Journal of Research in Education Sciences - Journal directory listing - Volume 68 (2023) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【68(3)】September(Special Issue: Current Status and Prospects of Rural Education in Taiwan)

Search by article title, author,
keywords, and DOI

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

[Style for Thesis Writing]

[Review of Research Papers]

[The Copyright]

[Flow of Review System]

[Regulations Governing]

[Editorial Board]

[Advisory Board]

[Form Download]

Call for papers for the special issue “Prevention and Treatment of Addictive Behaviors on Campus” (Final submission deadline: 2021/8/31) The Journal of Research in Education Sciences will no longer provide printed copies Call for papers for the special issue “Educational Research Related to Southeast Asian Countries” (Final submission deadline: 2018/12/31)

Journal directory listing - Volume 68 (2023) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【68(3)】September(Special Issue: Current Status and Prospects of Rural Education in Taiwan)

Back

(Special Issue)Correlations Between Interdistrict Enrollment, Parental Educational Expectation, Parental Involvement, and School Choice in Rural Areas Author: Wei-Cheng Chien (Research Center for Educational System and Policy, National Academy for Educational Research and Department of Education and Learning Technology, National Tsing Hua University and Department of Graphics Arts and Communications, National Taiwan Normal University), Chuan-Chung Hsieh (Department of Education and Learning Technology, National Tsing Hua University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 68, No. 3
Date：September 2023
Pages：61-93
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0003

Abstract：
Research Motivation and Purpose
Rural education has been emphasized during the development of Taiwan’s education-related policies since 2017 recent years. However, the factors influencing parental choices of schools for children graduating from junior high or elementary schools in remote areas remain underexplored. Moreover, in-depth studies on parental educational expectations and involvement in school education are limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to estimate the cross-district enrollment rate of junior high and elementary school graduates. Furthermore, the correlations between parental educational expectations, parental involvement in school education, and factors influencing their school choice were investigated. We also assessed the disparities arising from factors such as school tier, remoteness level, and family socioeconomic status and the differences in factors influencing school choice between parents enrolling their children in schools within their original district and those enrolling their children in schools outside their district.
Literature Review
Students from remote areas often encounter unfavorable conditions during school selection; this often results in their enrollment in schools outside their district (Lin, 2012). Parsons et al. (2000) conducted a case study on the situation of UK students attending schools outside their district and revealed that cross-district enrollment was most pronounced in rural areas, moderately remote suburbs, and nonremote urban areas, with the rural regions experiencing the most substantial impact. This underscores the fact that a considerable number of students from remote areas choose to attend schools outside their district, which potentially leads to the problem of student attrition.
Understanding the cross-district transition of students from remote areas and the factors affecting parental school choices can guide future education policies for remote areas. Apart from school choice, parental educational expectations is strongly correlated with children’s learning (Fan & Chen, 2001; Pinquart & Ebeling, 2020). Studies have reported disparities in parental children’s perspectives regarding their children’s educational expectations, particularly among parents with varying socioeconomic backgrounds and remoteness levels (Yulianti et al., 2019). Parents in areas with higher remoteness levels tend to have lower expectations for their children’s education attainment and participation (Byun et al., 2012). The importance of parental involvement in school education is often studied because of its significant effects on student learning (Hill & Tyson, 2009; Keith et al., 1998). These research perspectives (Byun et al., 2012; Fan & Chen, 2001; Hill & Tyson, 2009; Keith et al., 1998; Pinquart & Ebeling, 2020; Yulianti et al., 2019) indicate that studies on parental educational expectations and involvement in school education in remote areas should not be overlooked. Therefore, this study was conducted using parental educational expectations and involvement as related research variables.
Studies on the interrelationship between variables have reported a significant correlation between parental educational expectations and parental involvement in school education (Castro et al., 2015; Froiland et al., 2013; Goodall, 2018; Jeynes, 2022). Furthermore, the influence of parental educational expectations on parental involvement was demonstrated to be consistently high across students stratified by such as age, ethnicity, sex, academic achievement, and subject preferences (Jeynes, 2022). Some studies have also suggested that students often consider parental expectations in their decision-making process for school selection (Boerchi, 2020; Martinez et al., 1995). This finding suggests that parental educational expectations influence school selection to some extent. Regarding the effects of parental involvement in school education on school selection, Cox and Witko (2008) and McGinn and Ben-Porath (2014) did not report any correlation between parental involvement and school choice; however, their research samples mainly comprised parents from general or metropolitan areas and might not have represented parents in remote areas. By contrast, Goldring and Phillips (2008) indicated that parental involvement in schools is a key indicator of school choice.
Methods
We conducted a questionnaire survey among parents whose children had graduated from junior high or elementary schools in remote areas of Taiwan in 2021. A total of 2,047 valid questionnaires were obtained. The collected data were statistically analyzed through one-way analysis of variance and repeated-measures analysis of variance by using IBM SPSS software. Furthermore, structural equation modeling was performed and the multiple indicators multiple causes model was used for data analysis; for this, we used Muthén & Muthén Mplus.
Results and Conclusion
The study findings were as follows:
1. The cross-district enrollment rate of junior high school graduates (47%) was significantly higher than that of elementary school graduates (28%). The rate was significantly higher for graduates from extremely and moderately remote areas (60% and 58%, respectively) than for those from remote areas (44%). Additionally, the rate was significantly higher for elementary school graduates with a high socioeconomic status (30%) than for those with a low socioeconomic status (19%); this finding indicates that students who opted to stay in their original school district may not do so voluntarily but may be influenced by the limitations arising from their family’s socioeconomic status.
2. Parents of graduates from both elementary and junior high schools in remote areas had high expectations for their children’s education. However, parents of elementary school graduates had significantly higher expectations than did those of junior high school graduates. Moreover, parents of elementary school graduates with a high socioeconomic status had significantly higher education expectations than did those of elementary school graduates with a low socioeconomic status.
3. Parents of primary school graduates in remote areas exhibited significantly higher levels of involvement in school education than did those of junior high school graduates. Additionally, parents of primary school graduates in extremely remote areas exhibited significantly higher levels of involvement than did their counterparts from moderately remote and remote areas. Similarly, parents from extremely remote areas exhibited higher levels of involvement than those in remote areas. This trend suggests that the more remote the school is, the higher is the level of parental involvement in primary education. This trend was also observed for parents of junior high school students. Furthermore, parents of graduates with a high socioeconomic status exhibited significantly higher levels of involvement in school education than did those of graduates with a low socioeconomic status.
4. The most important factor influencing school choice for parents of both junior high school and elementary school graduates was facilities, followed by teacher quality.
5. The educational expectations of the parents of junior high school graduates in remote areas exerted a significant, positive, and moderate direct effect on parental involvement in school education. These expectations exerted a significant indirect effect on various factors influencing school choice; this effect was mediated through parental involvement in school education and varied across factors influencing school choice.
Parents of students who remained in their original district placed significantly more importance on the factor convenient transportation than did those of students who attended school in a cross-district. Conversely, parents of students who attended school in a cross-district placed more importance on welfare subsidies than did those of students remained in their original district.

