（專題）探索五位理工科女性世界中的創造力：她們對創造力的詮釋以及理工背景對其創造力的影響
作者:小天使婦兒診所宋玉英、國立臺南大學特殊教育學系高振耀
卷期：64卷第3期
日期：2019年9月
頁碼：55-84
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0003
摘要：
本研究從理工科女性的角度探討其如何詮釋創造力，同時瞭解她們的生活經驗對其創造力展現的影響。研究者從女性主義的立場出發，採用質性研究中的敘事研究法進行闡述，以立意取樣選定五位研究參與者，並透過半結構式的深入訪談、非參與性觀察及文件檢視以蒐集資料。研究結果發現，五位理工科女性的共同特質包括處事態度嚴謹、目標導向、喜歡彈性靈活的模式、對學習與工作充滿自信、多樣的興趣嗜好及正向積極六項特質；另外，從能力的觀點，她們定義創造力為解決問題的能力、發挸更多新問題的能力、表達的能力及改變的能力，而解決問題的能力是其核心，此反映出科學創造力的本質；至於富有創造力產品的元素，除了新穎，她們還提到成本效益、滿足客戶需求、美感、好玩等。此外，五位理工科女性基本上皆認為理工科系嚴謹的邏輯思考訓練對於創造力展現是有所幫助的，此與文獻所提出創造力的展現不僅需要擴散思考亦需要聚斂思考的論點不謀而合。還有值得注意的一點是，五位研究參與者皆提出創造力不僅可以表現在藝術方面且可以涵蓋各個領域的看法，此乃支持了創造力存在於人類各個活動領域之論述，也說明了過去有些實證研究以學生的主修領域來區分高低創造力組是不適宜的，同時給予將來有關創造力的實證研究可資參酌之提醒。
關鍵詞：理工科女性、創造力、聚斂思考、擴散思考
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 于曉平（2002）。雙親在資優生生涯發展中的角色之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，23，141-162。【Yu, H.-P. (2002). The research of parents’ in gifted’ career development. Bulletin of Special Education, 23, 141- 162.】
- 于曉平（2005）。高中數理資優女生選擇進入基礎科學科系之歷程研究。特殊教育研究學刊，29，337-361。doi:10.6172/BSE200509.2901016 【Yu, H.-P. (2005). The process research of the choice entering the foundation science department for math and science gifted girls at the high school. Bulletin of Special Education, 29, 337-361. doi:10.6172/BSE200509. 2901016】
- 于曉平、林幸台（2010）。角色楷模課程對高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，55（1），27-61。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010035501002 【Yu, H.-P., & Lin, H.-T. (2010). The effects of a mentoring curriculum on gender roles, career self-efficacy, and career development in a high school class for gifted girls in math and science. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(1), 27-61. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010035501002】
- 余民寧（2008）。邁向女科學家培育之路─從國際數學與科學成就評比資料分析探索起。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC96-2522-S-004-001-MY2）。臺北市：國立政治大學。 【Yu, M.-N. (2008). Towards the path of fostering women scientists − The analysis of international math-and- science achievement evaluation data. Technical Report of the National Science Council of the Executive Yuan (NSC96-2522-S-004-001-MY2). Taipei, Taiwan: National Chengchi University.】
- 李志峰、楊慶南、邱志麟（2003）。大葉大學學生運動性休閒參與動機之研究。大葉學報，12（2），99-108。doi:10.7119/JDYU.200312.0099 【Lee, C.-F., Yang, C.-N., & Chiou, C.-L. (2003). A study of Da-Yeh University students’ motivation for participating in sports recreation. Journal of Da-Yeh University, 12(2), 99-108. doi:10.7119/JDYU.200312. 0099】
» 展開更多
- 于曉平（2002）。雙親在資優生生涯發展中的角色之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，23，141-162。【Yu, H.-P. (2002). The research of parents’ in gifted’ career development. Bulletin of Special Education, 23, 141- 162.】
- 于曉平（2005）。高中數理資優女生選擇進入基礎科學科系之歷程研究。特殊教育研究學刊，29，337-361。doi:10.6172/BSE200509.2901016 【Yu, H.-P. (2005). The process research of the choice entering the foundation science department for math and science gifted girls at the high school. Bulletin of Special Education, 29, 337-361. doi:10.6172/BSE200509. 2901016】
- 于曉平、林幸台（2010）。角色楷模課程對高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，55（1），27-61。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010035501002 【Yu, H.-P., & Lin, H.-T. (2010). The effects of a mentoring curriculum on gender roles, career self-efficacy, and career development in a high school class for gifted girls in math and science. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(1), 27-61. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010035501002】
- 余民寧（2008）。邁向女科學家培育之路─從國際數學與科學成就評比資料分析探索起。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC96-2522-S-004-001-MY2）。臺北市：國立政治大學。 【Yu, M.-N. (2008). Towards the path of fostering women scientists − The analysis of international math-and- science achievement evaluation data. Technical Report of the National Science Council of the Executive Yuan (NSC96-2522-S-004-001-MY2). Taipei, Taiwan: National Chengchi University.】
- 李志峰、楊慶南、邱志麟（2003）。大葉大學學生運動性休閒參與動機之研究。大葉學報，12（2），99-108。doi:10.7119/JDYU.200312.0099 【Lee, C.-F., Yang, C.-N., & Chiou, C.-L. (2003). A study of Da-Yeh University students’ motivation for participating in sports recreation. Journal of Da-Yeh University, 12(2), 99-108. doi:10.7119/JDYU.200312. 0099】
