創意角色認定、工作動機及創造力教學技巧與創意教學行為關係之研究
作者:蕭佳純(國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所)、王佩雯(國立臺南大學教育學系)
卷期：61卷第2期
日期：2016年6月
頁碼：185-211
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).07
摘要：
本研究以臺南市國民小學教師作為研究樣本進行分析，採用問卷調查方式，總計回收34所學校，共331份有效問卷，使用結構方程模式（structural equation modeling, SEM）進行結構模式之檢測並探討各變項間的關係。根據研究結果，獲致以下主要結論：創意角色認定、工作動機以及創造力教學技巧對創意教學行為有正向的直接影響之外，創造力教學技巧在創意角色認定與創意教學行為以及工作動機與創意教學行為間具有中介效果。而工作動機在創意角色認定與創意教學行為間具有中介效果，更重要的是，創意角色認定會透過工作動機的中介，再透過創造力教學技巧的中介而對創意教學行為產生間接效果。根據上述結果，本研究提出具體建議為：直接效果中以工作動機的影響力較大，但是在間接效果中，仍是在創意角色認定、創造力教學技巧及創意教學的關係中扮演著重要的中介角色，所以，若強化教師的創意角色認定，並提升其工作動機以及增進其創造力教學技巧等能力，將可促進教師創意教學行為的展現。
關鍵詞：工作動機、創造力教學技巧、創意角色認定、創意教學行為
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式－SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 吳和堂、鍾明翰（2011）。國小實習教師的角色知覺、工作投入與專業成長之因果關係研究。教育心理學報，43（2），419-438。doi:10.6251/BEP.20100618.1【Wu, H.-T., & Chung, M.-H. (2011). The causality among role perception, job involvement and professional growth. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(2), 419-438. doi:10.6251/BEP.20100618.1】
- 吳明隆（2011）。論文寫作與量化研究（三版）。臺北市：五南。【Wu, M.-L. (2011). Quantitative research & thesis writing (3rd ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 吳家碧（2012）。體育教師的專業能力、工作動機與創意教學影響因素及現況之研究─以中區高中職為例。育達科大學報，33，191-206。【Wu, C.-P. (2012). Effects of professional capability, task motivation and creative teaching for high school physical educators. Yu Da Academic Journal, 33, 191-206.】
- 李亦芳（2009）。聆聽她／他們的聲音─多元身分下國中體育教師專業認同之建構。臺灣運動教育學報，3（2），61-78。【Lee, Y.-F. (2009). Listen to their voices－Multiple roles and divergence of junior high school physical education teacher’s professional identities. Journal of Taiwan Sport Pedagogy, 3(2), 61-78.】
» 展開更多
- 余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式－SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 吳和堂、鍾明翰（2011）。國小實習教師的角色知覺、工作投入與專業成長之因果關係研究。教育心理學報，43（2），419-438。doi:10.6251/BEP.20100618.1【Wu, H.-T., & Chung, M.-H. (2011). The causality among role perception, job involvement and professional growth. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(2), 419-438. doi:10.6251/BEP.20100618.1】
- 吳明隆（2011）。論文寫作與量化研究（三版）。臺北市：五南。【Wu, M.-L. (2011). Quantitative research & thesis writing (3rd ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 吳家碧（2012）。體育教師的專業能力、工作動機與創意教學影響因素及現況之研究─以中區高中職為例。育達科大學報，33，191-206。【Wu, C.-P. (2012). Effects of professional capability, task motivation and creative teaching for high school physical educators. Yu Da Academic Journal, 33, 191-206.】
- 李亦芳（2009）。聆聽她／他們的聲音─多元身分下國中體育教師專業認同之建構。臺灣運動教育學報，3（2），61-78。【Lee, Y.-F. (2009). Listen to their voices－Multiple roles and divergence of junior high school physical education teacher’s professional identities. Journal of Taiwan Sport Pedagogy, 3(2), 61-78.】
- 李茂能（2009）。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用。臺北市：五南。【Li, M.-N. (2009). An introduction to graphic AMOS and its uses in research. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 李堅萍、游光昭、朱益賢（2008）。國中科技教育運用Teresa M. Amabile工作動機原則與自我效能激發策略之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，25（2），129-159。【Lee, Z.-P., Yu, K.-C., & Chu, Y.-H. (2008). A study applying Teresa M. Amabile’s task motivation principles and self-efficacy improvement strategies in middle school technology education. Educational Journal of NHCUE, 25(2), 129-159.】
- 林生傳（2007）。資訊社會中的教師角色研究。教育學術彙刊，1（1），1-14。【Lin, S.-C. (2007). Construction and investigation on teacher role in an information society. Bulletin of Education Research, 1(1), 1-14.】
- 林振春、秦秀蘭（2011）。成人教學者教學角色定位分析之研究。課程與教學季刊，14（2），161-192。【Lin, J.-C., & Chin, H.-L. (2011). The position analysis of adult teacher’s roles. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 14(2), 161-192.】
- 林偉文（2006）。樂在其中的創意教師：國民中小學教師教學福樂經驗與創意教學之關係。國立臺北教育大學學報，19（2），111-128。【Lin, W.-W. (2006). The flow teachers: How teachers’ flow experiences relate to their creative teaching. Journal of National Taipei University of Education, 19(2), 111-128.】
- 林偉文（2011）。創意教學與創造力的培育─以「設計思考」為例。教育與資料研究，100，53-74。【Lin, W.-W. (2011). Creative teaching and the cultivation of creativity: The exemplar of design thinking. Educational Resources and Research, 100, 53-74.】
- 林碧芳、邱皓政（2008）。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4（1），141-169。【Lin, P.-F., & Chiou, H.-J. (2008). Construction and related study of the inventory of self-efficacy for creative teaching. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 4(1), 141-169.】
- 林碧芳、趙長寧、邱皓政（2010）。中小學教師創意教學效能與內在動機模式之檢驗－一項中介效果的驗證。創造學刊，1（1），65-92。【Lin, P.-F., Chao, C.-N., & Chiou, H.-J. (2010). Intrinsic motivation model of self-efficacy for creative teaching at elementary and junior high school teachers: An examination of mediation effect. Journal of Chinese Creativity, 1(1), 65-92.】
