(專題)從教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐論國語文教育政策之困境與契機
作者:國家教育研究院原住民族教育研究中心陳茹玲、國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系柯華葳、國立臺北教育大學臺灣文化研究所蔡佩眞
卷期:65卷第1期
日期:2020年3月
頁碼:47-91
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003
摘要:
本研究以12名中學國語文教師為研究對象,就教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐三個面向,進行結構化深度訪談,將所得資料轉譯為口語報告,再進行編碼與歸類分析。期透過教育理想與教育現場兩方對話,對語文教育政策之落實現況更深入理解,並據此提出國語文教育的政策建議。本研究結果顯示:一、教師最關注教師專業,具備高省思與評鑑能力,期待專業成長,盼望將所學轉化運用於課室。不過,教育單位提供的精進課程未能符合需求,在進行時也欠缺適當配套措施,且未能有足夠時間讓教師轉化所學,影響落實的成效。二、國語文課綱揭示的素養有關概念已內化為教師認知,但高層次概念較少被提及。三、各校硬體資源分配不平均,教學運用上仍可再精進。教學文本趨精美多元,但選文未符整體性、脈絡化與多元化,且教師對教材有較大依賴性,少數自編教材亦較少納入核心素養。四、現場教學活動多元,趨向學習者中心。但學生能力、評量與家長期待等因素,影響新式教學的落實。綜上,本研究對國語文教育建議如下:一、植基於教師專業知能與專業成長期待,規劃精進課程,提供課務協助有關配套措施,並培養轉化能力。二、將教師教學想像與更高層次的課綱目標連結,以有效落實課綱精神。三、善用教師的專業與教學經驗,改善教科書選文,同時鼓勵教師教材編撰,使其更系統、多元,符合學生經驗與課綱精神。四、將課綱揭示的高層次能力與評量結合,使教學朝向政策目標,同時增加素養教學意義之社會宣導,以協助教師更順利達成素養教學的目標。
關鍵詞:教師認知、教學資源、教學實踐、語文教育政策、課程綱要
《詳全文》
參考文獻:
- 方正一、洪志成(2013)。指派教師研習與學校對策間的拉扯:教師專業觀點。嘉大教育研究學刊,30,97-122。 【Fang, Z.-Y., & Hung, C.-C. (2013). The tugs between administrators and teachers who were compelled to participate in in-service training from the perspectives of teacher profession. National Chiayi University Journal of the Educational Research, 30, 97-122.】
- 王基倫(2015)。國語文教學現場的省思。臺北市:萬卷樓。 【Wang, C.-L. (2015). Thinking in the mandarin teaching scene. Taipei, Taiwan: Wan Juan Book.】
- 吳忠宏、廖麗卿、林政逸(2013)。國中國文教科書環境教育議題之內容分析。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,27(2),1-26。 【Wu, C.-H., Liao, L.-C., & Lin, J.-Y. (2013). A study on the environmental education issues within the Chinese literature textbooks of junior high schools: Content analysis approach. Journal of National Taichung University: Education, 27(2), 1-26.】
- 吳清山(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009 【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
- 李涵鈺、楊國揚(2017)。數位教科書教學設計之現況與問題探討。清華教育學報,34(1),71-104。doi:10.3966/252190062017063401003 【Li, H.-Y., & Yang, K.-Y. (2017). Current situation of and problems in digital textbook instructional design. Tsing Hua Journal of Educational Research, 34(1), 71-104. doi:10.3966/252190062017063401003】
» 展開更多
- 方正一、洪志成(2013)。指派教師研習與學校對策間的拉扯:教師專業觀點。嘉大教育研究學刊,30,97-122。 【Fang, Z.-Y., & Hung, C.-C. (2013). The tugs between administrators and teachers who were compelled to participate in in-service training from the perspectives of teacher profession. National Chiayi University Journal of the Educational Research, 30, 97-122.】
- 王基倫(2015)。國語文教學現場的省思。臺北市:萬卷樓。 【Wang, C.-L. (2015). Thinking in the mandarin teaching scene. Taipei, Taiwan: Wan Juan Book.】
- 吳忠宏、廖麗卿、林政逸(2013)。國中國文教科書環境教育議題之內容分析。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,27(2),1-26。 【Wu, C.-H., Liao, L.-C., & Lin, J.-Y. (2013). A study on the environmental education issues within the Chinese literature textbooks of junior high schools: Content analysis approach. Journal of National Taichung University: Education, 27(2), 1-26.】
- 吳清山(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009 【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
- 李涵鈺、楊國揚(2017)。數位教科書教學設計之現況與問題探討。清華教育學報,34(1),71-104。doi:10.3966/252190062017063401003 【Li, H.-Y., & Yang, K.-Y. (2017). Current situation of and problems in digital textbook instructional design. Tsing Hua Journal of Educational Research, 34(1), 71-104. doi:10.3966/252190062017063401003】
- 周彥君(2013)。九年一貫課程改革運作狀況之研究。教育學術彙刊,5,103-130。 【Chou, Y.-C. (2013). Research on operative situation of grade 1-9 curriculum reform. Bulletin of Education Research, 5, 103-130.】
