本研究以一所國小為研究場域，採行動研究法，邀集該國小之導師、身障教育教師及資優教育教師組成研究團隊，透過計畫、行動、觀察、省思、修改、再行動的動態歷程，檢視並調整一名自閉症兼一般智能資賦優異學生原有之教學輔導運作機制及內涵，且探討調整之結果。研究結果顯示，教師合作之身心障礙資賦優異學生教學輔導運作有助於提升學生整體表現，其具體成果在教師合作方面有：一、建立以個管教師擔任教師合作協調者之機制；二、採用靈活有彈性的教師合作方式；三、主動協調各類教師進行師生配對。在身障資優學生所需之支持與成效方面，則有：一、擬定以優勢發展為核心的教學輔導內涵與執行策略，使身障資優學生整體表現提升；二、建構普通班的支持性環境，成為身障資優學生展現優勢的舞臺。本研究根據研究結論，分別從實務現場及未來研究提出若干建議。

» 展開更多

1. 吳昆壽、林淑玟、楊憲明（2011）。資優障礙學生本土化教育模式試驗性建構及其賡續研究（NSC 98-2511-S-024-009-MY2）。行政院國家科學委員會。【Wu, K.-S., Lin, S.-W., & Yang, H.-M. (2011). A continuing study of developing an experimental native education program for the gifted with disabilities (NSC 98-2511-S-024-009-MY2). National Science Council, Executive Yuan.】
2. 李佩庭（2008）。當ADHD資優生與資優班教師相遇時─獨立研究課程之行動研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。【Li, P.-T. (2008). When ADHD gifted students meet teachers of the gifted: The action research of independent study for gifted students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
3. 李佩憶（2011）。國小雙重特教需求學生之優勢才能發展與學校適應（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。【Li, P.-I. (2011). Talent development and school adjustment of elementary twice-exceptional students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
4. 李欣樺（2013）。臺北市國民教育階段身心障礙資賦優異教育計畫實施現況及成效之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學。【Li, H.-H. (2013). The research of the performing status and performance evaluation of projects of gifted with disabilities in primary and junior high schools education in Taipei City [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Hsinchu University of Education.】
5. 周珮如（2010）。雙重特教需求學生課程與教學調整之研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學。【Chou, P.-J. (2010).The study of curriculum and instructional adaptations on twice-exceptional students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Taipei Municipal University of Education.】
6. 周淑萍（2009）。亞斯伯格資優生之家庭與學校生活適應（未出版碩士論文）。明道大學。【Chou, S.-P. (2009). The family and school life adjustment of gifted with Asperger syndrome [Unpublished master’s thesis]. MingDao University.】
7. 武秀韻（2011）。我與亞斯伯格資優生共舞─自然科學課程中師生互動歷程之敘事探究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學。【Wu, S.-Y. (2011). A narrative inquiry on the teaching and learning interaction process between an elementary school science teacher and a gifted with Asperger syndrome student [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taipei University of Education.】
8. 侯一欣、高新建（2018）。課程實施在推廣中的意涵與革新體現：課程史觀點。教育科學研究期刊，63（2），219-250。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0009【Hou, Y.-H., & Gau, S.-J. (2018). Curriculum implementation implies the meanings of the dissemination and innovation: The viewpoint of curriculum history. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(2), 219-250. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0009】
9. 張正芬、陳美芳（2009）。亞斯柏格資優生之適性教育方案（II）（NSC 96-2614-S-003-002）。行政院國家科學委員會。【Chang, C.-F., & Chen, M.-F. (2009). Appropriate education program for gifted children with Asperger syndrome (II) (NSC 96-2614-S-003-002). National Science Council, Executive Yuan.】
10. 教育部（2019）。十二年國民基本教育特殊教育課程實施規範。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/855/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E5%AF%A6%E6%96%BD%E8%A6%8F%E7%AF%84.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2019). Twelve years of national basic education special education curriculum implementation specification. https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/855/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E5%AF%A6%E6%96%BD%E8%A6%8F%E7%AF%84.pdf】
11. 郭靜姿（2006）。學前資優幼兒多元智能與問題解決能力之充實教學研究（NSC 94-2511-S-003-003）。行政院國家科學委員會。【Kuo, C.-C. (2006). The effects of the enrichment program on cultivating multiple talents and problem solving abilities for gifted preschoolers (NSC 94-2511-S-003-003). National Science Council, Executive Yuan.】
12. 郭靜姿、張書豪、廖釗君、陳錦雪、林燁虹、于曉平、蔡明富（2020）。臺灣中小學資優教育銜接與資優學生學習適應研究。教育心理學報，51（3），415-442。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0004【Kuo, C.-C., Jang, S.-H., Liao, C.-C., Chen, C.-H., Lin, Y.-H., Yu, H.-P., & Tsai, M.-F. (2020). The connection of gifted education services and learning adaptation of gifted students at primary and secondary schools. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 415-442. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202003_51(3).0004】
13. 陳靜芝（2008）。從一位資優班教師的角度看疑似亞斯伯格症資優生與學校環境交互出的面貌（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。【Chen, C.-C. (2008). On aspects of the interaction between a gifted student with suspected Asperger’s syndrome and the school environment: A gifted education teacher’s point of view [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
14. 曾薷瑩（2009）。國小ADHD資優生學校適應改變歷程之個案研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學。【Tseng, R.-Y. (2009). A case study of school adjustment and change process for a gifted student with ADHD in elementary school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Taipei Municipal University of Education.】
15. 鈕文英（2006）。國小融合班教師班級經營策略之研究。特殊教育學報，23，147-183。https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.200606.0147【Niew, W.-I. (2006). The study on strategies adopted by elementary teachers to manage an inclusive classroom. Journal of Special Education, 23, 147-183. https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.200606.0147】
16. 鈕文英（2014）。質性研究方法與論文寫作（修訂版）。雙葉書廊。【Niew, W.-I. (2014). Qualitative research methods and essay writing (Rev. ed.). Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
17. 黃瓊儀、游錦雲、吳怡慧（2018）。國中普通班身心障礙學生親子互動、自我概念與學校適應之關係研究。教育科學研究期刊，63（1），103-140。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).04【Huang, C.-Y., Yu, C.-Y., & Wu, I.-H. (2018). Relationships between the parent-child interaction, self-concept, and school adjustment of junior high school students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(1), 103-140. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).04】
18. 楊芸綺（2014）。我的全民超人─國小雙重特殊需求學生獨立研究方案的發展（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學。【Yang, Y.-C. (2014). A narrative inquiry of an independent study program for twice-exceptional students in elementary school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taipei University of Education.】
19. 鄒小蘭、盧台華（2015）。身心障礙資優學生支援服務系統建構之行動研究。特殊教育研究學刊，40（2），1-29。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201503.4002001【Chau, H.-L., & Lu, T.-H. (2015). Action research on support-service systems for gifted students with disabilities. Bulletin of Special Education, 40(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201503.4002001】
20. 甄曉蘭（1995）。合作行動研究─進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報，9，297-318。【Chen, H.-L. (1995). Cooperative action research: A new way of conducting educational research. Journal of National Chiayi Teachers College, 9, 297-318.】
21. 潘世尊（2005）。教育行動研究：理論、實踐與反省。心理。【Pan, S.-Z. (2005). Educational action research: Theory, practice and reflection. Psychological.】
22. 鄭聖敏、陳秀芬、柯惠菁（2014）。雙重特殊需求學生多層次教學輔導之理念與作法。資優教育季刊，132，13-28。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2014.132.13-28【Cheng, S.-M., Chen, H.-F., & Ko, H.-C. (2014). The concept and implementation of multi-tier teaching models for students with twice-exceptionality. Gifted Education Quarterly, 132, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2014.132.13-28】
23. Assouline, S. G., Foley-Nicpon, M., &Fosenburg, S. (2013). The paradox of twice-exceptionality: Packet of information for professionals (2nd ed.). https://belinblank.education.uiowa.edu/research/docs/pip2.pdf
24. Baldwin, L., Baum, S., Pereles, D., & Hughes, C. (2015). Twice-exceptional learners: The journey toward a shared vision. Gifted Child Today, 38(4), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217515597277
25. Baldwin, L., Omdal, S. N., & Pereles, D. (2015). Beyond stereotypes: Understanding, recognizing, and working with twice-exceptional learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(4), 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915569361
26. Baum, S. M. (2009). Talent-centered model for twice exceptional students. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed., pp. 17-48). Creating Learning Press.
27. Baum, S. M., Schader, R. M., & Hébert, T. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547632
28. Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, S. (2015). Meeting the needs of students with 2e: It takes a team. Gifted Child Today, 38(4), 252-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217515597274
29. Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600304
30. Foley-Nicpon, M., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382575
31. Khairuddin, K. F., Dally, K., & Foggett, J. (2016). Collaboration between general and special education teachers in Malaysia. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 16(s1), 909-913. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12230
32. Laija-Rodriguez, W., Grites, K., Bouman, D., Pohlman, C., & Goldman, R. L. (2013). Leveraging strengths assessment and intervention model (LeStAIM): A theoretical strengths-based assessment framework. Contemporary School Psychology, 17(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340990
33. Landever, G. S. (2010). Collaboration among general and special education teachers. https://www.bakeru.edu/images/pdf/SOE/EdD_Theses/Landever_Gwen.pdf
34. Nielsen, M. E., & Higgins, L. D. (2005). The eye of the storm: Services and programs for twice-exceptional learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800102
35. Olenchak, F. R. (2009). Effects of talents unlimited counseling on gifted/learning disabled students. Gifted Education International, 25(2), 144-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940902500205
36. Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
37. Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
38. Ripley, S. (1997). Collaboration between general and special education teachers (ED409317). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED409317.pdf
39. Shakenova, L. (2017). The theoretical framework of teacher collaboration. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(2), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2017.20.2.34
40. Trail, B. A. (2011). Twice-exceptional gifted children: Understanding, teaching, and counseling gifted students. Prufrock Press.
41. Winebrenner, S. (2003). Teaching strategies for twice-exceptional students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(3), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512030380030101

