策劃學校發展的資料運用：一所高中個案研究
作者:潘慧玲(淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所)、張淑涵(國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所)
卷期：59卷第1期
日期：2014年3月
頁碼：171-195
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).06
摘要：
二十一世紀在國際評比的推波助瀾下，學生學習成效再度成為各國教改的重要議題，而資料驅動決定（data-driven decision making）在原本講求績效責任的教育脈絡中，更成為協助學校謀求改進發展以提升學生學習的重要作法。惟國內對此尚屬陌生，故為拓展國內資料運用（data use）之學校實務與學術探究，本研究試圖透過大學與高中之協作計畫，探討資料運用在一所個案高中現場之操作情形。在採用觀察、訪談與文件分析方法蒐集本個案研究所需資料後，發現個案學校經由不同資料之結合，解讀與診斷學校問題，進而研訂改進之行動方案。其中也呈顯了學校成員從懷疑到覺得受用的塑義（sensemaking）過程。而校長領導、成員的時間、能力與認同度是影響學校資料運用之關鍵性條件。
關鍵詞：資料運用、資料驅動決定、塑義理論
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王世英、謝雅惠（2005）。從資料驅動決定觀點簡介國立教育資料館教育資源。教育資料與研究，67，37-52。【Wang, S.-Y., & Shieh, Y.-H. (2005). The educational resources in National Institute of Educational Resources and Research from the perspective of “data-driven decision-making”. Educational Resources and Research, 67, 37-52.】
- 吳清山、蔡菁芝（2006）。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報：教育類，51（1），1-21。doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001【Wu, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). A comparative analysis of educational accountability in the UK and USA. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001】
- 林其賢、高熏芳（2009）。資料導向決策系統之設計：校長決策領導的新思維。學校行政，62，80-97。【Lin, C.-S., & Kao, H.-F. (2009). The design of data-oriented decision making system: The new concept of principal’s leader decision. School Administrators Research, 62, 80-97.】
- 張文穗（2010）。臺北縣國小學校行政人員應用資料導向決定及其相關因素之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。【Chang, W.-S. (2010). A study of school administrators using data-driven decision-making and its related factors in elementary (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 張奕華、彭文彬（2012）。高中職校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策影響之研究。學校行政，79，20-42。【Chang, I.-H., & Peng, W.-P. (2012). The impact of information use environments on principals’ data-driven decision-making in high schools. School Administrators Research Association, 79, 20-42.】
» 展開更多
- 王世英、謝雅惠（2005）。從資料驅動決定觀點簡介國立教育資料館教育資源。教育資料與研究，67，37-52。【Wang, S.-Y., & Shieh, Y.-H. (2005). The educational resources in National Institute of Educational Resources and Research from the perspective of “data-driven decision-making”. Educational Resources and Research, 67, 37-52.】
- 吳清山、蔡菁芝（2006）。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報：教育類，51（1），1-21。doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001【Wu, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). A comparative analysis of educational accountability in the UK and USA. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001】
- 林其賢、高熏芳（2009）。資料導向決策系統之設計：校長決策領導的新思維。學校行政，62，80-97。【Lin, C.-S., & Kao, H.-F. (2009). The design of data-oriented decision making system: The new concept of principal’s leader decision. School Administrators Research, 62, 80-97.】
- 張文穗（2010）。臺北縣國小學校行政人員應用資料導向決定及其相關因素之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。【Chang, W.-S. (2010). A study of school administrators using data-driven decision-making and its related factors in elementary (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 張奕華、彭文彬（2012）。高中職校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策影響之研究。學校行政，79，20-42。【Chang, I.-H., & Peng, W.-P. (2012). The impact of information use environments on principals’ data-driven decision-making in high schools. School Administrators Research Association, 79, 20-42.】
- 梁歆、黃顯華（2010）。大學與學校協作下學校發展主任的理念、策略與角色－香港優質學校改進計畫的個案研究。教育研究集刊，56（1），99-126。【Liang, X., & Wong, H.-W. (2010). The concept, strategy and role of school development officers in university- school partnership: A case study of Hong Kong quality school improvement. Bulletin of Educational Research, 56(1), 99-126.】
- 陳佩英、焦傳金（2009）。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構：一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊，54（1），55-86。doi:10.3966/2073753X2009035401003【Chen, P.-Y., & Chiao, C.-C. (2009). Distributed leadership and professional learning community: A case study of innovative teaching in a high school. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 54(1), 55-86. doi:10.3966/ 2073753X2009035401003】
- 陳紹賓（2009）。資料導向決定在國民小學校長願景領導應用之研究－以臺北縣為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。【Chen, S.-B. (2009). A study of data-driven decision making applies for principals’ visionary leadership in elementary school－Take Taipei County as an example (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 劉名峯（2007）。國民小學校長應用資料導向決定之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。【Liou, M.-F. (2007). A research of the principal apply data-driven decision making in the elementary school (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 潘慧玲（2010，12月）。促進學校發展之評鑑機制。論文發表於「新世紀學校革新國際學術研討會」，臺北市。【Pan, H.-L. (2010, December). Evaluation as a mechanism for school innovation. Paper presented at International Conference on the Challenges and Prospects of School Improvement in the New Era, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- Barnes, F. D. (2004). Inquiry and action: Making school improvement part of daily practice. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
- Bernhardt, V. L. (2002). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning, implementation, and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
- Bernhardt, V. L. (2005). Using data to improve student learning in high schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
- Bernhardt, V. L. (2009). Data use: Data-driven decision making takes a big-picture view of the needs of teachers and students. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 24-27.
