本研究主要目的在探討導入Facebook輔助以數位學習為主的成人學習者學習，是否可增加互動機會、降低因時空分隔產生的學習孤立感，進而提升學習滿意度？採用實驗設計法，以兩班64位成人學習者為研究對象，使用混成式學習模式並參考Salmon（2003）的五階段模型設計非同步教學活動。研究發現：一、採用Facebook可增加學習者之社會臨場感與學習滿意度，但對合作學習態度及學習成績則沒有顯著影響；二、社會臨場感、合作學習態度、學習滿意度及學習成績彼此具有顯著正向關係；三、社會臨場感會正向影響學習滿意度；四、社會臨場感為學習滿意度的重要影響因素。本研究成果可作為成人教學者在教學策略及方法的設計參考。

» 展開更多

1. 林麗娟（2013）。電腦支援合作學習。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678946【Lin, L.-J. (2013). Computer-supported collaborative learning. Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/ 1678946】
2. 張鐸嚴（2013，4月）。成人學習動機的激發與維持。國立空中大學教學發展中心電子報，11。取自https://sites.google.com/site/nouepaper2/11/chengrenxuexidongjidejifayuweichi【Zhang, D.-Y. (2013, April). Ways to engaging and sustaining motivation of adult learners. National Open University Center for Teaching and Learning Development Newsletter, 11. Retrieved from https://sites.google. com/site/nouepaper2/11/chengrenxuexidongjidejifayuweichi】
3. 陳育亮、鄭淑慧（2010）。網路教學與社群學習在成人教育的應用－以混成式網路學習探討其行為意向。資訊管理學報，17（1），177-196。【Chen, Y.-L., & Zheng, S.-H. (2010). Digital learning and virtual community in adult education: A study of behavioral intention in blended learning. Journal of Information Management, 17(1), 177-196.】
4. 黃富順（2000）。成人學習者。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1304869/?index=1【Huang, F.-S. (2000). Adult learners. Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1304869/?index=1】
5. 黃慈（2004）。遠距教育環境下成人學習持續力及其影響因素。隔空教育論叢，16，89-102。【Huang, J. (2004). Adult learners retention in distance learning environment. Distance Education Essays, 16, 89-102.】
6. 趙美聲、黃仁竑（2003）。數位學習系統中學習支援工具之探究。隔空教育論叢，15，1-12。【Chao, M.-S., & Huang, R.-H. (2003). A study of inquiry-based learning support tools in e-learning systems. Distance Education Essays, 15, 1-12.】
7. 盧姵綺（2011）。Blog網路學習社群對大學生藝術通識課程知識建構影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，56（2），137-174。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011065602005【Lu, P.-C. (2011). A study on the influence of blog learning communities on undergraduates’ knowledge constructions in arts general curriculum. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(2), 137-174. doi:10. 3966/2073753X2011065602005】
8. 賴素純、陳裔專、莊雅茹（2012，6月）。應用混成式教學模式於成人教育之學習成效研究。論文發表於第21屆南區統計研討會，新北市。【Lai, S.-C., Chen, I.-C., & Chuang, Y.-R. (2012, June). Apply blended teaching model in adult education. Paper presented at the 21st South Taiwan Statistics Conference, FJU, New Taipei City, Taiwan.】
9. 顏春煌（2010）。線上非同步教學互動剖繪之分析與應用。管理與資訊學報，15，115-130。【Yen, C.-H. (2010). The analysis and application of interaction profiles in online asynchronous instruction. Journal of Information Management, 15, 115-130.】
10. 顏春煌（2013，11月）。以網路社群的社交功能強化非同步教學的觀察與實驗研究。論文發表於國科會科教處資訊教育學門101年度專題研究計畫成果討論會，新竹縣。【Yen, C.-H. (2013, November). An empirical study of the social functions of network community for enhancing asynchronous e-learning. Paper presented at the 2012 Forum of Research Projects in Science Education, Division of Information Division, National Science Council, Hsinchu County, Taiwan.】
11. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174. doi:10.2307/249763
12. An, H., Shin, S., & Lim, K. (2009). The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students’ interactions during asynchronous online discussions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 749-760. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.015
13. Arteaga, S. R., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138-149. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012
14. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication, elearning, and interactivity: A review of the research. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 161-179.
15. Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343. doi:10.1016/j.chb. 2010.07.028
16. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, 1(1), 307-341.
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
18. Dantas, A. M., & Kemm, R. E. (2008). A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(1), 65-75. doi:10.1152/advan.00006.2007
19. Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167-176. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2013.04.028
20. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 3(3), 54.
22. Eler, A. (2012). 61% of social media users feel so close to you. Retrieved from http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/study_61_of_social_media_users_feel_so_close_to_yo
23. Eteokleous, N., Ktoridou, D., Stavrides, I., & Michaelidis, M. (2012). Facebook—A social networking tool for educational purposes: Developing special interest groups. In L. Murris & C. Tsolakidis (Eds.), Readings in technology in education: Processings of the 12th international conference on information communication technologies, in education (pp. 363-375). Rhodes, Greece: ICICTE.
24. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
25. Hammond, J., Bithell, C., Jones, L., & Bidgood, P. (2010). A first year experience of student-directed peer-assisted learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 201-212. doi:10.1177/1469 787410379683
26. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Student distress in a web-based distance education course. Information, Communication, and Society, 3(4), 557-579. doi:10.1080/13691180010002297
27. Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8), 689-708. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018
28. Horstmann, M., Renninger, M., Hennenlotter, J., Horstmann, C., & Stenzl, A. (2009). Blended e-learning in a web-based virtual hospital: A useful tool for undergraduate education in urology. Education for Health, 22(2), 269.
