Effect of COVID-19 on Taiwanese Mandarin Teachers' Textbook Selection Processes
Author: Ming-Wen Chang (Education Department,New Taipei City Governmenty), Chung-Hao Chiang (Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Wan-Fei Chen (Department of Language and Creative Writing,National Taipei University of Education), Yu-Hsi Yuan (Department of Graphic Communication Arts Education,National Taiwan University of Arts), Chien Yun Dai (Department of Industrial Education,National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 69, No. 1
Date:March 2024
Pages:35-68
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202403_69(1).0002
Abstract:
Purpose
Allowing teachers to select their own textbooks promotes the diversification, specialization, and democratization of education, encourages publishers to develop higher-quality materials, and enables teachers to select the materials that best meet their instructional needs. A policy of allowing instructors to choose their textbooks strengthens teachers’ professional growth and enhances the quality of education they provide. Numerous studies have identified the features that influence textbook selection, including policies and writing processes, evaluation criteria, visual design, content compilation, psychological factors, and disciplinary conceptual frameworks. However, the practices traditionally used to select standardized textbooks for national education have been subject to challenges and criticism owing to politically motivated changes in the content and selection of textbooks approved by Taiwan's Ministry of Education, the emphasis on a competency-oriented core in the compulsory 12-Year Basic Education, and the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Physical book selection and public briefings have been replaced by the online interactive texts and noncontact instructional modes required by the pandemic. Research on the factors influencing teachers when selecting their textbooks is lacking. The present study sought to address this critical research gap by examining the textbook selection criteria of elementary school Mandarin Chinese teachers.
Methodology
This study adopted a quantitative survey method. First, a literature review examined textbook selection practices to clarify how textbooks have historically been selected in terms of policies, institutional practices, and criteria. Second, studies were reviewed, and items were selected to develop a survey instrument. Third, six experts and scholars in textbooks, education, questionnaire design, and educational administration were invited to review and revise the questionnaire’s content and wording, thus ensuring expert inter-rater validity. This evaluation process resulted in a preliminary questionnaire titled “Questionnaire on Factors Influencing the Selection of Mandarin Chinese Textbooks in Elementary Schools,” which consisted of items in nine dimensions: environmental factors, textbook selection factors, teaching factors, content factors, physical factors, distribution factors, skill factors, social media factors, and usage factors. Fourth, the preliminary questionnaire was distributed to 129 participants for pilot testing, and item analysis and construct validity were examined. This process resulted in a formal questionnaire comprising 48 items. Fifth, convenience sampling was used to invite Taiwanese elementary school Mandarin teachers to participate; 1,264 valid responses were obtained. Sixth, descriptive statistics were used to understand the sample characteristics and the influence of the research factors. Seventh, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling. Finally, hierarchical regression analysis was employed to test the research hypotheses.
Findings
The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were examined using the data collected from the formal survey. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test each item’s standardized factor loading estimates, which were all greater than 0.500, indicating acceptable reliability. An assessment of convergent validity indicated the favorable convergent validity of the scale, and the results also confirmed the discriminant validity of the instrument through significant factor loadings. Subsequent regression analysis revealed that environmental factors significantly influenced five groups of factors in the textbook selection criteria: teaching, content, physical, distribution, and skill factors. These results indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic substantially affected teachers’ textbook selection criteria. Selection factors were positively associated with content factors and distribution factors. This result suggested that both content and availability strongly influenced selection factors. Regarding selection criteria, three types of factors— content, physical, and distribution factors were positively associated with selection factors. This result indicated that content, availability in nonphysical editions, and distribution influenced the teachers’ textbook selection decisions. Additionally, social media factors were found to have a significant moderating effect between distribution factors and selection factors. This finding suggested that when distribution factors were favorably reviewed in social media factors, teachers were more confident in their selection decisions.
