Journal directory listing - Volume 62(2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(3)】September

Difficulties Facing the Accountability Leadership of Junior High School Principals and the Strategies They Employ: A Qualitative Approach Author: Wen-Chuan Chang(Department of Educational Administration and Management, National Dong Hwa University), Chi-Wen Fan(Department of Educational Administration and Management, National Dong Hwa University), Cheng-Hung Chen(Department of Educational Administration and Management, National Dong Hwa University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 62, No.3
Date:September 2017


This study investigated the difficulties junior high school principals face regarding accountability leadership and examined strategies for resolving problems. A qualitative research method was employed, and a grounded theory approach was used for coding and analysis. The first investigation stage consisted of a focus group discussion chiefly intended to gain an understanding of the difficulties encountered and strategies used in accountability leadership. The case interviews employed in the second stage built upon the results of the focus group discussion, and purposive sampling was used to identify the practical behavior of the interviewees. The results of this study are as follows: First, the difficulties encountered in accountability leadership—owing to resistance from “individual and group” and “structure and culture”—include: (1) conflict situations and an inbalance between power and responsibility; (2) school members’ belief gaps and distrust; (3) the conservative culture in the teaching community; and (4) community expectations and resistance. Second, the strategies used in accountability leadership—which involve the construction of mutual support systems for “individual and group” as well as “institution and culture”—include the shaping of vision and empowerment, emphasizing educational meaning and commitment, cultivating norms for assuming responsibility, improving parent-teacher coaccountability, and promoting a trustworthy brand. Third, it is crucial that a principal’s belief and empowerment be emphasized during the exertion of accountability leadership. Fourth, establishing a normative culture of teacher coaccountability through communication is critical if principals are to enforce accountability leadership among group members.

Keywords:accountability leadership, grounded theory, junior high school, principal leadership

《Full Text》 檔名

  1. 吳清山(2016)。教育的正向力量。臺北市:高等教育。【Wu, C.-S. (2016). Positive power in education. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
  2. 吳清山、蔡菁芝(2006)。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報:教育類,51(1),1-21。doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001【Wu, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). A comparative analysis of educational accountability in the UK and USA. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001】
  3. 林清達(2003)。教育改革時代的學校與社區互動關係。花蓮師院學報,16,135-158【Lin, C.-D. (2003). Establishing school community relationship in the educational reform era. Journal of National Hualien Teachers College, 16, 135-158.】
  4. 范熾文(2007)。教育績效責任:市場模式及其啟示。中等教育,58(3),26-41。doi:10.6249/SE. 2007.58.3.02【Fan, C.-W. (2007). The implications of educational accountability for school management. Secondary Education, 58(3), 26-41. doi:10.6249/SE.2007.58.3.02】
  5. 范熾文(2008)。教育行政研究-批判取向。臺北市:五南。【Fan, C.-W. (2008). Education administrative research: Critical orientation. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
» More
APA FormatChang, W.-C., Fan, C.-W., Chen, C.-H. (2017). Difficulties facing the accountability leadership of junior high school principals and the strategies they employ: A qualitative approach. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(3), 57-93. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).03