課程實施在推廣中的意涵與革新體現：課程史觀點
作者:高雄市特殊教育資源中心教育推廣組侯一欣、國立臺灣師範大學課程與教學研究所退休高新建
卷期：63卷第2期
日期：2018年6月
頁碼：219-250
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0009
摘要：
本研究以歷史回顧的文獻分析技術就過程、觀點爬梳相關名詞釋義，並整合課程革新實施模式的探討，從中瞭解課程革新實施的相關詞義生成與脈絡演變，作為國內課程實施的學術和實務參考之借鏡。本研究的主要發現臚列如下：一、起源於美國1960年代推廣課程革新的失敗，「課程實施」的術語乃從「課程推廣」做概念衍伸。又因Fullan實施階段的劃分並不嚴謹，「課程實施」若附屬於「課程推廣」的子過程，則實施、擴散和制度化或可望做進一步的理論整合。二、課程革新實施的觀點從忠實轉變為調適取向，目標與結構逐漸消融，外來革新結合在地文化深耕，乃能導致後續的人際擴散與制度化。三、課程革新實施的模式主要為「自上而下」及「由下而上」兩種類型，各種模式的發展有其脈絡背景及假定基礎。
關鍵詞：課程史、課程革新、課程推廣、課程實施
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王恭志（2004）。新右派課程政策主張的評析與啟示。教育研究資訊，12（5），33-56。 【Wang, G.-Z. (2004). Criticism of the new right curriculum policy with implications for curriculum reforms in Taiwan. Educational Research & Information, 12(5), 33-56.】
- 尹弘颷、李子建（2008）。課程變革：理論與實踐。臺北市：高等教育。 【Yin, H.-B., & Lee, C.-K. (2008). Curriculum change: Theory and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: High Education.】
- 何雅芬（1999）。國民小學課程推廣之研究－臺北縣開放教育個案分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。 【Ho, Y.-F. (1999). Studies on curriculum dissemination in elementary schools: Open education in Taipei County (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.】
- 侯一欣（2009）。學校課程推廣應用教育行銷理論之可能性初探。中等教育，60（4），116-133。doi:10.6249/SE.2009.60.4.06 【Hou, Y.-H. (2009). The possibility of applying educational marketing to school curriculum dissemination. Secondary Education, 60(4), 116-133. doi:10.6249/SE.2009.60.4.06】
- 侯一欣（2013）。美英兩國課程推廣發展背景之探析：從1960到1980年代。教育與心理研究，36（1），63-87。doi:10.3966/102498852013033601003 【Hou, Y.-H. (2013). Analyzed the history about curriculum dissemination in USA and UK which is occurred during 1960 to 1980. Journal of Education & Psychology, 36(1), 63-87. doi:10.3966/102498852013033601003】
» 展開更多
- 王恭志（2004）。新右派課程政策主張的評析與啟示。教育研究資訊，12（5），33-56。 【Wang, G.-Z. (2004). Criticism of the new right curriculum policy with implications for curriculum reforms in Taiwan. Educational Research & Information, 12(5), 33-56.】
- 尹弘颷、李子建（2008）。課程變革：理論與實踐。臺北市：高等教育。 【Yin, H.-B., & Lee, C.-K. (2008). Curriculum change: Theory and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: High Education.】
- 何雅芬（1999）。國民小學課程推廣之研究－臺北縣開放教育個案分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。 【Ho, Y.-F. (1999). Studies on curriculum dissemination in elementary schools: Open education in Taipei County (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.】
- 侯一欣（2009）。學校課程推廣應用教育行銷理論之可能性初探。中等教育，60（4），116-133。doi:10.6249/SE.2009.60.4.06 【Hou, Y.-H. (2009). The possibility of applying educational marketing to school curriculum dissemination. Secondary Education, 60(4), 116-133. doi:10.6249/SE.2009.60.4.06】
- 侯一欣（2013）。美英兩國課程推廣發展背景之探析：從1960到1980年代。教育與心理研究，36（1），63-87。doi:10.3966/102498852013033601003 【Hou, Y.-H. (2013). Analyzed the history about curriculum dissemination in USA and UK which is occurred during 1960 to 1980. Journal of Education & Psychology, 36(1), 63-87. doi:10.3966/102498852013033601003】