中文APA引文格式	鄭聖敏（2021）。撥雲見日─身心障礙資賦優異學生教學輔導之行動研究。教育科學研究期刊，66（1），39-81。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0002
APA Format	Cheng, S.-M. (2021). Dispelling the clouds and seeing the sun: Action research on teaching and counseling for twice-exceptional students in an elementary school. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(1), 39-81. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0002

This study explored the operating mechanism and the content of teaching and counseling provided to twice-exceptional students by a team of teachers consisting of a regular classroom teacher, a disability resource room teacher, and a giftedness resource room teacher. The subject of the case study was a gifted fourth-grade student with autism. The research was conducted through a cyclical process of plan, action, observation, reflection, revision, and reaction. The results demonstrated that providing appropriate services for twice-exceptional students through collaborative efforts of various types of teachers can improves students’ overall performance. The results for teacher collaboration were (1) establishing a mechanism for case managers to lead teachers through collaboration; (2) adopting teacher cooperation flexibility; (3) actively coordinating various teachers for teacher-student matching. The results for providing support for twice-exceptional students were (1) developing strengths-based content and implementing strategies for twice-exceptional students; (2) constructing a performance stage for twice-exceptional students to demonstrate their talents in a supportive regular classroom setting. Finally, we proposed some suggestions for governmental education departments, schools, and future studies.