（專題）我國高齡教育基本權的憲法基礎探究：終身學習權保障觀點
作者:中國文化大學教育學院師資培育中心王等元
卷期：63卷第2期
日期：2018年6月
頁碼：1-24
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0001
摘要：
個別基本權利功能及其憲法保障基礎的探究是基本權利理論研究的重要問題；故本研究從終身學習權保障觀點出發，並以教育憲法釋義學方法，試圖探究我國新興高齡教育基本權功能及其憲法保障基礎。本研究發現，為因應臺灣高齡社會發展趨勢，高齡教育基本權利應屬國民教育基本權與大學學術自由以外的新興教育基本權利，其憲法保障的基礎為我國立國精神之憲法基本原則、憲法第22條「概括基本權利」，以及基本國策相關規定；其次，我國高齡教育基本權應具有防禦權功能、客觀價值秩序功能、制度性保障功能，以及組織與程序功能；最後，就其基本權功能而言，除防禦權功能外，其餘應屬基本權客觀法規範功能，旨在課予國家積極提供高齡學習機會之作為義務，以協助人民實現其高齡教育基本權利。
關鍵詞：在地老化、高齡社會、高齡教育、教育基本權、終身學習權
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 朱芬郁（2015）。高齡學習者老化態度之研究─以中國、澳門、新加坡及臺灣為例。國立空中大學社會科學學報，22，1-27。【Chu, F.-Y. (2015). A case study on the attitudes towards aging of senior learners in China, Macau, Singapore and Taiwan. Journal of Social Science, 22, 1-27.】
- 行政院教育改革審議委員會（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北市：作者。【Educational Reform Commission, Executive Yuan (1996). Educational reform summary report. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 余書麟（1978）。國民教育權。新竹市：新竹師專。【Yu, S.-L. (1978). The right to primary and junior education. Hsinchu, Taiwan: Hsinchu Teacher Junior College.】
- 吳庚（2003）。憲法的解釋與適用。臺北市：三民。【Wu, G. (2003). Constitution interpretation and application. Taipei, Taiwan: Sanmin.】
- 吳明烈（2012）。我國推動高齡學習的幾項重要思考。成人及終身教育，38，23-31。【Wu, M.-L. (2012). Key issues on the development of elder learning in Taiwan. Adult and Lifelong Education Bimonthly, 38, 23-31.】
» 展開更多
- 朱芬郁（2015）。高齡學習者老化態度之研究─以中國、澳門、新加坡及臺灣為例。國立空中大學社會科學學報，22，1-27。【Chu, F.-Y. (2015). A case study on the attitudes towards aging of senior learners in China, Macau, Singapore and Taiwan. Journal of Social Science, 22, 1-27.】
- 行政院教育改革審議委員會（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北市：作者。【Educational Reform Commission, Executive Yuan (1996). Educational reform summary report. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 余書麟（1978）。國民教育權。新竹市：新竹師專。 【Yu, S.-L. (1978). The right to primary and junior education. Hsinchu, Taiwan: Hsinchu Teacher Junior College.】
- 吳庚（2003）。憲法的解釋與適用。臺北市：三民。【Wu, G. (2003). Constitution interpretation and application. Taipei, Taiwan: Sanmin.】
- 吳明烈（2012）。我國推動高齡學習的幾項重要思考。成人及終身教育，38，23-31。【Wu, M.-L. (2012). Key issues on the development of elder learning in Taiwan. Adult and Lifelong Education Bimonthly, 38, 23-31.】
- 吳明烈、陳雯萍、楊國德（2008）。我國高齡教育的實施與發展。台灣教育，649，2-10。doi:10.6395/TER.200802.0002【Wu, M.-L., Chen, W.-P., & Yang, G.-D. (2008). The implement and development of elderly education in Taiwan. Taiwan Education Review, 649, 2-10. doi:10.6395/TER.200802.0002】
- 李建良（1999）。基本權理論體系之構成及其思考層次。載於李建良（主編），憲法理論與實踐（一）（pp. 55-102）。臺北市：學林。【Li, J.-L. (1999). The structure and thinking methods of the basic right theory. In J.-L. Li (Ed.), The theory and practice of constitution (Vol. 1, pp. 55-102). Taipei, Taiwan: Sharing.】
- 李園會（1987）。學習權。國教輔導，26（9），25-26。【Li, Y.-H. (1987). The right to learn. Guidance of Elementary Education, 26(9), 25-26.】
- 周志宏（2003）。教育法與教育改革。臺北市：高等教育。【Zhou, Z.-H. (2003). Education law and educational reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 法治斌、董保城（2014）。憲法新論（第六版）。臺北市：元照。【Fa, J.-B., & Dong, B.-C. (2014). New theory of the constitution (6th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.】
- 林麗惠、高玉靜（2016）。高齡教育社會效果之調查。人文與社會科學簡訊，17（3），47-54。【Lin, L.-H., & Gao, Y.-J. (2016). A survey on the social outcomes of elderly education. Human and Social Science Newsletter, 17(3), 47-54.】
- 張德永、陳柏霖（2013）。高齡學習者學習行為觀察與評估。文官培訓季刊，2，5-13。【Chang, T.-Y., & Chen, P.-L. (2013). Observation and assessment of the learning behaviors of elder learners. Journal of Civil Service Training, 2, 5-13.】
