學生知覺教師期望、能力信念、實用價值與內在價值對臺灣八年級學生數理成就之影響：以TIMSS 2011多層次結構方程式模型為例
作者:陳敏瑜(臺北市立大學教育學系)、游錦雲(臺北市立大學心理與諮商學系)
卷期：62卷第1期
日期：2017年3月
頁碼：59-102
DOI：doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).03
摘要：
本研究以期望價值理論為架構，進行國際數學與科學成就趨勢調查（TIMSS）2011年臺灣八年級學生數學和科學成就之多層次結構方程式模型分析，瞭解學生層次（學生知覺教師期望、能力信念、實用價值、內在價值）及班級層次（班級知覺教師期望、班級能力信念、班級實用價值、班級內在價值）重要變項之影響力，並探究能力信念在學生知覺教師期望與數理成就之間的中介效果。本研究發現，學生層次和班級層次的模型結構並不相同，在學生層次的分析中，數學和科學的能力信念對學生學業成就的直接效果最大，而在數學與科學的班級層次分析中，班級能力信念皆對班級學業成就產生相當大的直接影響。此外，學生能力信念在學生知覺教師期望與數理成就之間扮演中介角色。最後依據研究結果提供建議，以供實務應用及未來研究之參考。
關鍵詞：多層次結構方程式模型、次級資料分析、國際數學與科學成就趨勢調查2011、期望價值理論、數理成就
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 吳坤璋、黃台珠、吳裕益（2005）。影響中小學學生科學學習成就的因素之比較研究。教育心理學報，37（2），147-171。doi:10.6251/BEP.20051115【Wu, K.-C., Huang, T.-C., & Wu, Y.-Y. (2005). A comparative study of factors affecting science learning achievement of students in different grade levels. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 37(2), 147-171. doi:10. 6251/BEP.20051115】
- 巫思穎（2012）。香港、新加坡、臺灣八年級學生科學成就影響因素之比較：以TIMSS 2007為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立中興大學，臺中市。【Wu, S.-Y. (2012). Factors affect on the eighth grade students’ science achievements: A comparison among Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.】
- 李仁豪、余民寧（2008）。二層次結構方程式模型的應用：以教育心理學為例。師大學報：教育類，53（3），95-123。doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303005【Li, R.-H., & Yu, M.-N. (2008). Applying two-level structural equation model to a data sample drawn from educational psychology. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 95-123. doi:10. 3966/2073753X2008125303005】
- 李玉琳、廖主民（2005）。父母對兒童參與舞蹈活動的期望價值信念的影響。體育學系學刊，5，79-84。【Li, Y.-L., & Liao, Z.-M. (2005). The influence of parents on the belief of expectancy value of children’s participation in dance activities. Journal of Physical Education, 5, 79-84.】
- 李懿芳、江芳盛、蔡佳燕（2010）。校園安全觀感與國小學生數學及科學學業成就之相關研究。教育學刊，35，99-128。【Lee, Y.-F., Chiang, F.-S., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2010). A study of the correlation between perceptions of school safety and elementary students’ mathematics and science performance. Educational Review, 35, 99-128.】
» 展開更多
- 吳坤璋、黃台珠、吳裕益（2005）。影響中小學學生科學學習成就的因素之比較研究。教育心理學報，37（2），147-171。doi:10.6251/BEP.20051115【Wu, K.-C., Huang, T.-C., & Wu, Y.-Y. (2005). A comparative study of factors affecting science learning achievement of students in different grade levels. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 37(2), 147-171. doi:10. 6251/BEP.20051115】
- 巫思穎（2012）。香港、新加坡、臺灣八年級學生科學成就影響因素之比較：以TIMSS 2007為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立中興大學，臺中市。【Wu, S.-Y. (2012). Factors affect on the eighth grade students’ science achievements: A comparison among Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.】
- 李仁豪、余民寧（2008）。二層次結構方程式模型的應用：以教育心理學為例。師大學報：教育類，53（3），95-123。doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303005【Li, R.-H., & Yu, M.-N. (2008). Applying two-level structural equation model to a data sample drawn from educational psychology. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 95-123. doi:10. 3966/2073753X2008125303005】
- 李玉琳、廖主民（2005）。父母對兒童參與舞蹈活動的期望價值信念的影響。體育學系學刊，5，79-84。【Li, Y.-L., & Liao, Z.-M. (2005). The influence of parents on the belief of expectancy value of children’s participation in dance activities. Journal of Physical Education, 5, 79-84.】
- 李懿芳、江芳盛、蔡佳燕（2010）。校園安全觀感與國小學生數學及科學學業成就之相關研究。教育學刊，35，99-128。【Lee, Y.-F., Chiang, F.-S., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2010). A study of the correlation between perceptions of school safety and elementary students’ mathematics and science performance. Educational Review, 35, 99-128.】
- 林志哲（2007）。以結構方程模型驗證期望、價值與數學成就的關係。教育學刊，29，103-127。【Lin, C.-C. (2007). The verification of relationship among expectancy, value, and mathematic achievement by structural equation modeling. Educational Review, 29, 103-127.】
- 林章榜、吳海助（2007）。不同運動行為階段學生體育課情境樂趣差異的探討。弘光人文社會學報，6，143-156。【Lin, C.-P., & Wu, H.-C. (2007). The difference of situational interest among different sport behavior stages students. Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 6, 143-156.】
- 邱皓政（2007）。脈絡變數的多層次潛在變數模式分析：口試評分者效應的多層次結構方程模式實證應用。中華心理學刊，49（4），383-405。doi:10.6129/CJP.2007.4904.05【Chiou, H.-J. (2007). Multilevel latent variable modeling of contextual variables: Application of multilevel structural equation modeling on rater effects. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 383-405. doi:10.6129/CJP. 2007.4904.05】
