» 展開更多

1. 丁學勤（2009）。學校服務品質量表的發展與因素結構之研究。教育學刊，33，115-158。【Ting, S.-C. (2009). A study of the development and factorial structure of a school service quality scale. Educational Review, 33, 115-158.】
2. 王秀槐、丁艾竹、蘇愛嵐（2011）。跨越科系的藩籬：我國研究型大學實施前段不分系模式分析與個案大學實施策略之探討。教育科學研究期刊，56（3），1-30。doi:10.3966/2073753X 2011095603001【Wang, H.-H., Ding, A.-C., & Su, A.-L. (2011). Crossing the border of disciplinary knowledge: An analysis of the choice of major at the upper level of college in research-oriented comprehensive universities, with the use of one case study based on student needs in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(3), 1-30. doi:10.3966/2073753X2011095603001】
3. 李子建、黃顯華（1996）。課程：範式、取向和設計。香港：香港中文大學。【Lee, Z.-J., & Huang, H.-H. (1996). Curriculum: Paradigm, perspectives and design. Hong Kong, China: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.】
4. 李坤崇（2014）。模組化、學程化及分流化的成果導向課程模式。教育研究月刊，240，5-18。【Lee, K.-C. (2014). Modularization, curricularization, specialization: Three outcome-based modes of curriculum construction. Journal of Education Research, 240, 5-18.】
5. 林志明（2010）。全球視野與在地關懷的強化議題探討。臺北市：五南。【Lin, C.-M. (2010). Exploring issues for strengthening the global vision and the local concern. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
6. 邱貴發（1992）。電腦輔助教學成效探討。視聽教育雙月刊，33（5），11-18。【Chu, K.-F. (1992). An analysis of the effect of the computer-aid teaching. Audio-Visual Education Bimonthly, 33(5), 11-18.】
7. 施俊名、吳裕益（2008）。「大學生身心健康量表」構念效度驗證之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4（4），201-230。【Shih, C.-M., & Wu, Y.-Y. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis and construct validity of the Physical and Mental Health Inventory for Taiwan college students. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 4(4), 201-230.】
8. 張時健（2008）。不分系專班現制比較：政大傳院自由度高。傳播研究簡訊，52，7-9。【Chang, S.-C. (2008). A comparison of the declaration of majors systems in the universities: Chengchi University owns a higher level of freedom. Communication Research Newsletter, 52, 7-9.】
9. 郭文華（2011）。跨領域的永續挑戰：研究型大學的教學卓越。科學發展，464，84-88。【Kuo, W.-H. (2011). Continued challenges for inter-discipline: Excellent teaching in research-intensive universities. Science Development, 464, 84-88.】
10. 陳幼慧（2014）。政治大學通識課程改革理念與實務。教育研究月刊，240，57-78。【Chen, Y.-H. (2014). Ideas and practices of general education curriculum reform at National Chengchi University. Journal of Education Research, 240, 57-78.】
11. 陳素芬、張大慈、林立元、陳曉郁（2005）。大學生科技跨領域學程之課程評量。亞太科學教育論壇。取自http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v6_issue1/chensf/index.htm#contents【Chen, S.-F., Chang, D.-T., Lin, L.-Y., & Chen, H.-Y. (2005). The curriculum assessment of technological inter-displinary courses for undergraduates. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v6_issue1/chensf/index.htm#contents】
12. 陳淑敏、宋明娟、甄曉蘭（2010）。大學生專業能力指標之發展－以國立臺灣師範大學為例。高等教育，5（2），61-100。【Chen, S.-M., Sung, M.-C., & Chen, H.-L. (2010). Development of college students’ professional competences: A case of the National Taiwan Normal University. Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 61-100.】
13. 陳慧婷（2002）。下一波人才競技－跨領域學習潮。天下雜誌，250，186-189。【Chen, H.-T. (2002). The next wave of the competition among competent people: Inter-displinary learning. Common Wealth, 250, 186-189.】
14. 單文經（2001）。教學引論。臺北市：學富。【Shan, W.-J. (2001). The introduction of teaching. Taipei, Taiwan: Pro-Ed.】
15. 湯堯、蘇建洲、徐慧芝（2012）。大學學生事務服務品質評估量表發展與因素結構之探討。教育與心理研究，35（4），29-47。【Tang, Y., Su, C.-C., & Shu, H.-Z. (2012). A study on the development and factorial structure of scalogram for undergraduate student affairs service quality. Journal of Education & Psychology, 35(4), 29-47.】
16. 黃光雄、楊龍立（2000）。課程發展與設計：理念與實作。臺北市：師大書苑。【Huang, K.-H., & Yang, L.-L. (2002). Curriculum development and design: Conceptions and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Book Store.】
17. 黃延合、湯誌龍、溫瑞烘（2000）。技專校院為配合高科技產業人力培育所需建構學程化課程之研究。中華技術學院學報，21，1-15。【Huang, T.-H., Tang, Z.-L., & Wen, J.-H. (2000). The study of the polytechnic institute for developing the curriculum building on the program course of the technology industry. Journal of China Institute of Technology, 21, 1-15.】
18. 黃淑玲、張榮叁、鍾飲文（2014）。從學習品質保證機制到課室教學：高醫建立「深度學習」的取徑。教育研究月刊，240，34-56。【Huang, S.-L., Change, J.-S., & Chong, I.-W. (2014). From institutionalized learning quality assurance to classroom teaching: KMU’s path to create “deep learning”. Journal of Education Research, 240, 34-56.】
19. 楊建章、鄭凱元（2010）。跨領域教學課程調查與改進策略期末報告。臺北市：五南。【Yang, C.-C., & Cheng, K.-Y. (2010). The final report for the inter-disciplinary teaching curriculum survey and improving strategies. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
20. 楊維邦（2009）。國立東華大學學程化新課程規劃－兼具培育跨領域能力之模組化課程規劃。教育研究月刊，186，100-110。【Yang, W.-P. (2009). Designing programed modules and curriculum for developing the inter-disciplinary ability: A case study of National Dong Hwa University. Journal of Education Research, 186, 100-110.】
21. 廖慶榮、許政行（2014）。中原大學課程改革理念與實務。教育研究月刊，240，19-33。【Liao, C.-J., & Hsu, C.-H. (2014). Curriculum reform idea and practice in Chung Yuan Christian University. Journal of Education Research, 240, 19-33.】
22. 劉兆漢（2001）。二十一世紀我國大學教育的理念。通識教育季刊，8（1），101-105。【Liu, C.-H. (2001). The ideas of higher education in the 21^st century. Journal of General Education, 8(1), 101-105.】
23. 潘文福、陳雅苓（2012）。東華大學課程學程化之實施成效分析：CGDI觀點。慈濟大學教育研究學刊，8，91-117。【Pan, W.-F., & Chen, Y.-L. (2012). The effectiveness of programming curriculum of National Dong Hwa University－From the observational dimensions of cost, growth, differentiation, and integration. Tzu-Chi University Journal of the Educational Research, 8, 91-117.】