- 教育部（1998）。邁向學習社會白皮書。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (1998). White paper towards a learning society. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部（2006）。邁向高齡社會老人教育政策白皮書。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2006). White paper towards an aging society: The elderly education policy. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 許育典（2006a）。文化憲法與文化國。臺北市：元照。【Xu, Y.-D. (2006a). Cultural constitution and cultural state. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.】
- 許育典（2006b）。教育憲法的建構。載於蘇永欽（主編），部門憲法（pp. 507-561）。臺北市：元照。【Xu, Y.-D. (2006b). The construction of educational Constitution construction. In Y.-C. Su (Ed.), Department constitution (pp. 507-561). Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.】
- 許育典（2007）。教育法。臺北市：五南。【Xu, Y.-D. (2007). Education law. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 許宗力（1996）。基本權的功能與司法審查。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會學科，6（1），24-34。【Hsu, T.-L. (1996). Functions of the basic rights and judicial review. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 24-34.】
- 許慶雄（1992）。憲法入門。臺北市：元照。【Xu, Q.-H. (1992). Introduction to constitution. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.】
- 陳淑敏、林振春、謝婷婷（2010）。高齡者背景變項與其學習偏好和學習權之調查研究─以臺北縣為例。社區發展季刊，131，380-405。【Chen, S.-M., Lin, Z.-C., & Xie, T.-T. (2010). A survey on the elders learning preferences and learning rights in the Taipei County. Community Development Journal, 131, 380-405.】
- 黃月麗（2016a）。人口老化下的高齡教育政策。國土及公共治理季刊，4（1），106-114。 【Huang, Y.-L. (2016a). The elderly education policy in the aged society. Public Governance Quarterly, 4(1), 106-114.】
- 黃月麗（2016b）。活躍樂齡、深耕拓點─樂齡學習推動現況與展望。取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/ File/8651CB08A02DF44B?A=C【Huang, Y.-L. (2016b). Active senior citizens — The status and prospective of the senior citizens learning promotion. Retrieved from http://www.ey.gov.tw/File/8651CB08A02DF44B?A=C】
- 黃富順（2005）。高齡社會與高齡學習教育。成人及終身教育，5，2-12。【Huang, F.-S. (2005). Aged society and elder education. Adult and Lifelong Education Bimonthly, 5, 2-12.】
- 黃富順（主編）（2004）。高齡學習。臺北市：五南。【Huang, F.-S. (Ed.). (2004). The elder learning. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 黃富順（主編）（2008）。高齡教育學。臺北市：五南。【Huang, F.-S. (Ed.). (2008). The pedagogy of elder. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 黃富順、楊國德（2011）。高齡學。臺北市：五南。【Huang, F.-S., & Yang, K.-T. (2011). Gerontology. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 楊國德（2008）。保障高齡者的終身學習權。台灣教育，649，11-17。doi:10.6395/TER.200802. 0011【Yang, K.-T. (2008). Protection for the right to lifelong learning of the elderly. Taiwan Education Review, 649, 11-17. doi:10.6395/TER.200802.0011】
- 楊國德（2012）。建構社區化高齡者終身學習平臺芻議。成人及終身教育，38，2-12。【Yang, K.-T. (2012). A suggestion on developing the platform of community-based lifelong learning for older. Adult and Lifelong Education Bimonthly, 38, 2-12.】
- 楊國賜（2014）。終身學習的新思維與新方向。台灣教育，689，2-7。【Yang, K.-S. (2014). The updated rumination and new directions for lifelong learning. Taiwan Education Review, 689, 2-7.】
- 劉麗娟（2014）。臺灣建立健康及高齡友善城市之歷程、評量系統與未來趨勢。城市學學刊，5（1），87-114。【Liu, L.-C. (2014). The processes, assessment system and future of health and age-friendly cities in Taiwan. Journal of Urbanology, 5(1), 87-114.】
- 衛生福利部（2015）。高齡社會白皮書。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2015). White paper on the aging society. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 蘇永欽（2006）。部門憲法─憲法釋義學的新路徑？載於蘇永欽（主編），部門憲法（pp. 3-32）。臺北市：元照。【Su, Y.-C. (2006). Department constitution – New approaches to the constitution interpretation? In Y.-C. Su (Ed.), Department constitution (pp. 3-32). Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.】
- Cropley, A. J. (Ed.). (1980). Towards a system of lifelong education: Some practical considerations. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
- Huber, R., Gundar, M., & Sean, S. (1971). Community college services for senior citizens. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
