師資培育為專業化的歷程，師資培育課程在其中所扮演的角色與功能，更是重要的環節之一。本研究主要目的為探討我國師資培育課程發展，並以美國、澳洲及新加坡的師資培育機構為例，分析其小學師資培育課程與國家認證制度對我國師資培育課程之啟示。研究結果發現，臺灣小學師資培育課程改革受限於歷史路徑依賴的舊習、包班制概念不清，未能以多學科的能力作為小學師資培育課程的主軸、實踐課程未能階段性且持續性地落實於實際教學場域，以及師資培育評鑑無法確保各校課程實施前是否符合國家規範、實習與教師檢定考試無法發揮課程修習之加乘效果。最後根據三個國家之經驗，提供國內師資培育課程制度革新之啟示，包括：重視師資培育課程品質保證機制，確保課程實施前的品質；強化師資生具備國民小學包班與學習領域之學科知能專業能力；階段性且持續性地增加教育實踐之機會；依據課程性質與重要性，建立適切的學習結構。

» 展開更多

1. 方金雅（2017）。師資生實地學習之分析。國民教育學報，14，1-28。 【Fang, C.-Y. (2017). The analysis of pre-service teachers’ field-based experience. Journal of Research on Elementary Education, 14, 1-28.】
2. 王佳琪、宋世祥（2019）。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效：以適性教學為例。教育科學研究期刊，64（4），145-173。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006 【Wang, C.-C., & Sung, S.-H. (2019). The “adaptive instruction” course as an example of the application and evaluation of a teacher education program course incorporating design thinking. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006】
3. 國立臺北教育大學教育學系（2018）。大學部課程資訊。https://de.ntue.edu.tw/file/fileList/13/54 【Department of Education, National Taipei University of Education. (2018). Undergraduate program. https://de.　ntue.edu.tw/file/fileList/13/54】
4. 國立臺南大學教育學系（2018）。課程架構。http://www.edu.nutn.edu.tw/gac610/mode02.asp?m=20140528134845041&t=list【Department of Education, National University of Tainan. (2018). Curriculum structure. http://www.edu.nutn.edu.tw/gac610/mode02.asp?m=20140528134845041&t=list】
5. 教育部（1996）。第六次中華民國教育年鑑。作者。 【Ministry of Education. (1996). The sixth education yearbook of the Republic of China. Author.】
6. 教育部（2012）。第七次中華民國教育年鑑。作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2012). The seventh education yearbook of the Republic of China. Author.】
7. 教育部（2013）。師資職前教育課程教育專業課程科目及學分對照表實施要點。作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2013). The regulations of professional courses and credits for pre-service teacher education. Author.】
8. 教育部（2016）。師資職前教師專業素養指引及課程基準108學年度即將啟動。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=20E78CCBAC669CF2 【Ministry of Education. (2016). Pre-service teacher professional literacy guidelines and curriculum benchmarks will begin in the 108th academic year. https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=20E78CCBAC669CF2】
9. 教育部（2017）。澳洲最新原住民教育調查統計。https://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=20000 【Ministry of Education. (2017). Australia’s latest Aboriginal education survey statistics. https://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=20000】
10. 教育部（2018a）。107及108年度大學校院師資培育評鑑規劃與實施計畫。財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會。 【Ministry of Education. (2018a). 107 and 108 years university and college teacher education evaluation plan. Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan.】
11. 教育部（2018b）。中華民國教師專業素養指引—師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準。作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2018b). Teachers’ professional qualification guidelines－ Teachers’ pre-service education stages and teachers’ pre-service education curriculum benchmarks. Author.】
12. 符碧真、黃源河（2016）。實地學習：銜接師資培育理論與實務的藥方？教育科學研究期刊，61（2），57-84。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).03 【Fwu, B.-J., & Hwang, Y. R. (2016). Field-based experience: A solution for the theory-practice divide in teacher education?. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).03】
13. 陳沛雯、王俊斌（2017）。變革中的師資培育制度與學校現場專業期待。T&D飛訊，231，1-　18。 【Chen, P.-W., & Wang, C.-P. (2017). The changing of the teacher training system and the school professional expectations. Training & Development Fashion, 231, 1-18.】
14. 陳易芬（2011）。職前教師對師資培育課程與教學的看法與建議。彰化師大教育學報，20，21-　45。https://doi.org/10.6769/JENCUE.201112.0021 【Chen, Y.-F. (2011). The perception of preservice teachers to the teacher education program. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 20, 21-45. https://doi.org/10.6769/JENCUE.201112.0021】
15. 陳奎憙（1998）。我國師資培育制度變革之分析。教育資料集刊，23，171-195。 【Chen, K. (1998). Analysis on the reform of teacher education system in Taiwan. Bulletin of National Institute of Educational Resources and Research, 23, 171-195.】
16. 陳舜芬、丁志仁、洪儷瑜（1996）。師資培育與教師進修制度的檢討。教育研究集刊，37，39-　100。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.199603_(37).0003 【Chen, S., Ding, C.-J., & Hung, L. (1996). Evaluation on teacher education and teachers’ in-service training. Bulletin of Educational Research, 37, 39-100. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.199603_(37).0003】
