Influence of Competence-Oriented Instruction on the Learning Outcomes, Motivation, and Multicultural Literacy of Middle School Students Learning Geography
Author: Hsu-Hsien Kao (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Po-Sheng Huang (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education & Empower Vocational Education Research Center, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 68, No. 4
Date:December 2023
Pages:157-189
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202312_68(4).0006
Abstract:
Teaching geography in Taiwanese junior high schools has long been centered around memorization-based knowledge. With limited class hours and the pressure of entrance exams, geography is often misconstrued as a subject that merely necessitates the rote memorization of its content. This misunderstanding leads to diminished motivation and interest in learning. Generally, geography places a strong emphasis on the integration of real-world spaces and requires an understanding of numerous concepts through the observation of phenomena and causal relationships. In addition to providing fundamental knowledge, geography fosters the abilities of value judgment and problem-solving and increases students’ awareness of local and global problems. As a subject that closely relates to daily life and holds affective and practical value, geography is both meaningful and valuable in terms of skill development. To address challenges in the teaching environment, many studies have incorporated several instructional strategies into geography education with the aim of enhancing students’ motivation and their perception of the value of learning geography. Over the past five years, due to the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education, Taiwan has advocated for a competence-oriented approach to education. This approach can be used to cultivate the competencies necessary for students to adapt to the rapidly changing future environment. Competence refers to the combination of knowledge, skills, or abilities required to meet specific task expectations. It involves the application of these attributes in real-world scenarios to effectively perform complex tasks that meet the standards of success within these contexts. Competence orientation is an instructional approach that focuses on equipping students with the capability to actively respond to new information and unfamiliar environments rather than merely focusing on the delivery of content knowledge. Competence-oriented education involves a curriculum and instructional approach that centers around students, enabling them to apply what they have learned in relevant contexts through action and practice. Competence-oriented education not only emphasizes the acquisition of knowledge and skills but also places a strong emphasis on contextualized learning, providing meaningful learning experiences that contribute to the development of core competencies and transferable learning. Competence-oriented instruction is used to implement competence-oriented education. However, several gaps exist in the research on competence-oriented geography education. First, the majority of studies on this subject have employed an action-research or qualitative design, with few rigorous, quantitative experimental studies having been conducted. Second, research has primarily focused on investigating the influence of competence-oriented instruction on learning outcomes, learning motivation, and attitudes related to geography; it has generally neglected to explore other core competencies in geography. Third, few studies have specifically focused on competence-oriented instruction in the ninth-grade world regional geography curriculum in junior high schools. Because the content characteristics vary with each unit, a unique approach must be employed to incorporate competence-oriented instruction in this curriculum. Therefore, additional research efforts are required to explore competence-oriented geography instruction across different grade levels and geography units. This study investigated the influence of competence-oriented instruction on the learning outcomes, motivation, and multicultural literacy of ninth-grade geography students. A total of 6 classes comprising 109 students were divided into an experimental group (55 students in 3 classes) and a control group (54 students in 3 classes). In the experimental group, geography was taught through a competence-oriented approach, whereas in the control group, geography was taught through a traditional didactic approach. The curriculum focused on the ninth-grade world regional geography units of “Oceania Islands” and “Australia” and spanned a duration of 3 weeks. The competence-oriented geography approach involved four instructional processes, namely introducing scenarios, engaging in inquiry tasks, presenting outcomes, and reflecting on concepts, as part of the curriculum design. By contrast, the traditional lecture-based geography approach followed a curriculum design involving four instructional processes: initiating motivation, delivering explanations, evaluating performance, and summarizing and reviewing. Nonequivalent pretest-posttest designs were used to evaluate the outcomes. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed. A self-developed geography achievement test was conducted to evaluate the learning outcomes. The ARCS Learning Motivation Scale was used to measure students’ learning motivation in terms of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction, and the multicultural literacy scale was used to evaluate students’ multicultural literacy in terms of multicultural awareness, cross-cultural abilities, and global citizenship reflection. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with the students to gain insights into their perspectives on competence-oriented geography instruction. The results of this study indicated the following. First, the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in terms of the overall learning outcomes, particularly in areas related to knowledge comprehension-based and analysis application-based test items, indicating that competence-oriented instruction can enhance the geography learning outcomes of students. According to the results of the qualitative interviews, the students perceived competence-oriented geography instruction to foster multiple-perspective thinking rather than rote memorization. Through learning processes that involved peer discussions, the students were able to deepen their understanding and overcome learning difficulties, resulting in improved performance on exams. Second, no significant differences were observed between the experimental group and the control group in terms of total motivation scores and the dimensions of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. Nevertheless, the qualitative data indicated that the experimental group exhibited an overall positive attitude toward the competence-oriented geography instruction. They perceived the content to be more comprehensive and felt more engaged in the classroom. Through peer discussions, the students experienced increased motivation for learning and an elevated sense of participation in class. They appreciated the incorporation of inquiry and practical elements that increased their interest in the content. In addition, the competence-oriented approach facilitated autonomous learning outside the classroom. Third, despite the absence of significant improvements in multicultural literacy in the two groups, the qualitative interviews revealed that the two groups exhibited a high degree of acceptance for individuals of different cultural backgrounds. They also expressed willingness to engage with local residents to better understand their customs and cultures. Fourth, the qualitative interviews revealed that the students had varying levels of understanding regarding competence-oriented instruction. Many students viewed competence-oriented curriculum and instruction as closely related to their daily lives, thus providing them with a broader and more diverse range of learning experiences, which in turn increased their classroom engagement. By contrast, some junior high school students perceived the concept of competence primarily through their assessment of competence-oriented items, which might have led them to develop misconceptions. Given the findings of this study, recommendations were formulated for curriculum design and instructional practices within the context of competence-oriented instruction.
Keywords:geography teaching, multicultural literacy, competence-oriented instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation
《Full Text》
References:
- 王如哲(2010)。解析「學生學習成效」。評鑑雙月刊,27,62。https://doi.org/10.6445/EB.201009.0062【Wang, R.-J. (2010). Analyzing “student learning outcomes”. Evaluation Bimonthly, 27, 62. https://doi.org/10.6445/EB.201009.0062】
- 王雅玄(2007)。多元文化素養評量工具及其應用:現況與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,3(4),149-179。【Wang, Y.-H. (2007). Multicultural literacy instrumentation: A review and prospect. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 3(4), 149-179.】
- 左台益、李健恆(2018)。素養導向之數學教材設計與發展。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),29-58。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002【Tso, T.-Y., & Lei, K. H. (2018). Design and development of mathematical literacy-oriented subject materials. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002】
- 行政院(2021)。臺灣國情簡介—族群。https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/99B2E89521FC31E1/2820610c-e97f-4d33-aa1e-e7b15222e45a【Executive Yuan. (2021). Taiwan national conditions– Ethnic group. https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/99B2E89521FC31E1/2820610c-e97f-4d33-aa1e-e7b15222e45a】
- 李育維(2018)。多元文化課程對提升學生多元文化素養之研究—以國中社會學習領域公民課程設計為例(未出版碩士論文)。樹德科技大學。【Li, Y.-W. (2018). Research on multi-cultural courses for improving students multicultural literacy– Taking the civiccurriculum design in the social learning field of the junior high school as an example [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shu-Te University.】
» More
- 王如哲(2010)。解析「學生學習成效」。評鑑雙月刊,27,62。https://doi.org/10.6445/EB.201009.0062【Wang, R.-J. (2010). Analyzing “student learning outcomes”. Evaluation Bimonthly, 27, 62. https://doi.org/10.6445/EB.201009.0062】
- 王雅玄(2007)。多元文化素養評量工具及其應用:現況與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,3(4),149-179。【Wang, Y.-H. (2007). Multicultural literacy instrumentation: A review and prospect. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 3(4), 149-179.】
