（專題）日本高級中等教育的「多樣化政策」分析：特色學校的教改理念與實施
作者:劉語霏(中國文化大學師資培育中心)
卷期：59卷第1期
日期：Vol. 59, No. 1
頁碼：141-170
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).05
摘要：
本研究旨在探討日本高級中等教育「多樣化政策」之發展沿革，並分析該政策下成立之特色學校所象徵的教育改革理念與辦學意義。進而，剖析其實施狀況、影響與課題，以供國人借鏡參考。「多樣化政策」乃指學校型態、類科與教育課程的多元化政策，而特色學校則為實施有特色的教育課程之學校，不分公私立、高中職學校。本研究使用M. Trow的高等教育模式分析「多樣化政策」之歷史發展沿革，並同時採取質性與量化調查研究法，進行長期研究調查。研究發現，日本第二階段的「多樣化政策」，其教育改革的理念在於讓多元且具特色之高級中等教育的學校型態與教育課程來因應各式各樣的學生之特質與學習需求。而特色學校的建立也確實符合「普及化高級中等教育階段」下，高級中等教育所應有的「多樣性」姿態。據此提出建議「十二年國民基本教育」中應融入學校本位的改革精神，讓辦學自主權與獨立招生制回歸學校本身。設置多元且有特色的教育課程之特色學校既能有效因應學生素質與需求的多樣性，也才能真正達到適才適所、因材施教、適性揚才的目標。
關鍵詞：十二年國民基本教育、日本高級中等教育、多樣化政策、特色學校、教育改革
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 李敦義（2011）。綜合高中分流政策對學生學習成就的影響：以TEPS資料分析為例。教育科學研究期刊，56（2），107-135。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011065602004【Lee, D.-Y. (2011). Effects of comprehensive high school policy on students’ achievement: Evidence from Taiwan education panel survey. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(2), 107-135. doi:10.3966/2073753X 2011065602004】
- 宋曜廷、周業太、吳佩璵、林秀珊、曾芬蘭（2010）。從學校本位評量省思臺灣擴大免試入學方案。教育科學研究期刊，55（2），73-113。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., Wu, P.-Y., Lin, H.-S., & Tseng, F.-L. (2010). A reflection of school-based assessment on the extended open admission program in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 73-113. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003】
- 教育部統計處（2008）。各級教育學齡人口在學率─淨在學率。取自http://140.111.34.54/statistics/ publication.aspx?publication_sn=659【Department of Statistics of Ministry of Education. (2008). Enrollment rates of school－Net enrollment rates. Retrieved from http://140.111.34.54/statistics/publication.aspx?publication_sn=659】
- 楊思偉（主編）（1999）。日本教育。臺北市：商鼎文化。【Yang, S.-W. (Ed.). (1999). Education of Japan. Taipei, Taiwan: Shinning Culture.】
- 劉語霏（2006a）。從日本職校改革動向觀看臺灣之職校應如何轉變。教育研究月刊，149，135-147。【Liu, Y.-F. (2006a). A study analyzing how Taiwanese vocational schools should be changed based on investigations of reform movements of Japanese vocational schools. Journal of Education Research, 149, 135-147.】
» 展開更多
- 李敦義（2011）。綜合高中分流政策對學生學習成就的影響：以TEPS資料分析為例。教育科學研究期刊，56（2），107-135。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011065602004【Lee, D.-Y. (2011). Effects of comprehensive high school policy on students’ achievement: Evidence from Taiwan education panel survey. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(2), 107-135. doi:10.3966/2073753X 2011065602004】
- 宋曜廷、周業太、吳佩璵、林秀珊、曾芬蘭（2010）。從學校本位評量省思臺灣擴大免試入學方案。教育科學研究期刊，55（2），73-113。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., Wu, P.-Y., Lin, H.-S., & Tseng, F.-L. (2010). A reflection of school-based assessment on the extended open admission program in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 73-113. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003】
- 教育部統計處（2008）。各級教育學齡人口在學率─淨在學率。取自http://140.111.34.54/statistics/ publication.aspx?publication_sn=659【Department of Statistics of Ministry of Education. (2008). Enrollment rates of school－Net enrollment rates. Retrieved from http://140.111.34.54/statistics/publication.aspx?publication_sn=659】
- 楊思偉（主編）（1999）。日本教育。臺北市：商鼎文化。【Yang, S.-W. (Ed.). (1999). Education of Japan. Taipei, Taiwan: Shinning Culture.】
- 劉語霏（2006a）。從日本職校改革動向觀看臺灣之職校應如何轉變。教育研究月刊，149，135-147。【Liu, Y.-F. (2006a). A study analyzing how Taiwanese vocational schools should be changed based on investigations of reform movements of Japanese vocational schools. Journal of Education Research, 149, 135-147.】
