Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(1)】March

The Study of Developing the Administrative Performance Evaluation System From the Perspective of Institutional Research Author: An-Pan Lin (Department of Civic Education and Leadership, National Taiwan Normal University), Hua-Ling Chiang(International Business, National Taiwan University), Ya-Ting Chuang(Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Kuo-En Chang(Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 64, No.1
Date:March 2019
Pages:241-265
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0009

Abstract:
Institutional research (IR) is a kind of systematic data collection, which enables the self-assessment action of the higher education, finds out the problems of the school affairs and governance, and provides the data based information for related decision making. Thus, IR is an important approach to improve higher education quality to contribute its sustainable development. The administration has a function which can guide the university’s operation appropriately, which should combine the IR cogitation closely to improve the progress of the university’s overall goals. This study takes public S University as a case and investigates its administrative management which integrates the IR cogitation and joints to informationization. S University develops its special oversight and evaluation system to check school affairs planning, tracking, evaluating, feedback, and improvement, and ensure these affairs’ performance and quality. Based on the case study results of S University, we find the administrative oversight and evaluation system of S University not only combine the IR information support cycle but also implement the 5 roles of IR. By both quality control and performance appraisal of this system, the goals of administrative staffs and school can effectively integrate. This mechanism ensures the effectiveness and quality of administrative affairs and attains proof from the world university ranking of S University. By this case study, we wish to provide some views of IR study and implementation for other institutions.

Keywords:institutional research, oversight and evaluation system, performance appraisal

《Full Text》 檔名

References:
  1. 中央教育科學研究所比較教育研究室(編譯)(1990)。國際教育百科全書:教育管理。北京市:教育科學出版社。 【Comparative Education Graduate School at Central Educational Science Research Institute. (Ed.). (1990). The international encyclopedia of education. Beijing, China: Education Science Press.】
  2. 何希慧(2016)。建立校務專業管理體制:連結校務研究、校務發展與自我評鑑。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(3),40-43。 【He, S.-H. (2016). Building professional IR management system: Connection between institution research, institution development and self-evaluation. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 5(3), 40-43.】
  3. 李政翰(2015)。我國推動大學校務研究之策略評鑑雙月刊,57,9-15。 【Li, C.-H. (2015). The strategy of promoting higher education institution research in Taiwan. Evaluation Bimonthly, 57, 9-15.】
  4. 林惠玲(2015)。校務研究的省思─迸出新火花,迎向永續經營新契機。評鑑雙月刊,58,57- 58。 【Lin, H.-L. (2015). Reflections on the IR affairs − Flaring new sparks and facing new opportunities for sustainable development. Evaluation Bimonthly, 58, 57-58.】
  5. 林靜慧、簡瑋成、許政行(2015)。美國印第安那大學校務研究辦公室運作案例分享。評鑑雙月刊,58,26-29。 【Lin, C.-H., Chien, W.-C., & Hsu, C.-H. (2015). The case study of IR office in the University of Indiana. Evaluation Bimonthly, 58, 26-29.】
» More
APA FormatLin, A. – P., Chiang, H. – L., Chuang, Y. – T., & Chang, K. – E. (2019). The Study of Developing the Administrative Performance Evaluation System From the Perspective of Institutional Research. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(1), 241-265. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0009