- 吳淑敏（2009）。傑出女性科學家生涯發展歷程之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，34（1），75-103。doi:10.6172/BSE200903.3401004 【Wu, S.-M. (2009). The career development of eminent female scientists in Taiwan. Bulletin of Special Education, 34(1), 75-103. doi:10.6172/BSE200903.3401004】
- 吳慧敏（2002）。台灣物理界女性工作者之現況調查。物理雙月刊，24（1），15-16。 【Wu, H.-M. (2002). A survey of the current situation of female workers in Taiwan’s physics community. Bimonthly of Physics, 24(1), 15-16.】
- 周保男（2013）。工程女性大學生學習歷程之質性研究：公立教學型大學為例。科技與工程教育學刊，46（1），31-43。 【Chou, P.-N. (2013). A qualitative study on the learning process of female college engineering students: An example of a teaching-based university. Journal of Technology and Engineering Education, 46(1), 31-43.】
- 洪秀珍、謝臥龍、駱慧文（2013）。性別刻板印象與數學相關專業發展之研究：以科技大學工程女學生為例。屏東教育大學學報，40，77-104。 【Hung, H.-C., Shieh, V., & Lo, H.-W. A. (2013). A study on gender-stereotypes and mathematics-related professional development: An example to the female engineering majors in science and technology university. Journal of National Pingtung University: Education, 40, 77-104.】
- 高振耀（2011）。探索數理資優學生與普通生在創造思考能力上的差異。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，2011，127-151。doi:10.6379/AJSE.201112.0127 【Kao, C. (2011). Exploring the differences between mathematically gifted students and general students in their creative thinking. Annual Report of Special Education Association of Republic of China, 2011, 127-151. doi:10. 6379/AJSE.201112.0127】
- 高振耀（2012）。解開創造力的奧秘：創造力的四個P。特教論壇，12，1-12。doi:10.6502/SEF. 2012.12.1-12 【Kao, C. (2012). Disentangling the intricacy of creativity: Four P’s of creativity. Special Education Forum, 12, 1-12. doi:10.6502/SEF.2012.12.1-12】
- 張春興（2009）。現代心理學（重修版）。臺北市：東華。 【Chang, C.-T. (2009). Modern psychology (Rev. ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Donghua.】
- 連振杰（2009）。大學生休閒參與型態與休閒態度之研究─以南臺科技大學一年級新生為例。國立臺中教育大學體育學系系刊，4，22-33。doi:10.29781/NTCUPE.200906.0004 【Lian, C.-C. (2009). A study on college students’ leisure participation patterns and leisure attitudes − Taking the freshmen of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology as an example. NTCU Physical Education, 4, 22-33. doi:10.29781/NTCUPE.200906.0004】
- 陳雅婉、陳雅姿（2012）。尋找下一個居禮夫人─從傳記探討數理資優女性的成功。資優教育季刊，6，27-34。 【Chen, Y.-W., & Chen, Y.-Z. (2012). Looking for the next Marie Skłodowska Curie − Discussing success factors of mathematically and scientifically gifted females from biographies. Gifted Education, 6, 27-34.】
- 陳龍安（2006）。創造力思考教學的理論與實務。臺北市：心理。 【Chen, L.-A. (2006). Theory and practice of teaching for creativity. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.】
- 郭靜姿、王雅奇、林美和、吳舜文、簡維君、張靖卿…周佩蓉（2009）。五位高中資優班畢業優秀女性之人格特質與生涯發展分析。特殊教育研究學刊，34（1），47-73。doi:10.6172/ BSE200903.3401003 【Kuo, C.-C., Wang, Y.-C., Lin, M.-H., Wu, S.-W., Chien, W.-C., Chang, C.-C., ...Chou, P.-J. (2009). Personality traits of five outstanding young females who graduated from senior high gifted/talented classes. Bulletin of Special Education, 34(1), 47-73. doi:10.6172/BSE200903.3401003】
- 郭靜姿、林美和、胡寶玉（2006）。女性資優生在工作或學業上的助力、阻力、因應及轉變。教育研究月刊，143，41-56。 【Kuo, C.-C., Lin, M.-H., & Hu, P.-Y. (2006). The assistance, resistance, response and transformation of female gifted students at work or school. Educational Research Monthly, 143, 41-56.】
- 郭靜姿、林美和、張靖卿、胡寶玉、簡維君、謝佳男、周佩蓉（2009）。高中資優班畢業女性談資優教育之影響。特殊教育學報，29，87-100。doi:10.6768/JSE.200906.0087 【Kuo, C.-C., Lin, M.-H., Chang, C.-C., Hu, P.-Y., Chien, W.-C., Hsieh, C.-N., & Chou, P.-J. (2009). Influences of gifted education: Viewpoints of young females who graduated from senior high school gifted classes. Journal of Special Education, 29, 87-100. doi:10.6768/JSE.200906.0087】
- 郭靜姿、陳若男、林美和、簡維君、張靖卿、胡寶玉…周佩蓉（2007）。重要他人對於高中資優班畢業女性生涯發展的影響。資優教育研究，7（2），1-18。doi:10.7089/JGE.200712. 0001 【Kuo, C.-C., Chen, J.-N., Lin, M.-H., Chien, W.-C., Chang, C.-C., Hu, P.-Y., ...Chou, P.-J. (2007). The influences of significant others on career development of young females who graduated from senior high gifted/talented classes. Journal of Gifted Education, 7(2), 1-18. doi:10.7089/JGE.200712.0001】
- 鈕文英（2011）。教育研究方法與論文寫作（修訂版）。臺北市：雙葉。 【Niu, W.-Y. (2011). Educational research methods and essay writing (Rev. ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
- 鈕文英（2012）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市：雙葉。 【Niu, W.-Y. (2012). Qualitative research methods and essay writing. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