- 左台益、李健恆(2018)。素養導向之數學教材設計與發展。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),29-58。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002【Tso, T.-Y., & Lei, K. H. (2018). Design and development of mathematical literacy-oriented subject materials. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002】
- 行政院(2021)。臺灣國情簡介—族群。https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/99B2E89521FC31E1/2820610c-e97f-4d33-aa1e-e7b15222e45a【Executive Yuan. (2021). Taiwan national conditions– Ethnic group. https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/99B2E89521FC31E1/2820610c-e97f-4d33-aa1e-e7b15222e45a】
- 李育維(2018)。多元文化課程對提升學生多元文化素養之研究—以國中社會學習領域公民課程設計為例(未出版碩士論文)。樹德科技大學。【Li, Y.-W. (2018). Research on multi-cultural courses for improving students multicultural literacy– Taking the civiccurriculum design in the social learning field of the junior high school as an example [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shu-Te University.】
- 李佩茹(2018)。實察教學模式在地理科之運用—以核心素養為導向之課程設計為例(未出版碩士論文)。中原大學。【Lee, P.-R. (2018). Field work in geography– Core competence-based curriculum design [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Chung Yuan Christian University.】
- 李宛臻(2019)。素養導向教學融入高中地理科多元選修課程對學生行為的影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。【Lee, W.-C. (2019). The effect of the multi-elective geography curriculum with competency-based instruction on senior high school students’ behavior [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 李佳芬(2016)。多元文化融入國中地理科教學實踐之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。【Lee, C.-F. (2016). A case study on the practice of multicultural education integrated into geography teaching at ajunior high school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Kaohsiung Normal University.】
- 邱婕歆、吳連賞(2020)。國民中學新課綱地理課程之批判論述分析。嘉大教育研究學刊,44,89-110。【Chiu, C.-H., & Wu, L.-S. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of geography course in the junior high school stage from the 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum. National Chiayi University Journal of the Educational Research,44, 89-110.】
- 吳清山(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research inEducation Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
- 吳璧純(2017)。素養導向教學之學習評量。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(3),30-34【Wu, P.-C. (2017). Learning assessment in literacy-oriented teaching. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 6(3),30-34.】
- 林永豐(2018)。延續或斷裂?從能力到素養的課程改革意涵。課程研究,13(2),1-20。https://doi.org/10.3966/181653382018091302001【Lin, Y.-F. (2018). Continuity or rupture? The implication of the debate of skills/capabilities and competencies for curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3966/181653382018091302001】
- 林怡資(2014)。以ARCS動機模式與資訊科技融入國中地理科教學對國中生的學習動機與學習成就之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。【Lin, Y.-T. (2014). The effect of applying ARCS motivation model and integrating information technology to geography teaching on junior high school students’ learning motivation and academic achievement [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taichung University of Education.】
- 林佩璇、李俊湖(2018)。從教師專業能力到教師專業素養。台灣教育,711,104-112。【Lin, P.-H., & Lee, J.-H. (2018). From teacher professional capacity to teacher professional competence. Taiwan Education Review, 711, 104-112.】
- 林新發、陳紘(2018)。中小學教師專業素養指標之初構。台灣教育,711,49-55。【Lin, H.-F., & Chen, H. (2018). Initial construction of professional competence indicators for primary and secondary school teachers. Taiwan Education Review, 711, 49-55.】
- 洪欣玫(2019)。以素養導向教學提升偏鄉國小四年級學生英語學習動機與口說能力之行動研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。【Hung, S.-M. (2019). An action research of competency-based teaching to English learning motivation and English speaking ability in elementary school of rural area [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National TaichungUniversity of Education.】
- 洪詠善、范信賢(2015)。同行~走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。國家教育研究院籌備處。【Hung, Y.-S., & Fan, S.-S. (2015). Going together~ Walking into Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education– General guidelines. National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 郭明田、溫媺純(2021)。國中數學素養導向教學設計與學習成效之行動研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(10),196-228。【Kuo, M.-T., & Wen, M.-L. (2021). Action research on mathematics literacy-oriented teaching design and learning effectiveness in junior middle schools. Taiwan Educational Review, 10(10), 196-228.】
- 郭麗珠(2002)。國小社會科實施批判思考教學之實驗研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。【Guo, L.-Z. (2014). Experimental research on implementing critical thinking instruction in elementary school social studies [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taipei University of Education.】
- 陳文琴(2014)。合作學習對國中學生地理學業成就與學習滿意度的影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。【Chen, W.-C. (2014). A study of the effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement and learningsatisfaction in geography among junior high school students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National ChanghuaUniversity of Education.】
