Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(3)】september

Double-Edged Sword: Different Learning Behavior Patterns for Junior High School Mathematics Author: Chia-Cheng Chen (Teacher Education Center, National Taiwan University of Arts), Po-Lin Chen(Department of Applied Psychology, Hsuan Chuang University), Chao-Hsiang Hung(Department of Education, National Chengchi University), Jen-Hua Hsueh(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No.3
Date:September 2018
Pages:105-130
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0004

Abstract:
Some skilled students are deemed underachievers, even though they demonstrate adequate academic performances, because they fail to meet certain expectations. By contrast, some gifted students achieving below-average scores, but having performance capabilities exceeding their skill level, are labeled overachievers. These two categories representing student ability and effort have differences. This study investigated the profiles of underachievers and overachievers in junior high school mathematics by comparing variation patterns to build the foundation for future remedial education. Students from one junior high school were analyzed; the conclusions were as follows: (1) Of 3,530 participating students, 199 (5.6%), 143 (4.1%), 337 (9.5%), and 360 (10.2%) were low intelligence quotient (IQ) – overachievers, low IQ – underachievers, high IQ – overachievers, and high IQ – underachievers, respectively. (2) Perceived math competence and self-debilitating strategies were observed in high IQ – underachievers and low IQ – overachievers. (3) Finally, suggestions for teaching practices and future studies were proposed.

Keywords:learning behavior pattern, overachievement, perceived competence, test anxiety, underachievement

《Full Text》 檔名

References:
  1. 毛國楠、程炳林(1993)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報,26,85-106。 【Mao, K.-N., & Cherng, B.-L. (1993). The effects of goal orientation and goal specificity on college students’ self-regulated learning. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 26, 85-106. 】
  2. 吳裕益(1980)。國中高、低成就學生家庭背景及心理特質之比較研究。教育學刊,2,161-198。 【Wu, Y.-Y. (1980). A comparative study of junior high school overachievers and underachievers and their family background and personal characteristics. Educational Review, 2, 161-198.】
  3. 吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵學習策略量表。未出版手稿。 【Wu, J.-J., & Cherng, B.-L. (1992). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.】
  4. 呂勝瑛(1994)。高智商兒童的七十年追蹤研究。資優教育季刊,51,35-37。 【Lii, S.-Y. (1994). Seventy years follow-up study of high IQ children. Gifted Education Quarterly, 51, 35-37.】
  5. 李宜玫(2012)。數學低成就學習動機之類型與區別分析:中小學弱勢學生與一般學生之比較。教育科學研究期刊,57(4),39-71。 【Lee, Y.-M. (2012). Discriminating math low-achievement motivation patterns: Comparing disadvantaged and other students in elementary and junior high school. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(4), 39-71. 】
» More
APA FormatChen, C.- C., Chen, P,- L., Hung, C.- H., Hsueh, J.- H. (2018). Double-edged sword: different learning behavior patterns for junior high school mathematics. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(3), 105-130. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0004