Career Development and Improvements of Preservice Teachers Through Design Your Life Course at Science and Technology Universities
Author: Chia-Chi Wang (Department of Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University), Shih-Hsiang Sung (Program in Interdisciplinary Studies, National Sun-Yat-sen University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 67, No. 4
Date:December 2022
Pages:221-253
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0007
Abstract:
Background and Purpose
In the life of a student, the college phase is often regarded as a preparation stage for exploring career options and entering society as an adult. Very few students begin thinking about their future careers and preparing for their lives soon after or before entering college. Most students delay the decision-making process until the year of graduation, at which point they feel helpless when they have to make a career decision; during this period, they start preparing for future employment by processing information related to career development. Compared with these students, preservice teachers have a distinct career prospect. Compared with other students from comprehensive universities, students at science and technology universities must overcome more hurdles to become qualified teachers. The aim of this study was to explore preservice teachers’ perspectives on career development and improvements in their self-identity after participating in a career design course, entitled Design Your Life, at a science and technology university.
Literature Review
This study reviewed research on the implementation of design thinking in education and on the career development and self-identity of preservice teachers. Design thinking was first introduced by the design company IDEO and the Stanford d.school. Currently, in the field of higher education, design thinking is widely implemented in business management, humanities and social sciences, medicine, and engineering. With the promotion of design thinking, career designing has exceeded its original scope and been developed into a set of basic methodologies for cross-disciplinary cooperation and innovation. However, few studies have focused on the implementation of design thinking in the field of teacher training. Design thinking is a process of continual exploration. In addition to exploring the needs of individuals through investigation and research and developing innovative strategies for solving relevant problems, designers receive feedback from others, develop creative solutions, and construct prototypes in the testing stage, which would subsequently lead to effective results. The creative and specific process of design thinking itself is the key to solving complex problems. Moreover, life is a process of continual exploration and problem-solving. Experiencing different careers helps individuals assess their most suitable career options. By accepting feedback from others, individuals can construct a life prototype to meet their ultimate life expectations. Preservice teachers at science and technology universities are highly likely to become future teachers; through the training process, they must discover their career potentials and educational work-related values.
Previous studies have conducted various exploratory investigations regarding the career development of preservice teachers. Through continual selection and trial experiences, future teachers can evaluate themselves and gradually outline the direction of their career development; they must identify a practical and feasible goal and balance their ideal future self, personal ability, and reality. Regarding self-identity, studies have indicated that individuals form an inner structure on the basis of their abilities, experiences, beliefs, and inner drives; this structure represents self-identity, which increases or decreases with time or transfers. Therefore, individuals’ current state of self-identify is not the end point of self-identification. The development of self-identity is an exploratory process. To develop a distinct self-identity, individuals must be introspective and must persevere through a period of decision-making involving conflicts and doubts. Thus, to determine their career goals, preservice teachers must first explore their inner selves and the external environment and then make career decisions and commitments.
Methods
This study was based on Stanford University’s Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-lived, Joyful Life career planning course and the Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-lived, Joyful Life book (Burnett & Evans, 2016/2016). In an actual setting, career design courses are planned in accordance with the five-stage design thinking model (Stanford University); these stages are empathy, definition, idea, prototype, and test. Through design thinking, students explore their diverse interests and potentials, identify suitable career paths, and work toward future career development.
The present study selected preservice teachers from a total of 16 private science and technology universities and subjected them to the aforementioned course (three workshops, each lasting for 6h; total credit hours, 18) between March and July 2019. The study collected the following data for coding and analysis: teaching and reflective journals, class worksheets, homework sheets, student reports, and teaching feedback. Data were analyzed using triangulation correction and continual comparison methods to ensure the validity of the study findings.
Results
The results revealed that the preservice teachers could objectively view themselves through visual recordings and could discuss with others to increase their self-awareness levels. Convergent and divergent thinking resulting from the process of individual dialogue and teamwork helped strengthen the preservice teachers’ self-identity and career orientation. Finally, they could develop a positive creative mindset — fail early, succeed sooner — and could devise strategies to solve their life problems.
Discussion and Recommendations
On the basis of the findings, this study suggests that preservice teachers can not only use design thinking to plan their own careers but also learn how to implement this approach in designing courses for others. For example, future teachers may use the five-stage design thinking model to design courses for primary and secondary school students in order to help them discover their life or on-campus problems and to promote problem-oriented learning. Therefore, teacher education centers may include this course in their curricula and support preservice teachers who require career guidance and assistance with career development. Furthermore, although this study focused on preservice teachers at private science and technology universities, the findings may be useful for high school and college students because career indecision is a normal and common phenomenon. Thus, the content of this course may be expanded to include general high school and college students. Future studies are warranted to expand the content of teaching commitment in the current curriculum; moreover, future research should include more evaluation tools, such as career development scales, value scales, and self-identity scales, to offer empirical evidence for teacher education centers.