The results of this study’s analysis revealed that the content factors of the 108 Curriculum heavily influenced teachers’ textbook selection decisions, whereas skill factors did not. One reason skill factors may not have influenced textbook selection is that teachers trust that the 108 Curriculum textbooks align with the standards mandated by Taiwan’s Ministry of Education and that these textbooks are composed by experts in their fields. However, environmental factors during the pandemic strongly affected selection factors. Teachers considered online information a vital tool in making selection decisions when the pandemic prevented them from traveling to bookshops. Moreover, environmental factors were positively associated with all five dimensions of the selection criteria. Physical factors and distribution factors were positively associated with selection factors, suggesting that teachers prioritized readability in layout, font size, correspondence between text and illustrations, color arrangement, glare-free paper quality, and binding quality. Additionally, teachers who relied on social media platforms felt more confident in the quality of the textbooks they selected, whether they were available online, as physical copies only, or both. Social media platforms, including Line and Facebook, significantly influenced textbook selection decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic beyond merely increasing teachers’ confidence in their choices.
Originality/Value
This study provides empirical research on the factors influencing textbook selection during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research sample consisted of elementary school teachers throughout Taiwan, ensuring the study’s objectivity and specificity. This study proposes textbook selection factors and decision-making patterns distinct from those found in marketing and procurement decision-making models in business contexts. The differences have arisen from the unique needs of Taiwan’s elementary school Mandarin Chinese teachers, which differ substantially from those of teachers in previous studies on textbook selection.
Keywords:twelve-year basic education, textbook, COVID-19, textbook selective decision-making
《Full Text》
References:
» More
- 王文科、王智弘(2020)。教育研究法。五南。【Wang, W.-K., & Wang, Z.-H. (2020). Educational research method. Wu-Nan Book.】
- 王雅玄(2016)。「批判教科書研究」方法論探究。課程與教學,19(3),27-54。https://doi.org/ 10.6384/CIQ.201607_19(3).0002【Wang, Y.-X. (2016). “Critical textbook research” a methodological exploration. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly, 19(3), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201607_19(3).0002】
- 吳俊憲、吳錦惠(2015)。理想的教科書設計:以學習為中心。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(8),157-160。【Wu, J.-H., & Wu, K.-H. (2015). The ideal textbook design: A learning-centered ap-proach. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 4(8), 157-160.】
- 吳清山(2020)。新冠疫情時代的未來教育發展。教師天地,214,1-9。【Wu, C.-S. (2020). Future educational development in the era of the new crown epidemic. Teachers’ World, 214, 1-9.】
- 李崗、楊琇惠(2014)。國小國語文領域課程統整類型之分析。課程與教學,17(4),113-144。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201410_17(4).0005【Li, G., & Yang, S.-H. (2014). An analytic study of curriculum integration in the area of Chinese language in elementary schools. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly, 17(4), 113-144. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ. 201410_17(4).0005】
- 李涵鈺、楊國揚(2017)。數位教科書教學設計之現況與問題探討。清華教育學報,34(1),71-104。https://doi.org/10.3966/252190062017063401003【Lee, H.-J., & Yang, K.-Y. (2017). Current situation of and problems in digital textbook instructional design. Tsing Hua Journal of Education, 34(1), 71-104. https://doi.org/10.3966/252190062017063401003】
- 李懿芳、楊宜蓁、邱欣榆(2020)COVID-19疫情對全球教育的衝擊與機會。臺灣教育研究期刊,1(4),231-240。【Li, Y. -F., Yang, Y.-C., & Chiu, H.-Y. (2020). Educational challenges and opportunities of the COVID-19 pandemic in the world. Taiwan Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 231-240.】
- 周珮儀(2005)。我國教科書研究的分析:1979-2004。課程與教學,8(4),91-116。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200510.0091【Chou, P.-Y. (2005). A critical study of textbook research in Taiwan: 1979-2004. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly, 8(4), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200510.0091】