- 劉語霏（2007）。日本後期中等教育階段之就業體驗教育的現狀與問題探討。載於國立高雄師範大學主辦之「2006臺灣職業教育與訓練學術研討會暨東亞職業教育與訓練學會2006年會」論文集（pp. 5-53-5-63），高雄市。【Liu, Y.-F. (2007). A study on the current status and issues of the cooperative education and internships in the upper secondary education in Japan. In National Kaohsiung Normal University (Ed.), 2006 International Conference of Taiwanese Vocational Education and Training & East-Asian Academic Society for Vocational Education and Training (pp. 5-53-5-63), Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
- 劉語霏（2013a）。日本「民間人士校長」制度實施的經驗在學習領導改革上的意義。教育研究月刊，229，129-144。【Liu, Y.-F. (2013a). The meaning of the system of “principles without educational profession background” to the educational reforms about leadership for learning in Japan. Journal of Education Research, 229, 129-144.】
- 山口満（1996）。教育課程の変遷からみた戦後高校教育史。高校教育半世紀の検証，2。東京都，日本：学事出版。【Yamaguchi, M. (1996). The history of high school education after World War II from the perspective of transitions of curriculum. The Verification of a Half-Century of High School Education, 2. Tokyo, Japan: Gakuji Shuppan.】
- 大田尭（主編）（1978）。戦後日本教育史。東京都，日本：岩波書店。【Ota, T. (Eds.) (1978). History of Japanese education after World War II. Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami Shoten.】
- 山野井敦徳（2006）。戦後日本の大学改革と大学教授市場の変化。高等教育研究叢書，88，459-468。【Yamanoi, A. (2006). The reforms of universities and changes of the academic marketplace in Japan after World War II. Reviews in Higher Education, 88, 459-468.】
- 文部省（1986）。産業教育百年史。東京都，日本：ぎょうせい。【Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (1986). Hundred-year history of industrial education. Tokyo, Japan: Gyosei.】
- 文部科学省（2008）。在学者数（年次別）。取自http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/002/ 002b/mokuji20.htm【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2008). Statistical Abstract 2008 Edition: Students (1948-2008). Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/002/002b/mokuji20.htm】
- 文部科学省（2013）。高等学校教育の現状，取自http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/ chukyo3/047/siryo/1334827.htm【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2008). The current status of high school education. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo3/047/siryo/1334827.htm】
- 矢野真和（2005）。大学を変える24 中京大学の挑戦。カレッジマネジメント，134，68-72。【Yano, M. (2005). To change the university (24): The challenge of Chukyo University. Recruit college management, 134, 68-72.】
- 矢野真和（2006）。「改革」から「政策」へ。高等教育研究叢書，88，9-15。【Yano, M. (2006). From “reform” to “policy”. Reviews in Higher Education, 88, 9-15.】
- 伊藤一雄、佐々木英一、堀内達夫（主編）（2001）。専門高校の国際比較―日欧米の職業教育。京都市，日本：法律文化社。【Ito, K., Sasaki, E., & Horiuchi, T. (Eds.). (2001). A comparative study on specialized school education: The vocational and technical education in Japan, Europe, and the U.S.A. Kyoto, Japan: Horitsu Bunka Sha.】
- 伊藤英明（2000）。専門高校における進学者増加のメカニズム（未出版修士論文）。日本国立東北大学，仙台市，日本。【Ito, H. (2000). The mechanism of the increasing number of students who attend higher education in specialized high schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.】
- 佐々木享（1996）。普通教育と職業教育。日本の教育課題，8。東京都，日本：東京法令出版。【Sasaki, S. (1996). Normal education and vocational education. The Issues of Japanese Education, 8. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Horei Publishing.】
- 菱村幸彦（1995）。教育行政からみた戦後高校教育史。高校教育半世紀の検証，1。東京都，日本：学事出版。【Hishimura, Y. (1995). The history of high school education after World War II from the perspective of educational administration. The Verification of a Half-Century of High School Education, 1. Tokyo, Japan: Gakuji Shuppan.】
- 梁忠銘（1999）。近代日本職業教育の形成と展開。東京都，日本：多賀出版。【Liang, C.-M. (1999). The formation and development of vocational education in modern Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Taga-Shuppan.】
