師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升）

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「高等教育的教學卓越」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/09/30) 《教育科學研究期刊》「社會情緒學習｣專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/10/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「高齡教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/12/31)

期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升）

回上一頁

（專題）美、英、澳、星四國中小學師資生遴選標準及對我國啟示之探討作者:國立臺灣師範大學高等教育深耕計畫辦公室蘇容梅

卷期：65卷第2期
日期：2020年6月
頁碼：135-166
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0005

摘要：
教師素質是奠定學生成就的重要基礎，如何吸引、遴選、培訓和留住優秀教師，為國際逐漸重視之議題。本研究以師資生遴選為主題，旨在瞭解美國、英國、澳洲與新加坡強化師資生遴選的背景緣由，以及當前採用的師資生遴選作法。研究結果發現，美、英、澳、星四個國家皆設有專責單位訂定師資生遴選標準，重視申請人的基本讀寫算能力，並以認知為主要遴選測驗內容。依據四個國家之經驗，提供國內制定師資生入學制度之啟示，包括：一、加入基本能力檢核，確保師資生學術基礎；二、依據師資專長特性，訂定合適的遴選標準；三、結合多樣性的非認知類檢測，並提供周全的輔導及獎勵，增進師資生遴選效能。

關鍵詞：師資生遴選、師資培育、遴選標準

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

王瑞壎（2008）。人口結構變遷下我國師資培育現況之分析。臺東大學教育學報，19（2），143-182。【Wang, J.-H. (2008). The status of teacher education in Taiwan: A reaction to change in demographic structure. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 143-182.】
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育新辭書。臺北市：高等教育。【Wu, C.-S., & Lin, T.-Y. (2005). New dictionary of education. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
宋曜廷、周業太、曾芬蘭（2014）。十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革。教育科學研究期刊，59（1），1-32。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01 【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., & Tseng, F.-L. (2014). Standards-based assessments for 12-year basic education in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(1), 1-32. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01】
沈翠蓮（2004）。臺灣小學師資培育史。臺北市：五南。【Shen, C.-L. (2004). Taiwan primary school teacher training history. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan.】
周祝瑛（2009）。比較教育與國際教改。臺北市：三民。【Zhou, Z.-Y. (2009). Comparative education: From global educational reform perspectives. Taipei, Taiwan: San-Min.】