Keywords:preservice teachers at science and technology universities, design thinking, career development, self-identity
《Full Text》
References:
- 王秀槐、陳珍德(2019)。問世間「生涯」為何物?臺灣大學生生涯概念原型分析研究。教育科學研究期刊,64(2),39-68。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0002【Wang, H.-H., & Chen, J.-D. (2019). What do you mean when you think of career? A prototype analysis of the conception of career among Taiwanese college students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(2), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0002】
- 王佳琪、宋世祥(2019)。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效:以適性教學為例。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),157-185。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006【Wang, C.-C., & Sung, S.-H. (2019). The “adaptive instruction” course as an example of the application and evaluation of a teacher education program course incorporating design thinking. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 157-185. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006】
- 吳明振、林雅幸、陳培基(2014)。技職教育再造的挑戰與展望。中等教育,65(2),6-20。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2014.65.2.01【Wu, M.-J., Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-C. (2014). The challenge and prospection of reformation of technological and vocational education in Taiwan. Secondary Education, 65(2), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2014.65.2.01】
- 吳柏軒(2018,1月3日)。無懼少子化 台師大逆勢成立師資培育學院。自由時報。https://news. ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2301618【Wu, P.-S. (2018, January 3). No fear of declining birthrate National Taiwan Normal University bucked the trend and established a teacher training college. The Liberty Times. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2301618】
- 吳淑禎(2011)。師資職前教育的生涯課程發展暨輔導效果研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,31,1-32。https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.201112.0002【Wu, S.-C. (2011). The study of career course development and effect on the pre-service teacher education. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 31, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.201112.0002】
» More
- 王秀槐、陳珍德(2019)。問世間「生涯」為何物?臺灣大學生生涯概念原型分析研究。教育科學研究期刊,64(2),39-68。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0002【Wang, H.-H., & Chen, J.-D. (2019). What do you mean when you think of career? A prototype analysis of the conception of career among Taiwanese college students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(2), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0002】
- 王佳琪、宋世祥(2019)。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效:以適性教學為例。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),157-185。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006【Wang, C.-C., & Sung, S.-H. (2019). The “adaptive instruction” course as an example of the application and evaluation of a teacher education program course incorporating design thinking. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 157-185. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006】
- 吳明振、林雅幸、陳培基(2014)。技職教育再造的挑戰與展望。中等教育,65(2),6-20。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2014.65.2.01【Wu, M.-J., Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-C. (2014). The challenge and prospection of reformation of technological and vocational education in Taiwan. Secondary Education, 65(2), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2014.65.2.01】
- 吳柏軒(2018,1月3日)。無懼少子化 台師大逆勢成立師資培育學院。自由時報。https://news. ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2301618【Wu, P.-S. (2018, January 3). No fear of declining birthrate National Taiwan Normal University bucked the trend and established a teacher training college. The Liberty Times. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2301618】
- 吳淑禎(2011)。師資職前教育的生涯課程發展暨輔導效果研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,31,1-32。https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.201112.0002【Wu, S.-C. (2011). The study of career course development and effect on the pre-service teacher education. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 31, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.201112.0002】
- 吳淑禎(2012)。師資生的工作價值觀與生涯定向研究。中等教育,63(1),61-80。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2012.63.1.04【Wu, S.-C. (2012). The study of work value and career decidedness of pre-service teacher. Chinese Secondary Education, 63(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2012.63.1.04】
- 吳淑禎(2020)。技職教師生涯素養量表之編製。教育科學研究期刊,65(4),241-273。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0008【Wu, S.-C. (2020). Development of a career competencies scale for technological and vocational teachers. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(4), 241-273. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4). 0008】
- 李美華、王政華(2014)。培養學生未來想像與創造能力─簡介IDEO設計思考模式。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(6),28-30。【Lee, M.-H., & Wang, C.-H. (2014). Cultivate students’ ability to imagine and create in the future — Introduction to IDEO’s design thinking mode. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 3(6), 28-30.】
- 林幸台、田秀蘭、張小鳳、張德聰(2003)。生涯輔導。國立空中大學。【Lin, S.-T., Tian, S.-L., Chang, S.-F., & Chang, T.-C. (2003). Career counseling. National Open University Press.】
- 林延諭、鄭夢慈(2016)。融入設計思考於嚴肅教育遊戲的設計歷程及對科技學科教學知識的影響:以職前教師為例。數位學習科技期刊,8(1),71-94。https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2016010801004【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cheng, M.-T. (2016). The integration of design thinking into the process of developing a serious educational game and its influence on technological pedagogical content knowledge: Taking the case of a pre-Service teacher as an example. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 8(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2016010801004】
