The Effects of Digital Storytelling with the Reflective Platform on Graduate Students' Reflection Performance, Digital Storytelling Self-efficacy, and Narrative Performance
Author: Hsiu-Ling Chen (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Tzu-Yu Pan (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 69, No. 1
Date:March 2024
Pages:1-33
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202403_69(1).0001
Abstract:
Introduction
Scholars have indicated that the most effective learning occurs when students engage in self-monitoring or reflection. This process enables learners to gain a deeper understanding of their acquired knowledge, which enhances their overall learning performance. Consequently, promoting students’ ability to reflect has become a focal point in the field of education. In recent years, digital storytelling has garnered considerable attention from researchers as an innovative and effective teaching tool. Traditional, teacher-centered, lecture-based learning often involves memorizing and reciting, making it challenging for students to develop high-level thinking. By contrast, digital storytelling involves a learner-centered approach, enabling students to integrate learned concepts with their personal experiences through storytelling. This method empowers students to organize and reinterpret the knowledge that they have acquired. The integration of information technology enables students to more comprehensively share their acquired knowledge with each other and enhances the development of deep learning and high-level cognitive abilities. Although digital storytelling offers numerous benefits to teachers, the varying quality of digital stories created by students remains a notable challenge. Consequently, this study employed the reflective learning model proposed by McDrury and Alterio (2003) as an instructional scaffold to design a digital storytelling reflection platform. The platform effectively guides students through the process of creating and reflecting on digital stories, ultimately improving the overall quality of their narratives.
Literature Review
Digital storytelling closely resembles traditional storytelling; both emphasize developing thematic narratives from a specific perspective. The key difference between the two is that digital storytelling incorporates multimedia elements, such as pictures, text, voiceovers, videos, animation, and music. In addition, computer editing is used to enhance the presentation of information. Digital storytelling involves seven key elements: point of view, dramatic question, emotional content, the gift of voice, the power of the soundtrack, economy, and pacing. Studies have demonstrated that digital storytelling not only boosts students’ motivation and interest but also encourages them to express their ideas and engage in collaborative thinking. Additionally, creating digital stories helps students understand complex and abstract concepts and organize their knowledge in a personalized and meaningful manner. Moreover, collaborative small-group work stimulates student interest, and through the process of publishing and sharing, collaborative storytelling promotes peer interaction, communication and expression, problem-solving, and reflection. McDrury and Alterio’s (2003) reflective learning model comprises the following stages: story finding, storytelling, story expanding, digital story editing, and story reconstructing. The model focuses on storytelling as a framework for promoting reflective learning, with students being encouraged to express their ideas through narratives. Engaging in peer collaboration during this process enables students to share and discuss their viewpoints and experiences, which leads to further reflection on the stories and reconstruction of meaning.
Method
A total of 28 graduate students (6 men and 22 women) participated in this study. The students were randomly divided into eight groups. A one-group pretest-posttest design was adopted within the quasi-experimental research in which digital storytelling was integrated with a reflection platform for experimental teaching. To investigate whether this curriculum design enhanced participants’ reflection skills, digital storytelling self-efficacy, and collaborative digital storytelling performance, the study analyzed differences in the participants’ scores on the Questionnaire for Reflective Thinking and Digital Storytelling Self-Efficacy Scale before and after the experimental teaching. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the course was evaluated by grading each group’s presentation by using the Digital Storytelling Assessment. In addition to quantitative data, qualitative information, such as peer feedback and interviews with the participants through the digital storytelling reflection platform, was obtained, with these data serving as a supplementary reference for assessing the effects of the experiments.
