Learner Perceptions of AI-Powered Learning Portfolios and Personalized Material Recommendation Mechanisms in Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
Author: Jian-Wei Tzeng(Department of Information Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology), Tien-Chi Huang (Department of Computer Science, National Taichung University of Science and Technology), Cheng-Yu Hsueh (Department of Information Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology), Ying-Song Liao (Department of Information Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 69, No. 3
Date:September 2024
Pages:73-96
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0003
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated alternative pedagogical approaches, with online autonomous learning courses emerging as a viable method for compiling learning portfolios. Consequently, online autonomous learning has garnered increasing scholarly attention. Embodying principles of openness and transcending temporal and spatial constraints, online courses afforded global learners opportunities for continued education during the pandemic. Online courses facilitate enhanced online interaction among students and teachers and allow students to control their learning experience (learner autonomy) and pace. Nevertheless, online autonomous learning presents fundamental challenges. Notably, in the absence of direct teacher and teaching assistant supervision, online autonomous learning tends to lead to lower completion rates and higher dropout rates, concerns currently under investigation by numerous researchers. In contrast to traditional teacher-centered models, online autonomous learning courses prioritize self-directed learning. Learners independently establish learning objectives and strategies commensurate with their personal learning levels to master course content. Through a series of instructional videos, in-class exercises, discussion forums, and other interactive features, an appropriate self-regulated learning mechanism was developed to guide learners toward effective autonomous learning.
The exponential growth of big data in recent years has positioned artificial intelligence as a focal point of inquiry across various fields. Machine learning has catalyzed substantial advancements in the field of data science. The accumulation of extensive learning generates substantial volumes of structured and unstructured data, including the personal information of learners and various learning metrics. A growing body of research advocates for the use of data analytics as a viable method to optimize online and adaptive learning processes.
Learning diagnosis entail learners’ self-assessment of requisite capabilities for learning tasks and comparative analyses of capabilities against domain expert-established concept structures by employing relevant question parameters, such as difficulty and discrimination. To facilitate this, an automated artificial intelligence material recommendation mechanism was developed, underpinned by several machine learning models. By observing online user learning behavior patterns, learning data and indicators were formulated, enabling the analysis of various online learning behaviors (e.g., watching videos and answering practice questions) and the generation of learning processes that can be viewed by learners. A practice question recommendation mechanism combined with an instant messaging application (LINE) was designed, leveraging teacher-created knowledge maps to assess students’ mastery of concepts. Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulation served as the foundational framework for the recommendation mechanism.
A quasiexperimental research design was employed. Participants were recruited from a calculus course taught at a university in northern Taiwan. An experimental group used reinforcement learning–recommended practice questions for self-evaluation, and a control group received randomly assigned questions. Significant improvements in scores were observed in the experimental group, and greater learning stickiness was observed compared with the control group. Consistent percentile rank increases following practice question completion suggest the system’s capacity to deliver personalized recommendations on the basis of individual differences, thereby facilitating concept-specific feedback and adaptive learning. This, in turn, fostered increased teacher–student interaction, mitigated learner isolation, and increased learning motivation, thereby strengthening self-regulated learning abilities.
Upon course completion, the participants could autonomously generate artificial intelligence learning portfolios through the system on the basis of diagnostic results, creating a comprehensive record of their learning performance. These portfolios facilitated the elucidation of learner mastery levels through the accumulation of extensive learning data (big data) on the platform. A postcourse self-regulated learning questionnaire survey revealed a positive participant perception of the material recommendation mechanism and generated artificial intelligence learning portfolio. The participants demonstrated strong positive attitudes toward system reliability, learning attitudes, and metacognition but low perceptions of system utility, and low overall usage rates. Enhancing usage incentive, continuously refining the accuracy of the recommendation system’s algorithms, and conducting comparative analyses with existing systems are essential to improve the recommendation system’s perceived utility
Keywords:AI learning portfolio, self-regulated learning, reinforcement learning, educational big data, learning diagnosis
《Full Text》
References:
» More
- 余民寧(2012)。心理與教育統計學。三民。
- Yu, M.-N. (2012). Statistics in psychology & education. San Min Book.】
- Albelbisi, N. A., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Habibi, A. (2021). Self-regulated learning and satisfaction: A key determinants of MOOC success. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3459- 3481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10404-z
- Alonso-Mencia, M. E., Alario-Hoyos, C., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Estevez-Ayres, I., Perez- Sanagustin, M., & Kloos, C. D. (2019). Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: Lessons learned from a literature review. Educational Review, 72(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911. 2019.1566208
- Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.
- Crosslin, M. (2018). Exploring self-regulated learning choices in a customizable learning pathway MOOC. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/ 10.14742/ajet.3758
- Fryer, L. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language, Learning and Technology, 10(3), 8-14.
- Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017. 05.045
- Ghahramani, Z. (2015). Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence. Nature, 521(7553), 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14541
- Hew, K. F., Hu, X., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. Computers & Education, 145, 103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103724
- Holotescu, C. (2016). MOOCBuddy: A chatbot for personalized learning with MOOCs. In A. Iftene & J. Vanderdonckt (Eds.), RoCHI– International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 91-94). Matrix ROM.
- Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
- Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., & Kester, L. (2020). Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
- Kay, J., & Kummerfeld, B. (2019). From data to personal user models for life-long, life-wide learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2871-2884. https://doi.org/10.1111/ bjet.12878
- Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
- Lee, C. A., Tzeng, J. W., Hwang, N. F., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Prediction of student performance in massive open online courses using deep learning system based on learning behaviors. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202107_24(3).0010
- Lee, C. A., Huang, N. F., Tzeng, J. W., & Tsai, P.-H. (2023). AI-based diagnostic assessment system: Integrated with knowledge map in MOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(5), 873-886. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3308338
- Lee, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, P. Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1843-1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11423-022-10142-8
- Liu, Z., Dong, L., & Wu, C. (2020). Research on personalized recommendations for students’ learning paths based on big data. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(8), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12245
- Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2020.104009
- Nabizadeh, A. H., Leal, J. P., Rafsanjani, H. N., & Shah, R. R. (2020). Learning path personalization and recommendation methods: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Expert Systems with Applications, 159, 113596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113596
- Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/ 2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=1
- Oh, K.-J., Lee, D., Ko, B, & Choi, H.-J. (2017, May 29-June 1). A chatbot for psychiatric counseling in mental healthcare service based on emotional dialogue analysis and sentence generation [Paper presentation]. 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Daejeon, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.1109/MDM.2017.64
- Su, M.-H., Wu, C.-H., Huang, K.-Y., Hong, Q.-B., & Wang, H.-M. (2017, December 8-10). A chatbot using LSTM-based multi-layer embedding for elderly care [Paper presentation]. 2017 International Conference on Orange Technologies, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICOT.2017.8336091
- Sun, Y., Ni, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, X. L., & Wang, N. (2019). Understanding students’ engagement in MOOCs: An integration of self-determination theory and theory of relationship quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3156-3174. https:// doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12724
- Tzeng, J.-W., Huang, N.-F., Chuang, A.-C., Huang, T.-W., & Chang, H.-Y. (2023). Massive open online course recommendation system based on a reinforcement learning algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08686-8
- van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Effects of self-regulated learning prompts in a flipped history classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106318
- Wang, J., Xie, H., Wang, F. L., Lee, L. K., & Au, O. T. S. (2021). Top-N personalized recommendation with graph neural networks in MOOCs. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100010
- Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA– A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45. https:// doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
- Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30(1), 54-62. http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.iheduc.2016.04.001
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Development phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.