- 蔡麗玲（2009）。在科學裡看見性別。性別平等教育季刊，46，8-10。 【Tsai, L.-L. (2009). See gender in science. Gender Equality Education Quarterly, 46, 8-10.】
- Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(2), 609-618. doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8
- Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
- Bateson, P. (2015). Playfulness and creativity. Current Biology, 25(1), R12-R16. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.009
- Bateson, P., & Nettle, D. (2014). Playfulness, ideas, and creativity: A survey. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 219-222. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901091
- Benedek, M., Könen, T., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 273-281. doi:10.1037/a0027059
- Berg, T., Sharpe, A., & Aitkin, E. (2018). Females in computing: Understanding stereotypes through collaborative picturing. Computer & Education, 126, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07. 007
- Best, D. L. (2009). Another view of the gender-status relation. Sex Roles, 61(5-6), 341-351. doi:10. 1007/s11199-009-9629-1
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Brinkmann, A., & Sriraman, B. (2009). Aesthetics and creativity: An exploration of the relationships between the constructs. In B. Sriraman & S. Goodchild (Eds.), Relatively and philosophically earnest: Festschrift in honor of Paul Ernest’s 65th birthday (pp. 57-80). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted (4th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
- Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50-66. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002
- Glǎveanu, V. P. (2014). Revisiting the ‘art bias’ in lay conceptions of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 11-20. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873656
- Glǎveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25-32. doi:10. 1016/j.tsc.2017.11.006
- Hennesey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
- Jouini, E., Karehnke, P., & Napp, C. (2018). Stereotypes, underconfidence and decision-making with an application to gender and math. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 148, 34- 45. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.002
- Kao, C. (2008). Socio-emotional issues of mathematically gifted adolescent females: Portraits of two cases in Taiwan. Bulletin of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 19, 91-111. doi:10.6457/BSER.200812.0091
- Kao, C. (2011). The dilemmas of peer relationships confronting mathematically gifted female adolescents: Nine cases in Taiwan. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 83-94. doi:10.1177/0016986210391658
- Kao, C. (2015). Mathematically gifted adolescent females’ mixed sentiment toward gender stereotypes. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 17-35. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9278-2
- Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308. doi:10. 1037/a0029751
- Kaufman, J. C., Glǎveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316274385
- Kogan, N. (1974). Creativity and sex differences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 8(1), 1-14. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1974.tb01103.x
- Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., Bianchi, G., & de Paiva, V. T. (2010). Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. International Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 453-476. doi:10.1007/s10798-009-9102-z
- Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 27-38. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x
- Moè, A. (2018). Mental rotation and mathematics: Gender-stereotyped beliefs and relationships in primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 172-180. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.002
- Morin, S., Robert, J.-M., & Gabora, L. (2018). How to train future engineers to be more creative? An educative experience. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 150-166. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.05.003
- Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22. doi:10.1177/160940690200100202
- Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 129-144. doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.129