- 張芃婕、曾政清(2020)。高中數學新課綱素養導向的教學設計探究及學習歷程實踐:以高一常用對數符號引入與計算機融入學習為例。科學教育月刊,428,58-64。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.202005_(428).0006【Zhang, P.-J., & Tseng, C.-C. (2020). Exploration of competency-oriented teaching design and learning process practice in the new high school mathematics curriculum: A case study of introducing common logarithm symbols and integrating calculators into learning in the first year of senior high school. Science Education Monthly, 428, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.202005_(428).0006】
- 張芬芬(2019)。素養是師生共構融會貫通的活知識—108課綱知識論。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),1-5。【Chang, F.-F. (2019). Literacy is the utilized knowledge constructed jointly by teachers and students– 108Curriculum Guidelines and theory of knowledge. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 8(10), 1-5.】
- 張政亮、鄧國雄、陳新轉、鄭麗娜(2005)。社會領域課程中之地理學概念及其能力指標分析。臺北市立師範學院學報,36(1),31-64。【Chang, C.-L., Teng, K.-H., Chen, S.-T., & Zheng, L.-N. (2005). Analysis of geographyconcepts and ability indexes in social field courses. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 36(1), 31-64.】
- 張春興(2007)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐(重修二版)。東華。【Chang, C.-H. (2007). Educational psychology (2nd ed.). Tunghua.】
- 張淑貞(2020)。與他者相遇:一個帶入「東南亞」的多元文化地理課程設計(未出版碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。https://doi.org/10.6837/ncnu202000264【Chang, S.-C. (2020). Encountering others: A multicultural geography course design with “SEA” built-in [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chi Nan University. https://doi.org/10.6837/ncnu202000264】
- 張華真(2019)。素養導向教學之行動研究—以國小六年級數學為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立虎尾科技大學。【Chang, H.-C. (2019). An action research on competency-oriented instruction: A case of sixth grade math in elementary school. [Unpublished master’s thesis] National Formosa University.】
- 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。作者。【Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education– General guidelines. Author.】
- 教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通高級中等學校—社會領域。作者。【Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary, junior high schools and general senior high schools– Social studies. Author.】
- 國家教育研究院(2020)。議題融入說明手冊。作者。【National Academy for Educational Research. (2020). Social issues integrated instruction guide. Author.】
- 符碧真(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育:國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),59-87。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003【Fwu, B.-J. (2018). Teacher preparation in response to competence-based curriculum reform for K-12 education: National Taiwan University’s proposal of inquiry-based and competence-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003】
- 游自達(2019)。素養導向教學的實踐:深化學習的開展。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),6-12。【Yiu, T.-T. (2019). The practice of competence-oriented teaching: The development of deeper learning. Review Monthly, 8(10), 6-12.】
- 黃思綺(2016)。翻轉教室應用於地理教學之評估(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。【Huang, S.-C. (2014). Assessment of the flipped classroom applied to geography teaching in junior high school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Kaohsiung Normal University.】
- 楊俊鴻(2018)。世界各國國家課程中的核心素養:以日本、韓國與新加坡為例。中等教育,69(2),21-39。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.201806_69(2).0016【Yang, C.-H. (2018). An international study of the core competencies in national curriculum: Taking Japan, South Korea and Singapore as examples. Secondary Education, 69(2), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE. 201806_69(2).0016】
- 趙志榮(2020)。國中社會領域地理科素養導向課程發展—以台灣的人口成長與分布為例(未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學。【Chao, C.-J. (2020). Competency-based curriculum development in geography for students in junior high schools: A case of the population growth and distribution in Taiwan [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Tamkang University.】
- 鄭可萱、李松濤(2018)。當科學素養與閱讀素養相遇:高中學生科學新聞閱讀策略之實驗研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),157-192。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0006【Zheng, K.-H., & Lee, S.-T. (2018). When science literacy and reading literacy meet: Experimental study of science news reading strategy for high school students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 157-192. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0006】
- 鄭美瑜、李壹明、邱健銘、魏秀蘭、黃琪、鄭毓瓊、李宜樺、陳光鴻(2018)。跨域素養導向課程設計─2030移工知多少。中等教育,69(1),95-122。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.201803_69(1).0006【Cheng, M.-Y., Lee, Y.-M., Chiu, C.-M., Wei, H.-L., Hwang, C., Cheng, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-H., & Chen, G.-H. (2018). An interdisciplinary competence-based course design: What do we know about migrant workers in 2030? Secondary Education, 69(1), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.201803_69(1).0006】
- 鄭銘仁(2014)。運用地理行動學習APP輔助國中生在台灣地理產業之學習探討(未出版碩士論文)。中華大學。【Jheng, M.-R. (2014). Using geographic mobile learning APP to assist Taiwan industry learning for junior high school students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Chung Hua University.】
- 蔡清田(2012)。課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA:核心素養。五南。【Tsai, C.-T. (2012). Key DNA of curriculum development and design: Core competencies. Wu-Nan Book.】