- 林俊彥、郭宗賢、何俐安、郭彥谷(2006)。技職校院學生生涯規劃之探討。學校行政,45,124-139。https://doi.org/10.6423/hhhc.200609.0124【Lin, J.-Y., Guo, Z.-X., Ho, L.-A., & Guo, Y.-G. (2006). Investigation into career planning of students in technological and vocational colleges. School Administrators, 45, 124-139. https://doi.org/10.6423/hhhc.200609.0124】
- 洪菁苑(2014)。生涯探索對生涯未定向大學生發展生涯定向之影響探究。諮商與輔導,337,33-36。https://doi.org/10.29837/CG【Hong, C.-Y. (2014). An influence study of career exploration on the development of career orientation of undergraduates without career orientation. Counseling & Guidance, 337, 33-36. https://doi.org/10.29837/CG】
- 洪榮昭、葉建宏、范靜媛(2019)。技術及職業教育政策之接受度:實踐研究新視角。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),181-211。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0007【Hong, J.-C., Ye, J.-H., & Fan, J.-Y. (2019). Policy acceptance of technical vocational education: A perspective from a new act on field study. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(1), 181-211. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0007】
- 張添洲(1993)。生涯發展與規劃。五南。【Chang, T.-Z. (1993). Career development and planning. Wu-Nan.】
- 教育部(2015)。技術及職業教育法。https://edu.law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode= H0040028【Ministry of Education. (2015). Technical and Vocational Education Law. https://edu.law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/ LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0040028】
- 教育部(2017)。中華民國師資培育統計年報。https://is.gd/h4LXtV【Ministry of Education. (2017). Annual report on teacher cultivation statistics of the Republic of China. https://is. gd/h4LXtV】
- 陳坤虎、雷庚玲、吳英璋(2005)。不同階段青少年之自我認同內容及危機探索之發展差異。中華心理學刊,47(3),249-268。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2005.4703.04【Chen, K.-H., Lay, K.-L., & Wu, Y.-C. (2005). The developmental differences of identity content and exploration among adolescents of different stages. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2005.4703.04】
- 陳金英(2005)。科技大學應屆畢業生之生涯定向焦慮研究。教育與心理研究,28(4),745- 771。【Chen, J.-Y. (2005). A study on college students’ anxiety of career decision. Journal of Education & Psychology, 28(4), 745-771.】
- 陳金英、湯誌龍(2006)。專業生涯認同:影響社會工作系學生生涯選擇之相關因素。社會政策與社會工作學刊,10(1),151-187。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.200606.0151【Chen, J.-Y., & Tang, J.-L. (2006). A study on social work undergraduates’ commitment to social work profession. Social Policy & Social Work, 10(1), 151-187. https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.200606.0151】
- 黃政傑(2015)。技職教育學術化的問題與對策。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(11),1-6。【Huang, C.-J. (2015). The problems and countermeasures of the academicization of technical and vocational education. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 4(11), 1-6.】
- 黃琇屏、游宗輝(2016)。少子化對師資培育現況與影響之個案研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(12),168-181。【Huang, H.-P., & Yu, T.-H. (2016). A case study on the impact of low birth rate on teacher education. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(12), 168-181.】
- 楊珮琳、林靜萍(2007)。中等學校體育師資生就業之困境與因應策略。中華體育,21(3),67-73。https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe.2103.200709.1808【Yang, P.-L., & Lin, J.-P. (2007). The employment difficulties and countermeasures of physical education teachers in secondary schools. Quarterly of Chinese Physical Education, 21(3), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe. 2103.200709.1808】
- 楊珮琳、林靜萍(2009)。師範校院體育系學生生涯發展與生涯阻隔。體育學報,42(2),67-80。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4202.200906.0705【Yang, P.-L., & Lin, J.-P. (2009). The study on students’ career development and career barriers for physical education students. Physical Education Journal, 42(2), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4202.200906.0705】
- 楊朝祥(1990)。生計輔導─終生的輔導歷程。行政院青年輔導委員會。【Yang, C.-X. (1990). Livelihood counseling- A lifelong counseling journey. The Youth Auxiliary Association of the Executive Yuan.】
- 楊智馨、林世華(1998)。大學生生涯發展狀況與自我認定狀態之關係。教育心理學報,30(2),1-16。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19980827【Yang, C.-S., & Lin, S.-H. (1998). A study on the relationship between career development and ego identity status for college students in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 30(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19980827】
- Birsel, A.(2017)。設計你所愛的人生:用設計思考的創造力,建構一個你想要的未來(廖子杰,譯)。遠流。(原著出版於2015年)【Birsel, A. (2017). Design the life you love: A step-by-step guide to building a meaningful future (T.-C. Liao, Trans.). Yuan-Liou. (Original original published in 2015)】
- Burnett, B., & Evans, D.(2016)。做自己的生命設計師:史丹佛最夯的生涯規劃課,用「設計思考」重擬問題,打造全新生命藍圖(許恬寧,譯)。大塊文化。(原著出版於2016年)【Burnett, B., & Evans., D. (2016). Designing your life: How to build a well-lived, joyful life (T.-N. Hsu, Trans.). Locus. (Original work published in 2016)】
- Burnett, B., & Evans, D.(2021)。做自己的工作設計師:史丹佛經典生涯規畫課「做自己的生命設計師」【職場實戰篇】(許恬寧,譯)。大塊文化。(原著出版於2020年)【Burnett, B., & Evans., D. (2021). Designing your work life: How to thrive and change and find happiness at work (T.-N. Hsu, Trans.). Locus. (Original original published in 2020)】
- IDEO(2017)。教育工作者的設計思考實踐手冊(李岳霞、陳伯雄,合譯)。親子天下。(原著出版於2012年)【IDEO. (2017). Design Thinking for Educators (Y.-H. Li & P.-H. Chen, Trans.). Parenting Family Lifestyle. (Original original published in 2012)】
- Balakrishnan, B. (2021). Exploring the impact of design thinking tool among design undergraduates: A study on creative skills and motivation to think creatively. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09652-y