- Oh, S. S., & Lewis, G. B. (2011). Stemming inequality? Employment and pay of female and minority scientists and engineers. The Social Science Journal, 48(2), 397-403. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.11.008
- Passolunghi, M. C., Ferreira, T. I. R., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). Math-gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 70-76. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.005
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Reis, S. M. (2001). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4), 305-316. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_2
- Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Rossmann, E., & Fink, A. (2010). Do creative people use shorter associative pathways? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 891-895. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.025
- Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
- Sawyer, R. K. (2017) Creativity research and cultural context: Past, present, and future. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 352-354. doi:10.1002/jocb.204
- Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50(11-12), 835-850. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0
- Shi, Y. (2018). The puzzle of missing female engineers: Academic preparation, ability beliefs, and preferences. Economics of Education Review, 64, 129-143. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.04.005
- Starko, A. J. (2005). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98. doi:10. 1207/s15326934crj1801_10
- Turner, S. (2009). ASIT − A problem solving strategy for education and eco-friendly sustainable design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(2), 221-235. doi:10. 1007/s10798-008-9080-6
- Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201-226. doi:10.2307/249576
- Woolf, V. (1957). A room of one’s own. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(3)】September (Special Issue: Creativity, STEAM and Maker Education)
(Special Issue) Exploring Creativity in the World of Five Women Majoring in Science and Engineering: How They Interpret Creativity and How Their Educational Backgrounds Affect Their Creativity
Author: Yuk-Ying Sung (Little Angel United Clinic), Chen-Yao Kao (Department of Special Education, National University of Tainan)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.3
Date：September 2019
Pages：55-84
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0003
Abstract：
This study examined how women majoring in science and engineering interpreted creativity and how their life experiences affected their expression of creativity. This study used a qualitative research method for narrative inquiry combined with the feminist approach to explore major research questions. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit five participants. Data collection involved semistructured in-depth interviews, document review, and observation. Data analysis revealed six qualities these women had in common: earnestness, goal orientation, preference for flexibility, professional and academic confidence, diverse interests, and proactive attitudes. From the perspective of ability, these women defined creativity as the ability to solve problems, to produce problems, to express themselves, and to facilitate transformation. They believed that the ability to solve problems was at the heart of creativity, which was in line with the essence of scientific creativity. For key elements in creative products, they mentioned novelty, cost-performance ratio, customization, aesthetic feeling, and playfulness. Moreover, they believed that logical reasoning derived from their professional training was helpful for their expression of creativity, supporting the argument that convergent thinking is integral to creativity. Notably, these women mentioned that creativity could be expressed not merely in arts but in any human endeavor, upholding the viewpoint that creativity exists in every field. This also implies that some empirical studies’ use of college students’ majors as a means for categorizing them into high- and low-creativity groups is inappropriate and suggests that such research design should be avoided in future.
Keywords：convergent thinking, creativity, divergent thinking, females majoring in science and engineering