Factors Influencing Elementary Teachers’ Satisfaction With Online Teaching in the Post- epidemic Era in Central Taiwan
Author: Jung-Wen Hsia (Department of Counseling Psychology and Human Resource Development, National Chi Nan University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 69, No. 1
Date:March 2024
Pages:69-97
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202403_69(1).0003
Abstract:
Research Motivation and Objectives
The global outbreak of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) in late 2019 led to a widespread pandemic. When the pandemic became most intense in Taiwan, schools at all levels were required to shift to online teaching, with such instruction continuing until May 2021. After this period Taiwanese schools adjusted their teaching methods, with many schools alternating between in-person and online instruction on the basis of the evolving pandemic conditions. The sudden transformation in teaching methods considerably affected teachers at all levels of education. Nevertheless, research investigating teachers’ satisfaction with online instruction has primarily focused on university or high school teachers. However, elementary education serves as a crucial foundation for all levels of education. Compared with university teachers, elementary school teachers are less familiar with online teaching and face challenges in effectively conducting online classes. Furthermore, online teaching in elementary schools may become a common instructional method in the future. Therefore, investigating methods to enhance the satisfaction of elementary school teachers with online teaching is imperative. This study identified the factors influencing elementary school teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching.
Literature Review
On the basis of a review of the literature, this study divided the factors influencing elementary school teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching into three categories: student-related, teacher-related, and technology-related factors. Regarding student-related factors, this study used student engagement as a predictive variable for analyzing teacher satisfaction with online teaching. Regarding teacher-related factors, teaching efficacy, teaching enjoyment, and training adequacy were included as predictive variables. Regarding technology factors, perceived ease of use was employed as a predictive variable. These factors were used to establish a theoretical model for elucidating the factors influencing elementary school teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching.
Methods
This study employed stratified sampling and convenience sampling. Questionnaires were distributed to elementary school teachers in central Taiwan (Taichung City, Nantou County, and Changhua County) who had experience in online teaching. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. Furthermore, the partial least squares (PLS) method, which has been demonstrated to be suitable for exploratory research and theory development, was employed in this study. Because studies that have constructed a theoretical model for elementary school teachers’ online teaching satisfaction are limited, this study considered PLS to be appropriate for developing such a model. Consequently, the hypotheses of this study were tested using PLS, which was employed to assess both the measurement model and the structural model.
Results
Of the 250 valid samples that were collected, 93 (37.2%) were from male teachers and 157 (62.8%) were from female teachers. Regarding age, the majority of the teachers (129 individuals) were aged 31-40 years, accounting for 51.6% of the sample, followed by those (65 individuals) aged 41-50 years, accounting for 26.0% of the sample. In terms of teaching location, 139 teachers (55.6%) were from Taichung City, 69 (27.6%) were from Changhua County, and 42 (16.8%) were from Nantou County. In terms of teaching experience, the majority of the teachers (98 individuals) had 6-10 years of experience, accounting for 39.2% of the sample, followed by those (65 individuals) with 11-15 years of experience, accounting for 26.0% of the sample. Moreover, the majority of the teachers (103 individuals, 41.2% of the sample) had experience in online teaching of 6 months to 1 year. Furthermore, most teachers (171 individuals, 68.4% of the sample) held a university degree. An analysis of the measurement model indicated that all six variables used in this study had sufficient reliability and construct validity. The results of the structural model analysis revealed that student engagement, teaching efficacy, teaching enjoyment, and training adequacy significantly and positively influenced the elementary school teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching. However, perceived ease of use did not significantly influence the teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching.
Discussion and Implications
Online teaching and traditional teaching differ in their contexts. Therefore, future research seeking to further explore the impact of specific predictive variables, such as student engagement and teaching efficacy, on satisfaction with online teaching should complete observations of and interviews with elementary school teachers with respect to their experiences in online teaching. This approach can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching and the causal relationships among them. In addition, although the elementary school teachers were unfamiliar with online teaching platforms prior to the pandemic, they were likely regularly exposed to various technological platforms, such as learning management systems and social media, before engaging in online teaching. This may explain why the teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching was not affected by the ease of platform use. Nevertheless, platforms that emphasize interactions and discussions may contribute to enhanced teaching efficacy and student engagement. Additionally, incorporating features such as mini-games into a teaching platform may increase teaching enjoyment and student engagement. Such adjustments may influence the satisfaction of elementary school teachers with online teaching.
On the basis of the study findings, this study provides several practical recommendations. First, the study recommends enhancing student engagement in online teaching and learning by incorporating engaging digital teaching resources, implementing effective teaching strategies, and enhancing the interactive features on teaching platforms to increase student engagement. Second, the study recommends enhancing teachers’ online teaching efficacy. This can be achieved by providing technical support specifically tailored to the needs of elementary school teachers engaged in online teaching. Moreover, encouraging these teachers to participate in professional learning communities can help address problems related to online teaching. Third, this study recommends increasing teachers’ online teaching enjoyment by, for example, introducing more engaging games or competitions on online platforms and establishing professional learning communities in which teachers can share teaching software and resources. Finally, this study recommends enhancing the adequacy of training for online teaching. Schools are encouraged to offer both synchronous and asynchronous online teaching training courses that cover various aspects such as online teaching techniques, online classroom management, and psychological adjustment. By employing comprehensive and effective training content, schools can improve the effectiveness and adequacy of training for online teaching.