- Bissola, R., Imperatori, B., & Biffi, A. (2017). A rhizomatic learning process to create collective knowledge in entrepreneurship education: Open innovation and collaboration beyond boundaries. Management Learning, 48(2), 206-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507616672735
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
- Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, 84-92.
- Cutumisu, M., Schwartz, D. L., & Lou, N. M. (2020). The relation between academic achievement and the spontaneous use of design-thinking strategies. Computers & Education, 149, 1-13.
- Denzin, N. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Elsbach, K. D., & Stigliani, I. (2018). Design thinking and organizational culture: A review and framework for future research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2274-2306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252
- Erikson, E. H. (1958). Young man Luther: A study in psychoanalysis and history. W. W. Norton and Company.
- Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton and Company.
- Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton and Company.
- Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. W. W. Norton and Company.
- Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1997). Vital involvement in old age- The experience of old age in our time. W. W. Norton and Company.
- Ewin, N., Luck, J., Chugh, R., & Jarvis, J. (2017). Rethinking project management education: A humanistic approach based on design thinking. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.067
- Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (Eds.). (2017). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. Routledge.
- Gottlieb, M., Wagner, E., Wagner, A., & Chan, T. (2017). Applying design thinking principles to curricular development in medical education. AEM Education and Training, 1(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10003
- Harter, S. (1990). Processes underlying adolescent self-concept formation. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? (pp. 205-239). Sage.
- Hava, K., & Ünlü, Z. K. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between middle school students’ computational thinking skills and their STEM career interest and attitudes toward inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956- 020-09892-y
- Herr, E. L., & Cramer, S. H. (1996). Career guidance and counseling through the lifespan: Systematic approaches (5th ed.). HarperCollins.
- Herr, E. L., Cramer, S. H., & Niles, S. G. (2004). Career guidance and counseling through the lifespan: Systematic approaches (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
- Jamal, T., Kircher, J., & Donaldson, J. P. (2021). Re-visiting design thinking for learning and practice: Critical pedagogy, conative empathy. Sustainability, 13, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020964
- Lauff, C. A. (2018). Prototyping in the wild: The role of prototypes in companies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Colorado.
- Lauff, C. A., Knight, D., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Rentschler, M. E. (2020). The role of prototypes in communication. Design Studies, 66, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.007
- Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: As filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(2), 1e27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762
- Löfström, E., Poom-Valicks, K., Hannula, M. S., & Mathews, S. R. (2010). Supporting emerging teacher identities: Can we identify teacher potential among students? European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619761003631831
- Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
- Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). Wiley.
- Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.b2.3.8323320856251826
- Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J. S., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Novak, E., & Mulvey, B. (2020). Enhancing design thinking in instructional technology students. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 37(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12470
- Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking-A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
- Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010, December). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence [Paper presentation]. 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010), Kobe, Japan.
- Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
- Rognstad, M. K., & Aasland, O. (2007). Change in career aspirations and job values from study time to working life. Journal of Nursing Management, 15, 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2834.2007.00655.x
- Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. MIT Press.
- Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (pp. 197-261). Jossey-Bass.
- Werbel, J. D. (2000). Relationships among career exploration, job search intensity and job search effectiveness in graduation college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1746
- Withell, A. J., & Haigh, N. (2013, May). Developing design thinking expertise in higher education [Paper presentation]. 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, Oslo, Norway.
- Yang, C.-M., & Hsu, T.-F. (2020). Integrating design thinking into a packaging design course to improve students’ creative self-efficacy and flow experience. Sustainability, 12(15), 5929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155929