29. Hsu, J., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Adult learners, e-learning, and success: Critical issues and challenges in an adult hybrid distance learning program. In H. Yang & S. Yuen (Eds.), Handbook of research on practices and outcomes in e-learning: Issues and trends (pp. 116-137). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-788-1.ch007
30. Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221-1232.
31. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73. doi:10.1080/00405849909543834
32. Jong, B.-S., Lai, C.-H., Hsia, Y.-T., Lin, T.-W., & Liao, Y.-S. (2014). An exploration of the potential educational value of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 201-211. doi:10.1016/j.chb. 2013.12.007
33. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162. doi:10.1080/14703290252934603
34. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003
35. Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. doi:10.1007/ BF02291575
36. Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 763-777. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010. 01107.x
37. Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512-1520. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005
38. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
39. Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS). Computers & Education, 59(4), 1162-1169. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021
40. Lin, P.-C., Hou, H.-T., Wang, S.-M., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60(1), 110-121. doi:10. 1016/j.compedu.2012.07.017
41. Lin, Y.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Effects of different forms of physiology instruction on the development of students’ conceptions of and approaches to science learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 36(1), 42-47. doi:10.1152/advan.00118.2011
42. Lin, Y.-M., Lin, G.,-Y., & Laffey, J. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1-27. doi:10.2190/EC.38.1.a
43. Livingstone, D., & Kemp, J. (2008). Integrating web-based and 3D learning environments: Second life meets moodle. The European Journal for the Informatics Professional, 9(3), 8-14.
44. Lowes, S., Lin, P., & Wang, Y. (2007). Studying the effectiveness of the discussion forum in online professional development courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 181-210.
45. Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008
46. Mergel, I. (2010). The influence of social networks on the adoption of eLearning practices: Using social network analysis to understand technology diffusion and adoption decisions. Cologne, Germany: Lambert Academic.
47. Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). London, UK: Routledge.
48. Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2000). Distance learning on the internet: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 253-264. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00026-9
49. Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129-143. doi:10.2307/1170710
50. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
51. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
52. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 187-204). New York, NY: Cambridge. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511816833.013
53. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
54. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
56. Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R.-J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
57. Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112-126. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002
58. Tu, C.-H., & McIssac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150. doi:10.1207/S15389286 AJDE1603_2
59. Wu, J., Tsai, R.-J., Chen, C.-C., & Wu, Y. (2006). An integrative model to predict the continuance use of electronic learning systems: Hints for teaching. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 287-302.
60. Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. C. (1975). Marketing research: Fundamentals and dynamics. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.

中文APA引文格式	賴素純、莊雅茹、顏春煌(2014)。Facebook的使用對成人混成式學習之影響。教育科學研究期刊，59(4)，65-98。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).03
APA Format	Lai, S.-C., Chuang, Y.-R., & Yen, C.-H. (2014). Impact of Facebook on Blended Learning for Adult Learners. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(4), 65-98. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).03

    This study explored the possibility of using Facebook in online instruction as an auxiliary tool for promoting interaction. The goal was to increase interaction and intimacy among learners to reduce the feeling of isolation and increase learner satisfaction. This research adopted an empirical design and recruited a total of 64 students from two classes. The classes were taught using a blended learning mode. Asynchronous instructional activities were designed according to the five-stage model proposed by Salmon (2003). We collected data from both Facebook and the online learning platform. According to the research findings, social presence, attitude toward collaborative learning, learning satisfaction, and learning outcomes were positively related with statistical significance. In addition, the use of Facebook promoted learners’ social presence and learning satisfaction. The impact of social presence on the attitude toward collaborative learning and learning outcome was not significant. However, social presence had a positive impact on learning satisfaction. The results of this research can be used to develop instructional designs and strategies for online adult learners.