（專題）設計STEAM課程培養國小學生的STEAM素養：以「動物模仿獸」為例
作者:國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系盧秀琴、新北市光華國小馬士茵
卷期：64卷第3期
日期： 2019年9月
頁碼：85-118
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0004
摘要：
跨領域STEAM課程的專題研究能培養國小學生的STEAM素養，是全球的教育趨勢，也是我國十二年國民基本教育的教學重點。本研究採個案研究法，以國小五年級一個班級共28位學生為研究對象，由三位不同領域的協同教師設計「動物模仿獸」的STEAM專題研究，教導學生動物的特殊習性、撰寫Arduino設計程式、選擇材料組裝動物模仿獸；各組學生以兩個月的時間撰寫Arduino程式操控感應器以模仿動物的特殊習性、畫設計圖、組裝動物模仿獸。研究者蒐集Arduino學習單、動物模仿獸討論單、學習日誌、動物模仿獸作品、半結構式晤談、教師省思札記等質性資料，進行編碼、分類與詮釋。研究結果顯示：一、各組學生能撰寫Arduino程式去操控各種感應器，達到動物模仿獸身體顏色、叫聲頻率、改變發光頻率的效果；二、各組學生從畫設計圖到組裝的過程，學會正確測量容積、選擇正確材料以組裝動物模仿獸，呈現模仿獸的完整功能，以及具有特色的造型與質感；三、各組學生從STEAM專題研究中培養STEAM素養，擁有跨領域的整合能力。
關鍵詞：Arduino程式設計、STEAM素養、STEAM專題研究、協同教學、動物模仿獸
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 呂秀蓮（2018）。下世代教育─STEAM新素養。清華教育，95，1。 【Lu, H.-L. (2018). The next generation of education − STEAM new literacy. Tsinghua Education, 95, 1.】
- 柳棟、吳俊杰、謝作如、沈涓（2013）。STEM、STEAM課程與可能的實踐路線。中小學信息技術雜誌，6，39-41。 【Liu, D., Wu, J.-J., Xie, Z.-R., & Shen, J. (2013). STEM, STEAM courses and possible practice routes. Journal of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Schools, 6, 39-41.】
- 范斯淳、游光昭（2016）。科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，61（2），153-183。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06 【Fan, S.-Z., & You, G.-Z. (2016). Core value and implementation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum in technology education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 153-183. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06】
- 教育部（2019a）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要─自然科學領域課程手冊。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2019a). The outline of the 12-year national basic education curriculum outline − Natural science course manual. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部（2019b）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要─科技領域課程手冊。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2019b). The outline of the 12-year national basic education curriculum outline − Science and technology course manual. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
» 展開更多
- 呂秀蓮（2018）。下世代教育─STEAM新素養。清華教育，95，1。 【Lu, H.-L. (2018). The next generation of education − STEAM new literacy. Tsinghua Education, 95, 1.】
- 柳棟、吳俊杰、謝作如、沈涓（2013）。STEM、STEAM課程與可能的實踐路線。中小學信息技術雜誌，6，39-41。 【Liu, D., Wu, J.-J., Xie, Z.-R., & Shen, J. (2013). STEM, STEAM courses and possible practice routes. Journal of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Schools, 6, 39-41.】
- 范斯淳、游光昭（2016）。科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，61（2），153-183。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06 【Fan, S.-Z., & You, G.-Z. (2016). Core value and implementation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum in technology education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 153-183. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06】
- 教育部（2019a）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要─自然科學領域課程手冊。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2019a). The outline of the 12-year national basic education curriculum outline − Natural science course manual. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部（2019b）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要─科技領域課程手冊。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2019b). The outline of the 12-year national basic education curriculum outline − Science and technology course manual. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 陳怡倩（2017）。從STEAM的A來看美國STEAM教育。香港美術教育期刊，1（1），4-9。 【Chen, I.-C. (2017). View STEAM education in the US from A of STEAM. Hong Kong Art Education Journal, 1(1), 4-9.】
- 陳雅君、洪瑞兒、佘曉清、林煥祥（2016）。臺灣學生科學素養與科學教學者研究成果表現之發展趨勢探討。科學教育學刊，24（4），333-354。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2016.2404.01 【Chen, Y.-J., Hong, Z.-R, She, H.-C., & Lin, H.-S. (2016). Exploring the trend of Taiwan students’ scientific literacy and science educators’ research performance. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 333-354. doi:10. 6173/CJSE.2016.2404.01】