- Caldwell, B. J. (1993). The changing role of the school principal: A review of developments in Australia and New Zealand. In C. Dimmock (Ed.), School-based management and school effectiveness (pp. 165-184). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Coburn, C. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23(2), 145-170. doi:10.3102/01623737023002145
- Dean, J. S. (2007). A study of decision-making practices by urban Arizona Public school principals: Data-driven decision-making praxis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Mesa, AZ.
- Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. Glazier & R. R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
- Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Luo, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 603-634. doi:10.1177/001316X08321506
- MacGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J., & Beresford, C. (1995). Planning matters: The impact of development planning in primary school. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
- Malen, B. (2006). Revisiting policy implementation as a political phenomenon. In M. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 83-104). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
- McLaughlin, C., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2007). School-university partnerships for educational research-distinctions, dilemmas and challenges. Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 327-341. doi:10. 1080/09585170701589967
- Mclntire, T. (2002). The administrator’s guide to data-driven decision making. Technology & Learning, 22(11), 18-27.
- Means, B., Gallagher, L., & Padilla, C. (2007). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
- Murphy, J. (1993). Restructuring: In search of a movement. In J. Murphy & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts (pp. 1-31). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
- National Center for Educational Achievement. (2009). Just for the kids. Retrieved from http://www. just4kids.org
- National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (n.d.). Quality school portfolio decision supporting system: Transforming data into information. Retrieved form http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/overheads/OTHER/Egyptian.ppt
- Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School Leadership and Management, 29(5), 477- 494. doi:10.1080/13632430903162541
- Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Rankin, L., & Ricchiuti, L. (2007). Data-driven decision making: Five questions to help make sense of your data. Connected Newsletter, 14(1), 4-6.
- Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1993, April). The cost structure of sensemaking. Paper presented at the INTERCHI ‘93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, the Netherland. doi:10.1145/169059.169209
- Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33-63. doi:10.3102/00028312035001033
- Steele, J. L., & Boudett, K. P. (2008). The collaborative advantage. Educational Leadership, 66(4), 54-59.
- Wagner, T. (2001). Leadership for learning: An action theory of school change. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 378-383.
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239-259. doi:10.1080/09243450802246376
Journal directory listing - Volume 59 (2014) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【59(1)】March (Special Issue: 12-Year Basic Education)
Data Use in School Development Planning: A High School Case Study
Author: Hui-Ling Pan(Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Leadership, Tamkang University), Shu-Han Chang(Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 59, No. 1
Date：March 2014
Pages：171-195
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).06
Abstract：
Propelled by the international comparison of student achievement in the twenty first century, student learning caught the world’s attention and became critical to the agenda of education reform. Data-driven decision making plays a crucial role in assisting school improvement and enhancing student achievement; however, data use remains a relatively new concept for audiences in Taiwan. To enrich school practices and academic data use, this case study explored how a high school used data through collaboration with a university. Observation, interview, and document analysis were employed to collect data. The results indicated that the school had integrated different data to diagnose its weaknesses and problems. An improvement action plan was developed based on the data. It was also observed that school members who were initially suspicious gradually changed their attitude, finding the use of data to be meaningful in their sensemaking process. Effective principal leadership, as well as the time, capacity, and willingness of school members, were critical conditions for the successful use of data within schools.
Keywords：data use, data-driven decision making, sensemaking theory