- 侯雅齡（2013）。資優生科學自我概念與科學成就之縱貫研究。教育科學研究期刊，58（2），57-90。doi:10.3966/2073753X2013065802003【Hou, Y.-L. (2013). Longitudinal study of gifted students’ science self-concept and science achievement. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(2), 57-90. doi:10.3966/2073753X2013065802003】
- 梁麗珍、林恆瑜（2008）。期待－價值學習動機理論模式實證研究－以技職校院統計課程為例。教育理論與實踐學刊，18，75-98。【Liang, L.-J., & Lin, H.-Y. (2008). The empirical study of expectancy-value model of achievement motivation－The statistics curriculum on technological institutes as the example. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 18, 75-98.】
- 郭生玉（1982）。教師期望與學生內外控信念關係之研究。教育心理學報，15，139-148。doi:10. 6251/BEP.19820601.10【Kuo, S.-Y. (1982). Relationships between teacher expectations and internal-external control in an elementary school children. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 15, 139-148. doi:10.6251/BEP.19820601.10】
- 陳俊瑋（2014）。家庭作業與學習成就關係之研究－以TIMSS與TEPS臺灣學生為例（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。【Chen, C.-W. (2014). The relationship between homework and learning achievements: An example of Taiwan students from TIMSS and TEPS (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 陳敏瑜、游錦雲（2013）。以TIMSS資料檢視能力信念與任務價值對臺灣八年級學生數學成就之影響。教育科學研究期刊，58（3），153-186。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).06【Chen, M.-Y., & Yu, C.-Y. (2013). Using trends in mathematics and science study to investigate the effects of ability beliefs and task values on eighth-grader mathematics achievements in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(3), 153-186. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).06】
- 曾建章（1996）。國中資優學生所知覺之教師及父母學業成就期望與成就動機間差異之研究。資優教育學刊，60，31-36。【Zeng, J.-Z. (1996). Differences in perceptions of parental and teacher expectations and their influences on the academic motivation of gifted students. Gifted Education, 60, 31-36.】
- 黃秋華（2007）。從期望價值論驗證數學自我概念、效用性價值與數學成就之結構關係－以PISA 2003香港資料為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。【Huang, Q.-H. (2007). Verification of the structural relationship between the self-concept, utility value and achievement of mathematics from expectancy value theory: A case study of PISA 2003 Hong Kong (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 廖主民、林章榜（2008）。不同健身運動階段之期望與價值信念的研究。大專體育學刊，10（3），113-122。【Liao, C.-M., & Lin, C.-P. (2008). Expectancy and value beliefs in different stages of exercise behaviors. Journal of Physical Education in Higher Education, 10(3), 113-122.】
- 蕭金蘭、羅新興、黃俊彥（2010）。大學聲望知覺與教師期望知覺對研究生自我效能的影響。人文社會學報，6，63-83。【Hsiao, C.-L., Lo, H.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2010). The effect of perceived university reputation and teacher expectation on the self-efficacy of graduate students. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 6, 63-83.】
- 賴英娟（2013）。國中生學業情緒之認知評估中介歷程：二階調節效果（未出版博士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。【Lai, Y.-C. (2013). The mediation of cognitive appraisals on junior high school students’ academic emotions: Two-level moderated effect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.】
- Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9367-7
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.103.3.411
- Areepattamannil, S., & Freeman, J. G. (2008). Academic achievement, academic self-concept, and academic motivation of immigrant adolescents in the greater Toronto area secondary schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(4), 700-743. doi:10.4219/jaa-2008-831
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Comparison of estimation methods for complex survey data analysis. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/SurveyComp21.pdf
- Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
- Bentler, P. M., & Liang, J. (2003). Two-level mean and covariance structures: Maximum likelihood via an EM algorithm. In S. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 53-70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Bollen, K. A. (1980). Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review, 45(3), 370-390. doi:10.2307/2095172
- Bouffard, T., Marcoux, M. F., Vezeau, C., & Bordeleau, L. (2003). Changes in self-perception of competence and intrinsic motivation among elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 171-186. doi:10.1348/00070990360626921
- Chantala, K., & Suchindran, C. (2006). Adjusting for unequal selection probability in multilevel models: A comparison of software packages. Retrieved from http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/ SRMS/Proceedings/y2006/Files/JSM2006-000347.pdf
- Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary school students’ motivation and achievement in combined science. US-China Education Review B, 3(4), 213-228.
- DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (1999). Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 71-94. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0984
- DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245-254. doi:10.1080/ 00220670009598713
- Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78(2), 430-447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x
- Drent, M., Meelissen, M. R. M., & van der Kleij, F. M. (2013). The contribution of TIMSS to the link between school and classroom factors and student achievement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 198-224. doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.727872
- Duncan, O., Curzort, R., & Duncan, R. (1966). Statistical geography: Problems in analyzing a real data. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
- Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 26-43. doi:10.1037/0022-3514. 46.1.26
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003
- Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830- 847. doi:10.2307/1131221
- Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. III, pp. 1017-1095). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Eklöf, H. (2007). Self-concept and valuing of mathematics in TIMSS 2003: Scale structure and relation to performance in a Swedish setting. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 297-313. doi:10.1080/00313830701356141
- Fan, W. (2011). Social influences, school motivation and gender differences: An application of the expectancy-value theory. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 157-175. doi:10.1080/01443410.2010. 536525
- Fan, W., Lindt, S. F., Arroyo-Giner, C. A., & Wolters, C. A. (2009). The role of social relationships in promoting student academic self-efficacy and MIMIC approaches to assess factorial mean invariance. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 5(1), 34-53.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/ 3151312
- Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., & Yeung, A. S. (2015). Expectancy-value in mathematics, gender and socioeconomic background as predictors of achievement and aspirations: A multi-cohort study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 161-168. doi:10. 1016/j.lindif.2015.01.008
- Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949-967. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x
- Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hinnant, J. B., O’Brien, M., & Ghazarian, S. R. (2009). The longitudinal relations of teacher expectations to achievement in the early school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 662-670. doi:10.1037/a0014306
- Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hox, J. J., Maas, C. J. M., & Brinkhuis, M. J. S. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64(2), 157-170. doi:10. 1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00445.x
- Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self- competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509-527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421
- Jiménez-Morales, M., & López-Zafra, E. (2013). Impact of perceived emotional intelligence, social attitudes and teacher expectations on academic performance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(1), 75-98.
- Johnson, J. E., Burlingame, G. M., Olsen, J. A., Davies, D. R., & Gleave, R. L. (2005). Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 310-321. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
- Johnson, D. R., & Elliott, L. A. (1998). Sampling design effects: Do they affect the analyses of data from the National Survey of Families and Households? Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(4), 993-1001. doi:10.2307/353640
- Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2012). Sample design in TIMSS and PIRLS. Retrieved from http://timssand pirls.bc.edu/methods/pdf/TP_Sampling_Design.pdf
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? Retrieved from http://www. ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf
- Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131-155. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3
- Kadijevich, D. (2008). TIMSS 2003: Relating dimensions of mathematics attitude to mathematics achievement (MA). Retrieved from http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs
- Kano, Y., & Azuma, Y. (2003). Use of SEM programs to precisely measure scale reliability. In H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigemasu, Y. Kano, & J. J. Meulman (Eds.), New developments in psychometrics (pp. 141-148). Tokyo, Japan: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-66996- 8_14
- Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
- Li, F., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Harmer, P., & Acock, A. (1997). Latent variable modeling of multilevel intrinsic motivation data. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise, 1(4), 223-244. doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee0104_3
- Liu, S., & Meng, L. (2010). Re-examining factor structure of the attitudinal items from TIMSS 2003 in cross-cultural study of mathematics self-concept. Educational Psychology, 30(6), 699-712. doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.501102
- Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. S. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 791-809. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.791
- Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(6), 764-802. doi:10.1080/00273170903333665
- Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397-416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
- Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- McDonald, R. P., & Goldstein, H. (1989). Balanced versus unbalanced designs for linear structural relations in two-level data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42(2), 215-232. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb00911.x
- Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60-70. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60
- Miranda, H., & Russell, M. (2011). Predictors of teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A multilevel SEM approach using data from the USEIT study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 301-323. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782574
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54(4), 557-585. doi:10.1007/BF02296397
- Muthén, B. O. (1991). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28(4), 338-354. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00363.x
- Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(3), 376-398. doi:10.1177/0049124194022003006
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive- methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058-1066. doi:10.1177/0956797611415540
- Nagy, G., Garrett, J., Trautwein, U., Cortina, K. S., Baumert, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Gendered high school course selection as a precursor of gendered careers: The mediating role of self-concept and intrinsic value. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 115-143). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11706-004
- Raykov, T. (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 299-331. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80041-8
- Rosário, P., Nunez, J. C., Ferrando, P. J., Paiva, M. O., Lourenco, A., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2013). The relationship between approaches to teaching and approaches to studying: A two-level structural equation model for biology achievement in high school. Metacognition and Learning, 8(1), 47-77. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9095-6
- Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2006). Teacher expectations and student self-perceptions: Exploring relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 537-552. doi:10.1002/pits.20169
- Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2009). Teacher expectations and labeling. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Series Eds.), Springer international handbooks of education: Vol. 21 international handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 695-707). Norwell, MA: Springer.
- Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142-151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170
- Shen, C. (2002). Revisiting the relationship between students’ achievement and their self- perceptions: A cross-national analysis based on TIMSS 1999 data. Assessment in Education, 9(2), 161-184. doi:10.1080/0969594022000001913
- Shen, C., & Tam, H. P. (2008). The paradoxical relationship between student achievement and self-perception: A cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data. Educational Research & Evaluation, 14(1), 87-100. doi:10.1080/13803610801896653
- Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70-83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
- Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of intrinsic motivation and competence beliefs: Is there a relation over time? Child Development, 79(5), 1555-1569. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-8624.2008.01205.x
- Sullins, E. S., Hernandez, D., Fuller, C., & Tashiro, J. S. (1995). Predicting who will major in a science discipline: Expectancy-value theory as part of an ecological model for studying academic communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 99-119. doi:10.1002/ tea.3660320109
- Televantou, I., Marsh, H. W., Kyriakides, L., Nagengast, B., Fletcher, J., & Malmberg, L. E. (2015). Phantom effects in school composition research: Consequences of failure to control biases due to measurement error in traditional multilevel models. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 75-101. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.871302
- Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763-777. doi:10.1037/a0027470
- Ulstad, S. O., Halvari, H., Sørebø, Ø., & Deci, E. L. (2016). Motivation, learning strategies, and performance in physical education at secondary school. Advances in Physical Education, 6(1), 27-41. doi:10.4236/ape.2016.61004
- Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th-through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556-1574. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x
- Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49-78. doi:10.1007/BF02209024
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91-120). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1
- Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451-469. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
- Wilkins, W. E., & Glock, M. D. (1973). Teacher expectations and student achievement: A replication and extension. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Wilkins, J. L. M., Zembylas, M., & Travers, K. J. (2002). Investigating correlates of mathematics and science literacy in the final year of secondary school. In D. F. Robataille & A. E. Beaton (Eds.), Secondary analysis of the TIMSS results: A synthesis of current research (pp. 291-316). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/0-306-47642-8_18
- Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2), 114-128. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05.005
- Yewchuk, C., & Jobagy, S. (1991). Gifted adolescents: At risk for suicide. High Ability Studies, 2(1), 73-85. doi:10.1080/0937445910020109
- Yıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150-172. doi:10. 1080/00220973.2011.596855
- Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1189-1212. doi:10.1007/ s10763-010-9255-y
Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(1)】March
Effects of Perception of Teachers’ Expectations, Ability Beliefs, Utility Values, and Intrinsic Values on Math and Science Achievement Among Eighth-Grade Students in Taiwan: A Multilevel Structural Equation Model Using TIMSS 2011
Author: Min-Yu Chen(Department of Education, University of Taipei), Ching-Yun Yu(Department of Psychology and Counseling, University of Taipei)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 62, No.1
Date：March 2017
Pages：59-102
DOI：doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).03
Abstract：
On the basis of expectancy-value theory, multilevel structural equation models and trends in mathematics and science study 2011 data were applied to investigate the effects of the student-level variables (perception of teachers’ expectations, ability beliefs, utility values, and intrinsic values) and their respective class-level variables on math and science achievement, and to test the mediation effect of ability belief between students’ perception of teachers’ expectations and the math and science achievements of eighth-grade students in Taiwan. The study revealed the following results: (1) The student-level and class-level structures exhibited differences. (2) At the student level, students’ ability belief had the strongest effect on their math and science achievement; the class level of ability belief had a positive effect on math and science achievement. (3) Ability belief had a significant mediating effect between the perception of teachers’ expectations and math and science achievement. Finally, according to the results, some suggestions for practical applications and future research were introduced.
Keywords：expectancy-value theory, math and science achievement, multilevel structural equation model (MSEM), secondary data analysis, trends in mathematics and science study (TIMSS) 2011