學習的意義感：建立、失落及再創生
作者:黃囇莉(國立臺灣大學心理學系)、洪才舒(國立清華大學學習科學研究所)
卷期：62卷第1期
日期：2017年3月
頁碼：133-162
DOI：doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).05
摘要：
本研究旨在探究華人學習意義感之建立、失落及再創生之歷程。研究採用質性研究法，針對17位成人（九位男性和八位女性）進行深度訪談，研究者再以Baumeister（1991）的「意義連結論」、Park與Folkman（1997）的「整體意義」與「情境意義」，以及華人的「讀書文化腳本文化」為形式理論，對受訪者的自我敘說資料二度詮釋並揭露其存在處境的置身結構。資料分析結果顯示，此歷程包含四部分，首先，意義的建立主要透過連結，例如，與自我的連結、與生命及世界信念的連結、與學習信念的連結。接著，意義的失落則來自斷鏈、存在的空虛、與學習信念脫鈎。意義失落後，會將意義暫時擱置，讓自己回歸到現實，設下停損點，並試者去看到未來的各種可能性。最後再藉著轉化與代償而得以再創造新的學習意義感。本研究最後也討論文化之意涵、敘說研究之限制及未來可發展之方向。
關鍵詞：生命意義、華人文化腳本、意義感、學習
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 文崇一（1989）。中國人的價值觀。臺北巿：東大圖書。【Wen, C.-Y. (1989). The values of Chinese people. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong Da.】
- 王震武（2002）。升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎－一個歷史觀察。本土心理學研究，17，3-65。doi:10.6254/2002.17.3【Wang, J.-W. (2002). The reason and myth of education fanaticism: A historical review. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17, 3-65. doi:10.6254/2002.17.3】
- 何英奇（1987）。大專學生之生命意義感及其相關：意義治療法基本概念之實證性研究。教育心理學報，20，87-106。doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6【Ho, Y.-C. (1987). College students’ meaning of life and its correlates: An empirical study of the concept of logotherapy. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 20, 87-106. doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6】
- 余安邦（1994）。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機不同嗎？從動機與行為的關係加以探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，76，197-224。【Yu, A.-B. (1994). Is social-oriented achievement motivation (SOAM) different from individual-oriented achievement motivation (IOAM)? Further discussions of the relationship between motivation and behavior. Academia Sinica’s Institute of Ethnology Bulletin, 76, 197-224.】
- 余英時（1987）。士與中國文化。上海市：上海人民。【Yu, Y.-S. (1987). The Shi and Chinese culture. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Renmin.】
» 展開更多
- 文崇一（1989）。中國人的價值觀。臺北巿：東大圖書。【Wen, C.-Y. (1989). The values of Chinese people. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong Da.】
- 王震武（2002）。升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎－一個歷史觀察。本土心理學研究，17，3-65。doi:10.6254/2002.17.3【Wang, J.-W. (2002). The reason and myth of education fanaticism: A historical review. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17, 3-65. doi:10.6254/2002.17.3】
- 何英奇（1987）。大專學生之生命意義感及其相關：意義治療法基本概念之實證性研究。教育心理學報，20，87-106。doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6【Ho, Y.-C. (1987). College students’ meaning of life and its correlates: An empirical study of the concept of logotherapy. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 20, 87-106. doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6】
- 余安邦（1994）。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機不同嗎？從動機與行為的關係加以探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，76，197-224。【Yu, A.-B. (1994). Is social-oriented achievement motivation (SOAM) different from individual-oriented achievement motivation (IOAM)? Further discussions of the relationship between motivation and behavior. Academia Sinica’s Institute of Ethnology Bulletin, 76, 197-224.】
- 余英時（1987）。士與中國文化。上海市：上海人民。【Yu, Y.-S. (1987). The Shi and Chinese culture. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Renmin.】
- 吳宗國（1997）。唐代科舉制度研究。瀋陽市：遼寧大學出版社。【Wu, Z.-G. (1997). The imperial examinations under Tang dynasty of China. Yuan, China: Liaoning University Press.】
- 李弘祺（2003）。中國科舉制度的歷史意義及解釋－從艾爾曼（Benjamin Elman）對明清考試制度的研究談起。臺大歷史學報，32，237-267。doi:10.6253/ntuhistory.2003.32.07【Lee, T. H.-C. (2003). Review essay: The historical significance and interpretation of the Chinese examination system, on Benjamin Elman’s book, a cultural history of civil examinations in late imperial China. Historical Inquiry, 32, 237-267. doi:10.6253/ntuhistory.2003.32.07】
- 李維倫、賴憶嫺（2009）。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275- 321。【Lee, W.-L., & Lai, Y.-H. (2009). Phenomenological methodology as an existential move. Chineses Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 25, 275-321.】
- 金諍（1990）。科舉制度與中國文化。上海市：上海人民。【Jin, Z. (1990). Civil service exam systems and Chinese culture. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Renmin.】
- 南懷瑾（2009）。老子他說。臺北市：老古文化。【Nan, H.-C. (2009). What Laozi said. Taipei, Taiwan: Lao Ku Culture.】