» 展開更多

王瑞壎（2008）。人口結構變遷下我國師資培育現況之分析。臺東大學教育學報，19（2），143-182。【Wang, J.-H. (2008). The status of teacher education in Taiwan: A reaction to change in demographic structure. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 143-182.】
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育新辭書。臺北市：高等教育。【Wu, C.-S., & Lin, T.-Y. (2005). New dictionary of education. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
宋曜廷、周業太、曾芬蘭（2014）。十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革。教育科學研究期刊，59（1），1-32。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01 【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., & Tseng, F.-L. (2014). Standards-based assessments for 12-year basic education in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(1), 1-32. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01】
沈翠蓮（2004）。臺灣小學師資培育史。臺北市：五南。【Shen, C.-L. (2004). Taiwan primary school teacher training history. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan.】
周祝瑛（2009）。比較教育與國際教改。臺北市：三民。【Zhou, Z.-Y. (2009). Comparative education: From global educational reform perspectives. Taipei, Taiwan: San-Min.】
周愚文（2014）。英國現代師資培育研究（1945-2010）。臺北市：學富。【Chou, Y.-W. (2014). Modern teacher education studies in England (1945-2010). Taipei, Taiwan: Pro-Ed.】
洪榮昭、戴凱欣、陳柏熹、蘇少祖（2019）。調適性與創新性創造力之評量。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），143-168。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0006 【Hong, J.-C., Tai, K.-H., Chen, P.-H., & Su, S.-Z. (2019). Revolutionary drawing: Measuring adaptive and innovative creativity. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 143-168. doi:10.6209/JORIES. 201909_64(3).0006】
高熏芳（2002）。師資培育：職前教師教學系統發展。臺北市：高等教育。【Gao, S.-F. (2002). Teacher cultivation: Development of pre-service teacher teaching system. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
陳彥廷（2014）。課程轉化實作促進國小師培生對數學課程理解之研究。當代教育研究季刊，22（4），1-54。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2014.2204.01 【Chen, Y.-T. (2014). The implementation of curriculum transformation and the facilitation of elementary school pre-service teachers’ understanding of mathematics course. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 22(4), 1-54. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2014.2204.01】
陳冠利、劉湘瑤、陳柏熹、黃書涵（2015）。以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養。教育科學研究期刊，60（2），167-196。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06 【Chen, K.-L., Liu, S.-Y., Chen, P.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2015). Using contextualized assessment to measure the energy literacy of middle and high school students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(2), 167-196. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06】
陳柏熹、黃馨瑩、陳郁欣、葉泰廷、蘇少祖（2015）。大學生基本素養測驗的發展及信度效度分析。教育科學研究期刊，60（3），95-126。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04 【Chen, P.-H., Huang, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., Yeh, T.-T., & Su, S.-T. (2015). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the general literacy test for university students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(3), 95-126. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04】
陳奎憙（1977）。英國師範教育之現況與發展趨勢。教育資料集刊，2，117-134。【Chen, K.-C. (1977). The current situation and development trend of British teacher education. Bulletin of National Institute of Educational Resources and Research, 2, 117-134.】
教育部（2011）。中華民國教育報告書（全文版）。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/66/pta_1477_1069407_14033.pdf 【Ministry of Education. (2011). Republic of China education report. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/66/pta_1477_1069407_14033.pdf】
教育部（2012）。第七次中華民國教育年鑑。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2012). The seventh education yearbook of the Republic of China. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
教育部（2014）。教育部研發教師暨師資生潛能適性檢測。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2600/News_Content.aspx?n=E491D1720010EE05&sms=D4AB88F29491B48F&s=D2F0488929295908 【Ministry of Education. (2014). Ministry of education invent teacher and pre-service teacher potential test. Retrieved from https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2600/News_Content.aspx?n=E491D1720010EE05&sms=D4AB88 F29491B48F&s=D2F0488929295908】
教育部（2016）。中華民國師資培育統計年報（104年版）。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2016). Yearbook of teacher education statistics the Republic of China. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
符碧真（2018）。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式－素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），59-87。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003 【Fwu, B.-J. (2018). Teacher preparation in response to competence-based curriculum reform for K-12 education: National Taiwan University’s proposal of inquiry-based and competence-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 59-87. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003】
彭煥勝（2011）。我國小學師資培育政策的百年回顧與前瞻。市北教育學刊，39，79-101。doi:10.7036/JETMUE.201108.0081 【Peng. H.-S. (2011). A centennial review and prospect of the elementary school teacher education policy in the Republic of China (Taiwan). Journal of Education of University of Taipei, 39, 79-101. doi:10.7036/JETMUE.201108.0081】
黃源河、符碧真（2009）。一樣軌跡兩樣情：美國與我國師資培育機構轉型與教師質量之比較。教育科學研究期刊，54（4），171-200。doi:10.3966/2073753X2009125404007 【Huang, Y.-R., & Fwu, B.-J. (2009). Similar routes but different paths: Teacher preparation, teacher quantity and quality in the U.S. and Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(4), 171-200. doi:10.3966/2073753X2009125404007】
董秀蘭（2016）。為培養學生高層次認知與論述能力而評量：開放式建構反應試題的理念與示例。中等教育，67（2），1-6。doi:10.6249/SE.2016.67.2.01 【Doong, S.-L. (2016). Assessment for cultivating students’ higher-order cognitive skills and discursive abilities: Rationales and examples of open-ended response items. Secondary Education, 67(2), 1-6. doi:10.6249/SE.2016.67.2.01】
臺灣省文獻委員會（編）（1994）。重修臺灣省通志卷六：文教志教育行政篇。南投縣：作者。【Historical Research Commission of Taiwan Province (Ed.). (1994). Reconstruction of Taiwan proceedings volume 6: Education administration. Nantou, Taiwan: Author.】
趙子揚、黃嘉莉、宋曜廷、郭蕙寧、許明輝（2016）。教師情境判斷測驗之編製。教育科學研究期刊，61（2），85-117。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).04 【Chao, T.-Y., Huang, J.-L., Sung, Y.-T., Kuo, H.-N., & Shiu, M.-H. (2016). Construction of the teacher situational judgment test. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 85-117. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).04】
劉世雄（2017）。臺灣國中教師對共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課的實施目的、關注內容以及專業成長知覺之研究。當代教育研究季刊，25（2），43-76。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2017.2502.02 【Liu, S.-H. (2017). Perceptions on the purposes of and concerns about collaborative lesson study in the professional development of Taiwanese secondary school teachers. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 25(2), 43-76. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2017.2502.02】
瞿立鶴（1979）。近三十年來我國中等學校師資之培養與進修。教育資料集刊，4，77-116。【Qu, L.-H. (1979). Cultivation and training of teachers in secondary schools in China in the past 30 years. Bulletin of National Institute of Educational Resources and Research, 4, 77-116.】
Akyeampong, K., Lussier, K., Pryor, J., & Westbrook, J. (2013). Improving teaching and learning of basic math and reading in Africa: Does teacher preparation count? International Journal of Educational Development, 33(3), 272-282. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.006
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). About us. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/about-aitsl
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2015). Action now: Selection of entrants into initial teacher education. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2018). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Carlton South, Australia: Education Services Australia.
Australian Primary Principals Association. (2015). Initial teacher education: Teacher preparation, course content and specialisation at all levels but particularly in primary schools. Stirling, Australia: Author.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
California Educator Credentialing Examinations. (2018). Assessments. Retrieved from http://www. ctcexams.nesinc.com/PageView.aspx?f=GEN_Tests.html
Chao, T.-Y., & Sung, Y.-T. (2019). An investigation of the reasons for test anxiety, time spent studying, and achievement among adolescents in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(4), 469-484. doi:10.1080/02188791.2019.1671804
