現象學取向的磨課師教學經驗隱含之意義
作者:國立臺灣師範大學資訊中心汪耀華、國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系張基成
卷期：63卷第1期
日期：2018年3月
頁碼：141-171
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).05
摘要：
本研究旨在探討磨課師（MOOCs）教學經驗隱含之意義。以現象學的深度訪談與資料分析步驟，從受訪教師內隱的心理體驗歷程，歸納屬於人們共通性現象的經驗之意義，可分五大項陳述：傳達以學生為中心的訊息、編導故事情境的教學影片、增加多元學習經驗比小知識重要、放下名利得失心、創新教學的熱情與執行力。綜合上述描述，發現MOOCs授課教師具備五項教學經驗的意義：一、轉化專業實務經驗：將實務歷練注入教材製作，不同於學校課程所教授的內容與型態，讓學生感知有用及興趣。二、善用多媒體建構教材：教師構思教學劇本架構，編導影片或動畫，與生活面連結讓學生易於理解，引導學生想像空間預見未來。三、增加多元學習經驗：引用多元資源教學，安排實務專家參與課程，擴增學生視野及知識。四、精進數位教學知能：放下個人名利心，體驗MOOCs教學，獲得磨練及反思。五、做中學的精神：懷抱創新教學的熱情，勇於嘗試執行。最後，從反思MOOCs授課教師教學經驗的意義，得到啟示並提出建議。
關鍵詞：教學經驗、現象學、經驗意義、磨課師
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 卯靜儒（2008）。全球化效應下的課程改革－知識社會學的幾點觀察。教育研究月刊，170，5-14。【Mao, C.-J. (2008). Course revolution under globalization─Some observations from the view of sociology of knowledge. Journal of Education Research, 170, 5-14.】
- 史美瑤（2012）。21世紀的教學：以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。評鑑雙月刊，36，42-44。【Shih, M.-Y. (2012). Teaching in the 21st century: Teacher development toward “learner-centered”. Evaluation Bimonthly, 36, 42-44.】
- 汪文聖（2001）。現象學方法與理論之反思：一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研究，12，49-76。【Wang, W.-S. (2001). A reflection on the phenomenological method and theory: Introduction to a qualitative method. Research in Applied Psychology, 12, 49-76.】
- 林志成（2015，10月26日）。磨課師成時尚 海洋之窗最夯。中國時報。取自http://www. chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151026000319-260114 【Lin, C.-C. (2015, October 26). MOOC is IN! “The Window of the Ocean” is the hottest among all. China Times. Retrieved from http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151026000319-260114】
- 施偉隆（2009）。從現象學的觀點對質性研究的省思。新竹教育大學人文社會學報，2（1），127-152。【Shi, W.-L. (2009). A reflection on qualitative research from phenomenological viewpoint. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences of NHCUE, 2(1), 127-152.】
» 展開更多
- 卯靜儒（2008）。全球化效應下的課程改革－知識社會學的幾點觀察。教育研究月刊，170，5-14。【Mao, C.-J. (2008). Course revolution under globalization─Some observations from the view of sociology of knowledge. Journal of Education Research, 170, 5-14.】
- 史美瑤（2012）。21世紀的教學：以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。評鑑雙月刊，36，42-44。【Shih, M.-Y. (2012). Teaching in the 21st century: Teacher development toward “learner-centered”. Evaluation Bimonthly, 36, 42-44.】
- 汪文聖（2001）。現象學方法與理論之反思：一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研究，12，49-76。【Wang, W.-S. (2001). A reflection on the phenomenological method and theory: Introduction to a qualitative method. Research in Applied Psychology, 12, 49-76.】
- 林志成（2015，10月26日）。磨課師成時尚 海洋之窗最夯。中國時報。取自http://www. chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151026000319-260114 【Lin, C.-C. (2015, October 26). MOOC is IN! “The Window of the Ocean” is the hottest among all. China Times. Retrieved from http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151026000319-260114】
- 施偉隆（2009）。從現象學的觀點對質性研究的省思。新竹教育大學人文社會學報，2（1），127-152。【Shi, W.-L. (2009). A reflection on qualitative research from phenomenological viewpoint. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences of NHCUE, 2(1), 127-152.】
- 高淑清（2000）。現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育研究所（主編），質的研究方法（pp. 93-134）。高雄市：麗文。【Kao, S.-C. (2000). Phenomenological method and its application to pedagogical research. In National Chung Cheng University Graduate Institute of Education (Ed.), Quality research method (pp. 93-134). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Liwen.】
- 張德勝、王采薇、黃秀雯、林慧絢（2012）。當西方遇見東方：一位西方外籍教授與臺灣大學生的教室互動初探。教育科學研究期刊，57（3），27-57。doi:10.3966/2073753X2012095703002 【Chang, T.-S., Wang, T.-W., Huang, H.-W., & Lin, H.-H. (2012). When West meets East: The classroom interaction between a western professor and Taiwanese undergraduate students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(3), 27-57. doi:10.3966/2073753X2012095703002】
- 曹家榮（2013）。理解技術實作：現象學取徑初探。社會分析，7，1-43。doi:10.3966/221866892013080007001 【Tsao, C.-R. (2013). Understanding technological practices: An introduction to a phenomenological approach. Social Analysis, 7, 1-43. doi:10.3966/221866892013080007001】
- 裘學賢（1993）。教育研究的現象學分析。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑（主編），教育學方法論（pp. 33-63）。臺北市：五南。【Giu, X.-X. (1993). Phenomenological analysis of pedagogical research. In F.-M. Chia & S.-K. Yang (Eds.), Pedagogy methodology (pp. 33-63). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 楊心怡、李啟嘉（2015）。問題導向學習對法律系大學生問題解決能力及自我導向學習之研究。教育科學研究期刊，60（1），131-155。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).05 【Yung, H.-I., & Lee, C.-C. (2015). Problem-based learning on the problem-solving ability and self-directed learning of undergraduate students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(1), 131-155. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).05】