- 周祝瑛(2003)。誰捉弄了臺灣教改?心理。【Chou, C.-I. (2003). Who caught Taiwan’s education reform? Psychological.】
- 周愚文、周淑卿、林永豐、陳致澄、游自達、顏世枋(2019)。素養導向的教科書發展與設計。教科書研究,12(2),105-131。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201908_12(2).04【Chou, Y.-W., Chou, S.-C., Lin, Y.-F., Chen, C.-C., You, Z.-T., & Yan, S.-F. (2019). Textbook development and design for literacy-oriented textbooks. Textbook Research, 12(2), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR. 201908_12(2).04】
- 周碧香(2016)。論國小教師語文教學知能之養成。語教新視野,4,49-59。https://doi.org/10.6751/ NVLA.201603_(4).0004 【Chou, P.-H. (2016). My opinion about the cultivation of elementary school Chinese teacher’s competency. New Vision of Language Arts, 4, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.6751/NVLA.201603_(4).0004】
- 林小玉(2012)。從專長加註師培政策談國民小學教師素質相關議題。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(3),38-39。https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201201.0038【Lin, H.-Y. (2012). Discussing the quality of national elementary school teachers in relation to specialization endorsement teacher training policies. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 1(3), 38-39. https://doi.org/ 10.6791/TER.201201.0038】
- 林雨蓁(2019)。以政策工具觀點論臺中市推動十二年國民教育新課綱。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(7),35-43。【Lin, Y.-C. (2019). A policy tool for promoting the new 12-year national education curriculum in Taichung. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 8(7), 35-43.】
- 范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動,5,1-6。【Fan, H.-H. (2016). Core literacy and the 12-year national basic education curriculum outline: A guide to reading “National Core Literacy: The DNA of the 12-year National Education Curriculum Reform”. Education Pulse, 5, 1-6.】
- 張芳全(2015)。國民小學教科書的選擇。國民教育,55(3),101-112。【Zhang, F.-C. (2015). The selection of textbooks for national elementary schools. National Education, 55(3), 101-112.】
- 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2014). General outline of the 12-year national basic education curriculum. htps://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/2889E58D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6695%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf】
- 教育部統計處(2023)。學校基本統計資訊。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/ News.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96【Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2023). General school information of each education level. https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96】
- 梅文慧(2011)。國中小教科書開放政策困境與因應之探討。學校行政,71,176-193。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201101.0176【Mei, W.-H. (2011). A study of the difficulties and problem-solving of the textbook open-up policy for the elementary and junior high schools. School Administrators, 71, 176-193. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC. 201101.0176】
- 許民陽、陳秀雯(2013)。大臺北地區國民小學自然與生活科技教科書選用之研究。教科書研究,6(3),1-34。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201312_6(3).01【Hsu, M.-Y., & Chen, H.-W. (2013). A study of selection of science and technology textbooks used in elementary schools in greater Taipei area. Journal of Textbook Research, 6(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR. 201312_6(3).01】
- 許全守(2005)。高職技術實作專家效度之研究。技術及職業教育學報,11(10),151-177。【Hsu, C.-S. (2005). A study on the validity of technical experts’ practice in higher education. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 11(10), 151-177.】
- 陳月英(2001)。教科書評選的最適規範。師友,403,82-86。https://doi.org/10.6437/EM. 200101.0082 【Chen, Y.-Y. (2001). The most appropriate criteria for textbook evaluation. The Educator Monthly, 403, 82-86. https://doi.org/10.6437/EM.200101.0082】
- 陳伯璋、張新仁、蔡清田、潘慧玲(2007)。全方位的國民核心素養之教育研究(NSC 95-2511-S-003-001)。致遠管理學院。【Chen, P.-C., Chang, S.-J., Tsai, C.-T., & Pan, H.-L. (2007). Comprehensive study on national core competencies in education (NSC 95-2511-S-003-001). Diwan University.】
- 陳建州(2011)。國小教師備課歷程中的資訊需求與資訊尋求行為之探究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。【Chen, C.-C. (2011). Study on the information needs and information seeking behavior of elementary school teachers in their lessons preparation process [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taichung University of Education.】
