補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析
作者:國立政治大學教育學系余民寧、國立政治大學教育學系李昭鋆
卷期：63卷第1期
日期：2018年3月
頁碼：247-271
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).08
摘要：
本研究運用結構方程式模型中的中介模型，探索個別化教學透過自我歸因、學習動機等因素，對補救教學學習成效之影響關係的探討；樣本乃抽取臺灣地區國中、國小參與補救教學的學生共2,168人。本研究先進行個別化教學對學習成效直接影響效果的檢測，發現其標準化迴歸係數為 .86，達顯著。進一步分析則發現，部分中介模型優於完全中介模型。故本研究歸納得出的結論為：個別化教學能夠直接影響補救教學學生的學習成效，且個別化教學亦可透過自我歸因、學習動機等因素，間接影響補救教學學生的學習成效。根據上述結果，本研究提出結論與對教育當局的建議。
關鍵詞：中介效果、個別化教學、結構方程式模型、補救教學、學習成效
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 朱家儀、黃秀霜、陳惠萍（2013）。「攜手計畫課後扶助方案」補救教學方法之探究。課程與教學，16（1），93-114。【Chu, C.-Y., Huang, H.-S., & Chen, H.-P. (2013). A case study of the observation of teaching methods from “after school alternative program”. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(1), 93-114.】
- 朱敬先（1997）。教育心理學：教學取向。臺北市：五南。【Zhu, J.-H. (1997). Educational psychology: Education orientation. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 余民寧、鐘珮純、陳柏霖、許嘉家、趙珮晴（2011）。教師健康行為、評價性支持與憂鬱傾向之關係：以主觀幸福感為中介變項。健康促進與衛生教育學報，35，23-48。doi:10.7022/JHPHE.201106.0023 【Yu, M.-N., Chung, P.-C., Chen, P.-L., Syu, J.-J., & Chao, P.-C. (2011). Subjective well-being as a mediator among the relationships of healthy behavior, appraisal support, and depression in Taiwan teachers. Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education, 35, 23-48. doi:10.7022/JHPHE.201106.0023】
- 呂錘卿、曾榮華、陳韻如（2006）。國民小學個別化教學實施狀況之研究。國民教育研究集刊，15，137-159。【Lu, C.-C., Tseng, J.-H., & Chen, Y.-J. (2006). The current states of individualization in elementary school teaching. Bulletin of Research on Elementary Education, 15, 137-159.】
» 展開更多
- 朱家儀、黃秀霜、陳惠萍（2013）。「攜手計畫課後扶助方案」補救教學方法之探究。課程與教學，16（1），93-114。【Chu, C.-Y., Huang, H.-S., & Chen, H.-P. (2013). A case study of the observation of teaching methods from “after school alternative program”. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(1), 93-114.】
- 朱敬先（1997）。教育心理學：教學取向。臺北市：五南。【Zhu, J.-H. (1997). Educational psychology: Education orientation. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育。【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 余民寧、鐘珮純、陳柏霖、許嘉家、趙珮晴（2011）。教師健康行為、評價性支持與憂鬱傾向之關係：以主觀幸福感為中介變項。健康促進與衛生教育學報，35，23-48。doi:10.7022/JHPHE.201106.0023 【Yu, M.-N., Chung, P.-C., Chen, P.-L., Syu, J.-J., & Chao, P.-C. (2011). Subjective well-being as a mediator among the relationships of healthy behavior, appraisal support, and depression in Taiwan teachers. Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education, 35, 23-48. doi:10.7022/JHPHE.201106.0023】
- 呂錘卿、曾榮華、陳韻如（2006）。國民小學個別化教學實施狀況之研究。國民教育研究集刊，15，137-159。【Lu, C.-C., Tseng, J.-H., & Chen, Y.-J. (2006). The current states of individualization in elementary school teaching. Bulletin of Research on Elementary Education, 15, 137-159.】
- 吳鐵雄（1983）。電腦輔助教學之補救教學效果初探。教育心理學報，16，61-69。doi:10.6251/BEP.19831201.5 【Wu, T.-H. (1983). A pilot study of CAI effects as a remedial teaching in English. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 16, 61-69. doi:10.6251/BEP.19831201.5】
- 李孟峰、連廷嘉（2010）。「攜手計畫－課後扶助方案」實施歷程與成效之研究。教育實踐與研究，23（1），115-143。【Li, M.-F., & Lien, T.-C. (2010). A study of implementation process and results of the “Hand-in-Hand Project: Education support for disadvantaged child”. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 23(1), 115-143.】
- 李麗君（2012）。國民中小學教師對弱勢學生低成就之歸因與其補救教學作法關係之研究。αβγ量化研究學刊，4（2），25-46。【Lee, L.-C. (2012). A study of the relationship between junior high and elementary school teachers’ attribution on disadvantaged underachievement students and their remedial teaching practice. αβγ of the Journal for Quantitative Research, 4(2), 25-46.】
- 阮孝齊（2015）。國中學生學校歸屬感影響模式之研究。當代教育研究季刊，23（3），81-123。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2015.2303.03 【Juan, H.-C. (2015). The effect of school belonging in junior high school students. Contemporary Education Research Quarterly, 23(3), 81-123. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2015.2303.03】
