（專題）創意問題解決模式對大學生創造力之影響與團隊凝聚力之關聯性
作者:國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所陳秀玲、國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所陳宥蓉
卷期： 64卷第3期
日期：2019年9月
頁碼：169-201
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0007
摘要：
本研究旨在探討創意問題解決模式對工程學院大學生創造力之影響並探討其創造力與團隊凝聚力之關聯性。研究情境實施在臺灣北部某所公立大學機械工程系課程，研究編製創意問題解決模式，融入「工業4.0理論與實務」專題實作課程，教學課程為期18週，參與者為48名大專生，並將其分為四人小組製作創意專題。本研究採用混合研究設計，蒐集問卷調查（團隊凝聚力問卷）、創造力測量（創意繪圖展開測驗）與半結構式訪談等方式，深入瞭解創意問題解決歷程融入創意思考教學之有效性。本研究採用描述性統計、t檢驗與Pearson相關分析量化之結果。質化分析則採用半結構式訪談來支持量化之結果。研究結果顯示，機械工程系大學生在創意繪圖展開測驗的表現中前後測有顯著性的改善；在學生的創意思考方面，「創新性的創造力」也有顯著性的變化。此外，從質性結果中，發現部分學生對於課堂中教授的創意問題解決步驟和創意思維技巧給予肯定的評價，也有部分學生指出影響其創意產品製作和團隊凝聚力的可能困難和原因。最後，根據量化與質化分析之研究結果，本研究提出研究限制與相關建議，以供教育現場教師及未來相關研究之參考。
關鍵詞：創意問題解決、創意思考、工業4.0、團隊凝聚力
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72-81. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.003
- Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. HBS No. 396-239. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
- Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14
- Bailin, S. (1994). Achieving extraordinary ends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
» 展開更多
- Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72-81. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.003
- Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. HBS No. 396-239. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
- Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14
- Bailin, S. (1994). Achieving extraordinary ends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 58(1), 49-69. doi:10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5
- Boden, M. A. (1994). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75-117). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/2437.003.0006
- Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Buisine, S., Vandendriessche, C., Glaveanu, V., & Lubart, T. (2017). Engineering students’ use of creativity and development tools in conceptual product design: What, when and how? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 104-117. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.016
- Britz, J., & Richard, N. (1992). Problem solving in the early childhood classroom. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 1-30). New York, NY: Atherton Press. doi:10.1037/13117-001
- Carbonell, P., & Rodríguez Escudero, A. I. (2018). The dark side of team social cohesion in NPD team boundary spanning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 149-171. doi:10.1111/jpim.12473
- Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century US workforce. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2017). Does diversity actually increase creativity? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/06/does-diversity-actually-increase-creativity
- Clapham, M. M. (1997). Ideational skills training: A key element in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 33-44. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_4
- Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210. doi:10.5465/255754
- Davidson, N. (1985). Small-group learning and teaching in mathematics: A selective review of the research. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 211-230). New York, NY: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9_8
- Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 269-281). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon.
- Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50. doi:10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.03
- Ekvall, G. (1991). The organizational culture of idea-management: A creative climate for the management of ideas. In J. Henry & D. Walker (Eds.), Managing innovation (pp. 73-79). London, UK: Sage.
- Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006). How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 175-222. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27005-9
- Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). Concern for discovery in the creative process. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 161-165). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 27-51. doi:10.1080/10400418809534285
- Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
- Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267-293. doi:10.1037/h0040755
- Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Guilford, J. P. (1970). Creativity: Retrospect and prospect. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 4(3), 149-168. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1970.tb00856.x
- Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. New York, NY: Bearly Limited.
- Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. doi:10. 2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
- Hamalainen, R. (2008). Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning. Computers & Education, 50(1), 98-109. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.001
- Hill, N. S., Offermann, L. R., & Thomas, K. (2018). Mitigating the detrimental impact of maximum negative affect on team cohesion and performance through face-to-face communication. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 211-238. doi:10.1177/1059601118776835
- Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. doi:10.1287/ orsc.12.4.435.10635
- Hong, J.-C., Chen, P.-H., Su, S.-Z., & Tai, K.-H. (2019). Revolutionary drawing: Measuring adaptive and innovative creativity. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 193-218.
- Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Product creativity: Conceptual model, measurement and characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(4), 395-412. doi:10.1080/14639220500078195
- Hsieh, C.-Y. (2018). Developing design through a creative problem‐solving process: A group community art project. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 541-553. doi:10.1111/jade.12155
- Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978
- Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 75-101.
- Jeng, J.-H., & Tang, T.-I. (2004). A model of knowledge integration capability. Journal of Information, Technology and Society, 4(1), 19-44.
- Joo, B.-K., Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., & Yoon, S. W. (2012). Team creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, developmental feedback and team cohesion. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(2), 77-91. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00395.x
- Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Resource review: Creativity. Change, 39(4), 55-58.
- Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
- Kirton, M. J. (2004). Adaption-innovation: In the context of diversity and change. London, UK: Routledge.
- Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F. J., & Holt, K. D. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52(3), 233-248. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00879.x
- Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20-47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
- Kuo, Y.-H., Chien, Y.-K., Wang, W.-R., Chen, C.-H., Chen, L.-S., & Liu, C.-K. (2012). Development of a home-based telehealthcare model for improving the effectiveness of the chronic care of stroke patients. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 28(1), 38-43. doi:10.1016/j.kjms.2011.10.001
- Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.020
- Lemons, G. (2005). When the horse drinks: Enhancing everyday creativity using elements of improvisation. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 25-36. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_3
- Lewis, T. (2006). Creativity: A framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 35-52.
- Lissitz, R. W., & Willhoft, J. L. (1985). A methodological study of the Torrance Tests of Creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22(1), 1-11. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1985.tb01044.x
- Livingston, L. (2010). Teaching creativity in higher education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(2), 59-62. doi:10.1080/10632910903455884
- Lubart, T. I. (1994). Product-centered self-evaluation and the creative process (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Yale University, New Haven, CT.
- MacKinnon, D. W. (1987). Some critical issues for future research in creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 120-130). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.
- Martz, B., Hughes, J., & Braun, F. (2017). Creativity and problem-solving: Closing the skills gap. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(1), 39-48. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1181492
- Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130-160. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- McCarthey, S. J., & McMahon, S. (1992). From convention to invention: Three approaches to peer interactions during writing. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 17-35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031
- Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 87-111. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004
- Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York, NY: Charles Scribener’s Sons.
- Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York, NY: Scribners.
- Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2014). Helping children learn mathematics (11th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
- Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
- Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3), 243-253. doi:10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
- Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 521-547. doi:10.1177/1059601116636476
- Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16-21.
- Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
- Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 550-558. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.550
- Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13. doi:10.1177/003172171209400203
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. London, UK: Academic Press.
- Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
- Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179-185. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179
- Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1-31. doi:10.1159/000277029
- Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of Creativity, 1, 3-15. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511807916.003
- Taylor, C. W., & Sacks, D. (1981). Facilitating lifetime creative processes − A think piece. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(3), 116-118. doi:10.1177/001698628102500306
- Titus, P. A. (2000). Marketing and the creative problem-solving process. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(3), 225-235. doi:10.1177/0273475300223006
- Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking − Norms-technical manual research edition − Verbal tests, forms A and B − Figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
- Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking norms − Technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
- Torrance, E. P. (1998). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking norms − Technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
- Toyama, H., & Mauno, S. (2016). Associations of trait emotional intelligence with social support, work engagement, and creativity in Japanese eldercare nurses. Japanese Psychological Research, 59(1), 14-25. doi:10.1111/jpr.12139
- Treffinger, D. J. (1987). Research on creativity assessment. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 103-119). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.
- Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 342- 353. doi:10.1177/001698620504900407
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York, NY: John Wiley.
- Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403-413. doi:10.1111/jcal.12029
- Wallace, D. B., & Gruber, H. E. (Eds.). (1992). Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Yang, H.-L., & Cheng, H.-H. (2010). Creativity of student information system projects: From the perspective of network embeddedness. Computers & Education, 54(1), 209-221. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.004
- Zander, A. (1979). The psychology of group processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1), 417-451. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002221
- Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(3)】September (Special Issue: Creativity, STEAM and Maker Education)
(Special Issue) Influence of a Creative Problem-Solving Approach on College Students’ Creativity and Its Relation With Team Cohesion
Author: Hsiu-Ling Chen (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology),Yu-Jung Chen (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.3
Date：September 2019
Pages：169-201
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0007
Abstract：
This study attempts to present further perspectives upon the effectiveness of developing creative thinking among engineering majors in college both through the incorporation of creative problem-solving (CPS) method and the influence of team cohesion in an engineering course so as to explore the impact of the proposed pedagogical approach on students’ creative thinking. The 18-week course plan created in this research features the context of Industry 4.0. A total of 48 participants were enrolled in the course and divided into groups each of which was expected to develop a thematic project. To provide a holistic understanding of the CPS approach’s influence on students’ creativity, the present research applied a mixed methodology, which included survey questionnaires (team cohesion questionnaire), creativity measurement (creativity test), as well as semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics, t-test and Pearson product-moment correlation were adopted to analyze the quantitative results. Qualitative contents of semi-structured interviews were used to support the quantitative data. The results showed that the engineering college students had a significant improvement between their pre-test score on creativity and their post-test score. Furthermore, a significant change in students’ types of creative thinking was also found in terms of their innovative creativity. Besides, interviews with student participants echoed with the quantitative results and showed preferences among students toward certain types of creativity. The qualitative results reveal how some students praised the benefits of the CPS steps as well as those of creative thinking techniques taught in class, how some of them also pointed out the difficulties and reasons that might have influenced their development of a team project, and how the same challenges caused them to struggle with creative thinking and the maintenance of team cohesion. Finally, the research results are summarized and limitations are acknowledged to engage instructors and future studies in a discussion about the implementation of creative training among students and about how it may facilitate their creative thinking.
Keywords：creative problem-solving, creative thinking, Industry 4.0, team cohesion