- 劉美慧(2001)。多元文化課程設計。載於譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠,多元文化教育(頁199-231)。國立空中大學。【Liu, M.-H. (2001). Multicultural curriculum design. In K.-T. Tang, M.-H. Liu, & M.-H. You, Multiculturaleducation (pp. 199-231). National Open University.】
- 劉美慧(2011)。我國多元文化教育之發展與困境。載於國家教育研究院(主編),我國百年教育回顧與展望(頁221-236)。國家教育研究院。【Liu, M.-H. (2011). The development and challenges of multicultural education in Taiwan. In National Academy for Educational Research (Ed.), Education in Taiwan: Retrospect and prospect (pp. 221-236). National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。「國中小學習動機量表」之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊,57(3),371-402。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201009.0371【Liu,C.-H., Huang, P.-S., Su, C.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Wu, Y.-C. (2010). The development of learning motivation scale for primary and junior high school students. Psychological Testing, 57(3), 371-402. https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201009.0371】
- 劉昱君(2017)。脈絡整合對地理教學程效之研究—以國中南亞自然環境為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立交通大學。【Liu, Y.-C. (2017). Effects of geography teaching by context integration– A case study of natural environment in South Asia [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chiao Tung University.】
- 賴美杏(2004)。資訊融入地理教學與傳統地理教學之比較。中山女高學報,4,95-100。【Lai, M.-H. (2004). The comparison between technology-integrated instruction into geography teaching and traditional geography teaching. Journal of Zhongshan Girls High School, 4, 95-100.】
- 賴智誠(2013)。資訊圖表應用於國中地理教學學習成效之研究—以苗栗縣立苑裡高級中學國中部為例(未出版碩士論文)。育達科技大學。【Lai, C.-C. (2012). The influence of information graph intergrated into geogrophy instruction on junior high school students’ learning achievements– The instance of Miaoli County Yuanli High School [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Yu Da University of Science and Technology.】
- 謝旻蒼(2018)。淺談多元文化教育與中小學國際教育推動之關連。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(9),147-152。Hsieh, M.-T. (2018). Discussion on the relationship between multicultural education and the promotion of international education in primary and secondary schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 7(9), 147-152.】
- 簡文萱(2020)。素養導向地理教學提升偏鄉低學業成就國中生學習成效之行動研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。【Jian, W.-X. (2020). An action research to enhance underachiever’ learning efficiency in rural junior high school by geography curriculum design of the literacy-based [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Kaohsiung Normal University.】
- 簡瑋成(2022)。國中小校長學習領導、教師學習領導及學生核心素養關係之研究:素養導向教育觀點。教育科學研究期刊, 67 ( 3 ), 37-75 。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202209_67(3).0002【Chien, W.-C. (2022). A study on the correlations among elementary and junior high school principal leadership for learning, teacher leadership for learning, and student core competency: Perspective of competency-based education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 67(3), 37-75. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202209_67(3).0002】
- 藍偉瑩(2019)。教學力:深化素養學習的關鍵。親子天下。【Lan, W.-Y. (2019). Teaching ability: The Key to deepening literacy learning. Education‧Parenting Family Lifestyle.】
- Brendel, N., Aksit, F., Aksit, S., & Schrüfer, G. (2016). Multicultural group work on field excursions to promote student teachers’ intercultural competence. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1140731
- Chyung, S. Y., Stepich, D., & Cox, D. (2006). Building a competency-based curriculum architecture to educate 21st-century business practitioners. Journal of Education for Business, 81(6), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.6.307-314
- de Kraker, J., Lansu, A., & van Dam-Mieras, R. (2007). Competences and competence-based learning for sustainable development. In Crossing boundaries. Innovative learning for sustainable development in higher education (pp. 103-114). UNU Press.
- Fraefel, U., Bäuerlein, K., & Barabasch, A. (2017). Assessing teacher candidates’ professional competence for evaluating teacher education programs: The case of German-Speaking Europe.In V.-C. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of research on program development and assessment methodologies in K-20 education (pp. 418-442). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1- 5225-3132-6.ch020
- Gökçe, N. (2015). An implementation of tolerance training in a geography lesson: Students’ opinions. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(20), 2713-2723.
- Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of selfdetermination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 233-240.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012758
- Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
- Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
- Organisation for Economic Co-Operation Development. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
- Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2012). The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 550-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9239-y
- Serdenciuc, N. L. (2013). Competency-based education– Implications on teachers’ training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 754-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.200