- 周雅釧、黃志勝、施淑娟、郭伯臣（2009）。結合線上診斷評量系統之適性補救教學研究。網際網路技術學刊，10（4），419-425。doi:10.6138/JIT.2009.10.4.17 【Chou, Y.-C., Huang, C.-S., Shih, S.-C., & Kuo, B.-C. (2009). A study on the adaptive remedial instruction with a web-based testing system for computerized adaptive diagnosis. Journal of Internet Technology, 10(4), 419-425. doi:10.6138/JIT.2009.10.4.17】
- 林妙鞠、楊德清（2011）。故事融入小一弱勢學生之補救教學研究。台灣數學教師電子期刊，25，1-16。doi:10.6610/ETJMT.20110301.01 【Lin, M.-J., & Yang, D.-Q. (2011). The story assimilates intoremedial teaching on first year disadvantage students. Taiwan Journal of Mathematics Teachers, 25, 1-16. doi:10.6610/ETJMT.20110301.01】
- 林宗翰、姚如芬（2011）。情境融入國一最大公因數與最小公倍數文字題補救教學之研究－下一站‧北港。台灣數學教師電子期刊，28，21-39。doi:10.6610/ETJMT.20111201.02 【Lin, Z.-H., & Yao, R.-F. (2011). Context assimilates into remedial teaching of greater common factor and least common multiple in the seventh grade: Next station, Beigang. Taiwan Journal of Mathematics Teachers, 28, 21-39. doi:10.6610/ETJMT.20111201.02】
- 林晏瑛、程炳林（2014）。超越四向度：六向度目標導向模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報，46（1），117-140。doi:10.6251/BEP.20140120 【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cheng, B.-L. (2014). Beyond 4 dimensions: The verification and analysis of the 6-dimensional goal orientation model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 117-140. doi:10.6251/BEP.20140120】
- 邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市：雙葉書廊。【Chiou, H.-J. (2003). Structural equation modeling: Theory, technology, application. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
- 張春興（2007）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐（重修二版）。臺北市：東華。 【Chang, C.-H. (2007). Educational psychology: Tripled-orientation in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Tung Hua.】
- 許民陽、王郁軒、梁添水（2005）。國小自然科學地質概念個別化教學的研究。科學教育學刊，13（1），71-100。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2005.1301.04 【Hsu, M.-Y., Wang, Y.-H., & Liang, T.-S. (2005). Study of an individualized education instruction program on geological conceptions. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 71-100. doi:10.6173/CJSE.2005.1301. 04】
- 許金城（2016）。補救教學實施現況與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（11），86-89。【Hsu, C.-C. (2016). Implementation of situation and prospect of after school alternative program and remedial teaching. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(11), 86-89.】
- 許美香（2016）。從攜手計畫至補救教學之省思。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（11），58-64。【Hsu, M.-H. (2016). Reflection of after school alternative program and remedial teaching. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(11), 58-64.】
- 許崇憲（2012）。學業成敗歸因對學業能力知覺及表現的預測力：一個後設分析。αβγ量化研究學刊，4（1），1-28。【Hsu, C.-S. (2012). The prediction of the attribution for academic achievement on academic competence perception and performance: A meta-analysis. αβγ of the Journal for Quantitative Research, 4(1), 1-28.】
- 郭生玉（2010）。教育測驗與評量。臺北市：精華。 【Kuo, S.-Y. (2010). Educational assessment. Taipei, Taiwan: Jinghua.】
- 郭明堂、黃涵鈺（2009）。國小高年級英語低成就學生補救教學之行動研究。屏東教育大學學報－教育類，32，101-138。 【Kuo, M.-T., & Huang, H.-Y. (2009). An action research of English remedial teaching for the 6th grade underachievers in elementary schools. Journal of Pingtung University of Education: Education, 32, 101-138.】
- 陳梅芳、劉安倫、廖雪華、楊美雪、林聯賓（2004）。國中數學低成就學生補救教學成效之研究。教育部補助九十三年度鼓勵中小學教師從事行動研究期中報告。臺北市：教育部。【Chen, M.-F., Liu, A.-L., Liao, X.-H., Yang, M.-X., & Lin, L.-B. (2004). The research about the effect of the remedial teaching in the students in junior high school. Action research by elementary and secondary school teachers sponsored by Ministry of Education. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
- 陳淑麗（2008）。國小弱勢學生課業輔導現況調查之研究。臺東大學教育學報，19（1），1-32。【Chen, S.-L. (2008). The status quo of after-school academic assistance in Taiwan’s elementary schools. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 1-32.】
- 陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜（2006）。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報，51（2），147-171。doi:10.3966/2073753X2006105102007 【Chen, S.-L., Tzeng, S.-J., & Hung, L.-Y. (2006). The effectiveness of a remedial reading program for underachieving aboriginal students in Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(2), 147-171. doi:10.3966/2073753X2006105102007】
