偽科學信念與科學素養的共存與抗衡─民眾參與科學和偽科學活動之探究
作者:國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所林淑梤、國立中山大學通識教育中心林煥祥
卷期：64卷第2期
日期：2019年6月
頁碼：69-97
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0003
摘要：
本研究旨在探討臺灣民眾於2012～2015年3年期間偽科學信念和偽科學活動參與（如看偽科學節目）有無顯著變化，進而探討科學素養、偽科學信念和有關科學參與、偽科學參與各面向之相關性。另外，依據2015年民眾的科學素養和偽科學信念的高、中、低程度，將民眾區分為九群，探討不同偽科學信念的三群民眾在科學素養、科學與偽科學的情意和實務各面向的差異，以及具有較多偽科學健康實踐經驗之民眾特徵。研究資料為2012～2015年公民科學素養調查研究的資料庫。研究結果顯示，臺灣民眾於2012～2015年3年期間偽科學信念顯著地減低，但健康有關的偽科學經驗（如用磁性療法）和觀看偽科學節目頻率卻顯著地增加。影響民眾參與偽科學健康活動的主因是民眾的偽科學信念，而非民眾的科學素養。低科學素養的民眾中，職業與科學較無關的青年、已婚、女性則最容易接受偽科學信念。值得注意的是，高偽科學信念的民眾在科學學習的愉悅感顯著高於中偽科學信念群。高偽科學信念群有較多高學歷者，屬於樂於學習、接受科學與偽科學事物者，卻可能無法區辨科學與偽科學的差異。建議未來在大眾科學教育方面，可加強女性民眾區辨科學與偽科學的主題（如健康、醫療等），以降低偽科學對民眾可能造成的危害。
關鍵詞：科學素養、科學參與、偽科學、偽科學活動
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王念綺（2003）。另類醫療、醫療化與健康商品化現象：以芳香療法的新聞報導為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 【Wang, D. (2003). Phenomenon of alternative medical treatment, medical and health commercialization: A case study of aromatherapy news (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 王貞懿（2011）。從新聞中的偽科學報導看大學生的科學素養與媒體識讀能力（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 【Wang, C.-Y. (2011). Scientific literacy and media literacy: How college students believe pseudoscience in news (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 永康堂（2013）。磁療法。取自http://yct99.pixnet.net/blog/post/37949356-%E3%80%80%E7%A3 %81%E7%99%82%E6%B3%95%EF%B9%9Dmagnetic_treatment%EF%B9%9E%EF%BC%9A 【Yongkang Tang. (2013). Magnetic treatment. Retrieved from http://yct99.pixnet.net/blog/post/37949356-%E3%80 %80%E7%A3%81%E7%99%82%E6%B3%95%EF%B9%9Dmagnetic_treatment%EF%B9%9E%EF%BC%9A】
- 放心醫苑網（2015）。看似包治百病多是心理作用家用磁療效果不大。取自https://read01. com/x0j4EO.html 【Medical Care Web. (2015). Magnetic treatment used at home seems cure all diseases, but it is not effective. Retrieved from https://read01.com/x0j4EO.html】
- 林煥祥（2009）。公民科技素養的調查研究：指標內涵及評量架構規劃成果。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC98-2511-S-110-005）。高雄市：國立中山大學通識教育中心。 【Lin, H.-S. (2009). The survey of Taiwanese citizens’ scientific literacy: A report of planning indicator content and evaluation framework. National Science Council project report (NSC98-2511-S-110-005). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: The Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University.】
» 展開更多
- 王念綺（2003）。另類醫療、醫療化與健康商品化現象：以芳香療法的新聞報導為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 【Wang, D. (2003). Phenomenon of alternative medical treatment, medical and health commercialization: A case study of aromatherapy news (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 王貞懿（2011）。從新聞中的偽科學報導看大學生的科學素養與媒體識讀能力（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 【Wang, C.-Y. (2011). Scientific literacy and media literacy: How college students believe pseudoscience in news (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 永康堂（2013）。磁療法。取自http://yct99.pixnet.net/blog/post/37949356-%E3%80%80%E7%A3 %81%E7%99%82%E6%B3%95%EF%B9%9Dmagnetic_treatment%EF%B9%9E%EF%BC%9A 【Yongkang Tang. (2013). Magnetic treatment. Retrieved from http://yct99.pixnet.net/blog/post/37949356-%E3%80 %80%E7%A3%81%E7%99%82%E6%B3%95%EF%B9%9Dmagnetic_treatment%EF%B9%9E%EF%BC%9A】
- 放心醫苑網（2015）。看似包治百病多是心理作用家用磁療效果不大。取自https://read01. com/x0j4EO.html 【Medical Care Web. (2015). Magnetic treatment used at home seems cure all diseases, but it is not effective. Retrieved from https://read01.com/x0j4EO.html】
- 林煥祥（2009）。公民科技素養的調查研究：指標內涵及評量架構規劃成果。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC98-2511-S-110-005）。高雄市：國立中山大學通識教育中心。 【Lin, H.-S. (2009). The survey of Taiwanese citizens’ scientific literacy: A report of planning indicator content and evaluation framework. National Science Council project report (NSC98-2511-S-110-005). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: The Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University.】
- 林樹聲（1999）。科學素養的省思。科學教育月刊，222，16-26。 【Lin, S.-S. (1999). Reflection on scientific literacy. Science Education Monthly, 222, 16-26.】
- 侯佩君、杜素豪、廖培珊、洪永泰、章英華（2008）。台灣鄉鎮市區類型之研究：「台灣社會變遷基本調查」第五期計畫之抽樣分層效果分析。調查研究─方法與應用，23，7-32。doi:10.77014/TCYCFFYYY.200804.0007 【Hou, P.-C., Tu, S.-H., Liao, P.-S., Hung, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-H. (2008). The typology of townships in Taiwan: The analysis of sampling stratification of the 2005-2006 “Taiwan social change survey”. Survey Research − Method and Application, 23, 7-32. doi:10.77014/TCYCFFYYY.200804.0007】