24. 薛雅慈（2013）。臺灣高等教育各學門實施前段不分系課程的知識理念探討－全球化知識生產模式轉變之分析。課程與教學，16（4），1-34。【Hsueh, Y.-C. (2013). The “declaration of majors in sophomore or junior year” of undergraduate curriculum in Taiwan－The analysis of transformation of knowledge production from mode 1 to mode 2. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(4), 1-34.】
25. Apple, M. (2000, October). Curriculum, teaching, and the politics of educational reform. Paper presented in the Curriculum and Institution Forum in Taitung, Taiwan.
26. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Jouranl of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi:10.1177/009207038801600107
27. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73. doi:10.2307/3150876
28. Council of Arts Accrediting Associations. (2009). Disciplines in combination: Interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and other collaborative programs of study. Reston, VA: Author.
29. Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, F. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/ 3151312
30. Fruchter, R., & Emery, K. (1999, December). Teamwork: Assessing cross-disciplinary learning. Paper presented at the 1999 conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, California, PA.
31. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
32. Henson, K. T. (2001). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill.
33. Jacobs, J. A., & Frickel, S. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 43-65. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115954
34. Klein, J. T. (2005). Humanities, culture, and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35. Knight, D. B., Lattuca, L. R., Kimball, E. W., & Reason, R. D. (2013). Understanding inter- disciplinarity: Curricular and organizational features of undergraduate interdisciplinary programs. Innovative Higher Education, 38(2), 143-158. doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9232-1
36. Maruyama, M. G. (1997). Basics of structural equation modeling. Washington, WA: Sage.
37. Mello, M. D. (2008). Towards and all-embracing optimism in the realm of being and doing. Transdisciplinarity–Theory and practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
38. Montuori, A. (2008). Foreword transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity–Theory and practice (pp. ix-xvii). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
39. Nicolescu, B. (2008). In vitro and in vivo knowledge-methodology of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity–Theory and practice (pp. 1-21). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40. Nigel, C., & Anita, C. C. (1995). Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies, 16(2), 143-170. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00007-Z
41. Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 622-647. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM 1004_8
42. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: NY: McGraw-Hill.
43. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
44. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual leaning environment: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426. doi:10.2307/3250989
45. Shanken, E. A. (2005). Artists in industry and the academy: Collaborative research, interdisciplinary scholarship and the creation and interpretation of hybrid forms. Leonardo, 38(5), 415-418. doi:10.1162/leon.2005.38.5.415
46. Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. New York: NY: John Wiley & Sons.
47. Sherrill, C. (2004). Adapted physical activity, recreation and sport: Crossdisciplinary and lifespan (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
48. Steinheider, B., & Legrady, G. (2004). Interdisciplinary collaboration in digital media arts: A psychological perspective on the production process. Leonardo, 37(4), 315-321. doi:10.1162/ 0024094041724436

中文APA引文格式	湯堯、徐慧芝、蘇建洲(2016)。大學校院理工科系跨領域課程品質評估量表發展之研究。教育科學研究期刊，61(1)，91-113。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).04
APA Format	Tang, Y., Hsu, H.-C., & Su, C.-C. (2016). Development of the Evaluative Scalogram for University Science and Engineering-Related Department Interdisciplinary Learning Quality. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(1), 91-113. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).04

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate related studies on the evaluative scalogram for university science and engineering-related department interdisciplinary learning quality. Exploring interdisciplinary learning quality issues provided the foundation for the literature review in this study. According to the literature, the factorial structure and items of the preliminary scalogram were formed. The first step of the research method was to confirm the factorial structure and items of the preliminary scalogram by using a focus group, followed by reclassifying and purifying the structure and items through exploratory factor analysis. The second step was to randomly collect 653 valid samples from Taiwanese undergraduates of the science or engineering college for confirmatory factor analysis. The overall model fits, item reliability, composite reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity were used to confirm the factorial structure and to examine the optimal model that was identified in this study: the corrected factors model. According to the results, this study determined that three latent factors were extracted in the scalogram and that the corrected factors model was stable. Finally, suggestions for education administration and policymaking are proposed according to the findings.