- 甄曉蘭（2003）。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊，49（1），63-94。【Sharon Chen, H.-L. (2003). Teacher’s curricular consciousness and pedagogical praxis. Bulletin of Educational Research, 49(1), 63-94.】
- 蔡宗河（2006）。教師課程立論初探。課程與教學季刊，9（4），79-100。doi:10.6384/CIQ.200610.0079 【Tsai, T.-H. (2006). The study of teacher curriculum theorizing. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 9(4), 79-100. doi:10.6384/CIQ.200610.0079】
- 蔡美麗（1990）。胡賽爾。臺北市：東大。【Tasi, M.-L. (1990). Husserl. Taipei, Taiwan: Dongda.】
- 蔡晉宇（2016，3月21日）。〔一流讀書人的對談〕張志勇VS. 石貴平：解構萬物聯網。淡江時報。取自http://tkutimes.tku.edu.tw/dtl.aspx?no=33293 【Tsai, C.-Y. (2016, March 21). “Convesation between top tiers book reasers” Chang vs. Shih: The deconstruction of internet of things. Tamkang Times. Retrieved from http://tkutimes.tku.edu.tw/dtl.aspx?no=33293】
- 劉怡甫（2013）。與全球十萬人作同學：談MOOC現況及其發展。評鑑雙月刊，42，41-44。【Liu, Y.-F. (2013). Be a classmate of millions: The now and future of MOOC. Evaluation Bimonthly, 42, 41-44.】
- 賴素純、莊雅茹、顏春煌（2014）。Facebook的使用對成人混成式學習之影響。教育科學研究期刊，59（4），65-98。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).03 【Lai, S.-C., Chuang, Y.-R., & Yen, C.-H. (2014). Impact of Facebook on blended learning for adult learners. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(4), 65-98. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).03】
- Adams, C., Yin, Y., Vargas Madriz, L. F., & Mullen, C. S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: The tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35(2), 202-216. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917701
- Al-Atabi, M., & DeBoer, J. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship using massive open online course (MOOC). Technovation, 34(4), 261-264. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.006
- Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 15-44). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.
- Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234-249. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917703
- Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331-367. doi:10.1111/0362-6784.00057
- Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368-378. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835768
- Baggaley, J. (2014). MOOCS: Digesting the facts. Distance Education, 35(2), 159-163. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.919710
- Bates, T. (2014). MOOCs: Getting to know you better. Distance Education, 35(2), 145-148. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.926803
- Baxter, J. A. (2013). Professional inspector or inspecting professional? Teachers as inspectors in a new regulatory regime for education in England. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 467-485. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.819069
- Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology- enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 99-118.
- Clarà, M., & Barberà, E. (2013). Learning online: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129-136. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770428
- Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Journal of Distance Education, 39, 1-17.
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, 1-20. doi:10.5334/2012-18
- Downes, S. (2005). An introduction to connective knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.downes. ca/post/33034
- Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/ what-connectivism-is.html
- Downes, S. (2013). Week 2: The quality of massive open online courses. MOOC Quality Project. Retrieved from https://zh.scribd.com/document/311374509/Downes-the-Quality-of-Massive- Open-Online-Courses-by-Stephen-Downes-MOOC-Quality-Project
- Eacute, J., & Esteve, M. (2000). The transformation of the teachers’ role at the end of the twentieth century: New challenges for the future. Educational Review, 52(2), 197-207. doi:10.1080/713 664040
- Ellul, J. (1954). The technological society. Retrieved from https://ratical.org/ratville/AoS/The TechnologicalSociety.pdf
- Entwistle, N. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 127-134. doi:10.1080/0729436970160202
- Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2014). Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 35(2), 178- 201. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917707
- Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: Identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149-158. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.920752
- Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1161894
- Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8-22). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
- Goodson, I. F. (1998). Storying the self: Life politics and the study of the teacher’s life and work. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward new identities (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Garland.
- Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259. doi:10.3102/0013189X09336671
- Griesbaum, J. (2014). Students as teachers in MOOCs? The double gain of MOOCs as an in-class teaching method experiences from a student-made MOOC “online data privacy”. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 29-34. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2014.v4.363
- Haggard, S., Lawton, W., Katsomitros, A., Gore, T., & Inkelaar, T. (2013). The maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning. Rrtrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_ data/file/240193/13-1173-maturing-of-the-mooc.pdf
- Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: From being and time to the task of thinking (pp. 306-341). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
- Kerr, B. (2007). Which radical discontinuity? Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.tw/2007/02/ which-radical-discontinuity.html
- Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the e-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164-177. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
- Kolowich, S. (2013, March 18). The professors who make the MOOCs. Retrieved from http:// chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/#id=ov erview
- Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14(2), 171-196. doi:10.1163/156916283X00090
- Leontyev, A., & Baranov, D. (2013). Massive open online courses in chemistry: A comparative overview of platforms and features. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1533-1539. doi:10.1021/ed400283x
- Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917708
- Mackness, J. (2013, October 22). cMOOCs and xMOOCs–Key differences. Retrieved from http:// jennymackness.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/cmoocs-and-xmoocs-key-diff erences/
- Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
- Marshall, S. (2014). Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 250- 262. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917706
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.
- Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pinar, W. F. (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
- Raposo-Rivas, M., Martínez-Figueira, E., & Sarmiento-Campos, J. A. (2015). A study on the pedagogical components of massive online courses. Comunicar, 22(44), 27-35. doi:10.3916/C44-2015-03
- Roth, M. S. (2013). My modern experience teaching a MOOC. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(34), 18-21.
- Sandbergh, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 203-212. doi:10.1080/0729436970160207
- Schultz, K., & Ravitch, S. M. (2013). Narratives of learning to teach: Taking on professional identities. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 35-46. doi:10.1177/0022487112458801
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
- Stenfors-Hayes, T., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2013). A phenomenographic approach to research in medical education. Medical Education, 47(3), 261-270. doi:10.1111/medu.12101
- Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
- Wikipedia. (2012). Connectivism. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectivism
- Young, J. R. (2013). What professors can learn from “hard core” MOOC students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(37), A4.
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(1)】March
Denotations Pertaining to Teaching Experiences of Massive Open Online Courses on the Basis of the Phenomenological Perspective
Author: Yao-Hua Wang (Information Technology Center, National Taiwan Normal University), Chi-Cheng Chang (Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.1
Date：March 2018
Pages：141-171
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).05
Abstract：
This study analyzes the denotations pertaining to instructors’ teaching experiences of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). By conducting a detailed phenomenological interview and data analysis, the study provides the denotations pertaining to common human phenomena through intrinsic psychological processes experienced by the instructors. The denotations were described on the basis of five perspectives—Delivering a learner-centered message, editing a teaching video with a story scenario, valuing the diversity of the learning experience over the acquisition of basic knowledge, setting aside fame and profit during teaching, and displaying the power of enthusiastic innovative teaching. On the basis of the five aforementioned descriptions, five denotations of teaching experiences were identified. (1) Transfer of professional practical experiences: This category involves preparing teaching materials on the basis of practical experience. Such materials differ from the contents of traditional courses and enable students to find the topic useful and interesting. (2) Preparing optimal multimedia teaching materials: This category involves teaching by utilizing the framework provided in the teaching materials and editing videos or animations by linking the topics with situations encountered in daily life. This enables students to comprehend the materials easily and face the future responsibly. (3) Diversified learning experiences: This category involves teaching with diverse resources, including experts, to broaden students’ horizons. (4) Advancing the digital teaching ability: This category involves setting aside the individual fame and profit during teaching and teaching MOOCs to provide appropriate training and obtain suitable feedback. (5) Spirit of learning by experiences: This category involves cherishing the enthusiasm of innovative teaching and taking up novel challenges when teaching. Finally, implications and recommendations are proposed by analyzing the denotations pertaining to instructors’ experiences of teaching MOOCs.
Keywords：experiential connotation, MOOCs, phenomenology, teaching experiences