（專題）大學教師職級、主持研發計畫數與研究產能關聯性之探討：以一所私立醫學大學為例
作者:黃淑玲(高雄醫學大學人文與藝術教育中心)、沈碩彬(高雄醫學大學校務研究辦公室)
卷期：62卷第4期
日期：2017年12月
頁碼：89-115
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).04
摘要：
本研究旨在探討各職級（正、副、助理教授）大學教師其主持研發計畫數（非營利、校內、產學、政府、跨校）對研究產能（研討會、學術期刊論文數）之預測模型。研究資料採用南部一所私立醫學大學於2006-2015年共10年期間之教師人事資料，串接該校之校務資料庫中與本研究相關之變項，並採用描述性統計、階層迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析。主要研究結果如下：一、各職級教師均以主持政府計畫為主，但其他類計畫數與研究產能表現不盡相同；二、總體上，職級高者主持計畫數多，也正向預測研究產能；三、年輕但職級高者有較高的校內、政府與跨校計畫數和研究產能；四、不同職級教師的期刊論文發表途徑各異，正教授學術產出模式最靈活多元。本研究提出大學組織、教師個人策略規劃之建議；同時，優化校務資料蒐集有益進一步分析，以期掌握研究產能趨勢，降低大學教師職能落差。
關鍵詞：大學教師職級、研究產能、校務研究、階層迴歸
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 田芳華（1999）。我國大學教師升等制度對獎勵研究生產力功效之分析事件史分析法應用實例。人文及社會科學集刊，11（3），359-394。【Tien, F.-F. (1999). The impact of research productivity on promotion of college faculty in Taiwan: An application of event history analysis. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 11(3), 359-394.】
- 田芳華（2003）。臺灣學術研究資源的分配：教師知覺與歸因理論。教育與心理研究，26（1），133-165。【Tien, F.-F. (2003). Factors influencing access to academic resources in Taiwan: Testing the attribution theory of faculty perception. Journal of Education & Psychology, 26(1), 133-165.】
- 何希慧（2015）。推動大學教師評鑑及教學評量的省思與建議。評鑑雙月刊，55，9-12。【Ho, S.-H. (2015). Thoughts and suggestions on promoting university faculties’ assessment and teaching evaluation. Evaluation Bimonthly, 55, 9-12.】
- 吳安妮、王泰昌、彭火樹（2004）。台灣會計學術單位期刊著作表現之研究。證券市場發展季刊，16（1），1-58。doi:10.6529/RSFM.2004.16(1).1 【Wu, A., Wang, T.-C., & Peng, H.-S. (2004). Contributions to refereed journals by Taiwanese accounting institutions. Review of Securities and Futures Markets, 16(1), 1-58. doi:10.6529/RSFM.2004.16(1).1】
- 吳安妮、王泰昌、彭火樹、陳美惠（2016）。台灣會計學術單位期刊著作表現之再檢測。中華會計學刊，12（1），115-192。doi:10.6538/TAR.2016.1201.04 【Wu, A., Wang, T.-C., Peng, H.-S., & Chen, M.-H. (2016). A reexamination of the contributions to referred journals by Taiwanese accounting institutions. Taiwan Accounting Review, 12(1), 115-192. doi:10.6538/TAR.2016. 1201.04】
» 展開更多
- 田芳華（1999）。我國大學教師升等制度對獎勵研究生產力功效之分析事件史分析法應用實例。人文及社會科學集刊，11（3），359-394。【Tien, F.-F. (1999). The impact of research productivity on promotion of college faculty in Taiwan: An application of event history analysis. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 11(3), 359-394.】
- 田芳華（2003）。臺灣學術研究資源的分配：教師知覺與歸因理論。教育與心理研究，26（1），133-165。【Tien, F.-F. (2003). Factors influencing access to academic resources in Taiwan: Testing the attribution theory of faculty perception. Journal of Education & Psychology, 26(1), 133-165.】
- 何希慧（2015）。推動大學教師評鑑及教學評量的省思與建議。評鑑雙月刊，55，9-12。【Ho, S.-H. (2015). Thoughts and suggestions on promoting university faculties’ assessment and teaching evaluation. Evaluation Bimonthly, 55, 9-12.】
- 吳安妮、王泰昌、彭火樹（2004）。台灣會計學術單位期刊著作表現之研究。證券市場發展季刊，16（1），1-58。doi:10.6529/RSFM.2004.16(1).1 【Wu, A., Wang, T.-C., & Peng, H.-S. (2004). Contributions to refereed journals by Taiwanese accounting institutions. Review of Securities and Futures Markets, 16(1), 1-58. doi:10.6529/RSFM.2004.16(1).1】