Chao, T.-Y., Sung, Y.-T., & Huang, J.-L. (2019). Construction of the situational judgment tests for teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2019.1633621
Coble, C., Crowe, E., & Allen, M. (2016). CAEP Standard 3.2 research, study and analysis: A report to the council for the accreditation of educator preparation. Washington, DC: Teacher Preparation Analytics.
Corcoran, R. P. (2017). Preparing principals to improve student achievement. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(5), 769-781. doi:10.1007/s10566-017-9399-9
Corcoran, R. P., & O’Flaherty, J. (2016). Personality development during teacher preparation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01677
Corcoran, R. P., & Tormey, R. (2013). Does emotional intelligence predict student teachers’ performance? Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 34-42. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.008
Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013). 2013 caep standards. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/~/media/Files/caep/standards/caep-standards-one-pager-0219.pdf?la=en
Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2015). History of caep. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/about/history
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Developing and sustaining a high-quality teaching force. New York, NY: Asia Society.
Darmody, M., & Smyth, E. (2016). Entry to programmes of initial teacher education. Dublin, UK: Economic and Social Research Institute and the Teaching Council.
Department for Education. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. London, UK: Author.
Department for Education. (2018). Initial teacher training: Criteria and supporting advice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-training-criteria/initial-teacher-training-itt-criteria-and-supporting-advice
Donaldson, G. (2010). Teaching Scotland’s future. Retrieved from https://www.scotland.gov.uk/resource/doc/337626/0110852.pdf
Feuer, M. J., Floden, R. E., Chudowsky, N., & Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
Her Majesty’s Inspectors. (1983). Teaching in schools: The content of initial teacher training. London, UK: Department of Education and Science.
Hillman, S. J., Rothermel, D., & Scarano, G. H. (2005). The assessment of pre-service teachers’ dispositions. Teacher Education, 41(4), 234-250. doi:10.1080/08878730609555386
House of Commons. (2010). Training of teachers. London, UK: The Stationery Office Limited.
Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(2), 1-14. doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z
Ingvarson, L., Reid, K., Buckley, S., Kleinhenz, E., Masters, G., & Rowley, G. (2014). Best practice teacher education programs and Australia’s own programs. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education.
Ingvarson, L., & Rowley, G. (2017). Quality assurance in teacher education and outcomes: A study of 17 countries. Educational Researcher, 46(4), 177-193. doi:10.3102/0013189X17711900
Jacob, B. A., Rockoff, J. A., Taylor, E. S., Lindy, B., & Rosen, R. (2016). Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC public school. NBER Working Paper No. 22054. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Kim, E., & Corcoran, R. P. (2018). Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ persistence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 204-214. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.015
Kim, L. E., & MacCann, C. (2016). What is students’ ideal university instructor personality? An investigation of absolute and relative personality preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 190-203. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.068
Klassen, R. M., & Kim, L. E. (2017). Assessing critical attributes of prospective teachers: Implications for selection into initial teacher education programs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 11, 5-22.
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
Lee, S. K., & Low, E. L. (2014). Conceptualising teacher preparation for educational innovation: Singapore’s approach. In S. K. Lee, W. O. Lee, & E. L. Low (Eds.), Educational policy innovations: Levelling up and sustaining educational achievement (pp. 49-70). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Low, E. L., & Tan, O. S. (2017). Teacher education policy: Recruitment, preparation and progression. In O. S. Tan, W. C. Liu, & E. L. Low (Eds.), Teacher education in the 21st century: Singapore’s evolution and innovation (pp. 11-32). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Education in Singapore. Singapore, Singapore: Author.
Minister for Education and Training. (2016). Back to basics: Teacher test to lift literacy and numeracy outcomes for students. Retrieved from http://getsydney.com.au/2016/08/05/teacher-test-to-lift-literacy-and-numeracy-outcomes-for-students/
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. New York, NY: United States Department of Education.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching and America’s future. New York, NY: Author.
National Institute of Education. (2012). A teacher education model for the 21st century: NIE’s journey from concept to realisation. Singapore, Singapore: Author.
National Institute of Education. (2016). Bachelor of Arts (Education)/Bachelor of Science (Education). Singapore, Singapore: Author.
National Institute of Education. (2018). Bachelor of arts (education). Singapore, Singapore: Author.
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris, France: Author.
Pecheone, R. L., Pigg, M. J., Chung, R. R., & Souviney, R. J. (2005). Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(4), 164-176. doi:10.3200/TCHS.78.4.164-176
Perera, H. N., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 171-178. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.034
Queensland Tertiary Admissions Centre. (2019). Teacher entry. Retrieved from https://www.qtac. edu.au/courses---institutions/teacher-entry
Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predicts effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116(3), 1-27.
Sosu, E. M., & Gray, D. S. (2012). Investigating change in epistemic beliefs: An evaluation of the impact of student teachers’ beliefs on instructional preference and teaching competence. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 80-92. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.02.002
Staiger, D. O., & Rockoff, J. E. (2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 97-118. doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.97
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, Y.-T. Y., Cheng, T.-Y., & Tien, H.-L. S. (2017). Development and validation of a work values scale for assessing high school students: A mixed method approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 526-543. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000408
Sung, Y.-T., Cheng, Y.-W., & Wu, J.-S. (2016). Constructing a situation-based career interest assessment for junior-high-school students and examining their interest structure. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(2), 347-365. doi:10.1177/1069072715580419
Sung, Y.-T., & Wu, J.-S. (2018). The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1694-1715. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8
Tan, S. K. S., Wong, A. F. L., Gopinathan, S., Goh, K. C., Wong, I. Y. F., & Ong, K. H. (2007). The qualiﬁcations of the teaching force: Data from Singapore. In R. Ingersoll (Ed.), A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualiﬁcations in six nations (pp. 71-84). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/action_ now_classroom_ready_teachers_accessible-(1)da178891b1e86477b58fff00006709da.pdf?sfvrsn= 9bffec3c_0
The University of Sydney. (2018). Bachelor of education (Primary). Retrieved from https://sydney. edu.au/courses/courses/uc/bachelor-of-education-primary.html
UC Davis School of Education. (2018). Basic skills requirement. Retrieved from https://education. ucdavis.edu/general-information/4-basic-skills-requirement
Vagi, R., Pivovarova, M., & Barnard, W. M. (2019). Keeping our best? A survival analysis examining a measure of preservice teacher quality and teacher attrition. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 115-127. doi:10.1177/0022487117725025
Zeichner, K. M. (2006). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 737-759). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