- 侯毓昌、丁漢祥、曾韻潔、謝一紅、黃仲諄（2006）。一般外科癌症患者對另類療法使用情況之研究─以某區域醫院外科門診患者為例。中醫藥雜誌，17（1-2），25-33。 【Hou, Y.-C., Ting, H.-H., Tseng, Y.-C., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Huang, C.-C. (2006). Study of application of alternative medicine in cancer patients − Survey of a regional hospital surgery outpatient department. Journal of Chinese Medicine, 17(1-2), 25-33.】
- 夏勁、羅晰（2007）。試論偽科學的實質、成因與防治對策。武漢科技大學學報（社會科學版），9（5），437-449。 【Xia, J., & Luo, X. (2007). Nature, origin and resolution of pseudoscience. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 9(5), 437-449.】
- 教育部（2013）。教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書（初稿）公聽會。取自http://literacytw. naer.edu.tw/data/cht/20131002/20131002mm5b3b.pdf 【Ministry of Education. (2013). Report of the project of developing civic literacy by MOE (1st version) for public hearing. Retrieved from http://literacytw.naer.edu.tw/data/cht/20131002/20131002mm5b3b.pdf】
- 郭中一（1997）。偽科學及反科學的教育環境是教改當務之急。科學月刊，28（4），268-269。 【Kuo, C.-I. (1997). Educational environment of pseudoscience and anti-science is the first priority in educational reform. Science Monthly, 28(4), 268-269.】
- 郭重吉、張惠博（2005）。從政策層面評述國際間科學教育的改革。科學教育月刊，284，23-35。 【Guo, C.-J., & Chang, H.-P. (2005). Reviewing the reform of international science education from the policy aspect. Science Education Monthly, 284, 23-35.】
- 陳姵妡、黃富溢、莊柏驊（2017，3月22日）。「蓮花原精」可抗癌？中醫師籲別誤信偏方。民視FTV。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%93%AE%E8%8A%B1%E5%8E%9F%E7 %B2%BE-%E5%8F%AF%E6%8A%97%E7%99%8C-%E4%B8%AD%E9%86%AB%E5%B8%AB%E7%B1%B2%E5%88%A5%E8%AA%A4%E4%BF%A1%E5%81%8F%E6%96%B9-104638725.html 【Chen, P.-C., Huang, F.-Y., & Chuang, P.-H. (2017, March 22). Is the “lotus extraction” able to resist cancer? Chinese medicine practitioners appeal that do not believe the recipe. Formosa TV News. Retrieved from https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%93%AE%E8%8A%B1%E5%8E%9F%E7%B2%BE-%E5%8F%AF%E6%8A%97%E7%99%8C-%E4%B8%AD%E9%86%AB%E5%B8%AB%E7%B1%B2%E5%88%A5%E8%AA%A4%E4%BF%A1%E5%81%8F%E6%96%B9-104638725.html】
- 曾元珏（2014）。台灣成年國民從事運勢與健康之偽科學行為模式的研究（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。 【Tseng, Y.-C. (2014). Research on the behavior model of adult citizens in Taiwan engaging in fortune and health pseudoscience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
- 黃台珠（2012）。2008年國民對科學與技術的瞭解、興趣、與關切度調查計畫執行報告（修訂版）。行政院國家科學委員會計畫執行報告（NSC99-2511-S-110-007-MY2）。高雄市：國立中山大學通識教育中心公民素養推動研究中心。 【Huang, T.-C. (2012). An investigation report of Taiwanese citizens’ understanding of, attitudes towards, and concern about science and technology in 2008 (revised version). National Science Council project report (NSC99-2511-S-110-007-MY2). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: The Research Center for Promoting Civic Scientific Literacy of the Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University.】
- 黃台珠（主編）（2014）。2012年臺灣公民科學素養概況。高雄市：國立中山大學通識教育中心公民素養推動研究中心。 【Huang, T.-C. (Ed.). (2014). Overview of Taiwanese citizens’ scientific literacy in 2012. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: The Research Center for Promoting Civic Scientific Literacy of the Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University.】
- 黃孝宗、蔡俊彥、黃台珠（2013）。公民科學家意象與參觀博物館對科學研究利益知覺之影響。教育科學研究期刊，58（3），1-22。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).01 【Huang, H.-T., Tsai, C.-Y., & Huang, T.-C. (2013). Influence of citizens’ images of scientists and museum visits on the benefit perception of scientific research. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(3), 1-22. doi:10. 6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).01】
- 靳知勤（2002）。效化「基本科學素養問卷」。科學教育學刊，10（3），287-308。 【Chin, C.-C. (2002). The validation of the test of basic scientific literacy for the use in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 287-308.】
- 靳知勤（2014）。台灣所需優先解決的科學教育問題─科學與科學教育學者的觀點。教育學報，42（1），53-76。 【Chin, C.-C. (2014). Prioritizing major science education problems in Taiwan − Views of scientists and science educators. Educational Journal, 42(1), 53-76.】
- 蔡俊彥（2016）。2015年臺灣公民科學素養概況。高雄市：國立中山大學。 【Tsai, C.-Y. (2016). Overview of Taiwanese citizens’ scientific literacy in 2015. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: National Sun Yat-sen University.】
- 鄭怡卉（2013）。新聞中的「偽科學」內容分析研究。新聞學研究，116，47-90。 【Cheng, I.-H. (2013). Discovering the unexplored in science communication: Pseudoscience news. Mass Communication Research, 116, 47-90.】
- 謝佩妤（2009）。「科學知識」與「科學資訊來源」對大學生擬科學態度影響之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。 【Shieh, P.-Y. (2009). The effects of belief in pseudoscience on understanding of science, and acceptance of scientific information in university students (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
