Journal directory listing - Volume 59 (2014) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【59(3)】September

Verifying the Invariance of a Measurement Model for Achievement Goals Theory by Using the Multiple Group Structural Equation Modeling Author: Chung-Chin Wu(Institute of Education, National Cheng-Kung University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 59, No. 3
Date:September 2014
Pages:59-95
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(3).03

Abstract:

    The appropriateness of measure content, ambiguity of theoretical concepts, and interferences of theoretical measure are three problems in achievement goal research. These problems have yet to receive comprehensive attention or empirical examinations. The purposes of this study were (1) to revise the problems caused by achievement goal measures and to compile a Mandarin version of a 3×2 achievement goal measure (the best fit and most parsimonious model was chosen based on model comparisons), (2) to examine the multiple group invariance of the theoretical model by utilizing multiple group structural equation modeling, and (3) to investigate the influences of gender and the educational phase on each of the 3×2 achievement goals. The results are summarized as follows: (1) the measurement of 3×2 achievement goals yielded favorable reliability and construct validity. Moreover, this model is regarded as the best fit and the most parsimonious model. (2) The measurement presents favorable validity between gender and moderate validity between the educational phase. (3) In general, boys pursued higher approach- and avoidance-oriented goals than girls, indicating the complexity of achievement goals. Suggestions are proposed based on these findings presented at the end of the article.

Keywords:goal orientation, achievement goals, multiple group structural equation modeling

《Full Text》 檔名

References:
  1. 李宜玫(2012)。數學低成就學習動機之類型與區別分析:中小學弱勢學生與一般學生之比較。教育科學研究期刊57(4),39-71。 doi:10.3966/2073753X2012125704002【Lee, Y.-M. (2012). Discriminating math low-achievement motivation patterns: Comparing disadvantaged and other students in elementary and junior high school. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(4), 39-71. doi:10.3966/2073753X2012125704002】 
  2. 李茂能(2007)。結構方程模式軟體AMOS之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市:心理。【Li, M.-N. (2007). The introduction and application on tests compiling of structural equation modeling software–AMOS. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.】
  3. 林易慧、程炳林(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之交互效果。教育心理學報37(3),231-255。 doi:10.6251/BEP.20051209【Lin, Y.-H., & Cherng, B.-L. (2006). The interaction effects between the cues of classroom goal and personal goal orientations on solving mathematics problems and self-regulated learning. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 37(3), 231-255. doi:10.6251/BEP.20051209】
  4. 林哲宇(2010)。ARCS融入體驗式學習之學習活動中目標導向與教學策略對國小生電腦技能學習之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。【Lin, C.-Y. (2010). The effects of instructional strategies and goal orientation on elementary school students within an ARCS integrated experiential learning activity (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】 
  5. 林宴瑛(2006)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之關係及潛在改變量分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。【Lin, Y.-Y. (2006). The relation and latent change analysis among individual goal orientations, classroom goal structures and self-regulated learning strategies (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.】
» More
APA FormatWu, C.-C. (2014). Verifying the Invariance of a Measurement Model for Achievement Goals Theory by Using the Multiple Group Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(3), 59-95. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(3).03