Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2004, July). An analysis of the representation of problem types in Chinese and US mathematics textbooks. Paper presented at the ICME-10 Discussion Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 609-626. doi:10.1007/ s10763-006-9036-9

APA Format	Yang, D.-C., & Cheng, T.-Y. (2015). Geometry Content of Middle School Textbooks in Taiwan, the United States, and Singapore. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(1), 33-72. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(1)】March Back

Geometry Content of Middle School Textbooks in Taiwan, the United States, and Singapore Author: Der-Ching Yang(Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Chiayi University), Ting-Yun Cheng(Chiayi City Pei Shin Public Junior High School)

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(1)】March

Back

Geometry Content of Middle School Textbooks in Taiwan, the United States, and Singapore Author:
Der-Ching Yang(Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Chiayi University), Ting-Yun Cheng(Chiayi City Pei Shin Public Junior High School)