- 郭禎祥、陳瓊花、陳箐繡、蔡芷芬、陳建伶（2000）。藝術欣賞課程教師手冊─中學美術篇。臺北市：藝術館。【Kuo, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., Chen, J.-S., Tsai, C.-F., & Chen, C.-L. (2000). Art appreciation course teacher’s handbook − Middle school art. Taipei, Taiwan: Art Museum.】
- 黃永和、莊淑琴（2004）。「協同教學」的回顧與展望。教育研究月刊，117，64-77。 【Huang, Y.-H., & Zhuang, S.-Q. (2004). Review and outlook of “cooperative teaching.” Journal of Education Research, 117, 64-77.】
- 廖敦如（2018）。大學藝術與設計專業課程融入社會實踐之探究─以地方文化加值設計為例。教育科學研究期刊，63（1），207-245。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).07 【Liao, T.-J. (2018). Integrating social practice into the specialty program of art and design in universities: An example of a value-added concept for the local culture. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(1), 207-245. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).07】
- 賓靜蓀（2017）。5大精神，培養STEAM新素養。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7026/2442230 【Bin, J.-Y. (2017). The 5 spirits cultivate STEAM new literacy. Retrieved from https://udn.com/news/story/7026/ 2442230】
- 趙慧臣、周昱希、李彥奇、劉亞同、文潔（2017）。跨學科視野下「工匠型」創新人才的培養策略─基於美國STEAM教育活動設計的啟示。遠程教育雜誌，1，94-101。 【Zhao, H.-C., Zhou, Y.-X., Li, Y.-Q., Liu, Y.-T., & Wen, J. (2017). The strategies of innovative talents with craftsman spirit cultivation from the perspective of interdisciplinary: The enlightenment of activities design about STEAM education in USA. Journal of Distance Education, 1, 94-101.】
- 趙慧臣、陸曉婷（2016）。發展STEAM教育，提高學生創新能力─訪美國STEAM教育知名學者格雷特．亞克門教授。開放教育研究，22（5），4-10。doi:10.13966/j.cnki. kfjyyj.2016.05.001 【Zhao, H.-C., & Lu, X.-T. (2016). Develop STEAM education and improve students’ ability to innovate − Visit the famous scholar of STEAM education in the United States, Gret. Professor Yakemen. Open Education Research, 22(5), 4-10. doi:10.13966/j.cnki. kfjyyj.2016.05.001】
- 蔡淑玲（2017）。程式教育將納入課綱，會不會寫程式有這麼重要嗎？取自https://www.bnext. com.tw/article/46116/coding-programmer-scratch 【Tai, S.-L. (2017). Program education will be included in the curriculum outline. Is it so important to write a program? Retrieved from https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/46116/coding-programmer-scratch】
- 盧秀琴、洪榮昭、陳芬芳（2019）。設計STEAM課程的協同教學─以「感控式綠建築」為例。教育學報，47（1），113-133。 【Lu, C.-C., Hong, J.-C., & Chen, F.-F. (2019). Designing a collaborative teaching of the STEAM course: The case of “green building with sensor-controls.” Education Journal, 47(1), 113-133.】
- 簡佑宏、朱柏穎、簡爾君（2017）。STEAM取向之Maker教學。中等教育，68（2），12-28。doi:10.6249/SE.2017.68.2.02 【Chien, Y.-H., Chu, P.-Y., & Chien, E.-J. (2017). STEAM-oriented Maker curriculum. Secondary Education, 68(2), 12-28. doi:10.6249/SE.2017.68.2.02】
- 顏佩如、溫羚勻（2016）。業師協同教學之教學策略與學習成效之研究。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，8，3-40。 【Yan, P.-R., & Wen, L.-Y. (2016). Research on the teaching strategies and learning outcomes of the collaborative teaching of the division. National Education Institute Educational Pulse Electronic Journal, 8, 3-40.】
- Allan, F., Mort, S., & Brian, A. (2008). NSTA presentation－STEM RAYS franklin county STEM research academies for young scientists. Retrieved from http://umassk12.net/rays/about.php
- Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 85- 125. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1349
- Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2016). Student teachers’ team teaching: How do learners in the classroom experience team-taught lessons by student teachers? Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, 42(1), 93-105. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015. 1135226
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
- Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
- Council of Arts Accrediting Associations. (2009). Disciplines in combination: Interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and other collaborative programs of study. Reston, VA: Author.
- Fang, N. (2013). Increasing high school students’ interest in STEM education through collaborative brainstorming with yo-yos. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14(4), 8-14.
- Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Retrieved from http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf
- Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96-122. doi:10.30707/JSTE48.1Herschbach
- Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Szeto, E., Tai, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-R. (2016). Positive affect relevant to epistemic curiosity to reflect continuance intention to join a hands-on making contest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2267-2279. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1276a
- Jacobs, J. A., & Frickel, S. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 43-65. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115954
- Kamen, J., & Maeda, J. (2013). STEM to STEAM: Art is key to building a strong economy. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/stem-to-steam-art-is-key_b_2123099
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Long, R. L., II., & Davis, S. S. (2017). Using STEAM to increase engagement and literacy across disciplines. The STEAM Journal, 3(1), 1-11. doi:10.5642/steam.20170301.07
- Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students’ learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 161-183. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9112-x
- Lu, C.-C., & Chen, F.-F. (2018, June). STEAM used in designing and teaching the “biology and environment” unit in the elementary school. Paper presented at International Symposium on Education and Social Sciences, Okinawa Convention Center, Okinawa Island.
- Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + art = STEAM. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), 1-3. doi:10.5642/steam. 201301.34
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Olds, S. A., Patel, C. D., Yalvac, B., Kanter, D. E., & Goel, N. (2004). Developing a standards-based K-12 engineering curricula through partnerships with university students and industry. In Engineering Researchs New Heights (Ed.), ASEE annual conference proceedings (pp. 3151-3156), Salt Lake City, UT.
- Robinson, B., & Schaible, R. M. (1995). Collaborative teaching: Reaping the benefits. College Teaching, 43(2), 57-59. doi:10.1080/87567555.1995.9925515
- Tang, K. S., & Williams, P. J. (2018). STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs. Review of Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3162
- Toulmin, C. N., & Groome, M. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math agenda. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496324.pdf
- Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2013). Community partnerships for fostering student interest and engagement in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14(2), 47-55.
- Wilhelmsson, M., Pelling, S., Uhlin, L., Dahlgren, L. O., Faresjö, T., & Forslund, K. (2012). How to think about interprofessional competence: A metacognitive model. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(2), 85-91. doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.644644
- Wynn, T., & Harris, J. (2012). Toward a STEM + arts curriculum: Creating the teacher team. Art Education, 65(5), 42-47. doi:10.1080/00043125.2012.11519191
- Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STEAM? – A brief overview of STEAM education. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/8113832/What_is_the_Point_of_STEAM_A_Brief_Overview_ of_STEAM_Education
- Yakman, G. (2011). STEAM: Learning that is representative of the whole world. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/Georgette_Yakman_STEAM_-_Learning_That_is_Representative_of_the_Whole_World
- Yakman, G. (2013). STEAM education program description. Retrieved from https://4.files.edl.io/ 42d1/08/09/18/184755-6b4466a4-a3ea-47ef-886c-4d131a9b1934.pdf
- Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(3)】September (Special Issue: Creativity, STEAM and Maker Education)
(Special Issue) Design STEAM Course to Train STEAM Literacy of Primary Students: Taking “Animal Mimicry Beast” as an Example
Author: Chow-Chin Lu (Department of Science Education, National Taipei University of Education),Shih-Yin Ma (New Taipei Guang Hua Elementary School)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.3
Date：September 2019
Pages：85-118
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0004
Abstract：
Research on cross-disciplinary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEAM) curriculums could help primary students to develop their STEAM literacy. STEAM represents a global education trend and the target of Taiwanese students’ 12-year compulsory education. In this case study, 28 students from a fifth-grade elementary school class were included as research participants. The STEAM curriculum theme of “animal mimicry beast” was chosen by three teachers from various fields to teach students about the specific behaviors of animals, to write Arduino design programs, and to select materials for assembling animal mimicry beasts. After the teaching, the students wrote Arduino program control sensors to mimic animals’ individual behaviors, drew design diagrams, and assembled animal mimicry beasts during 2 months. The data collected included Arduino learning sheets, animal mimicry discussion lists, learning logs, animal mimicry beast works, semi structured interviews, and teacher feedback for data coding, classification, and interpretation. The results indicated that (1) each group of students was able to write Arduino programs to control various sensors and enable animal mimicry beasts to change color, tweet frequency, or light frequency. (2) Each group of students who created design diagrams and assembled animal mimicry beasts learned to correctly measure volume; to select appropriate materials for assembling animal mimicry beasts; and to present their animals’ full functionality, distinctive shapes, and textures. (3) Each group of students developed STEAM literacy from their STEAM projects studies and exhibited cross-disciplinary integration capabilities.
Keywords：animal mimicry beast, Arduino programming, collaborative teaching, STEAM literacy, STEAM project study