師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 58卷(2013) - 【教育科學研究期刊】58(3) 九月刊（本期專題：國民素養）

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「高等教育的教學卓越」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/09/30) 《教育科學研究期刊》「社會情緒學習｣專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/10/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「高齡教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/12/31)

期刊目錄列表 - 58卷(2013) - 【教育科學研究期刊】58(3) 九月刊（本期專題：國民素養）

回上一頁

（專題）公民科學家意象與參觀博物館對科學研究利益知覺之影響作者:黃孝宗(高雄市龍目國小)、蔡俊彥(正修科技大學資訊管理系)、黃台珠(國立中山大學通識教育中心)

卷期：58卷第3期
日期：2013年9月
頁碼：1-22
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).01

摘要：

科學與技術研究常伴隨著社會性科學議題的產生，公眾於這些議題中對各項科學研究利益知覺（簡稱「科學知覺」）被認為是一項科學素養的指標。本研究主要目的在於探討公民的科學家意象與有無參觀博物館對科學知覺的影響。研究工具採用「公民科學素養問卷」，以「機率比例抽樣法」抽出研究對象，並以實地訪談調查研究法完訪臺灣地區公民2,024人。分析方法採量化研究，以階層迴歸分析法檢驗。研究結果發現，科學家意象及參觀博物館對公民科學知覺有預測力，科學家意象愈無刻板印象及1年內有參觀博物館的公民，其科學知覺愈正向。以有無參觀博物館為調節變項，發現1年內沒有參觀博物館的公民，科學家意象對科學知覺的預測效果較大；1年內有參觀博物館的公民，科學家意象對科學知覺的預測效果較小。研究建議，科學教育學者應重視公民對科學家的刻板印象，以及促進公民參觀博物館，以期公民能夠有正向的科學知覺。

關鍵詞：非制式學習、利益知覺、科學家意象、科學素養、博物館教育

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

李文旗、張俊彥（2005）。中學生應達到的地球科學素養？－中學地科老師的觀點。師大學報：科學教育類，50（2），1-27。【Lee, W.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2005). Taiwan’s secondary school teachers’ expectations with regard to the earth science literacy of their students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education, 50(2), 1-27.】
佘曉清（1999）。影響我國中小學學生科學家印象因素之綜論。教育研究資訊，7（2），47-60。【She, H.-C. (1999). The discussions of factors influencing the images of scientists of primary and secondary school students in Taiwan. Educational Research Information, 7(2), 47-60.】
邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS/PASW資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南。【Chiou, H.-J. (2010). Quantitative research and statistical analysis: SPSS/PASW example analysis of data analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
洪文東、黃俊偉（2008）。國小學童對科學家的意象調查研究：以屏東縣某國小學童為例。美和技術學院學報，27（2），21-48。【Hung, W.-T., & Huang, C.-W. (2008). A survey study of elementary school students’ images of scientists: An example of elementary school students in Pingtung County. Journal of Meiho Institute of Technology, 27(2), 21-48.】
洪永泰（1992）。民意調查的抽樣設計。研考會雙月刊，16（1），22-34。【Hung, Y.-T. (1992). Sampling design of public opinion survey. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, 16(1), 22-34.】

