為何教師專業發展活動不有效？TALIS 2018臺灣國中教師調查結果之羅吉斯驗證
作者:北京師範大學教育學部教師教育研究所黃嘉莉、國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系謝傳崇
卷期：67卷第1期
日期：2022年3月
頁碼：1-32
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0001
摘要：
臺灣於2018年參加經濟合作暨發展組織（Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD）舉辦之「教學與學習國際調查」（Teaching and Learning International Survey, TALIS），國中教師在專業發展「對教學產生正面影響之活動特性」（即有效教師專業發展）中，「提供後續活動」、「學校多數同事參加」、「有較長的舉辦時間」調查結果都偏低，與學界主張有效專業發展的研究結果背道而馳。本研究旨在針對臺灣國中教師調查結果，採用羅吉斯迴歸統計進行次級資料分析，探究此矛盾背後來自教師個人與學校層面的可能因素。本研究發現：一、教師認為專業發展活動不有效，乃因工作忙碌、家庭責任與欠缺誘因；二、教師持「以學生為主」的教學信念愈高，愈能認同專業發展活動之有效性；三、工作滿意度也是教師知覺專業發展能對教學產生正面影響的重要來源之一；四、學校教學創新的支持環境愈高，教師愈能知覺專業發展活動的有效特徵；五、專業發展活動類型與有效特徵顯著不一，顯示專業發展活動類型應該根據目的和內容並兼顧教師個人需求而定。本研究最後提供建議，期以真正落實「有效」的教師專業發展。
關鍵詞：工作滿意度、有效教師專業發展、自我效能、教學信念、教學與學習國際調查
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- Stewart, D. W., & Kamins, M. A.（2000）。次級資料研究法（董旭英、黃儀娟，合譯）。弘智。（原著出版於1993年） 【Stewart, D. W. (2000). Secondary research (Y.-Y. Tung & Y.-J. Huang, Trans.). Hurng-Chin. (Original work published 1993)】
- 丁一顧、王淑麗、江姮姬（2019）。國小校長共創式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究：以教師信任為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），237-264。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0009 【Ting, Y.-K., Wang, S.-L., & Chiang, H.-C. (2019). The study on relationship between co-creating leadership of elementary school principals and teacher professional learning communities: Teacher trust as a mediator. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0009】
- 王濟川、郭志剛（2010）。Logistic迴歸模式─方法及應用。五南。 【Wang, C.-Z., & Guo, C.-K. (2010). Logistic regression models: Methods and application. Wu-Nan.】
- 余安順、施昆易、王國華、劉世雄（2009）。在職中學數理教師教學專業發展現況、需求與困境調查之初探。科學教育研究與發展季刊，55，21-48。 【Yu, A.-S., Shih, K.-Y., Wang, K.-H., & Liu, S.-H. (2009). A survey of the practices, needs and barriers of science and mathematics teachers’ teaching professional development. Research and Development in Science Education Quarterly, 55, 21-48.】
- 林官蓓、陳建志（2020）。從理念學校轉型實驗教育學校之教師專業發展歷程探究。教育政策論壇，23（1），91-121。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982020022301004 【Lin, K.-P., & Chen, C.-J. (2020). A study of the processes of teachers’ professional development: The case of an elementary school changing from a charter school to an experimental education school. Educational Policy Forum, 23(1), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982020022301004】
» 展開更多
- Stewart, D. W., & Kamins, M. A.（2000）。次級資料研究法（董旭英、黃儀娟，合譯）。弘智。（原著出版於1993年） 【Stewart, D. W. (2000). Secondary research (Y.-Y. Tung & Y.-J. Huang, Trans.). Hurng-Chin. (Original work published 1993)】
- 丁一顧、王淑麗、江姮姬（2019）。國小校長共創式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究：以教師信任為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），237-264。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0009 【Ting, Y.-K., Wang, S.-L., & Chiang, H.-C. (2019). The study on relationship between co-creating leadership of elementary school principals and teacher professional learning communities: Teacher trust as a mediator. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0009】
- 王濟川、郭志剛（2010）。Logistic迴歸模式─方法及應用。五南。 【Wang, C.-Z., & Guo, C.-K. (2010). Logistic regression models: Methods and application. Wu-Nan.】
- 余安順、施昆易、王國華、劉世雄（2009）。在職中學數理教師教學專業發展現況、需求與困境調查之初探。科學教育研究與發展季刊，55，21-48。 【Yu, A.-S., Shih, K.-Y., Wang, K.-H., & Liu, S.-H. (2009). A survey of the practices, needs and barriers of science and mathematics teachers’ teaching professional development. Research and Development in Science Education Quarterly, 55, 21-48.】
- 林官蓓、陳建志（2020）。從理念學校轉型實驗教育學校之教師專業發展歷程探究。教育政策論壇，23（1），91-121。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982020022301004 【Lin, K.-P., & Chen, C.-J. (2020). A study of the processes of teachers’ professional development: The case of an elementary school changing from a charter school to an experimental education school. Educational Policy Forum, 23(1), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982020022301004】
