（專題）素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議
作者:國立臺灣大學師資培育中心符碧真
卷期：63卷第4期
日期：2018年12月
頁碼：59-87
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003
摘要：
新課綱強調核心素養，是史上最大規模的課程改革，自108學年度起上路。為培育新課綱所需的師資，2017年公布的《師資培育法》規定教育部要訂定「教師專業素養指引」及「師資職前教育課程基準」。師資培育機構須根據這些規定，自行規劃課程，並自108學年度起實施，這對師資培育機構是很大的挑戰。本研究探討兩個問題：一、新課綱強調「核心素養」，新《師資培育法》強調教師「專業素養」，一時之間素養成為「顯學」，究竟何謂「素養」？有無同時適用於中、小學教育及教師專業的素養定義？素養為何如此重要？二、師資培育機構該如何規劃職前教育課程，以培育新課綱所需的師資？本研究指出素養包括「功能性素養」及橫跨各學科的「共通性能力」，藉由知識與真實情境的連結，可培養素養，並減少學生「學這要幹嘛」及「學這有何用」的疑問，以提升學習動機。此外，本研究根據學理，提出國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議，希望拋磚引玉，引發學界對話，為108學年度新課綱及新師資培育課程同步實施做好準備。
關鍵詞：十二年國教、核心素養、師資培育、師資職前教育課程、教師專業素養
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 天下雜誌（2012）。國中學習力調查：1/4不能完全聽懂上課內容。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5031643 【Common Wealth. (2012). A survey of junior high school students’ learning ability: One fourth of students cannot fully understand what was taught. Retrieved from https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5031643】
- 呂良正（2014）。臺大土木系Capstone課程經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊，49，21-24。 【Leu, L.-J. (2014). Experiences of capstone course at NTU’s Civil Engineering Department. Evaluation Bimonthly, 49, 21-24.】
- 吳淑禎（2011）。中等學校師資培育課程的發展特色與教育專業課程的能力指標分析。教育研究集刊，57（4），1-41。doi:10.3966/102887082011125704001 【Wu, S.-C. (2011). The curriculum development characteristics and competence indicators analysis of the secondary school teacher education programs. Bulletin of Educational Research, 57(4), 1-41. doi:10.3966/1028870820 11125704001】
- 吳璧純、鄭淑慧、陳春秀（2017）。以學生學習為主軸的生活課程素養導向教學。教育研究月刊，275，50-63。doi:10.3966/168063602017030275004 【Wu, P.-C., Cheng, S.-H., & Chen, C.-S. (2017). The approach toward students’ learning of competency-based education for life curriculum. Journal of Education Research, 275, 50-63. doi:10.3966/1680636020170302 75004】
- 李田英、曹博盛、左台益、謝豐瑞、黃福坤、陸健榮…羅珮華（2008）。中學科學教師之教育學程修習狀況與成效。科學教育月刊，311，2-16。 【Lee, T.-Y., Tsao, P.-S., Tso, T.-Y., Hsieh, F.-J., Hwang, F.-K., Lu, C.-R., …Lo, P.-H. (2008). The learning situation and effects of educational courses taken by secondary science teachers. Science Education Monthly, 311, 2-16.】
» 展開更多
- 天下雜誌（2012）。國中學習力調查：1/4不能完全聽懂上課內容。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5031643 【Common Wealth. (2012). A survey of junior high school students’ learning ability: One fourth of students cannot fully understand what was taught. Retrieved from https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5031643】
- 呂良正（2014）。臺大土木系Capstone課程經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊，49，21-24。 【Leu, L.-J. (2014). Experiences of capstone course at NTU’s Civil Engineering Department. Evaluation Bimonthly, 49, 21-24.】
- 吳淑禎（2011）。中等學校師資培育課程的發展特色與教育專業課程的能力指標分析。教育研究集刊，57（4），1-41。doi:10.3966/102887082011125704001 【Wu, S.-C. (2011). The curriculum development characteristics and competence indicators analysis of the secondary school teacher education programs. Bulletin of Educational Research, 57(4), 1-41. doi:10.3966/1028870820 11125704001】
- 吳璧純、鄭淑慧、陳春秀（2017）。以學生學習為主軸的生活課程素養導向教學。教育研究月刊，275，50-63。doi:10.3966/168063602017030275004 【Wu, P.-C., Cheng, S.-H., & Chen, C.-S. (2017). The approach toward students’ learning of competency-based education for life curriculum. Journal of Education Research, 275, 50-63. doi:10.3966/1680636020170302 75004】
- 李田英、曹博盛、左台益、謝豐瑞、黃福坤、陸健榮…羅珮華（2008）。中學科學教師之教育學程修習狀況與成效。科學教育月刊，311，2-16。 【Lee, T.-Y., Tsao, P.-S., Tso, T.-Y., Hsieh, F.-J., Hwang, F.-K., Lu, C.-R., …Lo, P.-H. (2008). The learning situation and effects of educational courses taken by secondary science teachers. Science Education Monthly, 311, 2-16.】
- 林永豐（2017）。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊，275，4-17。doi:10.3966/1680 63602017030275001 【Lin, Y.-F. (2017). Transformation and design of competence-based curriculum and instruction. Journal of Education Research, 275, 4-17. doi:10.3966/168063602017030275001】
- 符碧真（2012）。知識花園的探險樂趣：探究式教學法。取自http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/_epaper/ news_detail.php?f_s_num=116 【Fwu, B.-J. (2012). The joys of adventure in knowledge garden: Inquiry-based teaching. Retrieved from http://ctld. ntu.edu.tw/_epaper/news_detail.php?f_s_num=116】
- 符碧真（2017）。大學學習成果總檢驗：合頂石─總結性課程。教育研究集刊，63（1），31-67。doi:10.3966/102887082017036301002 【Fwu, B.-J. (2017). A total inspection of college student learning outcomes: Capstone courses as summative courses. Bulletin of Educational Research, 63(1), 31-67. doi:10.3966/102887082017036301002】