- 侯一欣（2015，6月）。學校課程推廣對教師在職進修的影響。論文發表於大葉大學教育專業發展研究所舉辦之「2015大葉大學教育學術研討會」，彰化縣。 【Hou, Y.-H. (2015, June). The influence of school curriculum dissemination on teachers’ in-service training. Paper presented at the meeting of 2015 Da-Yeh University Education Academy, Changhua County, Taiwan.】
- 高新建（2000）。課程管理。臺北市：師大書苑。 【Gau, S.-J. (2000). Curriculum management. Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Book Store.】
- 陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。 【Chen, X.-M. (2002). Qualitative research in social studies. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 陳惠邦（2004）。行動研究在臺灣教育場域中的發展與反思。載於潘慧玲（主編），教育研究方法論：觀點與方法（pp. 433-451）。臺北市：心理。 【Chen, H.-P. (2004). The ref1ection on the development of action research in the area of education in Taiwan. In H. L. Pan (Ed.), Methodology of educational research: Perspectives and methods (pp. 433-451). Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- 唐麗芳（2015）。課程改革中的學校文化。長春市：東北師範大學。 【Tang, L.-F. (2015). The school culture of curriculum reform. Changchun, China: Northeast Normal University Press.】
- 夏雪梅（2014）。課程變革實施過程的研究：學校組織的視角。上海市：上海教育。 【Xia, X.-M. (2014). The research of implement process of curriculum reform: View of school organization. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Education Press.】
- 教育部（2001）。教育大辭書。臺北市：文景。 【Ministry of Education. (2001). Encyclopedic dictionary of education. Taipei, Taiwan: Winjoin.】
- 單文經（2002）。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報教育類，47（2），123-142。doi:10.3966/ 2073753X2002104702001 【Shan, W.-J. (2002). A commentary on the debate between modern and postmodern views of curriculum theory. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 47(2), 123-142. doi:10.3966/2073753X2002104702001】
- 單文經（2005）。Rugg及Bruner社會領域課程改革經驗的啟示。教育研究集刊，51（1），1-30。 【Shan, W.-J. (2005). Learning from Rugg’s and Bruner’s curriculum reforms in social studies. Bulletin of Education Research, 51(1), 1-30.】
- 張善培（1998）。課程實施程度的測量。教育學報，26（1），149-170。 【Cheung, D. S.-P. (1998). Measurement the degree of curriculum implementation. Education Journal, 26(1), 149-170.】
- 黃政傑（1989）。課程改革。臺北市：漢文【Huang, J.-J. (1989). Curriculum reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Han-Wen.】
- 黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。臺北市：東華。 【Huang, J.-J. (1991). Curriculum design. Taipei, Taiwan: Tung Hua.】
- 黃政傑（2014）。課程設計。臺北市：東華。 【Huang, J.-J. (2014). Curriculum design. Taipei, Taiwan: Tung Hua.】
- 黃俊英（2001）。行銷學的世界。臺北市：天下文化。 【Huang, J.-Y. (2001). The world of marketing. Taipei, Taiwan: CommonWealth.】
- 黃光國（2003）。社會科學的理路。臺北市：心理。 【Huang, K.-K. (2003). Social science way of sociology. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- 黃旭鈞（2003）。課程領導：理論與實務。臺北市：心理。 【Huang, H.-C. (2003). Curriculum leadership: Theory and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】.