- 國家教育研究院（2012）。濡化。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/509581/【National Academy for Educational Research. (2012). Enculturation. Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/ 509581/】
- 黃光國（2004）。儒家社會中的生活目標與角色義務。本土心理學研究，22，121-193。doi:10. 6254/2004.22.121【Hwang, K.-K. (2004). Life goals and role obligation in a Confucian society. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 22, 121-193. doi:10.6254/2004.22.121】
- 黃光國（2009）。儒家關係主義：哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北市：心理。【Hwang, K.-K. (2009). Confucian relationalism: Philosophical reflection, theoretical construction, and empirical research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.】
- 黃光國（2013，11月）。反思與實踐：儒家自我修養的功夫。論文發表於東亞視域中的「自我」與「個人」國際學術研討會，臺北市。【Hwang. K.-K. (2013, November). Reflection and achievement: The Confucian self-cultivation effort. Paper presented at the International Conference of Self and Person in East Asian Perspective, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 黃囇莉（2008）。科學渴望創意、創意需要科學：紮根理論在本土心理學中的運用與轉化。載自楊中芳（主編），本土心理學研究取徑論叢（pp. 233-270）。臺北市：遠流。【Huang, L.-L. (2008). Science desiring creativity, creativity needing science: The application and transformation of grounded theory in Chinese indigenous psychology. In C.-F. Yang (Ed.), Collected essays of research method in indigenous psychology (pp. 233-270). Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou.】
- 黃囇莉、朱瑞玲（2012）。是亂流？還是潮起、潮落？─尋找台灣的「核心價值」及其變遷。載於朱瑞玲、瞿海源、張苙雲（主編），台灣的社會變遷1985~2005專書：心理、價值與宗教（pp. 1-36）。臺北市：中央研究院社會學研究所。【Huang, L.-L., & Chu, R.-L. (2012). Is it a wind Shear or a Tide going up and down－In search of core values and their trends in Taiwan. In R.-L. Chu, H.-Y. Chiu, & L.-Y. Chang (Eds.), Social change in Taiwan, 1985-2005: Psychology, value and religion (pp. 1-36). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.】
- 楊國樞（2004）。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。【Yang, K.-S. (2004). Theoretical and empirical analysis of the Chinese self from the perspective of social and individual orientation. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 22, 11-80.】
- 楊懋春（1986）。中國社會思想史。臺北巿：幼獅。【Yang, M.-C. (1986). History of Chinese social thoughts. Taipei, Taiwan: Youth.】
- 劉海峰、李兵（2004）。學優則仕：教育與科舉。長春市：長春。【Liu, H.-F., & Li, B. (2004). Excellent learning to be official: Education and imperial examination system. Changchun, China: Changchun.】
- Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self- control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670-676. doi:10.1086/338209
- Baumeister, R. F., & Wilson, B. (1996). Life stories and the four need for meaning. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 322-325. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0704_2
- Bering, J. M. (2002). The existential theory of mind. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 3-24. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.3
- Crumbaugh, J. C. (1973). Everything to gain: A guide to self-fulfillment through logoanalysis. Oxford, UK: Nelson-Hall.
- Davis, C. G., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1998). Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 561-574. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.561
- Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 248-272. doi:10.1080/09695940 42000304582
- Depaola, S. J., & Ebersole, P. (1995). Meaning in life categories of elderly nursing home residents. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40(3), 227-236. doi:10.2190/ TMNQ-JBGT-9MLE-YKQM
- De Vogler, K. L., & Ebersole, P. (1981). Adults’ meaning in life. Psychological Reports, 49(1), 87-90. doi:10.2466/pr0.1981.49.1.87
- De Vogler, K. L., & Ebersole, P. (1983). Young adolescents’ meaning in life. Psychological Reports, 52(2), 427-431. doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.52.2.427
- Ebersole, P., & Depaola, S. (1987). Meaning in life categories of later life couples. The Journal of Psychology, 121(2), 185-191. doi:10.1080/00223980.1987.9712656
- Emmons, R. A. (2005). Striving for the sacred: Personal goals, life meaning, and religion. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 731-745. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00429.x
- Fabry, J. B. (1988). Guideposts to meaning: Discovering what really matters. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
- Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. New York, NY: Washington Square Press/Pocket Books.