- 陳淑麗、曾世杰、張毓仁（2015）。國小二年級不同補救教學方案之實施與成效之比較：攜手計畫與永齡希望小學。當代教育研究季刊，23（2），35-74。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2015.2302.02 【Chen, S.-L., Tzeng, S.-J., & Chang, Y.-J. (2015). The comparison of the implementation and reading progress between two remedial programs on second grade students. Contemporary Education Research Quarterly, 23(2), 35-74. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2015.2302.02】
- 黃玉幸（2016）。國民中小學補救教學實施方案之評析。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（2），86-89。【Huang, Y.-H. (2016). Commentary of implementation of remedial teaching in elementary and junior high school. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(2), 86-89.】
- 湯維玲、蔡佩娟（2013）。一位國小校長推動攜手計畫補救教學之行動研究。課程與教學，16（1），69-92。【Tang, W.-L., & Tsai, P.-J. (2013). An action research on a principal’s promotion of after school alternative programs using remedial instruction. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(1), 69-92.】
- 劉育隆、曾筱倩、郭伯臣（2006）。以知識結構為基礎之適性測驗系統建置。測驗統計年刊，14，17-35。【Liu, Y.-L., Tseng, S.-C., & Kao, B.-C. (2006). A study of developing knowledge structure-based adaptive testing system. Journal of Educational Measurement and Statistics, 14, 17-35.】
- 劉政宏、張景緩、許鼎延、張瓊文（2005）。國小學生學習動機成分之分析及其對學習行為之影響。教育心理學報，37（2），173-196。doi:10.6251/BEP.20051117 【Liu, C.-H., Chang, C.-Y., Hsu, T.-Y., & Chang, C.-W. (2005). Analysis of the components of primary school students’ learning motivation and the effects on learning behavior. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 37(2), 173-196. doi:10.6251/BEP.20051117】
- 劉素珠、施又瑀、黃彥融（2014）。彰化縣國民小學推動補救教學之現況研究。學校行政，94，50-79。doi:10.3966/160683002014110094003 【Liu, S.-C., Shih, Y.-Y., & Huang, Y.-R. (2014). An exploration of the implementation of remedial instruction in elementary schools in Changhua County. School Administrators, 94, 50-79. doi:10.3966/160683002014110094003】
- 劉鎮寧（2016）。中小學補救教學政策執行問題之分析－以高雄市為例。學校行政，101，166-184。doi:10.3966/160683002016010101009 【Liou, J.-N. (2016). An analysis of execution problems for the remedial teaching policy of elementary and secondary education–Take the Kaohsiung city as example. School Administrators, 101, 166-184. doi:10.3966/160683002016010101009】
- 羅文秀、張淑玲（2005）。國中學生的工具性動機、目標導向與數學學業成就相關之研究。新竹師院學報，20，27-61。【Lo, W.-H., & Chang, S.-L. (2005). The relationships among instrumentality, goal orientations, and mathematics academic achievement of junior high school students. Educational Journal of NHCUE, 20, 27-61.】
- Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317-322. doi:10.1007/BF02294359
- Chodkiewicz, A. R., & Boyle, C. (2016). Promoting positive learning in Australian students aged 10-to 12-years-old using attribution retraining and cognitive behavioral therapy: A pilot study. School Psychology International, 37(5), 519-535. doi:10.1177/0143034316667114
- Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 5-20. doi:10.1086/461388
- Davidshofer, C. O., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
- Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
- Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2016). The effects of goal-oriented instructions in digital game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1744-1757. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1041409
- Hines, S. J., Speece, D. L., Walker, C. Y., & DaDeppo, L. M. W. (2007). Assessing more than you teach: The difficult case of transfer. Reading and Writing, 20(6), 539-552. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9052-3
- Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 429-440. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.429
- Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling－A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
- Huang, C.-T., & Yang, S.-C. (2015). Effects of online reciprocal teaching on reading strategies, comprehension, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 381-407. doi:10.1177/0735633115571924