- 林孟君、孫劍秋(2012)。從九年一貫國語文課程綱要到教師課程轉化。國文天地,342,134-142。 【Lin, M.-C., & Hsun, C.-C. (2012). From the grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines of mandarin to the curriculum transformation of mandarin teachers. The World of Mandarin Language and Literature, 342, 134-142.】
- 林易萱、龔心怡(2017)。教師信念、專業承諾與班級經營效能比較之研究-以國高中新手與資深教師為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10(2),111-138。doi:10.3966/207136492017081002005 【Lin, Y.-H., & Kung, S.-Y. (2017). Teacher’s belief, professional commitment and classroom management effectiveness: A comparison of novice and senior teachers in junior and senior high schools in Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 10(2), 111-138. doi:10.3966/207136492017081002005】
- 林美淑(2013)。九年一貫國語教科書修辭教材編選內容分析之探究-以「南一版」備課教學指引為例。新竹教育大學人文社會學報,6(1),121-152。doi:10.29895/ATFSAS.201303_6(1).0005 【Lin, M.-S. (2013). The content analysis of compiling rhetorical teaching materials on nine-year consistent mandarin language textbook: Teacher’s guideline of nan-yi publisher as the sample. Journal of Hummanities and Social Sciences of NHCUE, 6(1), 121-152. doi:10.29895/ATFSAS.201303_6(1).0005】
- 侯一欣(2011)。學校課程決策的另一層思考:以教師為主體。教師專業研究期刊,1,5-22。doi:10.7054/JPT.201106.000 【Hou, Y.-H. (2011). What decided about school curriculum policy should take teacher’s value in considerations. Journal of Professional Teachers, 1, 5-22. doi:10.7054/JPT.201106.000】
- 姚振黎(2006,8月)。從「孔子在哭泣」到〈搶救臺灣中文力〉─臺灣語文教育改革的理念與實施。論文發表於全國大學語文研究會第十一屆年會,南京市。 【Yao, Z.-C. (2006, August). Taiwan language education reform with concept and practice. Paper presented at the 11th Conference of National College Chinese Research Institute, Nanjing, China.】
- 國家教育研究院(2015)。十二年國民基本教育國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校「語文領域—國語文」課程綱要草案分區公聽會意見回應表。臺北市:作者。 【National Academy for Education Research. (2015). Curriculum guidelines of 12-Year basic education general guidelines-public hearings comment form with Mandarin curriculum guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 徐佳瑀(2018)。論校長正向領導對教師教學效能之影響。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(12),47-51。【Hsu, J.-Y. (2018). Principals’ positive leadership impact on teachers’ teaching effectiveness. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 7(12), 47-51.】
- 張學謙(2011)。語言復振的理念與實務。臺北市:翰蘆。 【Chang, H.-C. (2011). Language revitalization: Concept & practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Hanlu.】
- 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市:作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2003). Grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部(2017)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:總綱。臺北市:作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2017). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education general guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 曹逢甫(1997)。母語政策─海峽兩岸的比較。臺北市:文鶴。 【Tsao, F.-F. (1997). Mother tongue language policy: Compare with Taiwan and Mainland China. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.】
- 曹逢甫(2011)。語言政策、語言教育的回顧與前瞻。臺北市:聯經。 【Tsao, F.-F. (2011). Language policy and language education between past and future. Taipei, Taiwan: Linking Books.】
- 梁鳳珠(2012)。教師教學信念之影響因素分析。教育研究論壇,3(2),157-172。doi:10.6480/FER.201206.0157 【Liang, F.-C. (2012). A study of teacher’s teaching belief. Forum of Education Research, 3(2), 157-172. doi:10. 6480/FER.201206.0157