中文APA引文格式	蘇容梅（2020）。美、英、澳、星四國中小學師資生遴選標準及對我國啟示之探討。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），135-166。doi: 10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0005
APA Format	Su, J.-M. (2020). Selection Criteria for Primary and Secondary Preservice Teachers in the United States, Britain, Australia, and Singapore and the Enlightenment to Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 135-166. doi: 0.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0005

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(2)】June (Special Issue: The Innovation and Enhancement of Teacher Professional Development in Taiwan)

Top

(Special Issue) Selection Criteria for Primary and Secondary Preservice Teachers in the United States, Britain, Australia, and Singapore and the Enlightenment to Taiwan Author: Jung-Mei Su (Higher Education Sprout Project Office, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 65, No.2
Date：June 2020
Pages：135-166
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0005

Abstract：
The quality of teachers is an important predictor of student achievement. The methods to attract, select, train, and retain outstanding teachers have been attracting considerable attention the field of Taiwanese education. This article explores the selection of preservice teachers, aiming to understand the background of reasons for teacher selection in the United States, Britain, Australia and Singaporeand the current selection criteria and practices. The study results found that these four countries control teacher education quality through dedicated units. The selection tests focus on basic reading and writing skills, and the selection method is mainly based on cognitive tests. This study of preservice teacher selection in four countries provides inspiration for developing basic ability tests to ensure that preservice teachers have the necessary academic foundation and establishing appropriate selection criteria combined with diversity non-cognitive testing.

Keywords：preservice teacher selection, teacher education, selection criteria

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升） 回上一頁

（專題）美、英、澳、星四國中小學師資生遴選標準及對我國啟示之探討 作者:國立臺灣師範大學高等教育深耕計畫辦公室蘇容梅

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(2)】June (Special Issue: The Innovation and Enhancement of Teacher Professional Development in Taiwan) Top

(Special Issue) Selection Criteria for Primary and Secondary Preservice Teachers in the United States, Britain, Australia, and Singapore and the Enlightenment to Taiwan Author: Jung-Mei Su (Higher Education Sprout Project Office, National Taiwan Normal University)

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升）

回上一頁

（專題）美、英、澳、星四國中小學師資生遴選標準及對我國啟示之探討作者:國立臺灣師範大學高等教育深耕計畫辦公室蘇容梅

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(2)】June (Special Issue: The Innovation and Enhancement of Teacher Professional Development in Taiwan)

Top