- Fry, P. S. (1998). The development of personal meaning and wisdom in adolescence: A reexamination of moderating and consolidating factors and influences. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning (pp. 91-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Giddens, A. (2013). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Retrieved from http://as.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0745666523.html
- Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2004). Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for? Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 153-166. doi:10.1515/iprg.2004.1.2.153
- Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189-212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5-10
- Hedlund, D. E. (1977). Personal meaning: The problem of educating for wisdom. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 55(10), 602-604. doi:10.1002/j.2164-4918.1977.tb04312.x
- Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88-110. doi:10.1207/ s15327957pspr1002_1
- Hermans, H. J., & Hermans-Jansen, E. (1995). Self-narratives: The construction of meaning in psychotherapy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1-16. doi:10.1111/ 1467-839X.00002
- Huang, L.-L. (2016). Interpersonal harmony and conflict for Chinese people: A Yin-Yang perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 847. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00847
- Illeris, K. (2009). A comprehensive understanding of human learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 7-20). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a person in society: Learning to be me. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 21-34.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Jenerson-Madden, D., Ebersole, P., & Romero, A. M. (1992). Personal life meaning of Mexicans. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(1), 151-161.
- Leath, C. (1999). The experience of meaning in life from a psychological perspective. Retrieved from http://purl.oclc.org/net/cleath/writings/meaning.htm
- Li, J. (2003). US and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 258-267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.258
- Lu, L., & Yang, K.-S. (2006). Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 167-175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00195.x
- McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 295-321. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
- Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 90-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2) 115-144. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115
- Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Reker, G. T., & Wong, P. T. P. (1988). Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. In J. E. Birren & V. L. Bengston (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 214-246). New York, NY: Springer.
- Sartre, J. P. (1992). Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). London, UK: Methuen. (Original work published 1957)
- Schlegel, R. J., Hicks, J. A., King, L. A., & Arndt, J. (2011). Feeling like you know who you are: Perceived true self-knowledge and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 745-756. doi:10.1177/0146167211400424
- Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., Sullivan, B. A., & Lorentz, D. (2008). Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning. Journal of Personality, 76(2), 199-228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00484.x
- Stillman, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Uncertainty, belongingness, and four needs for meaning. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 249-251. doi:10.1080/10478400903333544
- Taylor, S. J., & Ebersole, P. (1993). Young children’s meaning in life. Psychological Reports, 73(3), 1099-1104. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3f.1099
- Wong, P. T. P. (1998). Implicit theories of meaningful life and the development of the personal meaning profile. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 111-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Yalom, I. D. (1980). Esistenial psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Zukier, H. (1986). The paradigmatic and narrative modes in goal-guided inference. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 465-502). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(1)】March
Meaning of Learning: Construction, Loss, and Reconstruction
Author: Li-Li Huang (Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University), Tsai-Shu Hung (Institute of Learning Sciences, National Tsing- Hua University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 62, No.1
Date：March 2017
Pages：133-162
DOI：doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).05
Abstract：
The aim of this study was to explore the processes and mechanisms of the construction, loss, and reconstruction of meaning in the context of learning. A qualitative method was implemented, and 17 adults (9 men and 8 women) were interviewed. Baumeister’s (1991) connection theory of meaning-making, Park and Folkman’s (1997) global meaning and situational meaning theory, and the Chinese cultural script of learning were all adopted as formal theories for the secondary interpretation of the participants’ self-narrative data, and also for the disclosure of the situational structures of existential contexts. The results showed the process to consist of four parts. First, connection is the key mechanism of meaning-building; for example, connecting with oneself/others or with one’s own beliefs about life and the world, or with belief in learning. Second, loss of meaning is a result of disconnection, such as disconnecting from the belief of learning, engendering thoughts about the vacancy of existence. Third, meaning is defined in terms of reality and cost consideration, and being able to see future possibilities. Finally, the reconstruction of meaning results from transformation and compensation. This paper also discusses the implications of culture, the limitations of self-narrative data, and the potential for future research.
Keywords：Chinese cultural script, learning, meaning, meaning of life