（專題）英語作為外語的國小畢業生詞彙量、詞彙閾值與閱讀理解
作者:國立臺灣師範大學通識中心暨華語文與科技研究中心胡翠君、國立臺灣師範大學學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心許媖茹、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系宋曜廷
卷期：65卷第1期
日期：2020年3月
頁碼：137-174
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0006
摘要：
本研究檢視臺灣國小畢業生英語詞彙量與閱讀理解之間的相關性，依此推估臺灣國小畢業生欲展現該學習年段閱讀理解程度所需要達到的詞彙閾值（lexical threshold），並探究臺灣國小畢業生英語詞彙量的分布狀況，以提供具體證據來評估當前國小英語詞彙學習目標（應用300個字詞）是否合理。本研究運用英語能力診斷及認證系統（Diagnosis and Certification of English Competency, DCEC），對1,903名國小畢業生進行詞彙和閱讀兩子測驗施測。本研究有三重貢獻：第一為瞭解臺灣小學生畢業時的詞彙量分布概況；其二為闡明設定詞彙量、詞彙閾值對於設計理想英語文課綱與課程的重要性；其三為彌補英語文課綱詞彙量設定時未採用實徵證據之不足。倡議詞彙量之設定，應從語言技能運用的觀點，先提出各階段所欲達成的語言技能層次，再探討獲致該語言技能層次所需的詞彙閾值（最小詞彙量），最後以該詞彙閾值作為課綱詞彙量設定之參考。
關鍵詞：英語文課綱、詞彙量、詞彙閾值、閱讀理解
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 中華人民共和國教育部（2011）。義務教育英語課程標準。北京市：北京師範大學出版社。【Minstry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2011). English Curriculum Standards for compulsory Education. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.】
- 曾芬蘭、鍾長宏、陳世玉、張銘秋（2018）。國中課室素養導向標準本位評量的設計與應用：以英語科閱讀為例。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），119-155。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_ 63(4).0005【Tseng, F.-L., Chung, C.-H., Chen, S.-Y., & Chang, M.-C. (2018). Development and implementation of a standardized junior high school classroom literacy assessment: English reading comprehension as an example. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 119-155. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0005】
- 張武昌、許月貴、林至誠、程玉秀、陳浩然、陳秋蘭（2012）。中小學英語課程綱要整合型研究。國家教育研究院整合型計畫報告（NAER-100-12-A-1-02-00-3-02）。新北市：國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心。【Chang, W.-C., Hsu, Y.-K., Lin, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-H., Chen, H.-R., & Chen, C.-L. (2012). An integrated study on Taiwan's elementary and secondary school English curricula. Report for National Academy for Educational Research (NAER-100-12-A-1-02-00-3-02). New Taipei, Taiwan: Research Center for Curriculum and Instruction, National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域－英語文。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Language domain for elementary, junior high school and upper secondary school education – English. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- Aidinlou, N. A., & Vaskehmahalleh, M. T. (2017). The relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ reading comprehension, vocabulary size and lexical coverage of the text. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(3), 291-300.
» 展開更多
- 中華人民共和國教育部（2011）。義務教育英語課程標準。北京市：北京師範大學出版社。【Minstry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2011). English Curriculum Standards for compulsory Education. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.】
- 曾芬蘭、鍾長宏、陳世玉、張銘秋（2018）。國中課室素養導向標準本位評量的設計與應用：以英語科閱讀為例。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），119-155。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_ 63(4).0005【Tseng, F.-L., Chung, C.-H., Chen, S.-Y., & Chang, M.-C. (2018). Development and implementation of a standardized junior high school classroom literacy assessment: English reading comprehension as an example. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 119-155. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0005】
- 張武昌、許月貴、林至誠、程玉秀、陳浩然、陳秋蘭（2012）。中小學英語課程綱要整合型研究。國家教育研究院整合型計畫報告（NAER-100-12-A-1-02-00-3-02）。新北市：國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心。【Chang, W.-C., Hsu, Y.-K., Lin, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-H., Chen, H.-R., & Chen, C.-L. (2012). An integrated study on Taiwan's elementary and secondary school English curricula. Report for National Academy for Educational Research (NAER-100-12-A-1-02-00-3-02). New Taipei, Taiwan: Research Center for Curriculum and Instruction, National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域－英語文。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Language domain for elementary, junior high school and upper secondary school education – English. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- Aidinlou, N. A., & Vaskehmahalleh, M. T. (2017). The relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ reading comprehension, vocabulary size and lexical coverage of the text. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(3), 291-300.
- Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. New York, NY: Continuum.
- Alonso, A. C. (2013). Receptive vocabulary size of secondary Spanish EFL learners. Revista de Lingüísticay Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 66-75. doi:10.4995/rlyla.2013.1180
- Alonso, A. C. (2015). The receptive vocabulary size of Spanish 5th grade primary school students in CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. ES. Revista de Filología Inglesa, 36, 63-85.
- Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In L. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Anjomshoa, L., & Zamanian, M. (2014). The effect of vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners in Kerman Azad University. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(5), 90-95.
- Baleghizadeh, S., & Golbin, M. (2010). The effect of vocabulary size on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 1(2), 33-46.
- Barrow, J., Nakanishi, Y., & Ishino, H. (1999). Assessing Japanese college students’ vocabulary knowledge with a self-checking familiarity survey. System, 27(2), 223-247. doi:10.1016/ S0346-251X(99)00018-4
- Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 431-459. doi:10.1007/BF02293801
- Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444. doi:10.1177/014662168200600 405
- Catalán, R. M. J., & Gallego, M. T. (2005-2008). The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies, 5-6, 173-191.
- Chen, H.-C., Chern, C.-L., & Wu, A. M.-C. (2016). Becoming reflective readers: A case study of group discussion in reading. English Teaching & Learning, 40(1), 1-24. doi:10.6330/ETL. 2016.40.1.01
- Chen, H.-J. H., & Hsu, H.-L. (2019). The impact of a serious game on vocabulary and content learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221. 2019.1593197
- Chiang, H.-H. (2018). English vocabulary size as a predictor of TOEIC listening and reading achievement among EFL students in Taiwan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(2), 203-212. doi:10.17507/tpls.0802.04
- Farvardin, M. T., & Koosha, M. (2011). The role of vocabulary knowledge in Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension performance: Breadth or depth? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1575-1580. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.11.1575-1580
- Gottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 330-344. doi:10.1037/a0014320
- Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69. doi:10.1017/S0267190504000030
- Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. London, UK: Routledge.
- Hajiyeva, K. (2014). Receptive and productive vocabulary level needs: An empirical study of Azerbaijani English majors. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 9(1), 51-65.
- Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403-430.
- Ibrahim, E. H. E., Sarudin, I., & Muhamad, A. J. (2016). The relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension of ESL learners. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 116-123. doi:10. 5539/elt.v9n2p116
- Jaeger, R. M. (1978). A proposal for setting a standard on the North Carolina high school competency test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Carolina Association for Research in Education, Chapel Hill, NC.
- Kameli, S., & Baki, R. B. (2013). The impact of vocabulary knowledge level on EFL reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(1), 85-89. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.85
- Karakoç, D., & Köse, G. D. (2017). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on reading, writing and proficiency scores of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 352-378.
- Katagiri, K. (2009). A three-year longitudinal study of vocabulary size in Japanese SHS students and a description of their developmental patterns. ARELE, 20, 131-140.
- Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation. (2006). The national school curriculum: English. Retrieved from http://www.basics.re.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=1500253&boardSeq=212 8199&lev=0&m=0301&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=8&s=english
- Lan, Y. J. (2018). Technology-enhanced learner ownership and learner autonomy through creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 859-862. doi:10.1007/s11423-018- 9608-8
- Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp. 316-321). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
- Laufer, B. (1992a). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). London, UK: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
- Laufer, B. (1992b). Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with the reader’s general academic ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 15(2), 95-103. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9817.1992.tb00025.x
- Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?. Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255-271. doi:10.1093/applin/19.2.255
- Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15-30.
- Laufer, B., & Sim, D. D. (1985). Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of contextual clues in EFL reading comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 23(2), 7-10.
- Legault, J., Fang, S. Y., Lan, Y. J., & Li, P. (2019). Structural brain changes as a function of second language vocabulary training: Effects of learning context. Brain and Cognition, 134, 90-102. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.09.004
- Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Meara. P. M. (1995). LLEX Lingua vocabulary tests. Swansea, UK: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Wales Swansea.
- Meara, P. M., & Jones, G. (1989). Eurocentres vocabulary test 10 KA. Zurich, Switzerland: Eurocentres.
- Meara, P. M., & Milton, J. L. (2003). X_Lex: The Swansea levels test. Newbury, UK: Express.
- Meara, P. M., & Milton, J. L. (2005). X_Lex: The Swansea vocabulary levels test. v2. 05. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.
