Journal directory listing - Volume 62(2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(4)】December (Special Issue: Institutional Research and Higher Education Development)

(Special Issue) High School Students’ Science Literacy and Educational Performance: A Comparison Between Taiwan and OECD Countries Author: Kai-Chiung Peng (Department of International Business Management, Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology), Chia-Wen Chang (Department of Finance, Chihlee University of Technology), Jui-Sheng Li (Taoyuan City Yang Mei Junior High School)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 62, No.4
Date:December 2017
Pages:145-179
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).06

Abstract:
This study compared science literacy between the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries and Taiwan. To evaluate educational achievements, the study included archiving the assessment results of science literacy, statistically analyzing science literacy accomplishments, investigating the factors that influence science literacy, and assessing the overall efficiency of the science literacy accomplishments that the OECD member countries and Taiwan have achieved. The study participants were the high school students of the OECD member countries and Taiwan who had participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012. The study data source was OECD PISA 2012 results. A 3-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used. The 1-stage DEA was employed to analyze variety efficiency in the DEA of the CCR and BCC models. The 2-stage DEA was used to remove environmental factors caused by the relative inefficiencies in the Tobit regression analysis. The last stage placed the adjusted output into the model and analyzed the efficiency. It also revealed more decreasing returns to scale countries. Because different countries have different management environments, these factors can interfere with the efficiency assessment. If they are not eliminated in advance, a deviation may be observed in the analysis. This study indicated that the number of countries with technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and a scale efficiency value of 1 has increased, while the constant returns to scale countries from 30 to 13, indicating that the status of returns is the most appropriate proportion in input and output. Therefore, no improvements and adjustments were observed. A decrease was observed in returns to scale countries from 5 to 22, indicating that the status of returns is a huge proportion gap in input and output. Therefore, governments should consider adjusting or reducing the proportion of inputs and outputs, as resources may be wasted due to excessive scale expansion.

Keywords:PISA, Three Stage-DEA, Tobit regression

《Full Text》 檔名

References:
  1. 王文派、賴淑呈(2008)。科技大學系所效率分析之實證研究。計量管理期刊,1(5),1-12。【Wang, W.-P., & Lai, S.-C. (2008). Performance analysis of technology university departments: An empirical study. Journal of Quantitative Management, 1(5), 1-12.】
  2. 江芳盛(2006)。學生學業成就和國家經濟發展:Heyneman-Loxley效應的再檢驗。教育政策論壇,9(3),161-176。【Chiang, F.-S. (2006). Student learning and national economic development: A re-examination of Heyneman- Loxley effect using TIMSS 1999 and 2003 data. Educational Policy Forum, 9(3), 161-176.】
  3. 吳濟華、何柏正(2008)。組織效率與生產力評估-資料包絡分析法。臺北市:前程。【Wu, J.-H., & Ho, B.-J. (2008). Efficiency and production analysis-Data envelopment analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: Future Career Management.】
  4. 吳濟華、何柏正(2009)。組織效率與生產力評估-資料包絡分析法。臺北市:前程。【Wu, J.-H., & Ho, B.-J. (2009). Efficiency and production analysis-Data envelopment analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: Future Career Management.】
  5. 巫有鎰(2007)。學校與非學校因素對臺東縣原漢國小學生學業成就的影響。臺灣教育社會學研究,7(1),29-67。【Wu, Y.-I. (2007). Effects of school and non-school factors on Aboriginal and Non-aboriginal elementary students’ academic achievement in Taitung, Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(1), 29-67.】
» More
APA FormatPeng, K. -C., Chang, C. -W. & Li, J. -S. (2017). High school students’ science literacy and educational performance: A comparison between Taiwan and OECD countries. Journal of Research in  Education Sciences, 62(4), 145-179. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).06