Result
The preclass and postclass questionnaire results regarding reflection skills and digital storytelling self-efficacy revealed that the integration of digital storytelling with the reflection platform enhanced the graduate students’ reflection skills (deepened their thinking) and digital storytelling self-efficacy. Additionally, the participants’ collaborative digital storytelling efforts yielded favorable performance outcomes. Qualitative interviews revealed that most students attributed their enhanced reflection skills to peer feedback and collaboration. Positive feedback from peers serves as encouragement and affirmation for students, boosting students’ confidence in creating digital stories. In the current study, when provided with suggestions from peers, most of the students chose to apply those presented as constructive feedback or those that were frequently mentioned. Additionally, the students expressed that because they did not receive face-to-face feedback, they did not feel stressed about receiving the feedback, which in turn made them more willing to share their thoughts with others. During the process of collaborative digital story creation, the participants benefitted from being presented with various ideas from their peers, brainstorming with each other, exploring multiple perspectives, and reflecting on their own stories. However, some participants mentioned that they experienced little improvement in their reflective thinking because of their individual habits and traits.
Discussion and Suggestions
Although the results of this study indicate that the curriculum design improved the participants’ reflection skills, digital storytelling self-efficacy, and collaborative digital storytelling performance, this study has the limitation of having simultaneously implemented different interventions. The simultaneous use of a reflection platform, story scaffolding, peer feedback, and teamwork increases the difficulty of determining which specific teaching intervention had the most notable impact on the graduate students’ reflection skills, digital storytelling self-efficacy, and collaborative digital storytelling performance. Future research may consider independently investigating individual teaching interventions, such as digital storytelling teaching combined with a reflection platform, digital storytelling with or without peer feedback, or digital storytelling with or without teamwork. By differentiating experimental and control groups more precisely, future studies can investigate the specific impact of digital storytelling, peer feedback, and group collaboration on reflection skills.
Keywords:reflection performance, digital storytelling self-efficacy, digital storytelling performance
《Full Text》
References:
» More
- 王瓊珠(2010)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀(第二版)。心理。【Wang, Q.-Z. (2010). Story structure teaching and shared reading (2nd ed.). Psychological.】
- 林素菁(2013)。「數位說故事專案」融入華文課堂之研究—以國立暨南國際大學高級僑生華文班為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2013.00232【Lin, S.-C. (2013). A study of implementing digital storytelling project into the advanced Chinese course for Chinese heritage students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chi Nan University. https://doi.org/10.6837/ NCNU.2013.00232】
- 林國憲(2008,8月18日)。數位說故事於學校教學之應用研究(研討會論文)。2008年臺灣網際網路研討會,高雄市。【Lin, G.-X. (2008, August 18). An applied study of digital storytelling in school instruction [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of Taiwan Academic Network Conference 2008, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
- 陳淑敏、林智凱(2022)。大學生敘事力的學習表現與反思之研究:以移工議題的實作為途徑。通識教育學刊,29,11-39。https://doi.org/10.6360/TJGE.202209/SP_(29).0001【Chen, A. S.-M., & Lin, C.-K. (2022). Using the issue of immigrant workers as a study on learning outcomes and reflections of undergraduates’ narrative competences. Taiwan Journal of General Education, 29, 11-39. https:// doi.org/10.6360/TJGE.202209/SP_(29).0001】
- 黃珉薇(2015)。探討大學生利用數位說故事的反思學習(未出版碩士論文)。國立中正大學。【Huang, M.-W. (2015). Digital storytelling for reflective learning at college level [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chung Cheng University.】
- 劉文翰(2012)。數位敘事教學對國小六年級學童學習動機及英語口語能力之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立中正大學。【Liu, W.-H. (2012). The effects of digital storytelling instruction on 6th graders’ learning motivation and English oral proficiency [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chung Cheng University.】
- 潘慧玲、洪秋瑋(2020)。標準本位政策脈絡下師資培育改革成效之評估:應用「行動模式/改變模式圖式」分析師資培育學程。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),73-104。https://doi.org/ 10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0003【Pan, H.-L., & Hung, C.-W. (2020). Effects of teacher education reform in the standard-based policy context: Analysis of a teacher education program by applying the action model/change model schema. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 73-104. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0003】
- 鍾世潤、黃博聖(2022)。以面對面、Moodle、Office 365進行課後活動對英文學習動機、學習成效及同儕互動之影響。教育科學研究期刊,67(4),1-34。https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202212_67(4).0001【Chung, S.-J., & Huang, P.-S. (2022). Impact of face-to-face interactions and digital learning platforms on learning motivation, learning achievements and peer interaction in after-school activities. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 67(4), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0001】
- 韓德彥(2017)。反思傾向量表的信、效度初探。載於林文琪(主編),反思寫作論集(一)(頁173-193)。臺北醫學大學。【Han, D.-Y. (2017). An initial exploration of the reliability and validity of the reflective tendency inventory. In W.-Q. Lin (Ed.), Collection of reflective writing (Vol. 1, pp. 173-193). Taipei Medical University.】
- Anggeraini, Y. (2020). An investigation of the students opinion on the use of digital storytelling in learning English. ELT-Lectura, 7(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v7i1.3645
- Balaman, S. (2020). A study on the impacts of digital storytelling on EFL learners’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward education technologies. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 289-311.