17. 單文經（2016）。Dewey良師論與職前師培課程主張評析。教育科學研究期刊，61（2），1-28。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).01 【Shan, W.-J. (2016). Critical analysis of J. Dewey’s thoughts on good teachers and the preservice teacher education program. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).01】
18. 黃源河（2013）。美國小學師資培育制度與教育專業課程。載於楊思偉（主編），各國小學師資培育制度與教育專業課程研究（頁1-29）。五南。 【Hwang, Y. R. (2013). American elementary school teacher training and curriculum. In S.-W. Yang (Ed.), Research on primary school teacher training and curriculum in different countries (pp. 1-29). Wu-Nan.】
19. 黃嘉莉（2013）。我國教育實習制度設計之結構邏輯分析。教育研究與發展期刊，9（3），115-　142。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042013090903005 【Huang, J.-L. (2013). Structual logic analysis on the education practicum institution design in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 9(3), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042013090903005】
20. 黃嘉莉、武佳瀅（2015）。我國教育實習學生知覺教師專業知能習得、運用與重要之研究。教育科學研究期刊，60（2），1-32。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).01 【Huang, J.-L., & Wu, C.-Y. (2015). Student teacher perception of teacher education and professional knowledge acquisition, use, and importance in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).01】
21. 黃嘉莉、葉怡芬、許瑛玿、曾元顯（2017）。取得中學教職的關鍵因素：運用決策樹探勘師資培育歷程。教育科學研究期刊，62（2），89-123。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04 【Huang, J.-L., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2017). Critical factors of becoming secondary school teachers: Mining the process of teacher education by decision trees. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 89-123. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04】
22. 熊瑞梅、紀金山（2002）。「師資培育法」形成的政策範疇影響力機制。台灣社會學，4，　199-246。https://doi.org/10.6676/TS.2002.4.199 【Xiong, R.-M., & Ji, J.-S. (2002). The policy scope influence mechanism formed by the “teacher education law”. Taiwan Sociology, 4, 199-246. https://doi.org/10.6676/TS.2002.4.199】
23. 臺灣省行政長官公署（1946）。臺灣省行政長官公署公報。作者。 【Taiwan Provincial Administrative Executive Office. (1946). Bulletin of the Taiwan Provincial Administrative Executive Office. Author.】
24. 臺灣省政府教育廳（1955）。十年來的臺灣教育。臺灣書店。 【Taiwan Provincial Government Department of Education. (1955). Taiwan education in the past ten years. Taiwan Book Store.】
25. 臺灣省政府教育廳（1987）。臺灣教育發展史料彙編。臺灣省立臺中圖書館。 【Taiwan Provincial Government Department of Education. (1987). The compilation of historical materials on Taiwan’s educational development. Taiwan Provincial Taichung Library.】
26. 趙子揚、宋曜廷（2019）。中學生考試壓力與個人特性：潛在類別分析。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），203-235。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0008 【Chao, T.-Y., & Sung, Y.-T. (2019). Examination stress and personal characteristics among Taiwanese adolescents: A latent class approach. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 203-235. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0008】
27. 賴怡真（2007）。師資培育制度的變遷過程：一個歷史制度論的觀點（未出版碩士論文）。南華大學。 【Lai, I. (2007). Transforming teacher education: A perspective of historical institutionalism [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Nanhua University.】
28. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2018). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Author.
29. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
30. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2017). Commission-approved educator preparation programs. https://www.ctc.ca.gov/commission/reports/data/app-edu-prep-prog
31. Catling, S., & Willy, T. (2009). Teaching primary geography. Learning Matters.
32. Chao, T.-Y., & Sung, Y.-T. (2019). An investigation of the reasons for test anxiety, time spent studying, and achievement among adolescents in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(4), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1671804
33. Chao, T.-Y., Sung, Y.-T., & Huang, J.-L. (2020). Construction of the situational judgment tests for teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1633621
34. Christophersen, K. A., Elstad, E., Turmo, A., & Solhaug, T. (2016). Teacher education programmes and their contribution to student teacher efficacy in classroom management and pupil engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(2), 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1024162
35. Chua, P. (2014). Centralized-decentralization emerging in Singapore. https://internationalednews.com/2014/03/25/centralized-decentralization-emerging-in-singapore/
36. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2018). CAEP handbook: Initial-level programs. Author.
37. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa. v13n42.2005
38. Dinham, S., Ingvarson, L., & Kleinhenz, E. (2008). Teaching talent: The best teachers for Australia’s classrooms. Business Council of Australia.
39. Goldstein, L. S. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers for success in NCLB’s kindergartens: Learning from experienced teachers’ strategies for managing professional relationships with colleagues and parents. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(3), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020802275278
40. Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111409415
41. Hou, A. Y.-C., Morse R., Ince, M., Chen, H.-J., Chiang, C.-L., & Chan, Y. (2013). Is the Asian quality assurance system for higher education going glonacal? Assessing the impact of three types of program accreditation on Taiwanese universities. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818638
42. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
43. Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/421608
45. Le Maistre, C., & Paré, A. (2010). Whatever it takes: How beginning teachers learn to survive. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 559-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.016
46. Martin, F. (2005). The relationship between beginning teachers’ prior conceptions of geography, knowledge and pedagogy and their development as teachers of primary geography [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Coventry University.
47. Martin, F. (2006). Teaching geography in primary schools: Learning to live in the world. Chris Kington.
48. Martínez-Torregrosa, J., Limiñana, R., Menargues, A., & Colomer, R. (2018). In-depth teaching as oriented-research about seasons and the sun/earth model: Effects on content knowledge attained by pre-service primary teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.97
49. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. (2018). Bachelor of arts (education). Bachelor of science (education). https://www.nie.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ote-documents/programme-booklets/babsc_programmes_ay2018-2019_as-at-28-june-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=0
50. Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills. (2011). Geography: Learning to make a world of difference. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/geography-learning-to-make-a-world-of-difference
51. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2003). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
52. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
53. Sinha, V., & Subramanian, K. S. (2013). Accreditation in India: Path of achieving educational excellence. Business Education & Accreditation, 5(2), 107-116.
54. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
55. Sung, Y.-T., Shih, P.-C., & Chang, K.-E. (2015). The effects of 3D-representation instruction on composite-solid surface-area learning for elementary school students. Instructional Science, 43, 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9331-8
56. Sung, Y.-T., Tseng, F.-L., Kuo, N.-P., Chang, T.-Y., & Chiou, J.-M. (2014). Evaluating the effects of programs for reducing achievement gaps: A case study in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9304-7
57. The University of Sydney. (2018). Bachelor of education (Primary). https://www.sydney.edu.au/handbooks/archive/2018/arts/subject_areas_oz/primary_table.shtml.html
58. Turner-Bisset, R. (1999). The knowledge bases of the expert teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250104
59. University of Maryland. (2017). Undergraduate catalog 2017/2018. https://catalogundergraduate.umd.edu/files/2017-2018-UGCatalog.pdf

中文APA引文格式	蘇容梅、宋曜廷、于文正（2021）。美、澳、星三國小學師資培育課程與認證制度對我國啟示之探討。教育科學研究期刊，66（2），35-74。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0002
APA Format	Su, J.-M., Sung, Y.-T., & Yu, W.-C. (2021). Accreditation of primary school pre-service teacher education curriculums in the United States, Australia, and Singapore and the implications to Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(2), 35-74. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0002

      The cultivation of teachers is a professional process, and the role of the teacher education curriculums is one of the crucial factors. This study aimed to understand the development of Taiwan’s primary school teacher education curriculums as well as to analyze the teacher education curriculums and accreditation systems in the United States, Australia, and Singapore. The results indicated that reforms to Taiwan’s primary school teacher training curriculums are limited by the old habits of historical path dependence and that the course fails to plan for the basic teaching abilities required for preservice teachers. The practical curriculum has not been implemented in a phased and continuous manner, and the teacher training assessment does not ensure that the school curriculum complies with national regulations before implementation. Finally, the relevant experience in the three included countries provides a reference for improving domestic teacher education — including the need for attention to the teacher education quality assurance mechanism, the strengthening of qualifications for primary school preservice teachers’ proficiency, the application of theory at the educational scene in a phased and continuous manner, and the establishment of an appropriate learning structure based on the nature and importance of the course.