- 黒羽亮一（1997）。ジャーナリストからみた戦後高校教育史。高校教育半世紀の検証，3。東京都，日本：学事出版。【Kuroha, R. (1997). The history of high school education after World War II from the perspective of a Journalist. The Verification of a Half-Century of High School Education, 3. Tokyo, Japan: Gakuji Shuppan.】
- 黒崎勲（1995）。現代日本の教育と能力主義－共通教育から新しい多様化へ－。東京都，日本：岩波書店。【Kurosaki, I. (1995). Education of modern Japan and meritocracy: From a common education to the new diversification. Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami Shoten.】
- 新海英行、寺田盛紀、的場正美（主編）（1998）。現代の高校教育改革―日本と諸外国―。岡山市，日本：大学教育出版。【Shinkai, H., Terada, M., & Matoba, M. (Eds.). (1998). Modern reforms of high school education: Japan and other countries. Okayama, Japan: University Education Press.】
- 楊思偉（2007）。台湾の国立大学法人化に関する予定政策の分析。大学財務経営研究，4，241-259。【Yang, S.-W. (2007). National Taiwan university analysis of prearranged corporations. The Journal of Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities, 4, 241-259.】
- 熊谷一乗（1984）。学制改革の社会学：学校をどうするか。東京都，日本：東信堂。【Kumagai, K. (1984). Sociological perspectives on school system reforms: How to reform schools. Tokyo, Japan: Toshindo.】
- 総務省統計局（2008a）。年齢別人口（大正9年～平成12年）。取自http://www.stat.go.jp/data/ nenkan/02.htm【The Statistics Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2008a). Population by age (1920-2000). Retrieved from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/nenkan/02.htm】
- 総務省統計局（2008b）。年齢各歳，男女別人口（明治17年～平成17年）。取自http://www. stat.go.jp/data/chouki/02.htm【The Statistics Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2008b). Population by single years of age and sex (1884-2005). Retrieved from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/chouki/02.htm】
- 劉語霏（2006b）。「目指せスペシャリスト」事業にみる専門高校改革－事業指定校の調査結果をもとに－。日本国立東北大学大学院教育学研究科研究年報，55（1），119-138。【Liu, Y.-F. (2006b). Educational reform in specialized schools focused upon the ‘Becoming a Specialist’ Policy in Japan: A case study of the exemplary schools. The Annual Report of Graduate School of Education, National Tohoku University, 55(1), 119-138.】
- 劉語霏（2008）。後期中等教育における就業体験教育の日台比較研究－「デュアルシステム」の政策分析－。国際教育（日本国際教育学会），14，3-22。【Liu, Y.-F. (2008). A comparative study on the cooperative education and internships in the upper secondary education: The policy of ‘the Dual Systems’ in Japan and Taiwan. Journal of International Education (Japan International Education Society), 14, 3-22.】
- 劉語霏（2009）。高等教育拡大期における後期中等教育に関する日台比較研究―学校体系の類型論からのアプローチ―（未出版博士論文）。国立東北大学大学院，仙台市，日本。【Liu, Y.-F. (2009). A comparative study on the upper secondary education under the expansion of higher education in Japan and Taiwan: A new analytic approach derived from the theory of school-system types (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.】
- 劉語霏（2013b，3月）。学校体系の類型論の理念と意義の再考察－日台の後期中等教育の構造と展開に着目して－。論文發表於日本東北教育學會第70屆大會，仙台市，日本。【Liu, Y.-F. (2013b, March). Reconsidering the idea and significance of the theory of school-system types: Focusing on the structure and development of the upper secondary education in Japan and Taiwan. Paper presented at 70th the Tohoku Society for the Study of Education, Sendai, Japan.】
- Trow, M. A.（1976）。高学歴社会の大学―エリートからマスへ―（天野郁夫、喜多村和之，編譯）。東京都，日本：東京大学出版会。（原著出版於1971、1974、1976年）【Trow, M. A. (1976). The university in the highly educated society: From elite to mass higher education (I. Amano & K. Kitamura, Eds. & Trans.). Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press. (Original work published 1971, 1974, 1976)】
- Trow, M. (2007). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 243-280). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_13
