期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(3)九月刊

從教師自編科學成就測驗之Rasch分析看教與學 作者:陳映孜(國立中山大學教育研究所)、何曉琪(國立中山大學人文創新與社會實踐研究中心)、劉昆夏(國立中山大學教育研究所)、林煥祥(國立中山大學通識教育中心)、鄭英耀(國立中山大學教育研究所)

卷期:62卷第3期
日期:2017年9月
頁碼:1-23
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).01

摘要:
本研究採Rasch測量模式,分析教師自編科學成就測驗,以檢驗測驗試題的品質,並提供有用的評量回饋訊息,作為教師調整教學與修正評量之參考。研究對象為高雄市8,936位(男生4,617位、女生4,319位)七年級學生。研究工具為教師自編生物科成就測驗。測驗資料採試題反應理論的Rasch模式進行分析。結果發現:整體而言,教師自編科學成就測驗能區分出學生的能力程度。然而,有些試題的內容對女生較不公平。本研究也發現,教師對於部分試題難易度的認知與學生實際的作答反應存有若干差異。最後,本研究透過評量回饋圖表,包含學生能力與試題難度對照圖、學生作答診斷圖等,提出辨識學習基礎發展區和學習可能發展區的範圍之方式,作為教師規劃學生學習進程之參考。

關鍵詞:Rasch測量、教師自編成就測驗、評量回饋、學習可能發展區、學習進程

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 王子華、范雅晴、王國華(2008)。數理科在職教師評量素養培育模式之探究。科學教育學刊,16(1),25-51。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2008.1601.04【Wang, T.-H., Fan, Y.-C., & Wang, K.-H. (2008). Implementation of web-based assessment system in improving in-service teachers’ assessment literacy. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 25-51 doi:10.6173/ CJSE.2008.1601.04】
  2. 教育部(2008)。教育部補助辦理精進教學要點修正規定。行政院公報,014(215)。取自https://gazette.nat.gov.tw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg014215/ch05/type2/gov40/num12/Eg.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2008). Revised regulations governing Ministry of Education subsidies for instruction improvement. The Executive Yuan Gazatte Online, 014(215). Retrieved from https://gazette.nat.gov.tw/EG_ FileManager/eguploadpub/eg014215/ch05/type2/gov40/num12/Eg.pdf】
  3. Alonzo, A., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389-421. doi:10.1002/sce.20303
  4. Allal, L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of-or in-the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 137-152. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00025-0
  5. Bell, B. (2007). Classroom assessment of science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 965-1006). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式陳映孜、何曉琪、劉昆夏、林煥祥、鄭英耀(2017) 。從教師自編科學成就測驗之Rasch分析看教與學。教育科學研究期刊62(3),1-23。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).01
APA FormatChen, Y.-T., Ho, H.-C., Liu, K.-H., Lin, H.-S., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2017). Glimpse into teaching and learning using Rasch analyses of a teacher-made science achievement test. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(3), 1-23. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).01

Journal directory listing - Volume 62(2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(3)】September

Glimpse Into Teaching and Learning Using Rasch Analyses of a Teacher-Made Science Achievement Test Author: Ying-Tze Chen(Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University), Hsiao-Chi Ho(Centre for Humanities Innovation and Social Practices, National Sun Yat-sen University), Kun-Hsia Liu(Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University), Huann-Shyang Lin(Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University), Ying-Yao Cheng(Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 62, No.3
Date:September 2017
Pages:1-23
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).01

Abstract:

This study examined the quality of a teacher-made achievement test using Rasch analyses and provided useful assessment feedback information for improving teaching and testing. The participants were 8,936 seventh-grade students (4,617 boys and 4,319 girls) from the Kaohsiung area in Taiwan. Data were collected through a teacher-made biology achievement test and analyzed using the Rasch model. The results indicated that the test clearly discriminated students’ abilities. Some questions, however, were found to have unfair content for girls. Additionally, some mismatches were identified between teachers’ expectations and students’ assessments of question difficulty. This paper also provides assessment feedback diagrams, including a person–item map and diagnostic map, and a method of identifying “the zone of fundamental learning development” and “the zone of proximal learning development” is proposed to enable teachers to plan students’ learning progression.

Keywords:assessment feedback, learning progression, Rasch model, teacher-made achievement test, zone of proximal learning development