- 符碧真、黃源河（2016）。實地學習：銜接師資培育理論與實務的藥方？教育科學研究期刊，61（2），57-84。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).03 【Fwu, B.-J., & Hwang, Y.-H. R. (2016). Field-based experience: A solution for the theory-practice divide in teacher education? Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 57-84. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).03】
- 張祐維、張盛硯、林詣翔（2013）。物理迷思：什麼？原來「光」會轉彎？！臺大教育實習輔導通訊，66，5-6。 【Chang, Y.-W., Chang, S.-Y., & Lin, Y.-S. (2013). The misconception in physics: What? Can light make a refraction?! Newsletter of NTU’s Center for Teacher Education, 66, 5-6.】
- 張景媛、林佳慧（2017）。綜合活動領域素養導向教學設計發展與實例。教育研究月刊，275，34-49。doi:10.3966/168063602017030275003 【Chang, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-H. (2017). The development of teaching design for cultivating key competencies and practices in the integrated activities curriculum. Journal of Education Research, 275, 34-49. doi:10.3966/ 168063602017030275003】
- 教育部（2003）。中等學校、國民小學教師師資職前教育課程教育專業課程科目及學分。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2003). Professional courses and credits for K-12 pre-service teacher education. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2014). Directions governing for the 12-year basic education curricula. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部（2018）。中華民國教師專業素養指引─師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2018). Guidance of ROC’s teacher professional competence − Standard for pre-service teacher education curriculum. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 黃源河、符碧真（2010）。芬蘭師資培育：研究為基礎的派典與課程實踐。教育研究集刊，56（3），105-137。 【Hwang, Y.-H. R., & Fwu, B.-J. (2010). Teacher education in Finland: The research-based paradigm and curricular praxis. Bulletin of Educational Research, 56(3), 105-137.】
- 靳知勤（2007）。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養─台灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊，15（6），627-646。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2007.1506.02 【Chin, C.-C. (2007). A reflection on the science education of Taiwan − The voice from the elites in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 627-646. doi:10.6173/CJSE.2007.1506.02】
- 陳瓊花（2017）。美感素養導向教學之理論與實踐。教育研究月刊，275，18-33。doi:10.3966/16 8063602017030275002 【Chen, J. C.-H. (2017). The teaching aesthetic literacy of theory and practice. Journal of Education Research, 275, 18-33. doi:10.3966/168063602017030275002】
- 國立臺灣大學教學發展中心（2016）。總整課程。取自http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/rp/ckc/capstone/ intro.php#intro_video 【Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Taiwan University. (2016). Capstone course. Retrieved from http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/rp/ckc/capstone/intro.php#intro_video】
- 彭杏珠（2017）。一次看懂大學考招、108課綱。遠見雜誌，6，13-18。 【Peng, S.-J. (2017). Understanding university’s entrance examination and 108 curriculum guideline. Global Views Monthly, 6, 13-18.】
- 蔡清田（2014）。國民核心素養：十二年國教課程改革的DNA。臺北市：高等教育。 【Tsai, C.-T. (2014). National core competencies: DNA for 12-year national education curriculum reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
- 潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳…蔡濱如（2004）。國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之發展。教育研究資訊，12（4），129-168。 【Pan, H.-L., Wang, L.-Y., Chien, M.-F., Sun, Z.-L., Chang, S.-J., Chang, S.-S., …Tsai, B.-Z. (2004). Developing a profession competence indicator system for teachers of elementary schools and junior high schools. Educational Research & Information, 12(4), 129-168.】
- 鄭淵全、黃榮宗、李佳穎（2014）。國立新竹教育大學創新師培典範之實踐。載於吳清基、黃嘉莉（主編），面對十二年國民基本教育的師資培育挑戰（pp. 115-138）。臺北市：中華民國師範教育學會。 【Cheng, Y.-C., Huang, J.-T., & Lee, C.-Y. (2014). Innovative paradigm of teacher education in National Hsinchu University of Education. In C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), The challenges of teacher education on facing 12-year basic education (pp. 115-138). Taipei, Taiwan: Teacher Education Society of R.O.C..】
- Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
- Blake, B. E., & Blake, R. W. (2002). Literacy and learning: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
- Byman, R., Krokfors, L., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., Kynäslahti, H., & Kansanen, P. (2009). Educating inquiry-oriented teachers: Students’ attitudes and experiences towards research-based teacher education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 79-92. doi:10. 1080/13803610802591808
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.
