運用人格、心理與環境因素預測教師教學設計想像力
作者:許育齡(慈濟大學教育研究所)
卷期：61卷第3期
日期：2016年9月
頁碼：69-98
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).03
摘要：
面對當前複雜與挑戰兼具的教學情境，本研究整合運用人格特質、心理與環境因素預測國民教育階段教師，從事教學設計想像力的結構模型。本研究運用結構方程模式進行探究，模型建構奠基於教師人格特質、心理與環境影響的相關研究，整合後提出假設進行驗證並獲得支持。研究結果顯示：一、以能力導向詮釋的教學設計想像力，包含創始、構思與轉造三種想像能力；二、開放與審慎特質對教學設計想像力主要是透過直接路徑預測，外向、親和及情緒穩定特質則是透過中介作用間接預測教學設計想像力；三、內在動機與自我效能可適切扮演中介角色，帶動部分人格特質、正向情緒、做中悟，與部分環境條件預測教學設計想像力；四、環境因素順應人格特質差異，對教學設計想像力的預測型態猶有深究的空間。綜整研究結果，本研究提出實務意涵與未來研究之建議。
關鍵詞：人格特質、心理因素、教學設計想像力、環境因素
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 余民寧、陳柏霖、許嘉家（2010）。教師憂鬱傾向的影響因素之研究。輔導與諮商學報，32（2），73-97。【Yu, M.-N., Chen, P.-L., & Syu, J.-J. (2010). The study of impact factors on teachers’ depression. The Archive of Guidance & Counseling, 32(2), 73-97.】
- 李茂能（2010）。虛無假設顯著性考驗的演進、議題與迷思。測驗統計年刊，18（1），1-22。【Li, F. M.-N. (2010). Null hypothesis significance testing: Its evolution, current use, misuse, and misconceptions. Journal of Research on Measurement and Statistics, 18(1), 1-22.】
- 梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖（2014）。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊，61（1），27-49。【Liang, C., Hsu, Y., & Lin, W.-S. (2014). The study of imaginative capabilities and imaginative capability scale development. Psychological Testing, 61(1), 27-49.】
- 許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成（2013）。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究季刊，21（2），113-148。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04【Hsu, Y., Liang, C., & Lin, C.-C. (2013). The influences of individual psychology and school environment on the teachers’ imaginative capability of instructional design. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 21(2), 113-148. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04】
- 陳學志、徐芝君（2006）。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報：教育類（創造力特刊），51（2），71-93。doi:10.3966/2073753X200610510304【Chen, H.-C., & Hsu, C.-C. (2006). Evaluating the impact of the humor training curriculum on teachers’ sense of humor and creativity. Journal of Taiwan Normal University (Special Issue on Creativity), 51(2), 71-93. doi:10. 3966/2073753X200610510304】
» 展開更多
- 余民寧、陳柏霖、許嘉家（2010）。教師憂鬱傾向的影響因素之研究。輔導與諮商學報，32（2），73-97。【Yu, M.-N., Chen, P.-L., & Syu, J.-J. (2010). The study of impact factors on teachers’ depression. The Archive of Guidance & Counseling, 32(2), 73-97.】
- 李茂能（2010）。虛無假設顯著性考驗的演進、議題與迷思。測驗統計年刊，18（1），1-22。【Li, F. M.-N. (2010). Null hypothesis significance testing: Its evolution, current use, misuse, and misconceptions. Journal of Research on Measurement and Statistics, 18(1), 1-22.】
- 梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖（2014）。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊，61（1），27-49。【Liang, C., Hsu, Y., & Lin, W.-S. (2014). The study of imaginative capabilities and imaginative capability scale development. Psychological Testing, 61(1), 27-49.】
- 許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成（2013）。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究季刊，21（2），113-148。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04【Hsu, Y., Liang, C., & Lin, C.-C. (2013). The influences of individual psychology and school environment on the teachers’ imaginative capability of instructional design. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 21(2), 113-148. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04】
- 陳學志、徐芝君（2006）。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報：教育類（創造力特刊），51（2），71-93。doi:10.3966/2073753X200610510304【Chen, H.-C., & Hsu, C.-C. (2006). Evaluating the impact of the humor training curriculum on teachers’ sense of humor and creativity. Journal of Taiwan Normal University (Special Issue on Creativity), 51(2), 71-93. doi:10. 3966/2073753X200610510304】
- 劉宗明、黃德祥（2008）。國中教師人格特質與教學效能之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報，39（2），1-34。doi:10.6336/JUTe/2008.39(2)1【Liu, T.-M., & Huang, D.-H. (2008). A study on Junior high school teachers’ personality traits and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 39(2), 1-34. doi:10.6336/JUTe/2008.39(2)1】
- 鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜（2011）。“International English big-five mini-markers”之繁體中文量表發展。管理學報，28（6），579-600。doi:10.6504/JOM.2011.28.06.004【Teng, C.-I., Tseng, H.-M., Li, I.-C., & Yu, C.-S. (2011). International English big-five mini-markers: Development of the traditional Chinese version. Journal of Management, 28(6), 579-600. doi:10.6504/JOM.2011.28.06.004】
- 鄭博真（2011）。我國幼兒教師創造力人格特質與創造力教學行為之研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，31，71-98。【Jeng, B.-J. (2011). A study of kindergarten teachers’ creative personality and teaching behavior for creativity in Taiwan. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal: Education and Social Sciences, 31, 71-98.】
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.103.3.411
- Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
- Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
- Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729-735. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729
- Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. doi:10.1177/0149206311410606
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence, and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallized intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 60-69. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.01.002
- Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior: Can the big five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores? Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 90-97. doi:10.1080/10400410903579627
- Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355-429. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430
- Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge, and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 532-535. doi:10.1016/j. lindif.2010.04.008
- Bickhard, M. H. (2000). Motivation and emotion: An interactive process model. In R. D. Ellis & N. Newton (Eds.), The caldron of consciousness (pp. 161-178). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/aicr.16.12bic
- Bickhard, M. H. (2003). An integration of motivation and cognition. BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 2-Development and Motivation, 1(1), 41-56.
- Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the big five: Multitrait‐ multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72(4), 845-876. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004. 00282.x
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118619179
- Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 239-253. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00057-8
- Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Caprara, G. V., & Cervone, D. (2003). A conception of personality for a psychology of human strengths: Personality as an agentic, self-regulating system. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths (pp. 61-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Carruthers, P. (2011). Creative action in mind. Philosophical Psychology, 24(4), 437-461. doi:10. 1080/09515089.2011.556609
- Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1991). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Cockburn, A. D., & Haydn, T. (2004). Recruiting and retaining teachers: Understanding why teachers teach. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
- Cropley, A. J., & Urban, K. K. (2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 481-494). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
- Cross, D., & Hong, J. Y. (2012). An ecological examination of teachers’ emotions in the school context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 957-967. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.001
- Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Digby, R., Howe, A., Collier, C., & Hay, P. (2014). The roles and development needs of teachers to promote creativity: A systematic review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41(July), 34-41. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.003
- de Jong, R. J., van Tartwijk, J., Verloop, N., Veldman, I., & Wubbels, T. (2012). Teachers’ expectations of teacher-student interaction: Complementary and distinctive expectancy patterns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 948-956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.009
- Dean, M. A., Conte, J. M., & Blankenhorn, T. R. (2006). Examination of the predictive validity of big five personality dimensions across training performance criteria. Personality & Individual Differences, 41(7), 1229-1239. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.020
- Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6-25. doi:10.1080/00461520. 2011.538645
- Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning. London, UK: The Althouse Press.
- Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
- Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113-130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763205.009
- Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2009). In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 150-154. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.008
- Fogarty, R., & McTighe, J. (1993). Educating teacher for higher order thinking: The three-story intellect. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 161-169. doi:10.1080/00405849309543592
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/ 3151312
- Frazier, P., Tix, A., & Barron, K. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134. doi:10.1037/0022- 0167.51.1.115
- Friedman, L., & Wall, M. (2005). Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. The American Statistician, 59(2), 127-136. doi:10.1198/000313005X41337
- Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1060-1069. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007. 10.035
- Gal, H. (2011). From another perspective-training teachers to cope with problematic learning situations in geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(2), 183-203. doi:10.1007/ s10649-011-9321-6
- Gorozidis, G., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39(April), 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.tate. 2013.12.001
- Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Hennessey, B. A. (2004). The social psychology of creativity: The beginnings of a multicultural perspective. In S. Lau (Ed.), Creativity: When east meets west (pp. 201-226). Hong Kong, China: World Scientific. doi:10.1142/9789812567192_0009
- Hennessey, B. A. (2010). The creativity-motivation connection. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 343-365). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763205.022
- Hernandez-Ramos, P., & Giancarlo, C. A. (2004). Situating teacher education: From the university classroom to the “real” classroom. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(3), 121-128.
- Houtz, J. C., Selby, E., Esquivel, G. B., Okoye, R. A., Peters, K. M., & Treffinger, D. J. (2003). Creativity styles and personal type. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 321-330. doi:10.1207/ S15326934CRJ1504_2
- Hsu, Y., Liang, C., & Chang, C.-C. (2014). The mediating effects of generative cognition on imagination stimulation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 544-555. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.796715
- Hsu, Y., Peng, L.-P., Wang, J.-H., & Liang, C. (2014). Revising the imaginative capability and creativity capability scales: Testing the relationship between imagination and creativity among agriculture students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 6(1), 57-70.
- Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
- Huber, J., Murphy, M. S., & Clandinin, D. J. (2003). Creating communities of cultural imagination: Negotiating a curriculum of diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 33(4), 343-362. doi:10.1046/j.1467- 873X.2003.00269.x
- James, M., & McCormick, R. (2009). Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 973-982. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.023
- Johnson, B., & Stevens, J. J. (2001). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the school level environment questionnaire (SLEQ). Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 325-344. doi:10. 1023/A:1014486821714
- Johnson, B., Stevens, J. J., & Zvoch, K. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of school climate: A validity study of scores from the revised school level environment questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(5), 833-844. doi:10.1177/0013164406299102
- Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
- Jurasaite-Harbison, E., & Rex, L. A. (2010). School cultures as contexts for informal teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 267-277. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.012
- Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., & Wisniewska, E. (2007). Creative teaching of creativity teachers: Polish perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 57-61. doi:10.1016/j.tsc. 2006.10.004
- Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 913-917. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.013
- Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M.-M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. doi:10.1037/a0019237
- Lam, S.-F., Cheng, R. W.-Y., & Choy, H. C. (2010). School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487-497. doi:10.1016/j. learninstruc.2009.07.003
- Liang, C., Chang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y. (2014). Differential effects of personality traits and environmental predictors on reproductive and creative imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(4), 237-253. doi:10.1002/jocb.50
- Liang, C., Hsu, Y., & Chang, C.-C. (2013). Intrinsic motivation as mediator on imaginative capability development. Thinking skills and Creativity, 8, 109-119. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012. 09.001
- Liang, C., Hsu, Y., Huang, Y., & Chen, S.-C. (2012). How learning environments can stimulate student imagination. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 432- 441.
- Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812-819. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
- Marsh, R. L., Ward, T. B., & Landau, J. D. (1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory and Cognition, 27(1), 94-105. doi:10.3758/BF03201216
- Martinsen, Ø. L. (2011). The creative personality: A synthesis and development of the creative person profile. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 185-202. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.595656
- McCrae, R. R. (2011). Personality theories for the 21st century. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 209-214. doi:10.1177/0098628311411785
- Modell, A. H. (2006). Imagination and the meaningful brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
- Montessori, M. (1917). Spontaneous activity in education. New York, NY: Frederick, A. Stokes.
- Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53-66. doi:10. 1080/10400410701841955
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
- Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2012). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms? Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 95-116. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9171-0
- Rushton, S., Morgan, J., & Richard, M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 432-441. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.011
- Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. doi:10.1037/1082- 989X.7.4.422
- Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., & Spörrle, M. (2011). Be yourself, believe in yourself, and be happy: Self-efficacy as a mediator between personality and well-being. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 43-48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00826.x
- Thomas, N. J. T. (2014). The multidimensional spectrum of imagination: Images, dreams, hallucinations, and active, imaginative perception. Humanities, 3(2), 132-184. doi:10.3390/ h3020132
- Thompson, E. R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English big-five mini- markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 542-548. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.013
- Thornton, B., Peltier, G., & Hill, G. (2005). Do future teachers choose wisely? A study of pre-service teachers’ personality preference profiles. College Student Journal, 39(3), 489-496.
- Vähäsantanen, K., Saarinen, J., & Eteläpelto, A. (2009). Between school and working life: Vocational teachers’ agency in boundary-crossing settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(6), 395-404. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.04.003
- Yamkovenko, B., & Holton, E. (2010). Toward a theoretical model of dispositional influences on transfer of learning: A test of a structural model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(4), 381-410. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20054
- Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.90.6.1265
- Zittoun, T., & Cerchia, F. (2013). Imagination as expansion of experience. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(3), 305-324. doi:10.1007/s12124-013-9234-2
Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(3)】September
Using Personality Traits and Psychological and Environmental Factors to Predict the Instructional Design Imagination of Teachers
Author: Yuling Hsu (Institute of Education, Tzu Chi University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 61, No. 3
Date：September 2016
Pages：69-98
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).03
Abstract：
This study responded to the challenging and complex situations faced by teachers by using personality, psychological, and environmental variables to construct a predictive model of the imaginative capabilities of teachers as demonstrated in their instructional design. On the basis of previous studies of the influence of personality traits and psychological and environmental factors on imaginative capabilities, we conducted structural equation modeling to propose a predictive model and then validated it. The results revealed that: (1) the imaginative capabilities involved in instructional design included initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, and transforming imagination; (2) openness to experience and conscientiousness had strong direct effects on imaginative capabilities, whereas extraversion, emotional stability, and agreeableness indirectly predicted imaginative capabilities; (3) self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation displayed mediating roles in the personality traits and psychological and environmental factors that predicted imaginative capabilities; (4) the means by which environmental factors influence imaginative capabilities requires further exploration. Finally, this study proposed suggestions regarding the practical implications of the results and future research directions.
Keywords：environmental factors, instructional design imagination, personality traits, psychological factors