- 柯華葳、陳明蕾、李俊仁、陳冠銘（2019）。2018教學與學習國際調查臺灣報告：國民中學。國家教育研究院。 【Ko, H.-W., Chen, M.-L., Lee, J.-R., & Chen, K.-M. (2019). A report on the Teaching and Learning International Survey of Taiwan: Junior high school. National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 柯華葳、陳明蕾、李俊仁、陳冠銘（2020）。2018教學與學習國際調查臺灣報告：國民中學。國家教育研究院。 【Ko, H.-W., Chen, M.-R., Lee, J.-R., & Chen, K.-M. (2020). Teaching and learning international survey 2018: Junior high education Taiwan report. National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 洪金英（2020）。區分性教學視導在教師專業發展上的運用與啟示。學校行政，126，1-23。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.202003_(126).0001 【Hung, K.-Y. (2020). The application and enlightenment of differentiated instructional supervision on teachers’ professional development. School Administrators, 126, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.202003_(126). 0001】
- 張民杰、賴光真（2019）。以TDO公開授課提升教師專業發展。師友，616，5-16。https://doi.org/10.6437/TEB.201910_(616).0002 【Chang, M.-C., & Lai, C.-C. (2019). Improving teachers’ professional development through teacher-driven observation. Educators, 616, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.6437/TEB.201910_(616).0002】
- 張素貞、劉美慧（2018）。以協作敘事取徑促進幼教師專業發展歷程之探究。當代教育研究季刊，26（3），35-68。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201809_26(3).0002 【Chang, S.-C., & Liu, M.-H. (2018). The process of applying collaborative-narrative approach to facilitate preschool teachers’ professional development. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 26(3), 35-68. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201809_26(3).0002】
- 黃嘉莉（2018）。TALIS 2013韓國教師工作滿意度影響因素之階層線性模型分析。比較教育，85，1-40。https://doi.org/10.3966/160957582018110085001 【Huang, J.-L. (2018). A study of the influence factors on Korean teacher job satisfaction using hierarchical linear model analysis among TALIS 2013. Journal of Comparative Education, 85, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.3966/160957582018110085001】
- 黃嘉莉、桑國元、葉碧欣（2020）。十二年國民基本教育課程改革中教師能動性之使動與制約因素：社會結構二元論觀點。課程與教學季刊，23（1），61-92。https://doi.org/10.6384/ CIQ.202001_23(1).0003 【Huang, J.-L., Sang, G.-Y., & Ye, B.-X. (2020). The enablement and constraint factors on teacher agency of 12-year basic education curriculum reform: A perspective of social structure duality. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(1), 61-92. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202001_23(1).0003】
- 黃嘉莉、陳學志、王俊斌、洪仁進（2020）。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），1-35。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001 【Huang, J.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wang, C.-P., & Hung, J.-C. (2020). Construction and application of teacher professional standards and curriculum baseline for preservice teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001】
- 黃嘉莉、謝紫菱、丁一顧（2019）。臺北市與亞洲三國TALIS教師專業發展之比較研究。中正教育研究，18（2），1-42。https://doi.org/10.3966/168395522019121802001 【Huang, J.-L., Hsien, T.-L., & Ting, Y.-K. (2019). The comparison study of teacher professional development between teachers of Taipei City and three Asia countries. Chung Cheng Educational Studies, 18(2), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3966/168395522019121802001】
- 潘慧玲、陳文彥（2010）。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊，56（3），29-65。 【Pan, H.-L., & Chen, W.-Y. (2010). A case study of organizational learning prompted by teacher evaluation for professional development. Bulletin of Educational Research, 56(3), 29-65.】
- 饒見維（2005）。從教師專業發展的觀點初探如何協助在職教師提昇情緒涵養。教育科學期刊，5（2），138-153。https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.200512.0138 【Rau, J.-W. (2005). A preliminary inquiry on how to help in-service teachers promote their emotional cultivation from the perspectives of teachers’ professional development. The Journal of Educational Science, 5(2), 138- 153. https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.200512.0138】
- 趙麗玲、郭重吉、溫育德、林宗岐、王瑋龍（2015）。教師在職進修動機與障礙因素之探討。自然科學與教育，1（1），1-22。 【Chao, L.-L., Guo, C.-J., Wen, Y.-D., Lin, C.-C., & Wang, W.-L. (2015). A investigation on factors of motivations and barriers for in-service teacher education. Natural Science and Education, 1(1), 1-22.】
- Abramczyk, A., & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: What teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733402
- Addimando, L. (2019). The effect of positive working conditions on work engagement and teaching classroom practice: A large cross-sectional study in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02129.
- Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2019). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47, 684-6981-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573
- Afshar, H. S., & Ghasemi, S. (2020). Investigating the barriers to teachers’ professional delvelopment in an EFL context. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(2), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.11862.1472
- Alberta Education. (2006). Effective professional development: What the research says (ED494706). ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494706.pdf
- Avidov-Ungar, O. (2020). The professional learning expectations of teachers in different professional development periods. Journal of Professional Development in Education 7(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1763435
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- Borg, M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186-188. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186
- Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
- Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. Learning Forward and NCTAF.
- Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Why autonomy-supportive interventions work: Explaining the professional development of teachers’ motivating style. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.022
- Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(2), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
- Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020105
- Cranston, J. (2011). Relational trust: The glue that binds a professional learning community. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v57i1.55455
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Naional Staff Development Council.
- Datnow, A. (2020). The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09372-5
- Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Routledge.
- De Vries, S., Jansen, E., & van de Grift, W. (2013). Profiling teachers’ continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.006
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
- Eckert, J. (2016). The novice advantage: Fearless practice for every teacher. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506341026
- Egodawatte, G., McDougall, D., & Stoilescu, D. (2011). The effects of teacher collaboration in grade 9 applied mathematics. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(3), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9104-y
- Fang, Z. H. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
- Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
- Gasse, R. V., Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Petegem, P. V. (2016). Teacher collaboration on the use of pupil learning outcome data: A rich environment for professional learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.004
- Glazier, J. A., Boyd, A., Hughes, K. B., Able, H., & Mallous, R. (2017). The elusive search for teacher collaboration. Journal the New Educator, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2016.1144841
- Gorozidis, G., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.001
- Granziera, H., & Perera, H. N. (2019). Relations among teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, engagement, and work satisfaction: A social cognitive view. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.003
- Guskey, T. R. (2003). Analyzing lists of the characteristics of effective professional development to promote visionary leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 87, 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650308763702
- Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers’ College Press.
- Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 476-487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13512674
- Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111854838710.1002/0471722146
- Jao, L., & McDougall, D. E. (2015). The collaborative teacher inquiry project: A purposeful professional development initiative. Canadian Journal of Education, 38(1), 1-22.
- Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of learning: On becoming an individual in society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802700
- Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18172.x
- Karaseva, A. (2017). Manifestations of teacher professional agency in relation to integration of ICT in teaching. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Society, Integration, Education, 3, 500-514. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol3.2296
- Katz, S., & Dack, L. A. (2014). Towards a culture of inquiry for data use in schools: Breaking down professional learning barriers through intentional interruption. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006
- Kelly, J., & Cherkowski, S. (2015). Collaboration, collegiality, and collective reflection: A case study of professional development for teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 169, 1-27.
- Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
- Krille, C. (2020). Teachers’ participation in professional development: A systematic review. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38844-7
- Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4
- Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035
- Liu, Y., & Liao, W. (2019). Professional development and teacher efficacy: Evidence from the 2013 TALIS. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(4), 487-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1612454
- Lubniewski, K. L., Cosgrove, D. B. F., & Robinson, T. Y. (2019). Supervision modules to support educators in collaborative teaching: Helping to support & maintain consistent practice in the field. Information Age.
- Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
- Luyten, H., & Bazo, M. (2019). Transformational leadership, professional learning communities, teacher learning and learner centred teaching practices: Evidence on their interrelations in Mozambican primary education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.11.002
- Maggioni, L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2008). The role of teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration in instruction. Educational Psychological Review, 20, 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9081-8
- McDonagh, C., Roche, M., Sullivan, B., & Glenn, M. (2019). Enhancing practice through classroom research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429401091
- Mulholland, M., & O’Connor, U. (2016). Collaborative classroom practice for inclusion: Perspectives of classroom teachers and learning support/resource teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(10), 1070-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1145266
- Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259-299. https://doi.org/10.1086/444249
- Nieto, S. (2009). From surviving to thriving. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 8-13.