- 徐瑋玲、鄭伯壎（2003）。組織認定與企業倫理效益。應用心理研究，20，115-138。【Hsu, W.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2003). Organizational identity and its application to business ethics: A critical review. Research in Applied Psychology, 20, 115-138.】
- 張世彗（2011）。創造力教學、學習方法與評量。教育與資料研究，100，1-22。【Chang, S.-H. (2011). An exploration of teaching for creativity, learning and assessment. Educational Resources and Research, 100, 1-22.】
- 張雨霖、陳學志、徐芝君（2010）。教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為之影響。復興崗學報，99，151-172。【Chang, Y.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Hsi, C.-C. (2010). Belief of creativity and self-efficacy for creativity-teaching’s effect on teaching behaviors for creativity. Fu Hsing Kang Academic Journal, 99, 151-172.】
- 郭丁熒（2006）。是「連續」還是「斷裂」？～臺灣小學教師角色變遷知覺之研究。師大學報：教育類，51（1），41-62。doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101003【Guo, D.-Y. (2006). Continuity or rupture? Elementary school teachers’ awareness of the changing role of teachers in Taiwan. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(1), 41-62. doi:10.3966/2073753 X2006045101003】
- 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2009）。多變量分析方法：統計軟體應用（五版）。臺北市：五南。【Chen, J.-C., Cherng, B.-L., Chen, S.-F., & Liu, T.-C. (2009). Multivariate analysis method: Statistical software application (5th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 陳玉樹、胡夢鯨（2008）。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響：階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報，40（2），179-198。doi:10.6251/BEP.20080225【Chen, Y.-S., & Hu, M.-C. (2008). The impact of task motivation and organizational innovative climate on adult education teachers’ creative teaching performance: An analysis of hierarchical linear modeling. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 40(2), 179-198. doi:10.6251/BEP.20080225】
- 陳玉樹、莊閔喬（2010）。創意個人認定與組織認同對創意教學表現之影響：多元組織認定的調節效果。教育政策論壇，13（3），155-184。【Chen, Y.-S., & Juang, M.-C. (2010). The impact of creative personal identity and organizational identification on creative teaching performance: Moderating effects of multiple organizational identities. Educational Policy Forum, 13(3), 155-184.】
- 陳昭儀、李雪菱（2013）。多元文化創造力教學的實踐與省思。創造學刊，4（2），5-29。【Chen. C.-Y., & Lee, S.-L. (2013). Practice and reflection of multicultural creativity teaching. Journal of Chinese Creativity, 4(2), 5-29.】
- 陳聰文、鍾舒萍（2009）。台中市國中教師教學動機、學校組織文化與創意教學關係之研究。東海教育評論，3，1-42。【Chen, T.-W., & Chung, S.-P. (2009). The relationships between junior high school teachers’ motivation of teaching, school-organizational culture and creative teaching in Taichung city. Tunghai Educational Review, 3, 1-42.】
- 黃惠君、葉玉珠（2008）。國中教師教學玩興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教學之關係。教育與心理研究，31（2），85-118。【Huang, H.-J., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2008). The relationships between playfulness in teaching, motivation of teaching, perceived happiness in teaching and creative teaching among junior high school teachers. Journal of Education & Psychology, 31(2), 85-118.】
- 劉奕禎、盧瑞山、侯堂盛（2013）。國高中體育教師心理資本與創意教學之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，12（2），15-25。doi:10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.201308.12.2.02【Liu, Y.-C., Lu, R.-S., & Ho, T.-S. (2013). The effects of physical education teachers’ sychological capital on work stress and creative teaching at middle and senior high school. Journal of Marketing, 12(2), 15-25. doi:10.6169/ NCYUJPEHR.201308.12.2.02】
- 蔡俊傑、劉威德、羅鴻仁（2012）。職業學校教導型組織文化與教師創新教學關係之探討。教師專業研究期刊，4，53-80。【Tsai, J.-J., Liu, W.-T., & Lo, H.-J. (2012). A study of the relationship between the teaching organization cultures and teacher’s innovation instruction of vocation high schools. Journal of Professional Teachers, 4, 53-80.】
- 鄭英耀、王文中（2002）。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究，15，163-189。【Cheng, Y.-Y., & Wang, W.-C. (2002). Factors that influence creativity behavior for awarded-winning teachers in scientific competitions. Research in Applied Psychology, 15, 163-189.】
- 鄭英耀、李育嘉、劉昆夏（2008）。科展績優教師教學行為與學童創造力、問題解決能力之關係。教育與心理研究，31（1），1-30。【Cheng, Y.-Y., Lee, Y.-J., & Liu, K.-S. (2008). The relationship between awarded teachers’ teaching behavior and pupils’ performance on creativity and problem solving in science subject. Journal of Education & Psychology, 31(1), 1-30.】
- 蕭佳純（2011）。學校創新氣氛、教師內在動機與教師創意教學表現關聯之研究：多層次調節式中介效果之探討。當代教育研究季刊，19（4），85-125。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2011.1904.03【Hsiao, C.-C. (2011). The relationship between schools’ climate of creativity, teachers’ intrinsic motivation, and teachers’ creative teaching performance: A discussion of multilevel moderated mediation. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 19(4), 85-125. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2011.1904.03】