Keywords：parental involvement, parental educational expectation, rural education, school choice

《Full Text》

References：

江民瑜（2006）。國小學生家長參與學校教育行為之影響機制探討：以高雄縣市為例。臺灣教育社會學研究，6（1），41-81。【Chiang, M.-Y. (2006). The influential mechanism of parental involvement in elementary schools: Taking Kaohsiung county and city as examples. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 6(1), 41-81.】
吳清山（2018）。近50年來國民教育發展之探究：九年國民教育與十二年國民基本教育政策之分析。教育研究集刊，64（4），1-36。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082018126404001【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Basic education development in the past 50 years: An analysis of the 9-year compulsory education and the 12-year basic education policy implementation in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 64(4), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082018126404001】
巫麗雪（2015）。揠苗助長：父母期望與參與對子女教育藍圖的影響。社會與區域發展學報，4（2），35-66。【Wu, L.-H. (2015). Haste makes waste: The effects of parents’ expectation and involvement on children’s educational blueprint. Journal of Social and Regional Development, 4(2), 35-66.】
李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用：Graphics & Basic。心理。【Li, M.-N. (2006). An introduction to Amos and its uses in scale development: Graphics & basic. Psychological.】
林天祐（2012）。偏鄉學校的師資課題。臺灣教育評論月刊，1（3），25-26。https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201201.0025【Lin, T.-Y. (2012). The issues of teachers in rural schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 1(3), 25-26. https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201201.0025】

» More

江民瑜（2006）。國小學生家長參與學校教育行為之影響機制探討：以高雄縣市為例。臺灣教育社會學研究，6（1），41-81。【Chiang, M.-Y. (2006). The influential mechanism of parental involvement in elementary schools: Taking Kaohsiung county and city as examples. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 6(1), 41-81.】
吳清山（2018）。近50年來國民教育發展之探究：九年國民教育與十二年國民基本教育政策之分析。教育研究集刊，64（4），1-36。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082018126404001【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Basic education development in the past 50 years: An analysis of the 9-year compulsory education and the 12-year basic education policy implementation in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 64(4), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082018126404001】
巫麗雪（2015）。揠苗助長：父母期望與參與對子女教育藍圖的影響。社會與區域發展學報，4（2），35-66。【Wu, L.-H. (2015). Haste makes waste: The effects of parents’ expectation and involvement on children’s educational blueprint. Journal of Social and Regional Development, 4(2), 35-66.】
李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用：Graphics & Basic。心理。【Li, M.-N. (2006). An introduction to Amos and its uses in scale development: Graphics & basic. Psychological.】
林天祐（2012）。偏鄉學校的師資課題。臺灣教育評論月刊，1（3），25-26。https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201201.0025【Lin, T.-Y. (2012). The issues of teachers in rural schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 1(3), 25-26. https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201201.0025】
邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL SIMPLIS原理與應用（二版）。雙葉書廊。【Chiou, H.-J. (2011). Structural equation modeling: LISREL/SIMPLIS (2nd ed.). Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
邱皓政、林碧芳（2016）。孰優、孰弱？臺灣學生學習成就軌跡之異質性分析。當代教育研究，24（1），33-79。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2016.2401.02【Chiou, H.-J., & Lin, P.-F. (2016). Who’s superior and who’s inferior? Study of heterogeneity of students’ achievement trajectories in Taiwan. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 24(1), 33-79. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2016.2401.02】
高台茜、康以諾、陳玉葉（2015）。網路課輔中層次性閱讀教學對偏鄉學童閱讀能力影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，60（4），191-221。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).07【Kao, T.-C., Kang, Y.-N., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2015). Effects of four-level reading instruction for an online tutoring project on promoting the reading ability of rural students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(4), 191-221. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).07】
張鈿富、吳舒靜（2008）。十二年國民基本教育學區劃分探討：政策歷史、考古、系譜之分析。教育研究與發展期刊，4（3），53-78。【Chang, D.-F., & Wu, S.-C. (2008). Planning school attendance areas in 12-year basic education: Historiography, archaeology, genealogy as approaches of policy analysis. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 4(3), 53-78.】
教育部（2018）。偏遠地區學校分級及認定標準。http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id= GL001771【Ministry of Education. (2018). Standards governing the determination of levels and classification of schools in remote areas. http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001771】
許誌庭（2014）。偏遠地區教育困境：空間、社會與文化。教育人力與專業發展，31（1），33-42。【Hsu, C.-T. (2014). Education dilemma in rural areas: Space, society, culture. Educators and Professional Development, 31(1), 33-42.】
甄曉蘭（2007）。偏遠國中教育機會不均等問題與相關教育政策初探。教育研究集刊，53（3），1-35。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200709_(53-3).0001【Chen, H.-L. (2007). The issues of inequality of educational opportunity in rural junior high schools and related educational policies: A preliminary investigation. Bulletin of Educational Research, 53(3), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200709_(53-3).0001】
鄭英耀、方德隆、莊勝義、陳利銘、劉敏如（2015）。大學經濟弱勢學生入學及就學扶助政策分析與建議。教育科學研究期刊，60（4），1-19。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).01【Cheng, Y.-Y., Fang, D.-L., Chuang, S.-Y., Chen, L.-M., & Liu, M.-J. (2015). Expanding access to and participation in higher education for low-SES students: Policy analysis and suggestions. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).01】
Bagley, C., Woods, P. A., & Glatter, R. (2001). Rejecting schools: Towards a fuller understanding of the process of parental choice. School Leadership & Management, 21(3), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430120074455
Bauch, P. A., & Goldring, E. B. (1995). Parent involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164267
Boerchi, D. (2020). Measuring difficulties in choosing an upper secondary school: Validating of the parental expectations, confusion, anxiety and suitability scale (PeCAS scale). Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(4), 588-601. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i4.1812
Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.001
Bradley, H. (1996). Parental choice of schools in an area containing grant-maintained schools. School Organization, 16(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260136960160106
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Byun, S. Y., Meece, J. L., & Irvin, M. J. (2012). Rural-nonrural disparities in postsecondary educational attainment revisited. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 412-437. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211416344
Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cox, J. H., & Witko, C. (2008). School choice and the creation of social capital reexamined. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00304.x
Cross, F. L., Marchand, A. D., Medina, M., Villafuerte, A., & Rivas-Drake, D. (2019). Academic socialization, parental educational expectations, and academic self-efficacy among Latino adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 56(4), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22239
Epstein, J. L. (1996). Advances in family, community and school partnerships. Community Education Journal, 23(3), 10-15.
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385
Fantuzzo, J., Tighe, E., & Childs, S. (2000). Family involvement questionnaire: A multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.367
Feuerstein, A. (2001). School characteristics and parent involvement: Influences on participation in children’s schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598740
Froiland, J. M., Peterson, A., & Davison, M. L. (2013). The long-term effects of early parent involvement and parent expectation in the USA. School Psychology International, 34(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312454361
Glick, J. E., & White, M. J. (2004). Post-secondary school participation of immigrant and native youth: The role of familial resources and educational expectations. Social Science Research, 33(2), 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.06.001
Goldenberg, C., Gallimore, R., Reese, L., & Garnier, H. (2001). Cause or effect? A longitudinal study of immigrant Latino parents’ aspirations and expectations, and their children’s school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 547-582. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003547
Goldring, E. B., & Phillips, K. J. R. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public-private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930801987844
Goodall, J. (2018). A toolkit for parental engagement: From project to process. School Leadership & Management, 38(2), 222-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1430689
Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00747.x
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001003
Hussain, S., Javaid, Z., Mushtaq, S., & Iqbal, A. (2018). Relationship between parental involvement and students’ performance in secondary schools. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 7(3), 203-209.
Independent Schools Australia. (2021). School choice: A research report 2021. https://isa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ISA260721_SCHOOL-CHOICE-REPORT_08.pdf
Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906293818
Jeynes, W. H. (2022). A meta-analysis: The relationship between the parental expectations component of parental involvement with students’ academic achievement. Urban Education, 47(3), 237-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211073892
Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Quirk, K. J., Sperduto, J., Santillo, S., & Killings, S. (1998). Longitudinal effects of parent involvement on high school grades: Similarities and differences across gender and ethnic groups. Journal of School Psychology, 36(3), 335-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00008-9
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809556
Martinez, V. J., Godwin, R. K., Kemerer, F. R., & Perna, L. (1995). The consequences of school choice: Who leaves and who stays in the inner city. Social Science Quarterly, 76(3), 485-501.
McGinn, K. C., & Ben-Porath, S. (2014). Parental engagement through school choice: Some reasons for caution. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514530714
Morgan, V., Dunn, S., Cairns, E., & Fraser, G. (1993). How do parents choose a school for their child? An example of the exercise of parental choice. Educational Research, 35(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188930350203
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
O’Shaughnessy, T. (2007). Parental choice and school quality when peer and scale effects matter. Economics of Education Review, 26(4), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.05. 009
Parsons, E., Chalkley, B., & Jones, A. (2000). School catchments and pupil movements: A case study in parental choice. Educational Studies, 26(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690097727
Pinquart, M., & Ebeling, M. (2020). Parental educational expectations and academic achievement in children and adolescents— A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09506-z
Wolf, P. J. (2008). School voucher programs: What the research says about parental school choice. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2008(2), 415-446.
Yamamoto, Y., & Holloway, S. D. (2010). Parental expectations and children’s academic performance in sociocultural context. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9121-z
Yulianti, K., Denessen, E. J. P. G., & Droop, W. (2018). The effects of parental involvement on children’s education: A study in elementary schools in Indonesia. International Journal about Parents in Education, 10(1), 14-32.
Yulianti, K., Denessen, E. J. P. G., & Droop, W. (2019). Indonesian parents’ involvement in their children’s education: A study in elementary schools in urban and rural Java, Indonesia. School Community Journal, 29(1), 253-278.
Zhan, M. (2006). Assets, parental expectations and involvement, and children’s educational performance. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(8), 961-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.008

APA Format	Chien, W.-T., & Hsieh, C.-C. (2023). Correlations between interdistrict enrollment, parental educational expectation, parental involvement, and school choice in rural Areas. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 68(3), 61-93. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0003

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

Journal directory listing - Volume 68 (2023) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【68(3)】September(Special Issue: Current Status and Prospects of Rural Education in Taiwan) Back

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

Journal directory listing - Volume 68 (2023) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【68(3)】September(Special Issue: Current Status and Prospects of Rural Education in Taiwan)

Back