Keywords:training adequacy, teaching efficacy, teaching enjoyment, satisfaction with online teaching, student engagement
《Full Text》
References:
» More
- 林小慧、郭哲宇、吳心楷(2021)。學生學習投入、好奇心、教師集體層級變項與科學探究能力的關係:跨層級調節式中介效果之探討。教育科學研究期刊,66(2),75-110。https:// doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0003【Lin, H.-H., Kuo, C.-Y., & Wu, H.-K. (2021). Relationship among engagement and curiosity of individual level variables of students, group level variables of teachers, and scientific inquiry abilities: Conference of cross-level moderated mediation. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(2), 75-110. https://doi.org/ 10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0003】
- 教育部統計處(2021)。各縣市國小概況統計。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/ News_Content.aspx?n=82CAED1A33B4CD83&sms=DBDDB8DC17D0D8C4&s=569D0FF10480BD4E【Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2021). Statistics of elementary schools by counties and cities. https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=82CAED1A33B4CD83&sms=DBDDB8DC17D0D8C4&s=569D0FF10480BD4E】
- 郭柏辰、王怡文、張素貞(2022)。教師實施線上課程,支持策略與增能之研究。中等教育,73(1),29-50。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.202203_73(1).0003【Kuo, P.-C., Wang, Y.-W., & Chang, S.-C. (2022). Research on teachers’ implementation of online courses, support strategies and empowerment. Secondary Education, 73(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.202203_ 73(1).0003】
- 羅寶鳳、陳麒(2020)。初任教師工作困擾、教學效能與專業表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),37-71。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2). 0002【Lo, P.-F., & Chen, Q. (2020). Beginning teachers’ job problems, teaching effectiveness, and professional performance. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 37-71. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES. 202006_65(2).0002】
- Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
- Bai, B., Wang, J., & Chai, C. S. (2021). Understanding Hong Kong primary school English teachers’ continuance intention to teach with ICT. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 528-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1627459
- Baroudi, S., Hojeij, Z., Meda, L., & Lottin, J. (2022). Examining elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and satisfaction in online teaching during virtual field experience. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2133497. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2133497
- Basbeth, F., Ahmad Saufi, R., & Sudharmin, K. B. (2021). E-teaching satisfaction in a black swan moment: The effect of student engagement and institutional support. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2021-0039
- Bolliger, D. U., Inan, F. A., & Wasilik, O. (2014). Development and validation of the online instructor satisfaction measure (OISM). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 183-195.
- Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01587910902845949
- Bulut, C., & Culha, O. (2010). The effects of organizational training on organizational commitment. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-2419.2010.00360.x
- Burić, I., & Moè, A. (2020). What makes teachers enthusiastic: The interplay of positive affect, self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103008. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tate.2019.103008
- Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008). An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2336-2356. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2008.01.001
- Chin, W. W. (2009). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito, W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655-690). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
- Falah Alfalahat, F. M. (2021). Factors affecting school teachers’ satisfaction with online classes during the outbreak of COVID-19. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 25(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2021/v25i230593
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/002224378101800104
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
- Han, J., Gao, C., & Yang, J. (2021). Chinese university EFL teachers’ perceived support, innovation, and teaching satisfaction in online teaching environments: The mediation of teaching efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 761106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761106
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
- Hong, X., Liu, Q., & Zhang, M. (2021). Dual stressors and female pre-school teachers’ job satisfaction during the COVID-19: The mediation of work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 691498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691498
- Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers’ perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2653-2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639 -019-09925-z
- Jiang, Z., Mok, I. A. C., & Yin, H. (2021). The relationships between teacher emotions and classroom instruction: Evidence from senior secondary mathematics teachers in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 108, 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer. 2021.101792
- Kengatharan, N. (2020). The effects of teacher autonomy, student behavior and student engagement on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(4), 1-15. https:// doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.4.001
- Kumar, A., Dhawan, S., Singh, S., & Kumar, A. (2021). Teachers’ satisfaction with online teaching: A study of private senior-secondary schools in Delhi. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 13(4), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2021
- Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.021
- Lei, S. I., & So, A. S. I. (2021). Online teaching and learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic– A comparison of teacher and student perceptions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(3), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1907196
- Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1052562904271199
- Oshagbemi, T. (2000). How satisfied are academics with their primary tasks of teaching, research and administration and management? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(2), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/1467630010371876
- Renshaw, T. L., Long, A. C. J., & Cook, C. R. (2015). Assessing teachers’ positive psychological functioning at work: Development and validation of the teacher subjective wellbeing questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/ spq0000112
- Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
- Song, H., Wu, J., & Zhi, T. (2020). Online teaching for elementary and secondary schools during COVID-19. ECNU Review of Education, 3(4), 745-754. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2096531120930021
- Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001
- Stickney, L. T., Bento, R. F., Aggarwal, A., & Adlakha, V. (2019). Online higher education: Faculty satisfaction and its antecedents. Journal of Management Education, 43(5), 509-542. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1052562919845022
- Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2020). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1181-1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9
- Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2018). Inauthentic expressions of enthusiasm: Exploring the cost of emotional dissonance in teachers. Learning and Instruction, 53, 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.learninstruc.2017.07.008
- Walter, D., & Schenker, T. (2022). Surviving or thriving? Experiences and job satisfaction of language instructors in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Language Teaching, 2(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2022.014
- Yang, C. (2021). Online teaching self-efficacy, social-emotional learning (SEL) competencies, and compassion fatigue among educators during the COVID-19 pandemic. School Psychology Review, 50(4), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1903815
- Zhu, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Yan, S., & Zhao, L. (2022). The selectivity and suitability of online learning resources as predictor of the effects of self-efficacy on teacher satisfaction during the COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 765832. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.765832
APA Format | Chang, M.-W., Chiang, C.-H., Chen, W.-F, Yuan, Y.-H., & Dai, J.-Y. (2024). Effects of COVID-19 on Taiwanese Mandarin Teachers’ Textbook Selection Processes. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 69(1), 69-97.
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202403_69(1).0003 |
---|