校長道德發展及其品德校園營造之質性探究
作者:李琪明(國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系)
卷期：58卷第1期
日期：2013年3月
頁碼：117-147
DOI：10.3966/2073753X2013035801005
摘要：
本研究結合品德教育與校長領導理念，聚焦中小學校長之道德發展及其校園營造關鍵角色，希冀達致具體研究目的有三：一為瞭解中小學校長的道德發展意涵；二為瞭解中小學校長營造品德校園的策略；三為對於校長道德發展及其品德校園營造提出反省與建議。研究者透過親訪19所中小學校園，以半結構式深度訪談其校長，並以質性探究之詮釋學方法進行訪談內容的剖析，歸納出研究結果的四個主軸：校長對於品德教育的觀點、校長面臨的道德兩難議題及其考量因素、校長的德育信念與道德核心價值，以及校長的品德校園營造策略等面向的特點。藉由理念基礎與實徵文獻對於研究結果的辯證與批判，提出對於校長領導、品德教育及進一步研究之建議。
關鍵詞：中小學校長、品德校園、道德發展、道德領導
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 方啟陽（2006）。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。【Fang, C.-Y. (2006). The study of the relationships between principals’ moral leadership and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior in elementary schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.】
- 古芝潔（2009）。台中縣市國民小學教師感受校長道德領導與教師工作滿意相關之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。【Ku, C.-C. (2009). A study of the relationship between the elementary school teachers’ perception of their principals’ ethical leadership and job satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taichung University of Education, Taichung, Taiwan.】
- 李琪明（2008）。國中小品德校園文化營造實徵研究。師大學報：教育類，53（3），153-178。【Lee, C.-M. (2008). An empirical study of character-based school culture building in Taiwan’s elementary and junior high schools. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 153-178.】
- 李琪明（2011）。品德教育與校園營造。臺北市：心理。【Lee, C.-M. (2011). Character/moral education and school-culture building. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.】
- 林明地（1999）。重建學校領導的倫理學觀念。教育政策論壇，2（2），129-157。【Lin, M.-D. (1999). Rebuilding the ethics of school leadership. Educational Policy Forum, 2(2), 129-157.】
» 展開更多
- 方啟陽（2006）。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。【Fang, C.-Y. (2006). The study of the relationships between principals’ moral leadership and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior in elementary schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.】
- 古芝潔（2009）。台中縣市國民小學教師感受校長道德領導與教師工作滿意相關之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。【Ku, C.-C. (2009). A study of the relationship between the elementary school teachers’ perception of their principals’ ethical leadership and job satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taichung University of Education, Taichung, Taiwan.】
- 李琪明（2008）。國中小品德校園文化營造實徵研究。師大學報：教育類，53（3），153-178。【Lee, C.-M. (2008). An empirical study of character-based school culture building in Taiwan’s elementary and junior high schools. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 153-178.】
- 李琪明（2011）。品德教育與校園營造。臺北市：心理。【Lee, C.-M. (2011). Character/moral education and school-culture building. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.】
- 林明地（1999）。重建學校領導的倫理學觀念。教育政策論壇，2（2），129-157。【Lin, M.-D. (1999). Rebuilding the ethics of school leadership. Educational Policy Forum, 2(2), 129-157.】
- 林明地、陳威良（2010）。國小校長道德領導對學校組織文化與學生學習表現之影響。教育學刊，35，129-165。【Lin, M.-D., & Chen, W.-L. (2010). A study of the influence of the elementary school principals’ moral leadership on school cultural and students’ learning performance. Educational Review, 35, 129-165.】
- 林純雯（2000）。國民中學校長道德領導之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。【Lin, C.-W. (2000). The study of principals’ moral leadership in junior high schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 周百崑（2004）。國民小學校長倫理決定之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院，臺中市。【Chou, P.-K. (2004). A study of the ethical decision-making of elementary school principals (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taichung College of Education, Taichung, Taiwan.】
- 范熾文、林加惠（2009）。校長道德領導：意涵、理論與實施策略。研習資訊，26（3），103-108。【Fan, C.-W., & Lin, G.-H. (2009). Principals’ moral leadership: Meaning, theory and implementing strategies. Inservice Education Bulletin, 26(3), 103-108.】
- 范熾文、林加惠（2010）。國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。市北教育學刊，36，23-50。【Fan, C.-W., & Lin, G.-H. (2010). A study of the relationships between principals’ moral leadership and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior in elementary schools. Journal of Education of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 36, 23-50.】
- 胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。一些質性方法上的思考。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（pp. 141-158）。臺北市：巨流。【Hu, Y.-H., & Yao, M.-H. (1996). Several considerations on qualitative methods. In Y.-H. Hu (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and cases for native feminist research (pp. 141-158). Taipei, Taiwan: Chuliu.】
- 教育部（2004）。教育部品德教育促進方案。取自http://ce.naer.edu.tw/policy.php【Ministry of Education. (2004). Guidelines for facilitating character and/or moral education programs. Retrieved from http://ce.naer.edu.tw/policy.php】
- 陳世哲、劉春榮（2005）。我國中小學校長培育之現況與展望─以臺北市立師範學院校長培育班為例。教育研究月刊，129，61-78。【Chen, S.-J., & Liu, C.-R. (2005). The situation and prospect of training for principals of elementary and secondary schools in Taiwan. Journal of Education Research, 129, 61-78.】
- 陳隆進（2005）。高屏地區國民小學校長道德領導行為現況調查及其發展策略之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。【Chen, J.-J. (2005). A study on the present status of principal’s moral leadership and its development strategy in Kaohsiung and Ping Tung region elementary schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
- 畢恆達（1996）。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（pp. 27-46）。臺北市：巨流。【Bih, H.-D. (1996). Hermeneutics and qualitative research. In Y.-H. Hu (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and cases for native feminist research (pp. 27-46). Taipei, Taiwan: Chuliu.】
- 黃琬婷（2003）。國民小學校長倫理取向與教師工作滿意之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。【Huang, W.-T. (2003). The study of the relations between principal’s leadership of ethical tendency in elementary school and teacher’s job satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.】