- Jacobs, H. L., Mason, W. D., & Kauffman, E. (1970). Education for aging: A review of recent literature. Washington, DC: Adult Education Association.
- Kauffman, E. (1967). Continuing education for older adults: A demonstration in method and content. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
- Ratana-Ubol, A., & Richards, C. (2016). Third age learning: Adapting the idea to a Thailand context of lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 35(1), 86-101. doi:10.1080/ 02601370.2015.1132279
- Ratsoy, G. (2016). The roles of Canadian universities in heterogeneous third-age learning: A call for transformation. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(1), 76-90.
- Tam, M., Boulton-Lewis, G., Buys, L., & Chui, E. (2017). Similarities and differences in views of ageing and learning in Hong Kong and Australia. Educational Gerontology, 43(8), 393-403. doi:10.1080/03601277.2017.1309634
- United Nations (1991). United Nations principles for older persons. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/olderpersons.pdf
- United Nations (1999). International year of older persons 1999. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/ageing/resources/international-year-of-older-persons-1999.html
- United Nations (2008). Madrid plan of action and its implement. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/development/desa/ageing/madrid-plan-of-action-and-its-implementation.html
- United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1985). Fourth international conference on adult education final report. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/ 251_13.pdf
- United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1996). Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris, France: Author.
- United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2003). Nurturing the treasure: Vision and strategy 2002-2007. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001311/131145e.pdf
- United Nations Volunteers (2018). Who we are. Retrieved from http://www.unv.org/about-unv/ who-we-are
- World Health Organization (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Retrieved from http://www. who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(2)】June (Special Issue: Lifelong Learning and Senior Education)
(Special Issue) Study of the Constitutional Foundations of the Right to Senior Education in Taiwan: A Lifelong-Learning-Right Perspective
Author: Deng-Yuan Wang (Center of Teacher Education, Chinese Culture University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.2
Date：June 2018
Pages：1-24
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0001
Abstract：
Discussions of individual basic rights and their constitutional protection are fundamental to research into basic rights theory. This paper aims at explicating the functions of the basic right to senior education and its constitutional rationale through interpretative epistemology of the Constitution from a lifelong-learning-right perspective. The research findings are as follows: (1) In global aging societies, the basic right to senior education is a relatively new right to education, and its constitutional rationale can be derived from articles 11 and 22 of the Constitution. (2) The functions of the basic right to senior education are the defensive function, objective values function, institutional protection function, and organizational and procedural function. (3) Except for the first function, the others are new basic-right functions, which impose the state obligations to help the older adults benefit from the right to senior education. On the basis of these findings, some suggestions for policy decision-makers and future research are provided.
Keywords：aging in place, aged society, basic right to education, right to lifelong learning, senior education