- 黃光雄、楊龍立（2012）。課程發展與設計：理念與實作。臺北市：師大書苑。 【Huang, G.-S., & Yang, L.-L. (2012). Curriculum development and design: Rationale and implementation. Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Book Store.】
- 楊龍立（2003）。課程改革模式的統合。臺北市立師範學院學報，34，97-114。 【Yang, L.-L. (2003). The integrating models of curriculum reform. Journal of Taipei Municipal Teachers College, 34, 97-114.】
- 蔡清田（2001）。課程改革實驗：以研究發展為根據的課程改革。臺北市：五南。 【Cai, Q.-T. (2001). The curriculum reform experiments: To study the development of curriculum reform based on. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 蔡清田（2003）。課程政策決定：以國家教育改革法案為依據的課程決策。臺北市：五南。 【Cai, Q.-T. (2003). Curriculum policies decision: Based on country’s laws of educational reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 蔡清田（2006）。課程創新。臺北市：五南。 【Cai, Q.-T. (2006). Curriculum innovation. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 蔡清田（2016）。50則非知不可的課程學概念。臺北市：五南。 【Cai, Q.-T. (2016). Fifty curriculum ideas: You really need to know. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Azano, A., Missett, T. C., Callahan, C. M., Oh, S., Brunner, M., Foster, L. H., & Moon, T. R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between fidelity of implementation and academic achievement in a third-grade gifted curriculum: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(5), 693-719. doi:10.1177/1932202X11424878
- Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12(1), 23-33. doi:10. 1007/s11121-010-0186-1
- Bhola, H. S. (1977). Diffusion of educational innovation. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
- Bishop, D., Bryant, K. S., Giles, S. M., Hansen, W. B., & Dusenbury, L. (2006). Simplifying the delivery of a prevention program with web-based enhancements. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(4), 433-443. doi:10.1007/s10935-006 -0042-z
- Brown, C. (2015). Replacing top-down with bottom-up: Reactitioners growing their own research. Education Today, 64(1), 15-20.
- Brown, S., & Mclntyre, D. (1982). Costs and rewards of innovation: Taking account of the teachers’ viewpoint. In J. Olson (Ed.), Innovation in the science curriculum (pp. 107-139). New York, NY: Nichols.
- Buston, K., Wight, D., Hart, G., & Scott, S. (2002). Implementation of a teacher-delivered sex education programme: Obstacles and facilitating factors. Health Education Research, 17(1), 59-72. doi:10.1093/her/17.1.59
- Carless, D. (2004). Continuity and ‘teacher-centred’ reform: Potential paradoxes in educational change. Curriculum Perspectives, 24(1), 42-51.
- Colbeck, C. L. (2002). Assessing institutionalization of curricular and pedagogical reforms. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 397-421. doi:10.1023/A:1015594432215
- Colby, M., Hecht, M. L., Miller-Day, M., Krieger, J. L., Syvertsen, A. K., Graham, J. W., & Pettigrew, J. (2012). Adapting school-based substance use prevention curriculum through cultural grounding: A review and exemplar of adaptation processes for rural schools. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 190-205. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9524-8
- Cooke, M. (2000). The dissemination of a smoking cessation program: Predictors of program awareness, adoption and maintenance. Health Promotion International, 15(2), 113-123. doi:10. 1093/heapro/15.2.113
- Cooper, B. S., Ehrensal, P. A. L., & Bromme, M. (2005). School-level politics and professional development: Traps in evaluating the quality of practicing teachers. Educational Policy, 19(1), 112-125. doi:10.1177/0895904804272231
- Dancy, M., Brewe, E., & Henderson, C. (2007). Modeling success: Building community for reform. In L. Hsu, C. Henderson, & L. McCollough (Eds.), Proceedings (peer reviewed) of the 2007 AAPT Physics Education Research Conference (vol. 951, pp. 77-80). New York, NY: American Institute of Physics Press.
- Dinani, A. E., Nasr, A. R., & Soltani, M. S. K. (2012). A study on strong and weak points of change process in domains of codification and design, dissemination and publication of qualitative- descriptive evaluation project in the province of Isfahan. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2(2), 11-20.
- Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Ennett, S. T., Haws, S., Ringwalt, C. L., Vincus, A. A., Hanley, S., Bowling, J. M., & Rohrbach, L. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice in school substance use prevention: Fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions. Health Education Research, 26(2), 361-371. doi:10.1093/her/ cyr013
- Farkas, M., Jette, A. M., Tennstedt, S., Haley, S. M., & Quinn, V. (2003). Knowledge dissemination and utilization in gerontology: An organizing framework. The Gerontologist, 43(s1), 47-56. doi:10.1093/geront/43.suppl_1.47
- Fogarty, B. J., & Pete, B. M. (2007). From staff room to classroom: A guide for planning and coaching professional development. Chicago, IL: Sage.
- Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., Penuel, W. R., Ellefson, N., & Porter, S. (2011). Focus, fiddle, and friends: Experiences that transform knowledge for the implementation of innovations. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 137-156. doi:10.1177/0038040711401812
- Fullan, M. (1982). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, M. (1988). Research into education innovation. In R. Glatter, M. Preedy, C. Riches, & M. Masterton (Eds.), Understanding school management (pp. 195-211). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
- Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397. doi:10.2307/1170134
- Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Gillborn, D., Nixon, J., & Rudduck, J. (1993). Dimensions of discipline: Rethinking practice in secondary schools. London, UK: HMSO.
- Gingiss, P. M., Roberts-Gray, C., & Boerm, M. (2006). Bridge-it: A system for predicting implementation fidelity for school-based tobacco prevention programs. Prevention Science, 7(2), 197-207. doi:10. 1007/s11121-006-0038-1
- Glatthorn, A. (1987). Curriculum leadership. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
- Goodlad, J. I. (1979). The scope of the curriculum field. In J. I. Goodlad (Ed.), Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice (pp. 17-42). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Green, B. (2003). Curriculum inquiry in Australia: Toward a local genealogy of the curriculum field. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 123-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27(1), 25-68. doi:10.3102/0091732X027001025
- Hannaway, J., & Woodroffe, N. (2003). Policy instruments in education. Review of Research in Education, 27(1), 1-24. doi:10.3102/0091732X027001001
- Hargreaves, A. (1989). Curriculum and assessment reform. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
- Havelock, R. G. (1971). Planning for innovation through the dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge.
- Havelock, R. G. (1978). The utilisation of educational research and development. In A. Harris, M. Lawn, & W. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum innovation (pp. 312-328). London, UK: Open University.
- Hecht, M. L. M., Colby, M., & Miler-Day, M. (2010). The dissemination of keepin’ it REAL through D.A.R.E. America: A lesson in disseminating health messages. Health Communication, 25(6-7), 585-586. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.496826
- Honig, M. I., & Venkateswaran, N. (2012). School-central office relationships in evidence use: Understanding evidence use as a systems problem. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 199-222. doi:10.1086/663282
- Kalichman, S. C., Hudd, K., & DiBerto, G. (2010). Operational fidelity to an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention for people living with HIV/AIDS. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 31(4), 235-245. doi:10.1007/s10935-010-0217-5
- Kane, G. C., Johnson, J., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Science, 60(12), 3026-3048.
- Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
- Kliebard, H. M. (2002). Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th century. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Kotler, P., & Fox, K. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Lo, Y. C. (2007). The micro-politics of curriculum leadership. Curriculum Perspectives, 27(1), 26-39.
- Magrini, J. M. (2015). Phenomenology and curriculum implementation: Discerning a living curriculum through the analysis of Ted Aoki’s situational praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(2), 274-299. doi:10.1080/00220272.2014.1002113
- Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Marsh, C., & Huberman, M. (1984). Disseminating curricula: A look from the top down. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1), 53-66. doi:10.1080/0022027840160107
- McBeath, C. (1995). Overcoming barriers to effective curriculum change: A case study in dissemination practice. Retrieved from http://www.clare-mcbeath.id.au/pubs/bris95.html
- McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Miles, M. B., Ekholm, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (1987). Lasting school improvement: Exploring the process of institutionalization (ISIP Vol. 5). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
- Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623-670. doi:10. 1177/0013161X10378689
- Musingarabwi, S., & Blignaut, S. (2015). Theorizing the implementation of the HIV/AIDS curriculum in Zimbabwe. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(1), 122-140. doi:10.1080/ 00220272.2014.962099
- Neal, J. W., Neal, Z. P., Atkins, M. S., Henry, D. B., & Frazier, S. L. (2011). Channels of change: Contrasting network mechanisms in the use of interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3-4), 277-286. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9403-0
- Ollila, S., & Elmquist, M. (2011). Managing open innovation: Exploring challenges at the interfaces of an open innovation arena. Managing Open Innovation, 20(4), 273-282. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8691.2011.00616.x
- Olson, A. L., Woodhead, J., Berkow, R., Kaufman, N. M., & Marshall, S. G. (2000). A national general pediatric clerkship curriculum: The process of development and implementation. Pediatrics, 106(s1), 216-222.
- Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Ow, T. T., & Morris, J. G. (2010). An experimental study of executive decision-making with implications for decision support. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 20(4), 370-397. doi:10.1080/10919392.2010.516642
- Ozer, E. J., Wanis, M. G., & Bazell, N. (2010). Diffusion of school-based prevention programs in two urban districts: Adaptations, rationales, and suggestions for change. Prevention Science, 11(1), 42-55. doi:10.1007/s11121-009-0148-7
- Paulussen, T., Kok, G., Schaalma, H., & Parcel, G. S. (1995). Diffusion of AIDS curricula among Dutch secondary school teachers. Health Education Quarterly, 22(2), 227-243. doi:10.1177/ 109019819502200210
- Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In I. Katznelson & H. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the Discipline (pp. 693-721). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
- Powell, W. W., & Bromley, P. (2013). New institutionalism in the analysis of complex organizations. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., vol. 16, pp. 764-769). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32181.X
- Rhodes, R. A. (2006). Policy network analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 425-447). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Rogers, E. M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of Health Communication, 9(s1), 13-19. doi:10.1080/10810730490271449
- Rogers, E. M., & Marcus, J. E. (1983). Advances in diffusion theory. In W. J. Paisley & M. Butler (Eds.), Knowledge utilization systems in education (pp. 251-257). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Rudduck, J. (1976). Dissemination of innovation: The humanities curriculum project. London, UK: Evans/Methuen Educational.
- Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Shatzer, M., Wolf, G. A., Hravnak, M., Haugh, A., Kikutu, J., & Hoffmann, R. L. (2010). A curriculum designed to decrease barriers related to scholarly writing by staff nurses. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(9), 392-398. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181ee4447
- Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
- Smith, T. M., & Rowley, K. J. (2005). Enhancing commitment or tightening control: The function of teacher professional development in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 19(1), 126- 154. doi:10.1177/0895904804270773
- Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402-435). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Stein, B. D., Kataoka, S. H., Hamilton, A. B., Schultz, D., Ryan, G., Vona, P., & Wong, M. (2010). School personnel perspectives on their school’s implementation of a school-based suicide prevention program. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 37(3), 338-349. doi:10.1007/s11414-009-9174-2
- Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Superfinea, A. C., Marshall, A. M., & Kelsoc, C. (2015). Fidelity of implementation: Bringing written curriculum materials into the equation. The Curriculum Journal, 26(1), 164-191. doi:10. 1080/09585176.2014.990910
- Surry, D. W., & Ely, D. P. (2001). Adoption, diffusion, implementation, and institutionalization of educational technology. Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/file/15928330/Adoption- Diffusion-Implementation-and-Institutionalization-of-Educational-Technology/
- Tamir, P. (2004). OP-ED: Curriculum implementation revisited. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 281-294. doi:10.1080/0022027032000058153
- Tyler, R. W. (1967). Changing concepts of educational evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 13-18). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company.
- Wernet, S. P., & Singleton, J. L. (2010). Institutionalization of gerontological curricular change in schools of social work. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 31(1), 19-36. doi:10.1080/ 02701960903578386
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(2)】June (Special Issue: Lifelong Learning and Senior Education)
Curriculum Implementation Implies the Meanings of the Dissemination and Innovation: The Viewpoint of Curriculum History
Author: Yi-Hsin Hou (Education and Extension Division, Special Education Learning Resource Center Program, Kaohsiung, Taiwan), Shin-Jiann Gau (Retired from Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction,National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.2
Date：June 2018
Pages：219-250
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0009
Abstract：
The aim of this study was to analyze previous literature on academics for integrating the model and process of innovative curriculum implementation (ICI). The findings yielded the following conclusions: (1) The academic term ICI was derived on the basis of curriculum dissemination and related factors and originated from a failure in curriculum innovation in the United States during the 1960s. The academic error committed by Fullan caused the integration of diffusion and institutionalism as a combined theory. (2) The concept of ICI was revised from fidelity to mutual adaptation. Moreover, the concept does not emphasize the goal and structure of ICI but combines innovation with culture to enable interpersonal diffusion and institutionalization. (3) The model of ICI differs from the top-down and bottom-up approaches, all of which were developed on the basis of assumptions.
Keywords：curriculum dissemination, curriculum history, curriculum implementation, curriculum innovation