- 張鈿富、馮丰儀（2010）。臺灣國民中小學校長倫理傾向及道德領導行為之研究。教育與心理研究，33（1），73-97。【Chang, D.-F., & Feng, F.-I. (2010). A study of lower-secondary and elementary school principals’ ethical predispositions and their moral leadership in Taiwan. Journal of Education & Psychology, 33(1), 73-97.】
- 鄭新輝（2009）。國民中學校長行政兩難來源、困擾與成因之研究。教育科學研究期刊，54（3），175-210。【Cheng, H.-H. (2009). Administrative dilemmas of junior high school principals: Sources, disturbance and causes. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(3), 175-210.】
- 謝文全（1998）。道德領導－學校行政領導的另一扇窗。載於林玉体（主編），跨世紀的教育演變（pp. 237-253）。臺北市：文景書局。【Hsieh, W.-C. (1998). Moral leadership: Another perspective of school administrative leadership. In Y.-T. Lin (Ed.), Educational innovation across the century (pp. 237-253). Taipei, Taiwan: Win-Join Book.】
- 謝文全（2003）。教育行政學。臺北市：高等教育。【Hsieh, W.-C. (2003). Educational administration. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 顏童文（2001）。中部四縣市國民小學校長道德領導之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。【Yen, T.-W. (2001). A study on elementary principal’ moral leadership of four counties in central Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chi Nan University, Nantou County, Taiwan.】
- Kuhmerker, L.（1993）。學校道德文化的評鑑（蘇建文，譯）。載於L. Kuhmerker, U. P. Gielen, R. L. Hayes, J. R. Rest, T. Lei, B. Noia, ...W. Kolber等（著），道德發展－柯爾堡的薪傳（俞筱鈞、林文瑛、郭靜晃、單文經、曾端真、葉光輝、蘇建文，譯，pp. 225-238）。臺北市：洪葉。（原著出版於1991年）【Kuhmerker, L. (1993). The evaluation for school moral culture (G.-W. Sue, Trans.). In L. Kuhmerker, U. P. Gielen, R. L. Hayes, J. R. Rest, T. Lei, B. Noia, ...W. Kolber et al., The Kohlberg legacy for the helping professions (X.-J. Yu, W.-I. Lin, J.-H. Gao, W.-J. Shan, D.-Z. Zeng, G.-H. Ye, & G.-W. Sue, Trans., pp. 225-238). Taipei, Taiwan: Hungyeh. (Original work published 1991)】
- Dempster, N., & Berry, V. (2003). Blindfolded in a minefield: Principals’ ethical decision-making. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 457-477. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122069
- Dempster, N., Carter, L., Freakley, M., & Parry, L. (2004). Contextual influences on school leaders in Australia: Some data from a recent study of principals’ ethical decision-making. School Leadership & Management, 24(2), 163-174. doi:10.1080/1363243041000695804
- Klinker, J. F., & Hackmann, D. G. (2003). An analysis of principals’ ethical decision-making using Rest’s four component model of moral behavior. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED478255)
- Kohlberg, L. (1986). A current statement on some theoretical issues. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (pp. 485-546). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Lashway, L. (1996). Ethical leadership. ERIC Digest, 107, 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed. gov/PDFS/ED397463.pdf
- Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Power, F. C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). Assessing the moral culture of schools. In F. C. Power, A. Higgins, & L. Kohlberg (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg’s approach to moral education (pp. 99-145). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Puka, W. (2005). Moral development. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/moraldev/
- Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo- Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1177/019263659207654719
- Starratt, R. J. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. London, UK: The Falmer.
- Tappan, M. B., & Packer, M. J. (Eds.). (1991). Narrative and storytelling: Implications for understanding moral development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Tough-Doogan, K. M. (2003). A study of female principals’ moral orientations and reasoning through the use of self-generated moral dilemmas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University, Dekalb, IL.
- Watson, M. (2008). Developmental discipline and moral education. In L. P. Nucci & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education (pp. 175-203). New York, NY: Routledge.
Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(1)】March
Qualitative Inquiry on Principals’ Moral Development and Their Building of Morality and Character in Schools
Author: Chi-Ming Angela Lee(Department of Civic Education and Leadership, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 58, No. 1
Date：March 2013
Pages：117-147
DOI：10.3966/2073753X2013035801005
Abstract：
This study focuses on the moral development of principals and their central role in school culture building based on connections between moral dimension and principal leadership in this study. The three purposes of this study are as follows: (1) Understanding principals’ moral development; (2) understanding principals’ strategies for building morality and character in schools; and (3) providing a reflection and suggestions regarding principals’ moral development and the building of morality and character in schools. We held a semistructured interview with 19 elementary and high school principals in Taiwan and visited each of their campuses. Using hermeneutics as a methodological approach in qualitative research, we reached four aspects of findings: perspectives on morality and character education, moral dilemma and influential factors, moral belief and core ethical values, and strategies for building morality and character in schools from principals’ self-reflections. This study offers implications and suggestions on morality and character education, and principal leadership through a discussion and critical thinking regarding the gaps between findings and literature reviews.
Keywords：elementary and secondary school principals, morality-and-character-based school, moral development, moral leadership