- Nikki, B.-C., & Reid, B. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs and teacher effectiveness: Implications for professional development. Professional Educator, 26(1), 13-22.
- Nir, A. E., & Bogler, R. (2008). The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 337-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.002
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023 606.pdf
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/ talis-2013-results/relationship-between-teacher-professional-development-and-teachers-job-satisfaction_9789264196261-table244-en
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners (Volume 1). Author.
- Opfer, D. (2016). Conditions and practices associated with teacher professional development and its impact on instruction in TALIS 2013. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 138. OECD. http://doi.org/10.1787/5jlss4r0lrg5-en
- Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2010). Access to continuous professional development by teachers in England. The Curriculum Journal, 21(4), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2010.529680
- Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
- Park, K. A., & Johnson, K. R. (2019). Job satisfaction, work engagement, and turnover intention of CTE health science teachers. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6(3), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.3.2
- Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308221
- Perera, H. N., Vosicka, L., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Towards an integrative perspective on the structure of teacher work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.006
- Rosenfeld, M., & Rosenfeld, S. (2008). Developing effective teacher beliefs about learners: The role of sensitizing teachers to individual learning differences. Educational Psychology, 28(3), 245-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701528436
- Prestridge, S. (2019). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generation professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003
- Safrudiannur, S., & Rott, B. (2020). Offering an approach to measure beliefs quantitatively: Capturing the influence of students’ abilities on teachers’ beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 419-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10063-z
- Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19(3), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309464
- Sim, M. P. Y., Bélanger, J., Stancel-Piątak, A., & Karoly, L. A. (2019). Starting strong teaching and learning international survey 2018 conceptual framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ docserver/106b1c42-en.pdf?expires=1632278325&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=AA0EC2D622B3E4968F28532C620DF97F
- Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Efects of a professional development program for teachingmathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. DM Mathematics Education, 52, 1411-1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01158-6
- Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Educational_Practices/ EdPractices_18.pdf
- Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 328-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308968
- Timperley, H. S., & Phillips, G. (2003). Changing and sustaining teachers’ expectations through professional development in literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00058-1
- Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2020). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1) 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247
- Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 217-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330501
- Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy & K. Van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805879
- Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
- Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
- Voelkel, R. H., Jr., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1299015
- Wang, K., Li, Y., Luo, W., & Zhang, S. (2019). Selected factors contributing to teacher job satisfaction: A quantitative investigation using 2013 TALIS data. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, 511-5321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1586963
- Weston, D., & Bridget, C. (2018). Unleashing great teaching: The secrets to the most effective teacher development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315101729
- Widjaja, W., Vale, C., & Doig, B. (2019). Nothing like planning and reflecting together to build trust. International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004419230_006
- Wolgast, A., & Fischer, N. (2017). You are not alone: Colleague support and goal-oriented cooperation as resources to reduce teachers’ stress. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9366-1
- Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663. 82.1.81
- Zeggelaar, A., Vermeulen, M., & Jochems, W. (2020). Evaluating effective professional development. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744686
- Zembylas, M., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Modeling teacher empowerment: The role of job satisfaction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(5), 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500146152
- Zhang, S., Shi, Q., & Lin, E. (2020). Professional development needs, support, and barriers: TALIS US new and veteran teachers’ perspectives. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1614967
Journal directory listing - Volume 67 (2022) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【67(1)】March
Why Are Teacher Professional Development Activities Ineffective? An Investigation of the Results of the TALIS 2018 Survey of Taiwan Junior High School Teachers
Author: Jia-Li Huang (Institute of Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University), Chuan-Chung Hsieh (Department of Education and Learning Technology, National Tsing Hua University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 67, No. 1
Date：March 2022
Pages：1-32
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0001
Abstract：
Taiwan participated in the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) in 2018. The survey results related to teacher professional development contradict academic research for several survey items. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that might explain the contradictory results regarding teachers’ personal and school environments. The study examined secondary data from TALIS by using logistic regression analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) teachers are less likely to agree to follow-up activities and extended professional development due to their busy work schedules, their family responsibilities, and a lack of incentives; (2) the stronger teachers’ beliefs in student-oriented teaching are, the more they recognize the effectiveness of professional development activities; (3) job satisfaction is related to teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of professional development; (4) the more supportive a school environment is of teaching innovation, the more teachers recognize the characteristics of effective professional development; and (5) the types and characteristics of professional development activities are significantly different. The study provides suggestions for implementing effective teacher professional development.
Keywords：job satisfaction, effective teacher professional development, self-efficacy, teaching beliefs, Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS)