Responding to “Inquiry and Practice” in the 2019 Curriculum Guidelines: A Dual-Practice Approach to a Teaching Practice Course in Teacher Education
Author: Bih-Jen Fwu (Center for Teacher Education & Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Taiwan University), Guan-Ying Li (Center for General Education & Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Taiwan University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 68, No. 3
Date:September 2023
Pages:239-273
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0008
Abstract:
1. Introduction
In 2019, the Ministry of Education of Taiwan introduced new guidelines for the 12-year basic education. The 2019 curriculum guidelines emphasize the importance of inquiry and practice and transdisciplinarity. Student teachers are expected to develop collaborative skills across disciplines; integrate curriculum, instruction, and assessment; and acquire the ability to design and implement inquiry-based courses. However, few empirical studies have examined how teacher education programs have adapted to the new curriculum guidelines or whether adaptation to the guidelines has been effective. In Finland, phenomenon-based learning has emerged as a promising approach, which aligns with the objectives of the 2019 guidelines. This study incorporated phenomenon-based learning into the design and implementation of a dual-practice approach to a teaching practice course. The first part of the course involved an inquiry project to prepare student teachers for the second part of the course, which involved designing and implementing a 5-week microcourse called Inquiry 101 for high school students. The present study examined whether this teaching practice course enhanced student teachers’ transdisciplinary inquiry skills and their ability to integrate curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
2. Literature Review
Inquiry-based learning has been promoted across disciplines (Chang et al., 2011; Selby, 2006; VanSledright, 2010; Wineburg, 2001). However, previous studies have shown that in-service teachers might not be adequately prepared for this new pedagogical approach and have highlighted the importance of integrating the new approach into teacher education (Khalaf & Zin, 2018; Levy et al., 2013). Teachers in Taiwan often face greater challenges than those in other countries; they are expected to teach and implement inquiry in a transdisciplinary setting according to the 2019 guidelines. As a curriculum reform, Finland recently introduced phenomenon-based learning, which aims to enhance students’ motivation through their exploration of real-life phenomena rather than by focusing their attention on subject-specific knowledge (Halinen et al., 2015; Lonka et al., 2018). This approach stimulates students’ curiosity and intrinsic motivation and enhances their problem-solving skills. Additionally, it promotes transdisciplinary integration and increases the usefulness of knowledge acquired in class.
Integrating phenomenon-based learning into inquiry, which is called the interrogative model, has been developed; it involves the processes of scientific inquiry and knowledge acquisition as “a question and answer process” (Hakkarainen & Sintonen, 2002). Students are guided to differentiate between explanation-seeking and fact-seeking questions. Explanation-seeking questions, such as why and how questions, constitute the core of inquiry-based learning; fact-seeking questions, which primarily consist of who, where, when, which, and what questions, provide the foundation for higher-level explanation-seeking inquiry. In general, inquiry-based learning involves four major phases: (1) identifying a question of interest, (2) formulating a hypothesis, (3) verifying the hypothesis, and (4) drawing a conclusion. These inquiry processes are not linear in practice; they are usually iterative and require revisions. Therefore, support or scaffolding is required to guide students through the inquiry processes, so that they can effectively learn and conduct knowledge construction (Hakkarainen, 1998, 2003; Hakkarainen & Sintonen, 2002; Rahikainen et al., 2001).
3. Methods
The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a dual-practice approach in a teacher education course, which focused on developing preservice teachers’ ability to design and implement transdisciplinary inquiry. This approach was guided by the belief that preservice teachers will teach as they learn (Moilanen, 2015). In the first part of the course, preservice teachers were required to work collaboratively on an inquiry project for 4 weeks. They selected a phenomenon of interest from real life, formulated and verified hypotheses, drew conclusions, and completed a 3000-word report. The purpose of this practice was to familiarize the preservice teachers with phenomenon-based inquiry. In the second part of the course, they designed and implemented a 5-week microcourse called Inquiry 101 for high school students. This study recruited 14 preservice teachers participating in a teaching practice course at a research-intensive university in Taiwan. The Inquiry 101 course was offered in partnership with a local high school. Four classes, with a total of 94 tenth-grade students, were enrolled. Each class had 22-24 students and was taught by a group of three or four preservice teachers. After the completion of the course, feedback sessions were conducted with the principal and mentors from the participating high school along with the preservice teachers. The feedback enabled the preservice teachers to reflect on their teaching and learning processes. Participation in the study was entirely voluntary. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
4. Results
The study examined whether a dual-practice approach was effective for improving preservice teachers’ transdisciplinary inquiry skills and their ability to integrate curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Analysis of the inquiry reports revealed that although the preservice teachers were able to propose meaningful and clear research questions, they struggled with formulating and verifying hypotheses. Further analysis of the pre- and post tests revealed that the first part of the course consolidated the preservice teachers’ understanding of inquiry processes; it also enhanced their awareness of formulating hypotheses and using hypotheses to guide reference search. Analysis of reflection journals indicated that the phenomenon-based microcourse enhanced the ability of the preservice teachers to integrate curriculum, instruction, and assessment in a transdisciplinary manner. These findings were supported by the analysis results of lesson plans, video recordings of the classes, and self-evaluations by the preservice teachers. Self-evaluations by both the preservice teachers and students demonstrated that the course improve their ability to differentiate between basic and higher-level questions and to identify questions worth inquiry.
5. Concluding Remarks
The teaching practice course examined in this study is expected to serve as a capstone course that helps preservice teachers integrate their learning and inquiry experiences in teacher education. The present study found that the experiences of preservice teachers varied greatly. The findings suggest that a dual-practice approach may be a practical way of preparing preservice teachers for the 2019 curriculum guidelines, which emphasize inquiry and practice to achieve curriculum integration. The participation of preservice teachers in inquiry projects would familiarize them with phenomenon-based inquiry and equip them with the skills needed to design and implement inquiry-based courses. Additionally, microcourses may enhance their ability to integrate curriculum, instruction, and assessment in a transdisciplinary setting.
Keywords:the 2019 curriculum guidelines, phenomenon-based learning, teacher professional competence, inquiry, trans-disciplinary
《Full Text》
References:
- 于承平(2018)。探討芬蘭國家基本教育核心課程變革。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(2),1-25。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492018081102001【Yu, C.-P. (2018). Discussion and reflection on the reform of the national core curriculum for basic education in Finland. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 11(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492018081102001】
- 王雅玲、詹寶菁(2017)。芬蘭新課程綱要及現象為本學習之探究:兼論其對臺灣實施跨領域課程之啟示與挑戰。教育脈動,11,59-73。【Wang, Y.-L., & Chan, P.-J. (2017). Investigating phenomenon-based learning in Finnish curriculum guideline: The implications and challenges of implementing integrated curriculum in Taiwan. Pulse of Education, 11, 59-73.】
- 李崗(2016)。芬蘭教育的變革:新制度論觀點的分析。課程研究,11(1),137-142。https://doi.org/10.3966/181653382016031101006【Lee, K. (2016). An analysis on the educational change in Finland: New institutionalism perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11(1), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.3966/181653382016031101006】
- 李懿芳(2019)。芬蘭現象本位教學課程改革之理念與實踐。教育政策論壇,22(2),1-26。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982019052202001【Lee, Y.-F. (2019). The rationale and practice of phenomenon-based teaching and learning in Finnish curriculum reform. Educational Policy Forum, 22(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982019052202001】
- 周淑卿、王郁雯(2019)。從課程統整到跨領域課程:台灣二十年的論述與問題。教育學報,47(2),41-59。【Chou, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-W. (2019). From curriculum integration to cross-disciplinary curriculum: Twenty years of reform discourse and problems in Taiwan. Education Journal, 47(2), 41-59.】
» More
- 于承平(2018)。探討芬蘭國家基本教育核心課程變革。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(2),1-25。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492018081102001【Yu, C.-P. (2018). Discussion and reflection on the reform of the national core curriculum for basic education in Finland. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 11(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492018081102001】
- 王雅玲、詹寶菁(2017)。芬蘭新課程綱要及現象為本學習之探究:兼論其對臺灣實施跨領域課程之啟示與挑戰。教育脈動,11,59-73。【Wang, Y.-L., & Chan, P.-J. (2017). Investigating phenomenon-based learning in Finnish curriculum guideline: The implications and challenges of implementing integrated curriculum in Taiwan. Pulse of Education, 11, 59-73.】
- 李崗(2016)。芬蘭教育的變革:新制度論觀點的分析。課程研究,11(1),137-142。https://doi.org/10.3966/181653382016031101006【Lee, K. (2016). An analysis on the educational change in Finland: New institutionalism perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11(1), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.3966/181653382016031101006】
- 李懿芳(2019)。芬蘭現象本位教學課程改革之理念與實踐。教育政策論壇,22(2),1-26。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982019052202001【Lee, Y.-F. (2019). The rationale and practice of phenomenon-based teaching and learning in Finnish curriculum reform. Educational Policy Forum, 22(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982019052202001】
- 周淑卿、王郁雯(2019)。從課程統整到跨領域課程:台灣二十年的論述與問題。教育學報,47(2),41-59。【Chou, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-W. (2019). From curriculum integration to cross-disciplinary curriculum: Twenty years of reform discourse and problems in Taiwan. Education Journal, 47(2), 41-59.】
- 林小慧、郭哲宇、吳心楷(2021)。學生學習投入、好奇心、教師集體層級變項與科學探究能力的關係:跨層級調節式中介效果之探討。教育科學研究期刊,66(2),75-110。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0003【Lin, H.-H., Kuo, C.-Y., & Wu, H.-K. (2021). Relationship among engagement and curiosity of individual level variables of students, group level variables of teachers, and scientific inquiry abilities: Conference of cross-level moderated mediation. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(2), 75-110. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0003】
- 洪詠善(2016)。學習趨勢:跨領域、現象為本的統整學習。國家教育研究院電子報,134。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=134&content_no=2671【Hung, Y.-S. (2016). Learning trend: Transdisciplinary phenomenon-based learning. National Academy for Educational Research E-newsletter, 134. https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=134&content_ no=2671】
- 陳玟樺(2020)。我在芬蘭中小學做研究的日子:芬蘭中小學教育現場課室親身觀摩365日。遠流。【Chen, W.-H. (2020). Research in Finland: 365 days of classroom observations in Finnish elementary and high schools. Yuan-Liou.】
- 陳玟樺、劉美慧(2021)。芬蘭一間學校的現象為本學習課程統整設計與學生學習表現。教育研究集刊,67(1),107-156。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082021036701004 【Chen, W.-H., & Liu, M.-H. (2021). A Finnish school’s phenomenon-based learning curriculum integration design and students’ learning performance. Bulletin of Educational Research, 67(1), 107-156. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082021036701004】
- 陳玟樺、劉美慧(2022)。芬蘭赫爾辛基一間學校的現象為本學習個案研究。當代教育研究,30(1),39-84。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202203_30(1).0002【Chen, W.-H., & Liu, M.-H. (2022). The phenomenon-based learning in a middle school in Finland. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 30(1), 39-84. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202203_30(1).0002】
- 章凱閎(2020,10月5日)。新課綱現場/探究與實作:空白課程推給代理師。聯合報。https://www.ushine168.com.tw/news_detail162.com【Zhang, K.-H. (2020, October 5). New curriculum on-site/inquiry and practices: Substitute teachers taking responsibility for flexible curriculum. United Daily. https://www.ushine168.com.tw/news_detail162.com】
- 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。作者。【Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. Author.】
- 教育部(2018a)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校─自然科學領域。作者。【Ministry of Education. (2018a). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school, junior high and general senior high school: The domain of natural science. Author.】
- 教育部(2018b)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校─社會領域。作者。【Ministry of Education. (2018b). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school, junior high and general senior high school: The domain of social studies. Author.】
- 教育部(2021)。中華民國教師專業素養指引─師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準。作者。【Ministry of Education. (2021). Guidance of ROC’s teacher professional competence– Standard for pre-service teacher education curriculum. Author.】
- 符碧真(2017)。大學學習成果總檢驗:合頂石─總結性課程。教育研究集刊,63(1),31-67。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082017036301002【Fwu, B.-J. (2017). A total inspection of college student learning outcomes: Capstone courses as summative courses. Bulletin of Educational Research, 63(1), 31-67. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082017036301002】
- 符碧真(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育:國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),59-87。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003【Fwu, B.-J. (2018). Teacher preparation in response to competence-based curriculum reform for K-12 education: National Taiwan University’s proposal of inquiry-based and competence-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003】
- 黃馨瑩(2019)。十二年國民基本教育實施成效評估─臺灣學生成就長期追蹤評量計畫(第一期)子計畫3:背景問卷評量架構效化與工具研發。國家教育研究院。https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=12464213【Huang, H.-Y. (2019). Effectiveness of 12-year basic education program: A longitudinal study on Taiwan assessment of student achievement (TASA-L) (I) subproject 3: An evaluation framework of demographic questionnaire and development of instrument. National Academy for Educational Research. https://www. grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=12464213】
- 甄曉蘭(2001)。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊,4(1),1-19。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200101.0001【Chen, H.-L. S. (2001). Examining integrated curriculum design and implimentation from the perspective of curriculum organization. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200101. 0001】
- 歐用生、黃騰(2007)。「銜接」課程統整的理論與實踐:以臺灣九年一貫改革下的教師觀點為例。課程研究,3(1),1-28。【Ou, Y.-S., & Huang, T. (2007). Connect the theory and practice of curriculum integration: From the perspective of teachers under Taiwan grade 1-9 curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(1), 1-28.】
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
- Bernstein, J. L. (2018). Unifying SoTL methodology: Internal and external validity. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 6(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.9
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
- Chang, H.-P., Chen, C.-C., Guo, G.-J., Cheng, Y.-J., Lin, C.-Y., & Jen, T.-H. (2011). The development of a competence scale for learning science: Inquiry and communication. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9256-x
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D. C. Heath.
- Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1995). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the learning environment across disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995(64), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956413
- Gere, A. R., Aull, L., Dickinson, H., McBee-Orzulak, M., & Thomas, E. E. (2007). 21st century literacies: A policy brief produced by the National Council of Teachers of English. NCTE Council Chronicle, 17, 13-20.
- Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
- Hakkarainen, K. (1998). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
- Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024995120180
- Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science & Education, 11(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013076706416
- Halinen, I., Harmainen, M., & Mattila, P. (2015). Making sense of the complexity of the world today: Why Finland is introducing multiliteracy in teaching and learning. In V. Bozsik (Ed.), CIDREE Yearbook 2015: Improving literacy skills across Europe (pp. 136-153). HIERD.
- Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10115
- Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
- Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell (Ed.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283-315). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Levine, A. (1998). A president’s personal and historical perspective. In J. N. Gardner & G. V. Veer (Eds.), The senior year experience: Facilitating reflection, integration, closure and transition (pp. 51-58). Jossey-Bass.
- Levy, B. L., Thomas, E. E., Drago, K., & Rex, L. A. (2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113496430
- Lonka, K., Makkonen, J., Berg, M., Talvio, M., Maksniemi, E., Kruskopf, M., Lammassaari, H., Hietajärvi, L., & Westling, S. K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Edita.
- McCown, R. R., Driscoll, M. P., & Roop, P. (1996). Educational psychology: A learning-centered approach to classroom practice. Allyn & Bacon.
- Moilanen, P. (2015). A phenomenon-based curriculum for teacher education. In G. Pusztai & T. Ceglédi (Eds.), Professional calling in higher education: Challenges of teacher education in the Carpathian Basin (pp. 12-18). Partium Press.
- National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). College, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards. Author.
- Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
- Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Progressive inquiry in CSILE environment: Teacher guidance and students’ engagement. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the first European conference on CSCL (pp. 520-528). Maastricht McLuhan Institute. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/progressive-inquiry-in- csile-environment-teachers-guidance-and-st
- Renau, M. L. (2016). A review of the traditional and current language teaching methods. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 3(2), 82-88.
- Selby, C. C. (2006). What makes it science? A modern look at scientific inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(7), 8-11.
- Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenology: The recent curriculum reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 31-47.
- VanSledright, B. A. (2010). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policies. Routledge.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
- Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Temple University Press.
- Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1157-1186. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211419491
- Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y