- Balta, E. E. (2018). Reflective thinking tendencies and epistemological beliefs in terms of learning styles. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 106-117.
- Bandura, A., & National Institute of Mental Health. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
- Boase, C. (2013). Digital storytelling for reflection and engagement: A study of the uses and potential of digital storytelling. https://gjamissen.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/boase_ assessment.pdf
- Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge.
- Burton, G. (2010). Media and society: Critical perspectives. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Castañeda, M. E., & Rojas-Miesse, N. (2016). Digital storytelling in the language classroom: The impact on technology self-efficacy, writing self-assessment, and perceptions of teacher feedback. Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (CSCTFL) Report, 1(1), 131-146.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200410
- Davies, A., Pantzopoulos, K., & Gray, K. (2011). Emphasising assessment “as” learning by assessing wiki writing assignments collaboratively and publicly online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 798-812. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.932
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath and Company.
- Dreyer, L. M. (2017). Digital storytelling to engage postgraduates in reflective practice in an emerging economy. South African Journal of Education, 37(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15700/ saje.v37n4a1475
- Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800950320212
- Fusai, C., Saudelli, B., Marti, P., Decortis, F., & Rizzo, A. (2003). Media composition and narrative performance at school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00018.x
- Gravestock, P., & Jenkins, M. (2009). Digital storytelling and its pedagogical impact. In T. Mayes, D. Morrison, H. Mellar, P. Bullen, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Transforming higher education through technology enhanced learning (pp. 249-264). The Higher Education Academy.
- Gravill, J.-I., Compeau, D.-R., & Marcolin, B.-L. (2002, January). Metacognition and IT: The influence of self-efficacy and self-awareness [Paper presentation]. The meeting of Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas.
- Hamilton, A., Rubin, D., Tarrant, M., & Gleason, M. (2019). Digital storytelling as a tool for fostering reflection. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 31(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v31i1.443
- Heo, M. (2009). Digital storytelling: An empirical study of the impact of digital storytelling on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and dispositions towards educational technology. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(4), 405-428.
- Ibanez, J., Aylett, R., & Ruiz-Rodarte, R. (2003). Storytelling in virtual environments from a virtual guide perspective. Virtual Reality, 7, 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-003-0112-y
- Idol, L., & Croll, V. J. (1987). Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(3), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510494
- Ivala, E., Gachago, D., Condy, J., & Chigona, A. (2013). Enhancing student engagement with their studies: A digital storytelling approach. Creative Education, 4, 82-89. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.410A012
- Jenkins, M., & Lonsdale, J. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of digital storytelling for student reflection. In R. J. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. K. A. Soong, & C. Cheers (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007 (pp. 440-444). Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University.
- Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., & Loke, A. Y. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
- Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 139-163). Kogan Page.
- Kim, D., & Li, M. (2021). Digital storytelling: Facilitating learning and identity development. Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 33-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231157461
- Kim, D., Coenraad, M., & Park, H. R. (2021). Digital storytelling as a tool for reflection in virtual reality projects. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.9
- Li, L. (2006). Digital storytelling: Self-efficacy and digital literacy. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of E-learn 2006— World conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 2159-2164). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299633
- Liu, C. C., Lu, K. H., Wu, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The impact of peer review on creative self-efficacy and learning performance in Web 2.0 learning activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 286-297.