- 陳茹玲、柯華葳、蔡佩真(2020)。從教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐論國語文教育政策之困境與契機。教育科學研究期刊,65(1),47-91。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003【Chen, J.-R., Ko, H.-W., & Tsai, P.-C. (2020). Dilemmas and opportunities in Mandarin education policy implementation from the perspectives of teacher acknowledgment, resources, and practice. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(1). 47-91. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003】
- 陳慶福、林麗娟、張瑞芬(2010)。問卷與量表的編製及分析方法。心理。【Chen, Q.-F., Lin, L.-J., & Chang, J.-F. (2010). Preparation and analysis methods of questionnaires and scales. Psychological.】
- 陳曉蕾、張嘉惠(2004)。國民中學自然與生活科技教科用書評鑑—以「生活科技」學域為例。生活科技教育,37(3),50-71。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2004.37(3).6【Chen, H.-L., & Chang, J.-H. (2004). A review of textbooks on nature and life science and technology in national high schools: The example of “life science and technology” school domain. Living Technology Education, 37(3), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2004.37(3).6】
- 陳麗華、丁志仁、周淑卿、柯文賢、張益仁、張祝芬、黃崇城、楊思偉、楊國揚(2010)。中小學教科書選用制度—遊走於理想與現實之間。教科書研究,3(2),115-138。https:// doi.org/10.6481%2fJTR.201012.0115【Chen, L.-H., Ding, Z.-R., Zhou, S.-Q., Ke, W.-X., Zhang, Y.-R., Zhang, Z.-F., Huang, C.-C., Yang, S.-W., & Yang, G.-Y. (2010). Selection system of textbooks for primary and secondary schools: Walking between ideal and reality. Journal of Textbook Research, 3(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.6481%2fJTR.201012.0115】
- 彭致翎、黃欣柔、藍順德(2015)。從多元到寡占:教科書市場的挑戰與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(8),1-5。【Peng, C.-L., Huang, S.-R., & Lan, S.-D. (2015). From diversity to oligopoly: Challenges and responses to the textbook market. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 4(8), 1-5.】
- 曾火城(1993)。教科書選用及其評鑑規準初探。空中大學社會科學學報,1,121-138。【Tzeng, H.-C. (1993). A preliminary study of textbook selection and evaluation criteria. Journal of Social Sciences, Open University, 1, 121-138.】
- 黃政傑(2020)。臺灣十二年國教新課綱的規劃與特色。載於黃政傑、謝金枝(主編),中小學課綱之國際經驗(頁2-23)。五南。【Huang, C.-J. (2020). The planning and features of Taiwan’s new 12-year national education curriculum. In C.-J. Huang & J.-C. Hsieh (Eds.), International experience in primary and secondary school curricula (pp. 2-23). Wu-Nan Book.】
- 黃庭鍾、馬子婷(2015)。基隆市國小學童進行課後補習行為影響因素之分析—以計劃行為理論觀點探討。元培學報,22,75-90。【Huang, T.-C., & Ma, T.-T. (2015). A study about attending after-school tutoring for pupils in Keelung: A perspective of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Yuanpei University of Science and Technology, 22, 75-90.】
- 黃祺惠、洪詠善(2019)。十二年國教藝術領域素養導向教材及教學模組之設計與發展。教科書研究,13(1),1-33。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202004_13(1).01【Huang, C.-H., & Hung, Y.-S. (2019). The design and development of literacy-oriented teaching materials and teaching modules in twelve years of national education in the field of arts. Journal of Textbook Research, 13(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202004_13(1).01】
- 黃儒傑(2004)。國小教科書選用方式及其滿意度與使用效能之研究。臺東大學教育學報,15(2),59-86。【Huang, J.-C. (2004). A survey on elementary schools’ textbook selection in Taipei: Its satisfaction and implementation efficacy. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 59-86.】
- 黃馨儀(2005)。我國教科書開放政策之評析。學校行政,40,190-200。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200511.0190【Huang, X.-Y. (2005). A review of Taiwan’s textbook openness policy. School Administrators, 40, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200511.0190】
- 楊國揚、王立心、張復萌、陳憶芬、劉奕帆(2019)。數位教科書。教科書研究,12(1),111-124。【Yang, K.-Y., Wang, L.-H., Chang, F.-M., Chen, Y.-F., & Liu, Y. F. (2019). Digital textbook. Journal of Textbook Research, 12(1), 111-124.】
- 萬榮水、吳秀玲(2009)。國小教師對數學教科書選用考量因素與版本使用滿意度之研究。文化事業與管理研究,2,1-46。【Wan, R.-S., & Wu, S.-L. (2009). A study on elementary school teacher selection consideration factor and edition usage satisfaction of mathematics textbook. Journal of Cultural Enterprise and Management, 2, 1-46.】