- 爆炸營養課堂（2017）。老太太聽信偏方害死人！連續吃了半年香蕉想降血壓，結果中風癱倒。取自https://kknews.cc/health/aebm89n.html 【Nutrition Class. (2017). An old lady suffered a paralyzing stroke because of the treatment of an alternative recipe − Eeating banana for one half year. Retrieved from https://kknews.cc/health/aebm89n.html】
- Shermer, M.（2011）。什麼是偽科學？（潘震澤，譯）。科學人，116（10），122。 【Shermer, M. (2011). What is pseudoscience? (J.-Z. Pan, Trans.). Scientific American, 116(10), 122.】
- Shermer, M.（2015）。分辨科學與偽科學（潘震澤，譯）。科學人，165（11），94。 【Shermer, M. (2015). Distinguish science from pseudoscience (J.-Z. Pan, Trans.). Scientific American, 165(11), 94.】
- Allum, N., & Stoneman, P. (2012). Beliefs about astrology across Europe. In M. W. Bauer, R. Shukla, & N. Allum (Eds.), The culture of science: How the public relates to science across the globe (pp. 301-322). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Baldwin, J. A., Ebert-May, D., & Burns, D. J. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83(4), 397-408. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1098-237X(199907)83:4<397::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-%23
- Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200-239). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Demirel, M., & Caymaz, B. (2015). Prospective science and primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in scientific literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1903-1908. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500
- Du, J., & MacEachern, S. N. (2008). Judgment post-stratification for designed experiments. Biometrics, 64(2), 345-354. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00898.x
- Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 431-452. doi:10.1002/tea.21080
- Impey, C., Buxner, S., & Antonellis, J. (2012). Non-scientific beliefs among undergraduate students. Astronomy Education Review, 11(1), 010111-1-010111-12. doi:10.3847/AER2012016
- Johnson, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2004). Is knowledge of science associated with higher skepticism of pseudoscientific claims? The American Biology Teacher, 66(8), 536-548. doi:10.2307/4451737
- Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation of common sense: Social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 431-448. doi:10.1111/j. 1468-5914.2008.00378.x
- Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuβ, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & von Rhöneck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489-507. doi:10.1080/09500690210163233
- Lin, H., Hong, Z., & Huang, T. (2012). The role of emotional factors in building public scientific literacy and engagement with science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 25-42. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551430
- Lin, H., Lawrenz, F., Lin, S.-F., & Hong, Z. (2013). Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science related activities. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 941-954. doi:10.1177/0963662511429412
- Lin, S.-F., Lin, H., Lee, L., & Yore, D. L. (2015). Are science comics a good medium for science communication? The case for public learning of nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 5(3), 276-294. doi:10. 1080/21548455.2014.941040
- Martin, M. (1994). Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education. Science & Education, 3(4), 357-371. doi:10.1007/BF00488452
- Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2008). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science & Education, 17(4), 317-357. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9039-5
- McLean, C. P., & Miller, N. A. (2010). Changes in critical thinking skills following a course on science and pseudoscience: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 37(2), 85-90. doi:10.1080/00986281003626714
- McMillan, J. H., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). What theories of motivation say about why learners learn. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 45(2), 39-51. doi:10.1002/tl.37219914507
- Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (13), 1499-1521. doi:10.1080/09500690600718344
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators − 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators − 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators − 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators − 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2015 draft science framework. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264281820-3-en