- 吳安妮、王泰昌、彭火樹、陳美惠（2016）。台灣會計學術單位期刊著作表現之再檢測。中華會計學刊，12（1），115-192。doi:10.6538/TAR.2016.1201.04 【Wu, A., Wang, T.-C., Peng, H.-S., & Chen, M.-H. (2016). A reexamination of the contributions to referred journals by Taiwanese accounting institutions. Taiwan Accounting Review, 12(1), 115-192. doi:10.6538/TAR.2016. 1201.04】
- 李珮如（2010）。影響大學教師研究生產力相關因素之探討。教育理論與實踐學刊，22，63-84。【Lee, P.-J. (2010). Factors related to research productivity of faculty. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 22, 63-84.】
- 周祝瑛（2011）。橘子與香蕉如何比？從SSCI看臺灣高等教育學術評鑑之迷思。教育研究月刊，212，40-51。【Chou, C.-I. (2011). How to compare oranges with bananas? On the myth of Taiwan’s higher education academic evaluation from SSCI. Journal of Educational Research, 212, 40-51.】
- 林俊瑩、謝亞恆、陳成宏（2014）。臺灣地區大專院校教師對學校評價的影響機制：學校屬性與教師分級的區隔作用。教育科學研究期刊，59（3），29-58。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014. 59(3).02 【Lin, C.-I., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Chen, C.-H. (2014). Taiwanese college instructors’ evaluation of their schools: The differences among school attributes and instructor ranks. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(3), 29-58. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(3).02】
- 林豔君、黃璉華、陳滋茨（1998）。大專護理教師學術生產力與其相關因素探討。護理研究，6（2），152-162。【Lin, Y.-C., Huang, L.-H., & Chen, Z.-T. (1998). Academic productivity of nursing faculty in colleges and universities. Nursing Research, 6(2), 152-162.】
- 邵婉卿、林明佳、陳昀萱（2016）。我國在五大世界大學評比系統表現之研究。大學圖書館，20（1），113-139。doi:10.6146/univj.20-1.06 【Shaw, W.-C., Lin, M.-C., & Chen, Y.-S. (2016). A study on the five worldwide rankings of higher education in Taiwan. University Library Quarterly, 20(1), 113-139. doi:10.6146/univj.20-1.06】
- 孫志麟（2007）。績效控制或專業發展？大學教師評鑑的兩難。教育實踐與研究，20（2），95-128。【Sun, C.-L. (2007). Accountability control or professional development? A dilemma of faculty evaluation in university. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 20(2), 95-128.】
- 黃薇蓁、鄧乃嘉、林哲堂、黃詠愷（2012）。齲齒指數與研究產能之文獻計量學。中華民國家庭牙醫學雜誌，7（1），4 -10。doi:10.6566/JFD/2012.7(1).4 【Huang, W.-C., Teng, N.-C., Lin, C.-T., & Huang, Y.-K. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of global research production and economic in caries during 1991~2010. Journal of Family Dentistry, 7(1), 4-10. doi:10.6566/ JFD/2012.7(1).4】
- Crookston, R. K.（2015）。與問題教師共舞：學系經營六步曲（黃淑玲、蔡佳翰，譯）。臺北市：高等教育。（原著出版於2012年）【Crookston, R. K. (2015). Working with problem faculty: A six-step guide for department chairs (S.-L. Huang & C.-H. Tsai, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: High Education. (Original word published 2012)】
- Blumenthal, D. M., Olenski, A. R., Yeh, R. W., Yeh, D. D., Sarma, A., Schmidt, A. C. S., …Jena, A. B. (2017). Sex differences in faculty rank among academic cardiologists in the United States. Circulation, 135(6), 506-517. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023520
- Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Burke, K. G., Fender, B. F., & Taylor, S. W. (2007). Walking the tightrope: The impact of teaching and service on scholarly productivity for accountants. The Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 23-30.
- Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Signori, A. (2016). Performance-based funding and university research productivity: The moderating effect of university legitimacy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 85-104. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9379-2
- Copes, H., Khey, D. N., & Tewksbury, R. (2012). Criminology and criminal justice hit parade: Measuring academic productivity in the discipline. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(4), 423-440. doi:10.1080/10511253.2012.683016
- Cvetanovich, G. L., Saltzman, B. M., Chalmers, P. N., Frank, R. M., Cole, B. J., & Bach, B. R., Jr. (2016). Research productivity of sports medicine fellowship faculty. The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 4(12), 1-6. doi:10.1177/2325967116679393
- Davis, J. C., & Patterson, D. M. (2001). Determinants of variations in journal publication rates of economists. The American Economist, 45(1), 86-91. doi:10.1177/056943450104500109
- Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26-48. doi:10.1353/jhe. 2002.0006
- Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 293-305. doi:10.2307/2112772
- Frost, N. A., Phillips, N. D., & Clear, T. R. (2007). Productivity of criminal justice scholars across the career. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(3), 428-443. doi:10.1080/1051125070 1705388
- Harle, C. A., Vest, J. R., & Menachemi, N. (2016). Using bibliometric big data to analyze faculty research productivity in health policy and management. Journal of Health Administration Education, 33(2), 285-293.
- Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507-542. doi:10.3102/00346543066004507
- Hesli, V. L., & Lee, J. M. (2011). Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others? Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 393-408. doi:10.1017/S10490 96511000242
- Khan, M. A. (2017). Achieving an appropriate balance between teaching and research in institutions of higher education: An exploratory study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(5), 341-349. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.5.892
- Kyvik, S. (1990). Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20(1), 149-160. doi:10.1177/030631290020001005
- Larivière, V., Macaluso, B., Archambault, É., & Gingras, Y. (2010). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 45-53. doi:10.3152/095820210X492495
- Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603-641. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0047
- Massy, W. F., & Wilger, A. K. (1995). Improving productivity: What faculty think about it－And its effect on quality. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(4), 10-20. doi:10.1080/ 00091383.1995.9936431
- Meyer, K. A. (1998). Faculty workload studies: Perspectives, needs, and future directions. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26(1), 1-129.
- Mongeon, P., Brodeur, C., Beaudry, C., & Larivière, V. (2016). Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 396-404. doi:10.1093/ reseval/rvw007
- Porter, S., & Umbach, P. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 171-196.
- Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28(2), 207- 226. doi:10.1007/BF01383729
- Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Association between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23(3), 273-295. doi:10.1007/BF00145017
- Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423-446. doi:10.1023/A:1015575616285
- Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. doi:10.2307/270723
- Taylor, S. W., Fender, B. F., & Burke, K. G. (2006). Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 846-859. doi:10.2307/20111856
- Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39(2), 201-222. doi:10.1023/A:1003901018634
- Webber, K. L. (2011). Measuring faculty productivity. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impact on global higher education (pp. 105-121). New York, NY: Springer.
- Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity revisited: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847-870. doi:10.2307/2657505
- Zhang, C., Murata, S., Murata, M, Fuller, C. D., Thomas, C. R., & Holliday, E. B. (2017). Factors associated with increased academic productivity among US academic radiation oncology faculty. Practical Radiation Oncology, 7(1), e59-e64. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2016.06.012
Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(4)】December (Special Issue: Institutional Research and Higher Education Development)
(Special Issue) Relationships Among Academic Ranks, Numbers of Funded Projects, and Research Productivity of University Faculty: The Case of a Private Medical University
Author: Sheila Shu-Ling Huang(Center for Humanities and Arts Education, Kaohsiung Medical University), Shuo-Pin Shen (Office of Institutional Research, Kaohsiung Medical University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 62, No.4
Date：December 2017
Pages：89-115
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).04
Abstract：
This study modeled the relationship between types of research funding and faculty research productivity. Utilizing faculty data between 2006 and 2015 and matching with variables of interest in the institutional data system of a private medical university in Southern Taiwan, this IRB-approved study employed hierarchical regression analyses to test the assumption that types of research funding affected research productivity in numbers of publications and conference papers. The results confirmed that funding sources significantly affected faculty research productivity. Specifically, we found the following: (1) governmental programs were the most effective funding resources, and faculty performance varied across academic ranks; (2) a higher rank was correlated with more funded projects, which positively predicted research productivity; (3) younger faculty with a higher academic rank, however, outperformed others in numbers of funded projects and publications; and (4) full professors had the most diverse and sophisticated strategies regarding academic productivity in numbers of funded projects and publications. Suggestions are made herein for appropriate institutional changes and individual strategies for career advancement. A more sophisticated data collection strategy should be established to monitor trends in faculty productivity and to close the gap between the faculty capacity and job demands.
Keywords：academic rank, hierarchical regression, institutional research, research productivity