- Glaser, R. (1962). Psychology and instructional technology. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training, research and education (pp. 1-30). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Goldstein, G., & Fernald, P. (2009). Humanistic education in a capstone course. College Teaching, 57(1), 27-36. doi:10.3200/CTCH.57.1.27-36
- Gordon, J., Arjomand, G., Rey, O., Arjomand, G., Siewiorek, A., Vivitsou, M., …Gilje, O. (2013). KeyCoNet 2013 literature review: Key competence development in school education in Europe. Retrieved from http://keyconet.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=060f39a1-bd86-4941- a6ca-8b2a3ba8548e&groupId=11028
- Henscheid, J. M., & Barnicoat, L. R. (2003). Capstone courses in higher education. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (Vol. 1, pp. 239-241). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Hsieh, F.-J., Wang, T.-Y., Hsieh, C.-J., Tang, S.-J., & Chao, G. (2010). A milestone of an international study in Taiwan teacher education − An international comparison of Taiwan mathematics teacher preparation (Taiwan TEDS-M 2008). Retrieved from http://tedsm.math. ntnu.edu.tw/TEDS-M_2008_International_Study_in_Taiwan_Mathematics_Teacher_Education.pdf
- Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Kansanen, P. (2003). Teacher education in Finland: Current models and new developments. In B. Moon, L. Vlăsceanu, & C. Barrows (Eds.), Institutional approaches to teacher education within higher education in Europe: Current models and new developments (pp. 85-108). Bucharest, Romania: UNESCO-CEPES.
- Kansanen, P. (2006). Constructing a research-based program in teacher education. In F. K. Oser, F. Achtenhagen, & U. Renold (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training: Old research demands and new pathways (pp. 11-22). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
- Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17. doi:10.3102/0013189X0 28004004
- Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. London, UK: Tavistock.
- Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Ludmerer, K. M. (1996). Learning to heal: The development of American medical education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Malaty, G. (2007). What are the reasons behind the success of Finland in PISA? Gazette des Mathématiciens, 108, 59-66.
- Mazzocchi, F. (2010). Complexity in biology. Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory. EMBO Reports, 9(1), 10-14. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401147
- McCown, R. R., Driscoll, M. P., & Roop, P. G. (1996). Educational psychology: A learner-centered approach to classroom practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Mulder, M., Weigel, T., & Collins, K. (2007). The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states: A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(1), 67-88. doi:10.1080/13636820601145630
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Volume III). Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264201170-en
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 results: Collaborative problem solving (Volume V). Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 9789264285521-en
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27-34. doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673
- Spring, J. (2008). Globalization of education: An introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
- Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenology: The recent curriculum reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 31-47.
- Venezky, R. L., Wagner, D. A., & Ciliberti, B. S. (Eds.). (1990). Toward defining literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45-65). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3-9. doi:10.1177/002248718303400302
- Zeichner, K. M. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X028009004
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(4)】December (Special Issue: The Concepts and Practices for Achieving Literacy)
(Special Issue) Teacher Preparation in Response to Competence-Based Curriculum Reform for K-12 Education: National Taiwan University’s Proposal of Inquiry-Based and Competence-Based Teacher Education
Author: Bih-Jen Fwu (Center for Teacher Education, National Taiwan University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.4
Date：December 2018
Pages：59-87
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003
Abstract：
A large-scale curriculum reform for K-12 education that emphasizes the cultivation of core competencies will be launched in 2019. To prepare future teachers for this reform, teacher education institutions (TEIs) are required to restructure their curriculum by 2019 in accordance with the “core competencies for teachers” and “standards for pre-service teacher education” specified by the new Teacher Education Act. “Core competencies” has become a jargon commonly used in discussions of K-12 and teacher education; however, its definition remains unclear. This paper investigated (1) whether a common definition of core competencies exists for both K-12 education and teacher education, and why core competencies have reached their current level of prominence; and (2) how TEIs have restructured their new curriculum to meet K-12 educational requirements. The results revealed that core competencies are defined as functional literacy and transversal competence, linking academic knowledge to real-life experience. Moreover, National Taiwan University proposed a restructuring of the teacher education curriculum based on theoretical reasoning of teacher education. It is believed that clarifying the definition of core competencies and the proposed plan may provoke discussions among educators in TEIs regarding implementing a curriculum reform in 2019 for both K-12 education and teacher education.
Keywords：core competencies, K-12 education, pre-service teacher education courses, teacher education, teacher professional competence