- Palermo, E. (2015). Does magnetic therapy work? Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/ 40174-magnetic-therapy.html
- Provencher, C. (2011). Towards a better understanding of cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 377-395. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00468.x
- Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Shein, P. P., Li, Y.-Y., & Huang, T.-C. (2014). Relationship between scientific knowledge and fortune-telling. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 780-796. doi:10.1177/0963662514522169
- Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
- Shermer, M. (2003). Why smart people believe weird things. Skeptic, 10(2), 62-75.
- Spector, B., Strong, P., & La Porta, T. (1998). Teaching the nature of science as an element of science, technology and society. The Nature of Science in Science Education, 5, 267-276. doi:10.1007/0-306-47215-5-17
- Tobacyk, J., & Milford, G. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1029-1037. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1029
- Tsai, C.-Y., Li, Y.-Y., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2017). The relationships among adult affective factors, engagement in science, and scientific competencies. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 30-47. doi:10.1177/0741713616673148
- Tsai, C.-Y., Shein, P.-P., Jack, B. M., Wu, K.-C., Chou, C.-Y., Wu, Y.-Y., …Huang, T.-C. (2012). Effects of exposure to pseudoscientific television programs upon Taiwanese citizens’ pseudoscientific beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(2), 175-194. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.610132
- Walker, W. R., Hoekstra, S. J., & Vogl, R. J. (2002). Science education is no guarantee of skepticism. Skeptic, 9(3), 24-27.
Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(2)】June
The Coexistence and Conflict of Pseudoscience Belief and Scientific Literacy: Investigate Adults’ Engagement in Scientific and Pseudoscientific Activities
Author: Shu-Fen Lin (Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Changhua University of Education), Huann-Shyang Lin (Center for General Education, National Sun Yat-sen University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.2
Date：June 2019
Pages：69-97
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0003
Abstract：
The first purpose of this study was to investigate whether Taiwanese adults’ pseudo-scientific beliefs and engagement in pseudo-scientific activities (i.e. watching pseudo-scientific TV programs) changed significantly. The second purpose was to investigate the relationship among science literacy, pseudo-scientific beliefs, and engagement in scientific and pseudo-scientific activities. According to the levels of subjects’ scientific literacy and pseudo-scientific beliefs in 2015 civic science literacy survey, a representational sample of adults was categorized into nine groups to investigate the difference of scientific literacy, scientific and pseudo-scientific affection and practice aspects among three groups with different levels of pseudo-scientific beliefs, and which groups of adults had more experience of pseudoscience health practice. The data base of 2012 and 2015 civic science literacy survey was analyzed. The results indicated that Taiwanese adults’ pseudo-scientific beliefs descended significantly from 2012 to 2015, but their pseudo-scientific experience of health practices (e.g. magnetic therapy) increased significantly. The main factor that influenced adults’ participation in pseudo-scientific health practices was their pseudo-scientific beliefs, rather than their scientific literacy. Among the adults with lows scientific literacy, youth, married, and women seem accept most easily pseudo-scientific belief. It is noted that people with high pseudoscientific beliefs had significantly higher scores of enjoyment in scientific learning than those with medium pseudoscientific beliefs. There are more adults with high education background in the group with high pseudoscientific beliefs. People with higher pseudoscientific beliefs may be interested in learning science and accept scientific and pseudoscientific things, but they lack ability to distinguish between science and pseudoscience. To decrease possible harm from pseudoscience, it is suggested that certain topics (i.e. health, medical treatment) for women to distinguish science from pseudo-science should be addressed in public science education.
Keywords：engagement in science, pseudoscience, pseudoscientific activity, scientific literacy