» 展開更多

李文旗、張俊彥（2005）。中學生應達到的地球科學素養？－中學地科老師的觀點。師大學報：科學教育類，50（2），1-27。【Lee, W.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2005). Taiwan’s secondary school teachers’ expectations with regard to the earth science literacy of their students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education, 50(2), 1-27.】
佘曉清（1999）。影響我國中小學學生科學家印象因素之綜論。教育研究資訊，7（2），47-60。【She, H.-C. (1999). The discussions of factors influencing the images of scientists of primary and secondary school students in Taiwan. Educational Research Information, 7(2), 47-60.】
邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS/PASW資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南。【Chiou, H.-J. (2010). Quantitative research and statistical analysis: SPSS/PASW example analysis of data analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
洪文東、黃俊偉（2008）。國小學童對科學家的意象調查研究：以屏東縣某國小學童為例。美和技術學院學報，27（2），21-48。【Hung, W.-T., & Huang, C.-W. (2008). A survey study of elementary school students’ images of scientists: An example of elementary school students in Pingtung County. Journal of Meiho Institute of Technology, 27(2), 21-48.】
洪永泰（1992）。民意調查的抽樣設計。研考會雙月刊，16（1），22-34。【Hung, Y.-T. (1992). Sampling design of public opinion survey. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, 16(1), 22-34.】
陳雪雲（2004）。邁向全球風險時代博物館教育新思維。博物館學季刊，18（1），7-17。【Chen, S.-Y. (2004). Towards a new pedagogy in museums in a global risk context. Museology Quarterly, 18(1), 7-17.】
章英華、傅仰止（2006）。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第五期第一次調查計畫執行報告。行政院國家科學委員會專案研究報告（NSC94-2420-H-001-008-B1）。臺北市：中央研究院社會學研究所。【Chang, Y.-H., & Fu, Y.-C. (2006). Taiwan social change survey, first wave of the fifth phase. National Science Council project report (NSC94-2420-H-001-008-B1). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.】
黃俊儒、簡妙如（2010）。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。【Huang, C.-J., & Jian, M.-J. (2010). Science communication studies between science and media: The needs and roles of the contemporary public. Mass Communication Research, 105, 127-166.】
黃書涵、劉德祥（2012）。「愛他，不Hot他」全球暖化特展對觀眾知識與態度的影響。博物館學季刊，26（1），59-85。【Huang, S.-H., & Lau, T.-C. (2012). The effects of the “Global Warming, We Care” exhibition on visitors’ knowledge and attitudes. Museology Quarterly, 26(1), 59-85.】
傅大為（2001）。再怎樣都不能。科技、醫療與社會，1，Ⅱ-Ⅳ。【Fu, D.-W. (2001). We cannot do it even though there is any prerequisite. Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine, 1, Ⅱ-Ⅳ.】
傅仰止、張晉芬（2007）。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第五期第二次調查計畫執行報告。行政院國家科學委員會專案研究報告（NSC95-2420-H-001-006-B1）。臺北市：中央研究院社會學研究所。【Fu, Y.-C., & Chang, C.-F. (2007). Taiwan social change survey, second wave of the fifth phase. National Science Council project report (NSC95-2420-H-001-006-B1). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.】
葉蓉樺（2003）。博物館在促進科學學習情境均等可扮演的角色。博物館學季刊，17（3），25-33。【Yeh, J.-H. (2003). Museums and science learing context inequality. Museology Quarterly, 17(3), 25-33.】
葉蓉樺（2004）。社會變遷中的博物館教育功能反思。博物館學季刊，18（1），55-62。【Yeh, J.-H. (2004). Thoughts on the social educational function of museums in a transitional society. Museology Quarterly, 18(1), 55-62.】
楊文金（1998）。「同儕科學家意像」對訊息合理性判斷的影響分析。師大學報：科學教育類，43（1），1-17。【Yang, W.-G. (1998). An analysis of the effects of “image of peer-scientists” on students’ judgement of the reasonableness of science information. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education, 43(1), 1-17.】
蔡俊彥（2011，3月）。臺灣地區第一次公民科學素養調查抽樣程序。論文發表於2011年海峽兩岸科學傳播論壇，北京市。【Tsai, C.-Y. (2011, March). The sampling procedure of the first wave survey of civic scientific literacy in Taiwan. Paper presented at 2011 Cross-Strait Science Communication Forum, Beijing, China.】
謝清俊（1997）。資訊科技對人文、社會的衝擊與影響期末研究報告。行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究計畫（（86）023-602）。臺北市：行政院經濟建設委員會。【Hsieh, C.-C. (1997). Final project report of the impacts and effects of information technology upon culture and society. Council for Economic Planning and Development research project (Report No. (86)023-602). Taipei, Taiwan: Council for Economic Planning and Development.】
Binder, A. R., Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2012). Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 830-847. doi:10.1177/096366 2510390159
Black, G. (2005). The engaging museum: Developing museum for visitor involvement. London, UK: Routledge.
Bonfadelli, H., Dahinden, U., & Leonarz, M. (2002). Biotechnology in Switzerland: High on the public agenda, but only moderate support. Public Understanding of Science, 11(2), 113-130. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/302
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. doi:10.1080/09500693. 2010.518644
Cobb, M. D., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395-405. doi:10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4
Critchley, C. R. (2008). Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 309-327. doi:10.1177/0963662506070162
Delicado, A. (2009). Scientific controversies in museums: Notes from a semi-peripheral country. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 759-767. doi:10.1177/0963662508098577
Du, J., & MacEachern, S. N. (2008). Judgment post-stratification for designed experiments. Biometrics, 64(2), 345-354. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00898.x
Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Holland, D. G. (1995). What do we think people learning in museum? In J. H. Falk & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda (pp. 17-22). Washington, DC: AAM.
Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N. L., & Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums.
Fan, M.-F. (2009). Public perceptions and the nuclear waste repository on Orchid Island, Taiwan. Public Understanding of Science, 18(2), 167-176. doi:10.1177/0963662507079369
Fields, D. A. (2009). What do students gain from a week at science camp? Youth perceptions and the design of an immersive, research-oriented astronomy camp. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 151-171. doi:10.1080/09500690701648291
Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335-345. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1999). Introduction. In S. M. Friedman, S. D. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty (pp. xi-xiv). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433-447. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306
Henriksen, E. K., & Froyland, M. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: Views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 393-415. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/304
Hursti, U., & Magnusson, M. K. (2002). Swedish consumers’ opinions about gene technology. British Food Journal, 104, 860-872. doi:10.1108/00070700210454596
Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio- scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689-1716. doi:10.1080/ 09500690600560878
Lee, C.-F. (2002). The museum as an educational entity: The performative transformation of places into spaces (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Liakopoulos, M. (2002). Pandora’s Box or panacea? Using metaphors to create the public representations of biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 11(1), 5-32. doi:10.1088/ 0963-6625/11/1/301
Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 773-792. doi:10.1080/09500690701250452
National Science Board. (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators-2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators-2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board. (2008). Science and Engineering Indicators-2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Olsen, R. V., & Lie, S. (2011). Profiles of students’ interest in science issues around the world: Analysis of data from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 97-120. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518638
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: Author.
Pardo, R., & Calvo, F. (2008). Attitudes toward embryo research, worldviews, and the moral status of the embryo frame. Science Communication, 30(1), 8-47. doi:10.1177/1075547008319432
Priest, S. H. (2001). Misplaced faith: Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Science Communication, 23(2), 97-110. doi:10.1177/10755470010 23002002
Reis, P., & Galvao, C. (2004). Socio-scientific controversies and students’ conceptions about scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1621-1633. doi:10.1080/09500 69042000205413
Ricroch, A., & Jésus, F. (2009). Consultations of stakeholders on the roles of research in relation to genetically modified plants in France. Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 91-102. doi:10. 1177/0963662507078015
Rosati, S., & Saba, A. (2004). The perception of risks associated with food-related hazards and the perceived reliability of sources of information. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 39(5), 491-500. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00808.x
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. doi:10. 1080/0950069032000119456
Sáez, M. J., Niño, A. G., & Carretero, A. (2008). Matching society values: Students’ views of biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 167-183. doi:10.1080/09500 690601152386
Schütz, H., & Wiedemann, P. M. (2008). Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 369-379. doi:10.1177/0963662506071282
Storksdieck, M., Ellenbogen, K., & Heimlich, J. E. (2005). Changing minds? Factors that influence free-choice learning about environmental conservation. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 353-369. doi:10.1080/13504620500081228
Sturgis, P. J., & Allum, N. (2001). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: Reply to Hayes and Tariq. Public Understanding of Science, 10(4), 427-430. doi:10. 1088/0963-6625/10/4/306
Traill, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M. S., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., …Morrow, J. L. (2004). Categories of GM risk-benefit perceptions and their antecedents. AgBioForum, 7(4), 176-186.
Van de Velde, L. V., Verbeke, W., Popp, M., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2011). Trust and perception related to information about biofuels in Belgium. Public Understanding of Science, 20(5), 595-608. doi:10.1177/0963662509358641
Van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Paris, S. G. (2002). Reading objects. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 215-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wallquist, L., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(17), 6557- 6562. doi:10.1021/es1005412
Wu, K.-C., Shein, P. P., Tsai, C.-Y., Chou, C.-Y., Wu, Y.-Y., Liu, C.-J., …Huang, T.-C. (2012). An investigation of Taiwan’s public attitudes toward science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.613643
Yaneva, A., Rabesandratana, T. M., & Greiner, B. (2009). Staging scientific controversies: A gallery test on science museums’ interactivity. Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 79-90. doi:10. 1177/0963662507077512