Journal directory listing - Volume 59 (2014) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【59(1)】March (Special Issue: 12-Year Basic Education)
(Special Issue) Policies for the Diversification of Upper Secondary Education in Japan: Educational Reform Concepts and Their Implementation in Featured High Schools
Author: Yu-Fei Liu(Center of Teacher Education, Chinese Culture University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 59, No. 1
Date：March 2014
Pages：141-170
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).05
Abstract：
After 30 years spent planning and designing a 12-Year Basic Education policy, the Ministry of Education finally announced in 2011 that the policy would be implemented in 2014. However, despite the government’s promotion of the policy for three years, it is still inducing intense disputes and controversy. The public is primarily concerned about the arrangement of the entrance examinations, outnumbered-applicant ranking criteria, and featured high schools; these three controversial points are related to enrollment and school administration. In particular, the public tends to directly link featured high schools with traditional, so-called “elite” high schools. Thus, the public has focused on school enrollment while overlooking the importance of school administration.
In the postwar period, Japan implemented diversification policies for upper secondary education twice: in the 1960s and the 1990s. In the first phase, general education and vocational education were separated. In the second phase, featured high schools were promoted. Following the emergence of the comprehensive course in the 1990s, the government of Japan aggressively promoted special designations among high schools regardless of whether they were public, private, general, or specialized, including the Super Science High School, Super English Language High School, Becoming a Specialist, and Japanese Dual System designations. These designations were intended to develop schools’ characteristics, innovation, localization, and diversification, as well as to help schools implement featured curricula to become featured schools. The implementation of the featured high schools policy released teachers and students from existing curricula, leading them to develop creative teaching materials; it also provided junior high school students with multiple choices for secondary school. Moreover, it facilitated cooperation between local enterprises and high schools, and balanced development between urban and rural areas.
This study suggests that for the 12-Year Basic Education policy, building featured high schools is not the same as eliminating elite high schools. Furthermore, it should not be confined to academic features. Although the enrollment strategy specified in the 12-Year Basic Education policy must be modified, the reform direction of the 12-Year Basic Education policy is in line with that implemented in Japan, and deserves recognition. Therefore, this study analyzed the development of policies for the diversification of upper secondary education in Japan through a literature review and a field survey. This study examined education reform concepts and their implementation in featured high schools, as well as school administrations. This study is intended as a reference for the implementation of the 12-Year Basic Education policy in Taiwan.
Keywords：12-Year Basic Education, upper secondary education in Japan, diversification policies, featured high schools, educational reforms