四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響:創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定
作者:陳玉樹(國立中正大學成人及繼續教育學系)、郭銘茜(國立中正大學成人及繼續教育學系)
卷期:58卷第3期
日期:2013年9月
頁碼:85-120
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).04
摘要:
本研究的目的在探討教學領域四向度成就目標對高中教師創意教學表現的影響,並檢定創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果。以問卷調查法蒐集資料,研究對象為全臺高中之國文、英文及數學科教師。總計回收有效問卷1,620份,來自93所學校的218個教學研究會。以階層線性模式進行資料分析,研究結果顯示:一、成就目標會透過創意自我效能影響創意教學表現,其中學習趨向、學習逃避、表現趨向具正向中介效果,而表現逃避則是負向的中介效果;二、團隊學習行為會正向影響創意教學表現;三、團隊學習行為對學習趨向與創意教學表現之關係具有正向調節效果。
關鍵詞:成就目標、創意自我效能、創意教學表現、團隊學習行為
《詳全文》
參考文獻:
- 李仁豪、余民寧(2003)。2×2成就目標理論架構之驗證。教育與心理研究,26(3),433-470。【Li, R.-H., & Yu, M.-N. (2003). The verification of 2×2 achievement goal theory framework. Journal of Education & Psychology, 26(3), 433-470.】
- 李新民、陳密桃(2007)。實用智能、目標導向、自我效能對工作表現之影響探析:以幼兒教師為例。教育學刊,28,63-100。【Lee, H.-M., & Chen, M.-T. (2007). The influence of practical intelligence, goal orientation, self-efficacy on job performance of the preschool teachers. Educational Review, 28, 63-100.】
- 吳明雄、許碧珊、饒達欽、簡明忠、陳建宏、張中一、黃秀玉(2008)。高職學生技術創造力指標建構之研究。師大學報:教育類,53(3),67-93。doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303004【Wu, M.-H., Hsu, P.-S., Rau, D.-C., Jian, M.-Z., Chen, C.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Huang, S.-Y. (2008). The development of technological creativity indicators for vocational high school students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 67-93. doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303004】
- 洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究-以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報:教育類,52(2),49-71。doi:10.3966/2073753X2007085202003【Horng, J.-S., Hong, J.-C., Lin, L.-J., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2007). Factors influencing the creative instruction of integrated activities teachers. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 52(2), 49-71. doi:10.3966/ 2073753X2007085202003】
- 教育部(2008)。風乎舞雩:教育部顧問室「創造力教育中程計畫」推動實錄。臺北市:作者。【Ministry of Education. (2008). Fing hu wu yu: Ministry of Education Advisory Office “creative education medium-term plan” implementation record. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
» 展開更多
- 李仁豪、余民寧(2003)。2×2成就目標理論架構之驗證。教育與心理研究,26(3),433-470。【Li, R.-H., & Yu, M.-N. (2003). The verification of 2×2 achievement goal theory framework. Journal of Education & Psychology, 26(3), 433-470.】
- 李新民、陳密桃(2007)。實用智能、目標導向、自我效能對工作表現之影響探析:以幼兒教師為例。教育學刊,28,63-100。【Lee, H.-M., & Chen, M.-T. (2007). The influence of practical intelligence, goal orientation, self-efficacy on job performance of the preschool teachers. Educational Review, 28, 63-100.】
- 吳明雄、許碧珊、饒達欽、簡明忠、陳建宏、張中一、黃秀玉(2008)。高職學生技術創造力指標建構之研究。師大學報:教育類,53(3),67-93。doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303004【Wu, M.-H., Hsu, P.-S., Rau, D.-C., Jian, M.-Z., Chen, C.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Huang, S.-Y. (2008). The development of technological creativity indicators for vocational high school students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 67-93. doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303004】
- 洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究-以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報:教育類,52(2),49-71。doi:10.3966/2073753X2007085202003【Horng, J.-S., Hong, J.-C., Lin, L.-J., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2007). Factors influencing the creative instruction of integrated activities teachers. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 52(2), 49-71. doi:10.3966/ 2073753X2007085202003】
- 教育部(2008)。風乎舞雩:教育部顧問室「創造力教育中程計畫」推動實錄。臺北市:作者。【Ministry of Education. (2008). Fing hu wu yu: Ministry of Education Advisory Office “creative education medium-term plan” implementation record. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 陳玉樹、周志偉(2009)。目標導向對創造力訓練效果之影響:HLM成長模式分析。課程與教學季刊,12(2),19-46。【Chen, Y.-S., & Chou, C.-W. (2009). The impact of goal orientation on creativity training: A growth model analysis of hierarchical linear modeling. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 12(2), 19-46.】
- 陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響:階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報,40(2),179-198。【Chen, Y.-S., & Hu, M.-C. (2008). The impact of task motivation and organizational innovative climate on adult education teachers’ creative teaching performance: An analysis of hierarchical linear modeling. Bulletin of Education Psychology, 40(2), 179-198.】
- 程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報:教育類,47(1),39-58。doi:10.3966/2073753X2002044701003【Cherng, B.-L. (2002). The interaction among multiple goals, motivational problems, and self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 47(1), 39-58. doi:10.3966/2073753X200 2044701003】
