期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(1)三月刊

我如何知道我關心什麼?─不同背景大學生的自身技術之分析 作者:郭丁熒(國立臺南大學教育學系)

卷期:61卷第1期
日期:2016年3月
頁碼:169-199
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07

摘要:

本研究旨在探討大學生運用自身技術之現況,並比較不同背景變項大學生的自身技術之差異情形。先根據文獻探討及40位大學生訪談資料所編製之「大學生自身技術量表」,針對452位大學生進行預試,再以修訂後之量表調查1,361位大學生,調查資料經以SPSS for Windows 21.0版套裝軟體中次數分配、單因子多變項分析、薛費事後多重比較分析法來進行資料處理與分析。研究結果發現:(一)大學生的自身技術包括鍛鍊、告解坦白、問題化、自我檢查、對話辯證、說真話、越界體驗、節制、觀察等九類,運用情形大都為中高程度;(二)大學生最常採用的自身技術是鍛鍊,而最不常採用的是告解坦白;(三)大學生採用的自身技術因其背景之不同而呈現多樣性,其中以有宗教信仰者最為多元。本研究反映出大學生可透過自身技術來治理自我之可能性,而最常使用鍛鍊可能與大學生的學習角色有關,最不常使用告解坦白則可能與教育或文化有關。

關鍵詞:大學生、自身、自身技術

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。【Wang, B.-J. (2006). Chinese windows version SPSS and behavioral science research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
  2. 王浩威(2014)。是怎樣的一個社會,逼出鄭捷這樣的生命狀態?天下雜誌。取自http://www. cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058359&idSubChannel=49【Wang, H.-W. (2014). What is a society to extract a life state of Zheng Jie? Common Wealth. Retrieved from http:// www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058359&idSubChannel=49】
  3. 王震武、林文瑛、張郡雯(2011)。科學教育有助於消除迷信嗎?-從思考統整層面所做的觀察。教育心理學報,42(3),467-490。doi:10.6251/BEP.20091112【Wang, J.-W., Lin, W.-Y., & Chang, Y.-W. (2011). The effect of science education on scientific thinking and superstitious thinking in terms of local coherence and global coherence. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 42(3), 467-490. doi:10.6251/BEP.20091112】
  4. 行政院主計總處(2013)。101年家庭收支調查報告。臺北市:作者。【Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. (2013). Household income and expenditure survey, 2012. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
  5. 何乏筆(2003)。從性史到修養史-論傅柯《性史》第二卷中的四元架構。載於黃瑞琪(主編),後學新論:後現代/後結構/後殖民(pp. 75-103)。臺北市:左岸文化。【Heubel, F. (2003). From the history of sexuality to the history of self-cultivation: The theoretical structure of Foucault’s history of sexuality II. In R. R. C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 75-103). Taipei, Taiwan: Walkers Cultural.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式
郭丁熒(2016)。我如何知道我關心什麼?─不同背景大學生的自身技術之分析。教育科學研究期刊61(1),169-199。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07
APA Format
Guo, D.-Y. (2016). How Do I Know What I Care About?—Analysis of Technologies-of-Self for Undergraduates With Different Backgrounds. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(1), 169-199. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07

Journal directory listing - Volume 61(2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(1)】March

How Do I Know What I Care About?—Analysis of Technologies-of-Self for Undergraduates With Different Backgrounds Author: Ding-Ying Guo(Department of Education, National University of Tainan)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 61, No. 1
Date:March 2016
Pages:169-199
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07

Abstract:

The purposes of this study were to survey the current status of undergraduates’ technologies-of-self and to analyze the differences of technologies-of-self for undergraduates with different backgrounds. The subjects were 1,361 undergraduates who participated in the survey study by using “The Technologies-of-Self Inventory for Undergraduates” as an instrument. The protocol of this instrument was prepared according to a literature review and data obtained from interviewing 40 undergraduates, whereas the validity and reliability of the instrument were established using a subsequent pretest in which 452 undergraduates participated. The data obtained from the survey study were statistically analyzed through frequency distribution, MONOVA, and a Scheffé Post Hoc Test by using SPSS for Windows 21.0 as software. The findings of this study indicate that the undergraduates adopted nine types of technologies-of-self: exercise, confession, problematization, self-examination, dialogue, parrhesia, transgressive experience, moderation, and observation. Their use of technologies-of-self was determined to be medium–high. The exercise technology was most often adopted by the undergraduates, whereas the confession technology was the most seldom used. The frequent use of exercise technology may have occurred because learning is the salient role of undergraduates, whereas the infrequent use of confession technology may have resulted from educational or cultural differences between Taiwan and Western countries. Undergraduates with a specific religious belief adopted more technologies-of-self compared with those with no specific religious beliefs. The results of this study imply that self-discovery and self-formation can be achieved by undergraduates through technologies-of-self.

Keywords:undergraduate, self, technologies-of-self