- Liu, C.-C., Wu, L. Y., Chen, Z.-M., Tsai, C.-C., & Lin, H.-M. (2014). The effect of story grammars on creative self‐efficacy and digital storytelling. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 450-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12059
- Long, B. T. (2014). Designing digital storytelling: Creative technology for reflection in initial teacher education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National University of Ireland.
- Long, B. T., & Hall, T. (2015). R-NEST: Design-based research for technology-enhanced reflective practice in initial teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(5), 572-596. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2535
- Long, B. T., & Hall, T. (2018). Educational narrative inquiry through design-based research: Designing digital storytelling to make alternative knowledge visible and actionable. Irish Educational Studies, 37(2), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1465836
- López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2021). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1293-1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2
- Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2008). Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. Peter Lang.
- Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
- McCombs, B. L. (2000). Assessing the role of educational technology in the teaching and learning process: A learner-centered perspective. http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/techconf00/ mccombs_paper.html
- McDrury, J., & Alterio, M. (2003). Learning through storytelling in higher education: Using reflection and experience to improve learning. Kogan Page.
- Mello, R. (2001). The power of storytelling: How oral narrative influences children’s relationships in classrooms. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 2(1), 1-15.
- Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
- Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203822296
- Nair, V., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). A systematic review of digital storytelling in improving speaking skills. Sustainability, 13(17), 9829. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179829
- Niemi, H., & Niu, S. J. (2021). Digital storytelling enhancing Chinese primary school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics learning. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921991432
- Ohler, J. B. (2006). The world of digital storytelling. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 44-47
- Ohler, J. B. (2013). Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452277479
- Önen, A. S., & Koçak, C. (2014). Analysis on reflective thinking tendencies of student teachers according to their individual innovativeness and sociotropic-autonomic personality characteristics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143(14), 788-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.477
- Pajares, F. (1995, April). Self-efficacy in academic settings [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
- Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2017). Effects of offline vs. online digital storytelling on the development of EFL learners’ literacy skills. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1285531.
- Robin, B. (2006). The educational uses of digital storytelling. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006— Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 709-716). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Robin, B. (2007). The convergence of digital storytelling and popular culture in graduate education. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007— Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 643-650). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
- Rong, L. P., & Noor, N. M. (2019). Digital storytelling as a creative teaching method in promoting secondary school students’ writing skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(7), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i07.10798
- Roth W. G. (1985). Treatment implications derived from self-efficacy research with children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Biola University.
- Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
- Saito, H., & Miwa, K. (2007). Construction of a learning environment supporting learners’ reflection: A case of information seeking on the Web. Computers & Education, 49(2), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.001
- Sandars, J., Murray, C., & Pellow, A. (2008). Twelve tips for using digital storytelling to promote reflective learning by medical students. Medical Teacher, 30(8), 774-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801987370
- Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self‐efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529281
- Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2012). Digital storytelling with Web 2.0 tools for collaborative learning. In A. Okada, T. Connolly, & P. Scott (Eds.), Collaborative learning 2.0: Open educational resources (pp. 145-163). IGI Global.
- Sonday, A. (2021). Digital storytelling as a reflective tool in occupational therapy curriculum. Occupational Therapy International, 2021, Article 2463916. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2463916
- Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. New Directions in Discourse Processing, 2(1979), 53-120.
- Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.002
- Tanrıkulu, F. (2022). Students’ perceptions about the effects of collaborative digital storytelling on writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), 1090-1105.
- Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 77-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6
- Tomkins, A. (2009). “It was a great day when...”: An exploratory case study of reflective learning through storytelling. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education (Pre-2012), 8(2), 123.
- Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
- Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0
- van Gils, F. (2005, June). Potential applications of digital storytelling in education [Paper presentation]. 3rd Twente Student Conference on IT, Enschede, Netherlands.
- Ward, J. R., & McCotter, S. S. (2004). Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.004
- Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467-502. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2
- Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.81
- Xu, Y., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2011). A new approach toward digital storytelling: An activity focused on writing self-efficacy in a virtual learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 181-191.
- Yamac, A., & Ulusoy, M. (2016). The effect of digital storytelling in improving the third graders’ writing skills. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 59-86.
- Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012
- Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1993). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools. Heinemann