- 程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。doi: 10.3966/2073753X2003044801002【Cheng, B.-L. (2003). Study of the model of 4 dimensions goal orientation. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 48(1), 15-40. doi:10.3966/2073753X2003044801002】
- 彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報:教育類,50(2),69-95。doi:10.3966/2073753X2005105002005【Peng, S.-L., & Cherng, B.-L. (2005). The relationship among a 4-dimensional classroom goal structure, personal goal orientation and academic help-seeking behavior. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 50(2), 69-95. doi:10.3966/2073753X2005105002005】
- 黃家齊、黃荷婷(2006)。團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響:一個多層次研究。管理學報,23(3),327-346。【Huang, J.-C., & Huang, H.-T. (2006). The effect of team member goal orientation on self-efficacy, collective efficacy and innovation: A multilevel study. Journal of Management, 23(3), 327-346.】
- 謝家琳(2008)。實地研究中的問卷調查法。載於陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎(主編),組織與管理研究的實證方法(pp. 179-198)。臺北市:華泰文化。【Xie, J.-L. (2008). Questionnaire survey methods in field research. In X.-P. Chen, S. Tsui, J.-L. Farh, & B.-S. Cheng (Eds.), Empirical methods of research in organization and management (pp. 179-198). Taipei, Taiwan: HuaTai Cultural.】
- 蕭佳純(2012)。國小學童科學學習動機、父母創意教養與科技創造力關聯之研究。教育科學研究期刊,57(4),103-133。doi:10.3966/2073753X2012125704004【Hsiao, C.-C. (2012). Science learning motivation and creative parenting effects on student technological creativity. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(4), 103-133. doi:10.3966/2073753X2012125704004】
- 蕭佳純、董旭英(2007)。教師參與團隊學習行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式之應用。師大學報:教育類,52(3),65-89。doi:10.3966/2073753X2007125203004【Hsiao, C.-C., & Tung, Y.-Y. (2007). A study of the multi-level analysis of junior high school teachers’ team learning behavior: Application of a hierarchical linear model. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 52(3), 65-89. doi:10.3966/2073753X2007125203004】
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
- Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185-201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
- Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950
- Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
- Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402. doi:10.2307/3150783
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122- 147. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.37.2.122
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1988). Organisational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275-302. doi:10.1177/031289628801300210
- Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.44.9.1175
- Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychological, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 497-505. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.497
- Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
- Bobko, P., & Colella, A. (1994). Employee reactions to performance standards: A review and research propositions. Personnel Psychology, 47(1), 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb02407.x
- Brett, J. F., & VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 863-873. doi:10.1037//0021-9010. 84.6.863
- Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 552-560. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552
- Button, S., B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0063
- Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297-312). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2010). Business research methods (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), 159-176. doi:10.1016/ 0732-118X(88)90001-3
- Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
- Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.41.10.1040
- Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
- Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to achievement motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666999
- Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10; pp. 143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
- Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meditational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.461
- Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
- Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613-628. doi:10. 1037/0022-0663.100.3.613
- Farr, J. L., Hofmann, D. A., & Ringenbach, K. L. (1993). Goal orientation and action control theory: Implications for industrial and organizational psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 191-232.
- Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51(2), 397-420. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998. tb00731.x
- Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071865
- George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525934
- Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Azeemi, H. R., & Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Mediating role of creative self-efficacy. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11093-11103. doi:10.5897/ AJBM11.876
- Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670890
- Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45(1-3), 153-171. doi:10.1023/A:1006941729637
- Heyman, G. D., & Dweck, C. S. (1992). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Their relation and their role in adaptive motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 231-247. doi:10. 1007/BF00991653
- Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308035
- James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98. doi:10.1037//0021- 9010.69.1.85
- Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader- member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384. doi:10.2307/20159587
- Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2&3), 247-258. doi:10.1080/10400410701397339
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, MI: Scientific Software International.
- Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1; pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195-229. doi:10.5465/AMR.1994. 9410210745
- Koestner, R., & McClelland, D. C. (1990). Perspectives on competence and motivation. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 527-548). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 23(4), 418-444. doi:10.1177/0193841X9902300404
- Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249-277. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what costs? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77-86. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.77
- Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131-149. doi:10.1111/j.2044- 8325.1992.tb00490.x
- Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.103.1.27
- Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. doi:10.2307/256657
- Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 792-802. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555. doi:10.1037//0022-0663. 92.3.544
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
- Potosky, D., & Ramakrishna, H. V. (2002). The mediating role of updating climate perceptions in the relationship between goal orientation, self-efficacy, and job performance. Human Performance, 15(3), 275-297. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1503_03
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120-151. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1027
- Relich, J. D., Debus, R. L., & Walker, R. (1986). The mediating role of attribution and self-efficacy variables for treatment effects on achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(3), 195-216. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(86)90017-2
- Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale of social desirability. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119-125. doi:10.1002/1097- 4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I
- Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social learning and cognition. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453. doi:10. 1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
- Schunk, D. H., & Gunn, T. P. (1986). Self-efficacy and skill development: Influence of task strategies and attributions. Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 238-244.
- Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
- Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
- Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 724-738. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.5.724
- Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
- Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. doi:10.2307/ 3069429
- Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413-432. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.001
- Timmermans, O., Van Linge, R., Van Petegem, P., Van Rompaey, B., & Denekens, J. (2013). A contingency perspective on team learning and innovation in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(2), 363-373. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06014.x
- Urdan, T. C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10; pp. 99-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- VandeWalle, D. (1993, August). Feedback seeking behavior: A goal orientation model. Paper presented at the Academy of Management National Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
- VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Education and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015. doi:10.1177/0013164497057 006009
- VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 629-640. doi:10.1037/0021-9010. 86.4.629
- Wang, A.-C., & Cheng, B.-S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121. doi:10.1002/job.634
- Wang, Y.-L., & Ellinger, A. D. (2011). Organizational learning perception of external environment and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5&6), 512-536. doi:10. 1108/01437721111158189
- Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067
- Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. doi:10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
- Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 682-696. doi:10.2307/3069410
Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(3)】September (Special Issue: Research, theory, and practice)
Four-Dimensional Achievement Goal Effects on Creative Teaching Performance: Testing the Mediating Effects of Creative Self-Efficacy and the Cross-Level Moderating Effects of Team Learning Behavior
Author: Yu-Shu Chen(Adult & Continuing Education, National Chung Cheng University), Ming-Chien Kuo(Adult & Continuing Education, National Chung Cheng University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 58, No. 3
Date:September 2013
Pages:85-120
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).04
Abstract:
The purposes of this study were to explore the mediating effects that creative self-efficacy exerts on the relationship between achievement goals in the teaching domain and creative teaching performance, as well as the moderating effects that team learning behavior exerts on the relationships between learning-orientation goals and creative teaching performance. A survey method was used to collect the data. Participants were 1,620 teachers from 218 committees of teaching and research in 93 senior high schools. We used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to conduct data analysis. The results indicated that (1) creative self-efficacy mediated the relationship between achievement goals and creative teaching performance, in which the learning-approach, learning-avoidance, and performance-approach exerted positive mediating effects; however, the performance-avoidance exerted a negative mediating effect; (2) team learning behavior exerted a positive effect on creative teaching performance; and (3) team learning behavior positively moderated the relationship between learning-approach and creative teaching performance.
Keywords:achievement goals, creative self-efficacy, creative teaching performance, team learning behavior