- 萬榮水、林素嬌(2013)。國民小學教師選用科普補充教材的決策準據之研究:以自然與生活科技領域為例。文化事業與管理研究,10,69-87。【Wan, R.-S., & Lin, S.-J. (2013). A study on the evaluation factors that elementary school teachers use for selecting popular science supplementary materials: The field of science and technology. Journal of Cultural Enterprise and Management, 10, 69-87.】
- 葉興華(2009)。臺北市國小教師教科書選用之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報:教育類,40(2),33-72。https://doi.org/10.6336/JUTe/2009.40(2)2【Yeh, S.-H. (2009). Research on textbook selection and use by elementary school teachers in Taipei City. Journal of University of Taipei. Education, 40(2), 33-72. https://doi.org/10.6336/JUTe/2009.40(2)2】
- 劉子鍵、柯華葳(2005)。初探十八歲青少年需要之重要能力:能力的架構、意義與內涵。教育研究月刊,140,22-29。【Liu, T.-K., & Ko, H.-W. (2005). A preliminary exploration of the important competencies needed by 18-year-old adolescents: The framework, meaning and connotation of competencies. Journal of Education Research, 140, 22-29.】
- 劉興欽(2005)。國民小學教科書選用評鑑規準之探討。學校行政,39,95-122。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200509.0095【Liu, H.-C. (2005). Exploration of the criteria for evaluating and selecting textbooks in national elementary schools. School Administrators, 39, 95-122. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200509.0095】
- 劉興欽(2006)。紮根理論應用於苗栗縣藝術與人文教科書評鑑規準之研究。學校行政,46,246-278。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200611.0246【Liu, H.-C. (2005). Application of grounded theory in the evaluation criteria of arts and humanities textbooks in Miaoli County. School Administrators, 46, 246-278. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200611.0246】
- 劉寶元、劉嘉茹(2013)。屏東縣國小科學教師人力結構的現況與初探—以參與推廣研習教師為例。科學教育,37,3-15。【Liu, B.-Y., & Liu, J.-R. (2013). The present situation and preliminary study on the manpower structure of primary school science teachers in Pingtung County: Taking the teachers participating in the extension study as an example. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 37, 3-15.】
- 歐用生(1997)。教科書事件平議。國民教育,37(3),3-10。【Ou, Y.-S. (1997). The textbook incident. National Education, 37(3), 3-10.】
- 潘政緯(2012)。澎湖縣國小教師教學資訊需求與資訊尋求行為之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學。【Pan, C.-W. (2012). A study on teaching information needs and information seeking behavior of elementary school teachers in Penghu County [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chengchi University.】
- 蔡清田(2011)。課程改革中的核心素養之功能。教育科學期刊,10(1),203-217。https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201106.0203 【Tsai, C.-T. (2011). Function of key competencies in curriculum reform. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201106.0203】
- 衛生福利部疾病管制署(2020)。「COVID-19(武漢肺炎)」因應指引:阻絕社區傳染策略。https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Uploads/6f836467-3f73-4153-86fb-eb96a1acf437.pdf 【Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Welfare. (2020). Guidelines for COVID-19 (Wuhan Pneumonia): Strategies to stop community transmission. https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Uploads/ 6f836467-3f73-4153-86fb-eb96a1acf437.pdf】
- 賴光真(2010)。國小教科書評選規準制訂過程與內涵之分析。教科書研究,3(2),1-25。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201012.0001【Lai, K.-J. (2010). An analysis of the content and the process used to establish selection criteria for elementary school textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Textbook Research, 3(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR. 201012.0001】
- 賴光真(2012)。二十年目睹之怪現狀—教科書評選的缺失與改善之道。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(13),49-51。【Lai, K.-J. (2012). The strange status quo of twenty years of witnessing: The deficiencies of textbook evaluation and the ways to improve it. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 1(13), 49-51.】
- 謝金枝(2016)。教科書研究的整合取徑—混合方法研究。課程與教學,19(3),55-83。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201607_19(3).0003【Shieh, J.-J. (2016). The integrated approach of textbook research: Mixed methods research. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 19(3), 55-83. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201607_19(3).0003】
- 謝進昌(2019)。促進中文閱讀理解教學成效量化研究統合:調節變項影響與評估。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),175-206。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0007【Hsien, J.-C. (2019). Synthesis of quantitative research on Chinese reading comprehension instruction: Analysis of moderating effects. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 175-206. https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.201912_64(4).0007】