- 蕭佳純（2012）。國小學生內在動機、學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究：教師創造力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊，37（3），89-113。【Hsiao, C.-C. (2012). The relationship among intrinsic motivation, subject knowledge, and creative performance of students: The moderating effect of teachers’ creativities in teaching behavior. Bulletin of Special Education, 37(3), 89-113.】
- 蕭智真、陳儷勻（2006）。大專校院排球運動創意教學之初探。大專體育，86，1-6。【Hsiao, C.-C., & Chen, L.-Y. (2006). The study of creativity teaching for volleyball in university. The University Physical Education & Sports, 86, 1-6.】
- 顏弘欽（2013）。教師個人—工作適配與工作角色行為之關聯性。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，27（1），19-37。【Yen, H.-C. (2013). The relationships between teachers’ person-job fit and work role behaviors. Journal of National Taichung University: Education, 27(1), 19-37.】
- Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creativity: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York, NY: Crown.
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 203-215. doi:10. 2307/3033681
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. Theories of Creativity, 4, 61-91.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
- Csikszentmihaylyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approach to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mark, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Stubotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 81-94). New York, NY: Elsevier.
- Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung, K. M. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630. doi:10.2307/30040653
- Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skill, and personality factors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255-268. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb01399.x
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 247-258. doi:10.1080/10400410701397339
- Johnson, D. (2002). Everyday practice in problem-solving. Library Talk, 15(1), 64.
- Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146. doi:10.1002/bs.3830090206
- Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., III, & Swanson, R. (2005). The adult leaner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.
- Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299-337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.299
- Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd－Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Torrance, E. P. (2004). Great expectations: Creative achievements of the sociometric stars in a 30- year study. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(1), 5-13. doi:10.4219/jsge-2004-465
- Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Zhao, J. J., & Zhao, S. Y. (2010). The impact of IQ+EQ+CQ integration on student productivity in web design and development. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(1), 43-53.
- Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 151-167. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01004.x
Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(2)】June (Special Issue: Teacher Education: Reflection, Effect, and Prospect)
Relationships Among Creative Role Identity, Work Motivation, Instructional Skill for Creativity, and Creative Instructional Behavior
Author: Chia-Chun Hsiao(Graduate Institute of Educational Entrepreneurship and Management, National University of Tainan), Pei-Wen Wang(Department of Education, National University of Tainan)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 61, No. 2
Date：June 2016
Pages：185-211
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).07
Abstract：
This study conducted a questionnaire survey with elementary school teachers from 34 schools in Tainan City. A total of 331 valid questionnaires were retrieved. Structural equation modeling was applied to test the structural model and investigate the relationships among the variables. According to the results, the conclusions are summarized as follows: creative role identity directly influences creative instructional behavior; work motivation directly influences creative instructional behavior; instructional skill in creativity directly influences creative instructional behavior; instructional skill in creativity moderates the relationship between creative role identity and creative instructional behavior; instructional skill in creativity moderates the relationship between work motivation and creative instructional behavior; work motivation moderates the relationship between creative role identity and creative instructional behavior; and work motivation and instructional skill in creativity moderate the relationship between creative role identity and creative instructional behavior. This paper offers a discussion on the proposed model and suggestions for teaching practices and future research.
Keywords：work motivation, instructional skill in creativity, creative role identity, creative instructional behavior