- 陳文彥、潘慧玲(2019)。校長領導對教師學習領導的影響:檢視信任關係與學業強調的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),119-147。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0005 【Chen, W.-Y., & Pan, H.-L. (2019). The effect of principal leadership on teacher leadership for learning: How trust and academic emphasis moderate? Journal of research in education sciences, 64(1), 119-147. doi:10.6209/ JORIES.201903_64(1).0005】
- 陳伯璋(1999,3月)。九年一貫課程理念與倫理分析。論文發表於九年一貫課程發展系列研討會,臺北市。 【Chen, P.-C. (1999, March). An analysis of grade 1-9 curriculum ideas and ethics. Paper presented at the Grade 1-9 Curriculum Development Series Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 陳利銘、王文科(2006)。制度化文本對課程改革的影響:以九年一貫課程為例。國民教育研究集刊,15,1-14。doi:10.7038/BREE.200612. 0001 【Chen, L.-M., & Wang, W.-K. (2006). The impact of institutionalized text on curriculum reform: In the case of grade 1-9 curriculum. Bulletin of Research on Elementary Education, 15, 1-14. doi:10.7038/BREE.200612.0001】
- 陳美如(1998)。臺灣語文教育政策之回顧與展望。高雄市:復文。 【Chen, M.-J. (1998). Taiwan language education policy between past and future. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: FuWen Books.】
- 陳茹玲、柯華葳(2017)。我國語文教育政策現況研究(I):國語語文教育政策現況研究。國家教育研究院期末報告(NAER-106-08-F-1-03-04-1-09)。臺北市:國家教育研究院。 【Chen, J.-L., & Ko, H.-W. (2017). A research report of language education policy in Taiwan: Mandarin education policy. National Academy for Educational Research Report (NAER-106-08-F-1-03-04-1-09). Taipei, Taiwan: National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 陳康宜(2005,4月10日)。時數不足,國語文教學首要問題。國語日報,2版。 【Chen, K.-Y. (2005, April 10). The first question in mandarin teaching about lack of teaching hours. Mandarin Daily News, p. 2.】
- 游美惠(2000)。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究,8,5-42。doi:10.7014/TCYC.200008.0005 【You, M.-H. (2000). Content analysis, textual analysis and discourse analysis in social research. Survey Research — Method and Application, 8, 5-42. doi:10.7014/TCYC.200008.0005】
- 黃宣範(1993)。語言、社會與族群意識:臺灣語言社會學的研究。臺北市:文鶴。 【Huang, S.-F. (1993). Language, society and ethnic consciousness: Sociolinguistics study in Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.】
- 楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析法。載於楊國樞(主編),社會及行為科學研究法(下冊,pp. 809-831)。臺北市:東華書局。 【Yang, S.-J. (1989). Content analysis. In K.-S. Yang (Ed.), Social and behavioral science research (Vol. 2, pp. 809-831). Taipei, Taiwan: Tung Hua Book.】
- 劉欽敏、張永宗(2002)。從霸權的學科歧視走向平權的課程統整-九年一貫課程國中教師合理授課節數推估與建議。學校行政,17,94-104。doi:10.6423/HHHC.200201.0094 【Liu, C.-M., & Chang, Y.-T. (2002). Calculation and advice: In grade 1-9 curriculum junior high school teacher with resonable teaching sessions. School Administrators Research, 17, 94-104. doi:10.6423/HHHC.200201.0094】
- 潘麗珠(2013)。以積極思維面對十二年國教的國文教學示例-格式塔理論融入〈旅夜書懷〉之意象分析。中等教育,64(3),6-16。doi:10.6249/SE.2013.64.3.1 【Pan, L.-C. (2013). Thinking aggressively about the 12-year compulsory education: The integration of gestalt theory for symbolic analysis. Secondary Education, 64(3), 6-16. doi:10.6249/SE.2013.64.3.1】
- 蔡東鐘(2015)。電子教科書與傳統教科書對學習影響分析。教科書研究,8(2),39-72。doi:10.6481/JTR.201508_8(2).02 【Tsai, T.-C. (2015). A comparative analysis on the learning effect of electronic textbooks and paper textbooks. Journal of Textbook Research, 8(2), 39-72. doi:10.6481/JTR.201508_8(2).02】
- Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Harrison, K. D. (2007). When language die: The extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
- Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Supovitz, J. A., MacGowan, A., & Slattery, J. (1997). Assessing agreement: an examination of the interrater reliability of portfolio assessment in Rochester. Educational Assessment, 4(3), 237-259. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0403_4
Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(1)】March (Special Issue: Language and Culture Education Policies)
(Special Issue) Dilemmas and Opportunities in Mandarin Education Policy Implementation from the Perspectives of Teacher Acknowledgment, Resources, and Practice
Author: Ju-Ling Chen (Research Center for Indigenous Education, National Academy for Educational Research), Hwa-Wei Ko (Department of Education and Learning, National Tsing Hua University), Pei-Chen Tsai (Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture, National Taipei University of Education)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 65, No.1
Date:March 2020
Pages:47-91
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003
Abstract:
Structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 junior-high school Mandarin teachers to explore their opinions regarding three dimensions of Mandarin Education Policy —teacher acknowledgment, resources, and practices. The obtained data were first transcribed into verbal protocol, and classification and analysis were subsequently conducted according to a coding schema. Through discussion of the concepts and situation of Mandarin education, in-depth insight was obtained about the policy’s implementation. Based on the obtained insights, recommendations are proposed for the future Mandarin Education Policy.
The study results revealed the following: First, teachers were most concerned about their professional development, demonstrating their strong abilities of reflection and evaluation, anticipation of professional growth, and goal of translating theory into practice. However, according to teachers, the in-service training provided by existing educational institutes is unsatisfactory, involves inadequate follow-up evaluations, and provides insufficient time for practice. These factors influence the policy’s effectiveness. Second, the concepts related to literacy presented in the Mandarin curricula were internalized within teachers’ schema, but high-level literacy concepts were rarely mentioned in their reports. Third, the distribution of hardware among schools was reported to be unequal and thus can be improved. Teachers reported that the curriculum textbooks are refined and diverse but fail to form a systematic framework. Finally, teachers claimed that teaching activities are diverse and oriented toward a learner-centered teaching method. However, differences in the abilities of students, assessments, expectations of parents influence their teaching.
Based on the above observations, suggestions are presented for framing future policies pertaining to Mandarin education: First, in-service training courses should be based on the professional knowledge and growth expectations of teachers. Moreover, a habit of implementing theory into practical scenarios should be cultivated. Second, teachers should be encouraged to be more creative and undertake courses more closely related to the high level objectives of the curricula. Third, the Mandarin literature expertise and teaching experience of teachers should be utilized to improve textbook selection and compiling. Thus, the texts could be more relevant, diverse, and appropriate for students’ experiences. Finally, the high-level literacy abilities that are aims of the curricula should be incorporated into teaching materials and assessment, and promoted among parents to gain more support.
Keywords:teacher acknowledgement, teaching resources, teaching practice, mandarin education policy, language curricula