- Meara, P. M., & Miralpeix, I. (2006). Y_Lex: The Swansea advanced vocabulary levels test. v2. 05. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.
- Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S. A., & Kian, P. (2011). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 222(53), 97-127.
- Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. doi:10. 21832/9781847692092
- Milton, J., & Meara, P. (1998). Are the British really bad at learning foreign languages? Language Learning Journal, 18, 68-76. doi:10.1080/09571739885200291
- Miralpeix, I., & Muñoz, C. M. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(1), 1-24. doi:10.1515/iral-2017-0016
- Mochizuki, M. (1998). Nihonjin eigo gakushusha no tameno goi saizu tesuto [A Vocabulary Size Test for Japanese learners of English]. The Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin, 12, 27-53.
- Nassif, P. M. (1978, March). Standard setting for criterion referenced teacher licensing tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Toronto, Canada.
- Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5(1), 12-25.
- Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.
- Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524759
- Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82. doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0049
- Nation, I. S. P. (2011). Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44(4), 529-539. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000267
- Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.
- Nation, P. (1993). Measuring readiness for simplified material: A test of the first 1,000 words of English. In M. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and application (pp. 193-203). Singapore: SAMOE Regional Language Centre.
- Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 161-175. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00005-2
- Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A. D. 2008). Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Education.
- Orosz, A. (2009). The growth of young learners’ English vocabulary size. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes (pp. 181-194). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
- Ostyn, P., & Godin, P. (1985). RALEX: An alternative approach to language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 69, 346-355.
- Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282-308. doi:10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282
- Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536. doi:10. 1111/1467-9922.00193
- Rashidi, N. S., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108.
- Raju, N. S., Price, L. R., Oshima, T. C., & Nering, M. L. (2007). Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 169-180. doi:10.1177/ 0146621606291569
- Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511732942
- Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88. doi:10.1191/02655 3201668475857
- Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. doi:10.1177/1362168808089921
- Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
- Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913-951. doi:10.1111/lang.12077
- Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212-226. doi:10.1017/S0261444815000075
- Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26-43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011. 01146.X
- Şen, Y., & Kuleli, M. (2015). The effect of vocabulary size and vocabulary depth on reading in EFL context. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 555-562.
- Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139-152.
- Wang, H.-C., & Chen, C. W.-Y. (2019). Learning English from YouTubers: English L2 learners’ self-regulated language learning on YouTube. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. doi:10.1080/17501229.2019.1607356
- Wang, C.-P., Lan, Y.-J., Tseng, W.-T., Lin, Y.-T. R., & Gupta, K. C. L. (2019). On the effects of 3D virtual worlds in language learning – A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1598444
- West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London, UK: Longman.
- Xue, G., & Nation, I. S. P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3(2), 215-229.
↵
Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(1)】March (Special Issue: Language and Culture Education Policies)
(Special Issue) Vocabulary Size, Lexical Threshold, and Reading Comprehension of Elementary-School EFL Learners
Author: Tsui-Chun Hu (Center for General Education, Chinese Language and Technology Center, National Taiwan Normal University), Ying-Ju Hsu (Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 65, No.1
Date：March 2020
Pages：137-174
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0006
Abstract：
In this study, we examined the relationship between the vocabulary size and reading comprehension of Taiwanese elementary-school graduates. We identified a lexical threshold that they need to cross to demonstrate adequate reading comprehension. We investigated the English vocabulary sizes of Taiwanese elementary-school graduates to provide solid evidence of whether the current English vocabulary-learning goal (300 words) is reasonable. We employed the Diagnosis and Certification of English Competency (DCEC) as the main assessment tool and administered the DCEC-Vocabulary Size (DCEC-VS) and DCEC-Reading Comprehension (DCEC-RC) subtests to 1903 elementary-school graduates. This study has three crucial contributions. The first contribution is evidence that explains the distribution of the vocabulary sizes of Taiwanese elementary-school graduates. The second contribution is proof of how crucial vocabulary size and lexical threshold are for an ideal curriculum. The third contribution compensates for a lack of empirical evidence regarding a lexical threshold at the elementary-school level. We propose that the application of language skills should be the main consideration when setting a lexical threshold. The degree to which specific language skills should be acquired at each level should first be proposed, followed by an exploration of the lexical threshold (minimum vocabulary size) required to match goals for specific language skills at each level. Finally, the lexical threshold proposed should be used as reference when determining the vocabulary size in the curriculum.
Keywords：English curriculum guidelines, vocabulary size, lexical threshold, reading comprehension