中文APA引文格式	黃孝宗、蔡俊彥、黃台珠(2013)。公民科學家意象與參觀博物館對科學研究利益知覺之影響。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，1-22。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).01
APA Format	Huang, H.-T., Tsai, C.-Y., & Huang, T.-C. (2013). Influence of Citizens’ Images of Scientists and Museum Visits on the Benefit Perception of Scientific Research. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(3), 1-22. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).01

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(3)】September (Special Issue: Research, theory, and practice)

Top

(Special Issue) Influence of Citizens’ Images of Scientists and Museum Visits on the Benefit Perception of Scientific Research Author: Hsiao-Tsung Huang(Longmu Elementary School,Kaohsiung City), Chun-Yen Tsai(Department of Information Management, Cheng Shiu University),Tai-Chu Huang(Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 58, No. 3
Date：September 2013
Pages：1-22
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).01

Abstract：

Science and technology research addresses various socio-scientific issues. The benefit perception of scientific research (BPSR) is a crucial indicator of scientific literacy. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of citizens’ images of scientists and museum visits on the BPSR. Participants for this study (2,024 in total) were obtained through a probability-proportional-to-size sampling method and were interviewed using the Civic Scientific Literacy Survey. A quantitative analysis was conducted through hierarchical regression analyses. The results showed that images of scientists and museum visits revealed predictability to the BPSR among Taiwanese citizens. The fewer stereotypes that Taiwanese citizens possess about scientists, the greater is the perceived benefits of scientific research. Those who had visited museums in the past year perceived more benefits from scientific research. When museum visit was used as the moderating variable, it revealed two levels of regression. Among the citizens who had not visited museums in the past year, the effect of images of scientists on their BPSR was strong. By contrast, among people who had visited museums in the past year, the effect of images on their BPSR was weak. The research suggests that science educators emphasize citizen stereotypes of scientists and promotion of the visits to science museums. This may allow citizens to perceive the benefits of scientific research.

Keywords：informal Learning, benefit perception, images of scientists, scientific literacy, museum education

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 58卷(2013) - 【教育科學研究期刊】58(3) 九月刊（本期專題：國民素養） 回上一頁

（專題）公民科學家意象與參觀博物館對科學研究利益知覺之影響 作者:黃孝宗(高雄市龍目國小)、蔡俊彥(正修科技大學資訊管理系)、黃台珠(國立中山大學通識教育中心)

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(3)】September (Special Issue: Research, theory, and practice) Top

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 58卷(2013) - 【教育科學研究期刊】58(3) 九月刊（本期專題：國民素養）

回上一頁

（專題）公民科學家意象與參觀博物館對科學研究利益知覺之影響作者:黃孝宗(高雄市龍目國小)、蔡俊彥(正修科技大學資訊管理系)、黃台珠(國立中山大學通識教育中心)

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(3)】September (Special Issue: Research, theory, and practice)

Top