- 藍順德(2003)。教科書開放政策的演變與未來發展趨勢。國立編譯館館刊,31(復刊號),3-11。【Lam, S.-T. (2003). The evolution of textbook openness policy and its future development trend. Journal of the Library of Translation and Interpretation, 31(Reissue), 3-11.】
- 魏俊陽(2020)。國中推動閩南語文教學之建議。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(2),109-114。【Wei, J.-Y. (2020). Suggestions for promoting Minnan language teaching and learning in NCC. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 9(2), 109-114.】
- Abdullah, N. A., Nishioka, D., & Murayama, Y. (2016). Questionnaire testing: Identifying Twitter user’s information sharing behavior during disasters. Journal of Information Processing, 24(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.24.20
- Alfons, A., Ateş, N. Y., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2022). A robust bootstrap test for mediation analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 25(3), 591-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428121999096
- Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research-challenges and benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5, 288-296. https:// doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288
- Althubaiti, A. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 211-217. https://doi.org/10.2147/ JMDH.S104807
- Amerian, M., & Khaivar, A. (2014). Textbook selection, evaluation and adaptation procedures. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(1), 523-533.
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207038801600107
- Barlow, J., Fisher, J. D., & Jones, D. (2012). Systematic review of models of analysing significant harm, systematic review of models of analysing significant harm. Oxford University Press.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (2nd ed.). University of South Florida.
- Boparai, J. K., Singh, S., & Kathuria, P. (2018). How to design and validate a questionnaire: A guide. Current Clinical Pharmacology, 13(4), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884713666180807151328
- Carson, D. (2012). Reviewing reviews of professionals’ risk-taking decisions. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34(4), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2012.753729
- Chatman, S. P., & Goetz, E. T. (1985). Improving textbook selection. Teaching of Psychology, 12(3), 150-152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1203_9
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Corcoran, T., & Silander, M. (2009). Instruction in high schools: The evidence and the challenge. The Future of Children, 19(1), 157-183.
- de Jong, P. F. (1999). Hierarchical regression analysis in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(2), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10705519909540128
- Dillahunt, A. K., Feldman, D. A., Thomas, L. R., Farstead, B. W., Frandsen, S. B., Lee, S., Pazdera, M., Galloway, J., Bessette, K. L., Roberts, H., Crowell, S. E., Watkins, E. R., Langenecker, S. A., & Westlund Schreiner, M. (2022). Self-injury in adolescence is associated with greater behavioral risk avoidance, not risk-taking. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(5), 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051288
- Duffy, J., Taylor, B., & Mc Call, S. (2006). Human rights and decision making in child protection through explicit argumentation. Child Care in Practice, 12(2), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575270600618331
- Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
- Gambrill, E., & Shlonsky, A. (2001). The need for comprehensive risk management systems in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(1), 79-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190- 7409(00)00124-9
- Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Johnston, R. A. (2008). Nonnormality of data in structural equation models. Transportation Research Record, 2082(1), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.3141/2082-14
- Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
- International Labor Organization. (2020). COVID-19 and the education sector.
- Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage.
- Johnsen, E. B. (1993). Textbooks in the kaleidoscope. In T. L. Sidewind (Ed.), A critical survey of literature and research on educational texts (pp. 165-166). Oxford University Press.
- Knapper, C., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. Psychology Press.
- Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263-314). Emerald.
- Larsen, R., & Warne, R. T. (2010). Estimating confidence intervals for eigenvalues in exploratory factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 871-876. https://doi.org/10.3758/ BRM.42.3.871
- Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2007). Understanding user acceptance of multimedia messaging service: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(13), 2066-2077. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20670
- Lin, K. Y., & Williams, P. J. (2016). Taiwanese preservice teachers’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teaching intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 1021-1036.
- Livingston, S. A. (2006). Item analysis. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 421-441). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Loewen, S., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 182-212). Routledge.
- MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
- Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., & Craven, R. G. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
- Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
- Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M., & Pateli, A. (2013). Shopping and word-of-mouth intentions on social media. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 17-34. https:// doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762013000100003
- Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205-1226. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
- Nuzzo, R. (2014). Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature News, 506(7487), 150-152. https:// doi.org/10.1038/506150a
- Rahimpour, M., & Hashemi, R. (2011). Textbook selection and evaluation in EFL context. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p62
- Richardson, D. B., Hamra, G. B., MacLehose, R. F., Cole, S. R., & Chu, H. (2015). Hierarchical regression for analyses of multiple outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 182(5), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv047
- Sahragard, R., & Rahimi, S. A. (2018). Textbook evaluation of family and friends series based on teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 68-85.
- Shahmohammadi, S. (2018). Textbook evaluation: Looking at prospect series through teachers’ perspective. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 6(2), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.30486/ relp.2018.542578
- Skrzypiec, G., & Lai, M. Y. (2017). Social psychology meets school mathematics in PISA 2012: An application of the theory of planned behaviour in Australia. Psychology, 8(13), 2146-2173. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.813137
- Smeda, A. M., Shiratuddin, M. F., & Wong, K. W. (2015). Factors affecting the e-book adoption amongst mathematics and statistics students at universities in Libya: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 5(4), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.17706/ijeeee.2015.5.4.237-248
- Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
- Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
- Tajvidi, M., Richard, M. O., Wang, Y., & Hajli, N. (2018). Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media. Journal of Business Research, 121, 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008
- Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
- Taylor, B. J. (2017). Decision making, assessment and risk in social work (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Taylor, B. J. (2021). Risk-managing decision-making: A psycho-social rationality model. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(7), 2819-2838. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa094
- Taylor, B. J., & McKeown, C. (2013). Assessing and managing risk with people with physical disabilities: Development of a safety checklist. Health, Risk and Society, 15(2), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.764973
- Taylor, B. J., Stevenson, M., & McDowell, M. (2018). Communicating risk in dementia care: Survey of health and social care professionals. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26(2), e291-e303. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12519
- Thompson, C. B. (2009). Descriptive data analysis. Air Medical Journal, 28(2), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2008.12.001
- Wang, W. C., Lin, C. H., & Lee, C. C. (2011). Thinking of the textbook in the ESL/EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p91
- Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
- Zhang, X. (2017). A critical review of literature on English language teaching textbook evaluation: What systemic functional linguistics can offer. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2017-0005
- Zheng, C., Huang, W. Y., Sheridan, S., Sit, C. H. P., Chen, X. K., & Wong, S. H. S. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic brings a sedentary lifestyle in young adults: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176035
APA Format | Chang, M.-W., Chiang, C.-H., Chen, W.-F, Yuan, Y.-H., & Dai, J.-Y. (2024). Effects of COVID-19 on Taiwanese Mandarin Teachers’ Textbook Selection Processes. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 69(1), 35-68. |
---|