- Idol, L. (2010). Reading success: Validation of a specialized literacy program (1978-2007). Remedial and Special Education, 31(2), 97-115. doi:10.1177/0741932508324403
- Kikas, E., Silinskas, G., Jõgi, A. L., & Soodla, P. (2016). Effects of teacher’s individualized support on children’s reading skills and interest in classrooms with different teaching styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 270-277. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.015
- Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602-640. doi:10.3102/0034654315617832
- Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2006). Audio-visual training in children with reading disabilities. Computers & Education, 46(4), 407-425. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.008
- Menec, V. H., Perry, R. P., Struthers, C. W., Schonwetter, D. J., Hechter, F. J., & Eichholz, B. L. (1994). Assisting at-risk college students with attributional retraining and effective teaching. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(8), 675-701. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00607
- Mioduser, D., Lahav, O., & Nachmias, R. (2000). Using computers to teach remedial spelling to a student with low vision: A case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94(1), 15-25.
- Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist, 27(4), 485-527. doi:10.1177/0011000099274002
- Raval, H., McKenney, S., & Pieters, J. (2014). Remedial teaching in Indian under-resourced communities: Professional development of para-teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 38, 87-93. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.02.004
- Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Lohr, L., & McNelis, M. (1994). Math and reading-instruction in tracked 1st-grade classes. Elementary School Journal, 95(2), 105-119. doi:10.1086/461793
- Slavin, R. E. (2013). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Cognitive views of human motivation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Wirthwein, L., Sparfeldt, J. R., Pinquart, M., Wegerer, J., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review, 10, 66-89. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.07.001
- Zhang, Y., Watermann, R., & Daniel, A. (2016). Are multiple goals in elementary students beneficial for their school achievement? A latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 100-110. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.023
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(1)】March
Impact of Individualized Instruction on the Learning Outcomes of Low-Achieving Students Who Received Remedial Instruction
Author: Min-Ning Yu (Department of Education, National Chengchi University), Chao-Yun Li (Department of Education, National Chengchi University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.1
Date：March 2018
Pages：247-271
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).08
Abstract：
The study was commissioned under the contract of the K-12 Education Administration. In this study, 2,168 students in Taiwan who joined the remedial instruction program were randomly selected. A mediation model was applied to analyze the procedure by which individualized teaching influences the learning outcomes of remedial instruction through self-attribution and learning motivation. The analysis results suggested that the direct effect of individualized teaching on the learning outcome was .86. Furthermore, the partial mediation model was more acceptable than the complete mediation model. The results obtained from the partial mediation model are provided as follows: Individualized teaching affected the learning outcomes of low-achieving students who received remedial instruction directly and indirectly through self-attribution and learning motivation. Finally, on the basis of the results, conclusions were drawn, and several policy-making suggestions were proposed for educational authorities in Taiwan.
Keywords：individualized instruction, learning outcomes, mediation effect, remedial instruction, structural equation modeling