Journal directory listing - Volume 65(2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(4)】December

Students’ Early Alert Systems in Taiwanese Universities: A Study of Current Uses and Restrictions Author: Pei-Shan Hsieh (Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Taiwan University), Meilun Shih (Centerfor Teachingand Learning Development, National Taiwan University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 65, No. 4
Date:December 2020
Pages:171-201
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0006

Abstract:
The development of students’ early alert systems (EAS), or students’ learning alarm systems, has long been discussed by administrators and researchers in higher education. They are considered a powerful mechanism for evaluating students’ learning effectiveness, predicting potential learning difficulties, and identifying academically at-risk students. The rapid growth of information technology has made the EAS advanced in scale and practice. However, although most universities in Taiwan have established similar preventive systems or mechanisms, few studies have focused on exploring actual uses of and possible restrictions on existing EAS. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to outline the current situation of EAS in Taiwanese universities. We explored the following questions: (1) What types of EAS have been established in universities in Taiwan? (2) What are the main functions and mechanisms of the current EAS? (3) What are the actual uses of EAS in universities? (4) What are the possible restrictions on and solutions for using EAS? Data were gathered from 56 public and private universities in Taiwan. Experts familiar with or in charge of EAS design, development, and use in these universities were interviewed by telephone or face-to-face. We found that although the utility rate of EAS in most universities tended to be high, faculty resistance and difficulty in follow-up assessments on EAS utilization were the two common restrictions that occurred across campuses. To enhance the use effectiveness of EAS, faculty and administrators from both departmental and institutional levels should be involved. In addition, this study suggested that in the future, universities must attempt to strengthen collaboration among units related to EAS, improve the evaluation of EAS effectiveness, and provide additional early alert indicators of students’ academic performance.

Keywords:at-risk student group, academic alert, early alert system, intervention

《Full Text》 檔名

References:
  1. 王瑋婷、黃國倫(2016)。學生課程出席率對學習成效之影響─以國立臺北藝術大學為例。載於國立東華大學主辦之TANET2016臺灣網際網路研討會」論文集(pp. 1129-1133),花蓮縣。doi:10.6679/TANET.2016.201【Wang, W.-T., & Huang, G.-L. (2016). The impact of student’s attendance on learning outcomes: A case study at Taipei National University of the Arts. In National Dong Hwa University (Ed.), Proceeding of 2016 Taiwan Academic NETwork Conference (TANET2016) (pp. 1129-1133), Hualien, Taiwan. doi:10.6679/TANET.2016.201】
  2. 余奕憲(2018)。學習預警機制之探討與預測模型之建立(未出版碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。【Yu, Y.-H. (2018). Exploration of the early warning system and establishment of a forecast model (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.】
  3. 周汎澔、歐秀慧、林志隆、鐘育志、陳鵬元、楊瑞成(2010)。醫學大學學生期中成績預警與課業輔導之實施成效。醫學教育,14(3),197-208。doi:10.6145/jme.201009_14(3).0004【Chou, F.-H., Ou, H.-H., Lin, C.-L., Jong, Y.-J., Chen, P.-Y., & Yang, R.-C. (2010). Effectiveness of midterm early warning and tutoring in students at a medical university. Journal of Medical Education, 14(3), 197-208. doi:10.6145/jme.201009_14(3).0004】
  4. 邱宏彬、許依宸(2011)。資料採礦在學生流失偵測上之應用。資訊管理研究,11,83-99。【Chiu, H.-P., & Hsu Y.-C. (2011). Application of data mining techniques for detection of student drop out. Journal of Information Management, 11, 83-99.】
  5. 唐慧慈、郭玟杏(2017)。臺灣經驗:校務研究及對大學校院發展之影響。評鑑雙月刊,65,24-26。【Tang, H.-C., & Guo, W.-X. (2017). Taiwan experience: Institutional research and the impact on higher education. Evaluation Bimonthly, 65, 24-26.】
» More
APA FormatHsieh, P.-S., & Shih, M. (2020). Students’ early alert systems in taiwanese universities: A study of current uses and restrictions. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(4), 171-201. doi:10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0006