內容與語言整合性學習原則融入職前教師之教育社會學課程教學：準實驗研究(英文稿)
作者:北京師範大學教育學部教師教育研究所黃嘉莉、中國文化大學教育學系武佳瀅
卷期：67卷第2期
日期：2022年6月
頁碼：243-268
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0009
摘要：
本研究旨在針對臺灣師資培育課程中，職前教師對學習教育社會學專有術語，以及連結理論概念與教育政策或實務之學習困難，期能透過「內容與語言整合性學習」（CLIL）原則融入課程的教學試驗，瞭解其對職前教師學習教育社會學成效之情形。為達研究目的，本研究採取非相等控制組設計的準實驗研究，以臺灣一所綜合性大學修習師資培育課程中教育社會學師資生為對象，共計118名，其年紀範圍是20～24歲，分為實驗組58人及對照組60人。實驗組將CLIL原則融入教學，結合心智圖法、即時反饋系統，以及小組討論活動強調教學過程中專有術語與生活情境之相互連結。本研究採用期末考成績和調查問卷進行t檢定與相關分析，結果顯示實驗組與控制組的期末考成績差異達顯著（t = -2.383, p = .019），且實驗組（= 79.81）的平均測驗分數高於控制組（= 75.81）。甚者，採用李克特五點量表計分的調查問卷，其全量表平均數達3.86，而在因素分析方面，在選取特徵值大於1之原則下，抽離出三個主要因素，如：「提升知能」（Cronbach’s α = .92）、「學習認同」（Cronbach’s α = .91），以及「接納態度」（Cronbach’s α = .73），皮爾森相關分析更可見三個因素之間呈現中度相關。綜觀上述而論，本研究結果發現CLIL原則融入在教育社會學課程中確實對師資生的學習成就產生顯著影響，並能提升師資生對教育社會學的理解與敏覺度，且師資生對CLIL原則運用在學習教育社會學歷程的提升知能、學習認同感，與其對課程學習的接納態度息息相關。
關鍵詞：內容與語言整合性學習、職前教師、教育社會學、臺灣、師資培育
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- Barr, S., Eslami, Z. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2012). Core strategies to support English language learners. The Educational Forum, 76(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.628196
- Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8
- Borràs, E., & Moore, E. (2019). The plurilingual and multimodal management of participation and subject complexity in university CLIL teamwork. English Language Teaching, 12(2), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n2p100
- Chang, C.-C. (2016). Development of Taiwan’s sociology of education disciplines architecture seen from the textbook content. Educational Research Quarterly, 62(4), 113-153. https://doi.org/10. 3966/102887082016126204004
- Costa, R. S., Medrano, M. M., Ostáriz, P. L., & Moreno-Tuerrero, A. (2020). How to teach pre-service teachers to make a didactic program? The collaborative learning associated with mobile devices. Sustainability, 12(9), 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093755
» 展開更多
- Barr, S., Eslami, Z. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2012). Core strategies to support English language learners. The Educational Forum, 76(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.628196
- Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8
- Borràs, E., & Moore, E. (2019). The plurilingual and multimodal management of participation and subject complexity in university CLIL teamwork. English Language Teaching, 12(2), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n2p100
- Chang, C.-C. (2016). Development of Taiwan’s sociology of education disciplines architecture seen from the textbook content. Educational Research Quarterly, 62(4), 113-153. https://doi.org/10. 3966/102887082016126204004
- Costa, R. S., Medrano, M. M., Ostáriz, P. L., & Moreno-Tuerrero, A. (2020). How to teach pre-service teachers to make a didactic program? The collaborative learning associated with mobile devices. Sustainability, 12(9), 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093755
- Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
- Coyle, D. (2012). Content and language integrated learning: Language using, learning gains. In M. G. Davies & A. Taronna (Eds.), New trends in early foreign language learning: The age factor, CLIL and language in contact (pp. 26-33). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
- Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins Pub.
- Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
- Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Charting policies, premises and research on content and language integrated learning. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classroom (pp. 1-20). John Benjamins Pub. https://doi.org/ 10.1075/aals.7.01dal
- De Smet, A., Mettewie, L., Galand, B., Hiligsmann, P., & Van Mensel, L. (2018). Classroom anxiety and enjoyment in CLIL and Non-CLIL: Does the target language matter? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.3
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
- DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Sage.
- Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Toward a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1348/ 000709900158281
- Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, and community partnership: Preparing educators and improving schools. Westview Press.
- Estrada, J. L., & Otto, A. (2019). Timing of pedagogical intervention: Oral error treatment in EFL vs. CLIL contexts in primary education in Spain. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 578-586. https://doi.org.10.17263/jlls.586263
- Estrada, A. C. M., Vera, J. G., Ruiz, G. R., & Arrebola, I. A. (2019). Flipped classroom to improve university student centered learning and academic performance. Social Science, 8(11), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110315.
- European Commission. (1995). Teaching and learning: Toward the learning society. http://europa. eu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com95_590_en.pdf
- Fontecha, A. F., & Alonso, A. C. (2014). A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction. International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 21-36.
- Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. Jossey-Bass.
- Housen, A. (2002). Processes and outcomes in the European schools model of multilingual Education. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2002. 10668698
- Hsiao, C.-C. (2020). Teaching willingness as a moderator: A longitudinal study on preservice teachers’ teacher belief. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 251-276. https://doi. org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0009
- Huang, H.-L., Chou, C.-P., Leu, S., You, H.-L., Tiao, M.-M., & Chen, C.-H. (2020). Effects of a quasi-experimental study of using flipped classroom approach to teach evidence-based medicine to medical technology students. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 31. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12909-020-1946-7
- Huang, J.-L. (2008). Sociological analysis of teacher professional system. National Taiwan Normal University Journal: Education Class, 53(3), 125-151.
- Huang, J.-L. (2015). IRS applied to test of teaching sociology of education. In National Taiwan Normal University Teaching Development Center (Ed.), Happy farming in National Taiwan Normal University, Master Anthology (2014 Innovative Sophisticated Teaching and Professional Community) (pp. 169-191). National Taiwan Normal University Publishing Center.
- Huang, J.-L. (2016). Sociology analysis on junior high school and elementary school teachers license system: On the point of view of social barriers. Taiwan SOE Research, 16(2), 65-103. https://doi.org/10.3966/168020042016121602003
- Huang, J.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wang, C.-P., & Hung, J.-C. (2020). Construction and application of teacher professional standards and curriculum baseline for preservice teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES. 202006_65(2).0001
- Huang, J.-L., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2017). Critical factors of becoming secondary school teachers: Mining the process of teacher education by decision trees. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 89-123. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04
- Hughes, S. P., & Madrid, D. (2020). The effects of CLIL on content knowledge in monolingual contexts. The Language Learning Journal, 48, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019. 1671483
- Jian, L.-P. (2007). An observation and reflection about the process of teachers’ reprofessionalization: A case study on the rural element school teacher’s action research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(1), 29-58.
- Johnson, T. J. (1972). Professions and power. Macmillan.
- Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
- Jongejan, W., Verhoeven, L., & Seigel, L. S. (2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first-and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.835
- Jumani, N. B. (2013). Connections between theory and practice in teacher education. European Journal of Social & Behavioral Sciences, 4(1), 788-800. https://doi.org/10.15405/Future Academy/ejsbs(2301-2218).2012.4.12
- Kinyaduka, B. D. (2017). Why are we unable bridging theory-practice gap in context of plethora of literature on its causes, effects and solutions? Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 102-105.
- Lasagabaster, D., & Beloqui, R. L. (2015). The impact of type of approach (CLIL versus EFL) and methodology (book-based versus project work) on motivation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53737
- Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2017). A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 688-712. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059
- Leontjev, D., & deBoer, M. A. (2020). Multimodal meditational means in assessment of processes: An argument for a hard-CLIL approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1275-1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1754329
- Li, J.-S., & Chang, C.-C. (1999). Retrospect and prospect of sociology of education research in Taiwan. In National Taiwan Normal University Department of Education and Education Ministry Lectures (Ed.), Educational science internationalization and localization (pp. 283-345). Yang-Chih.
- Lo, Y., & Jeong, H. (2018). Impact of genre-based pedagogy on students’ academic literacy development in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Linguistics and Education, 47, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.001
- Löfström, E., Poom-Valicks, K., Hannula, M. S., & Mathews, S. R. (2010). Supporting emerging teacher identities: Can we identify teacher potential among students? European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619761003631831
- Mahan, K. R. (2020). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571 736.2019.1705879
- Maljers, A., Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (2007). Foreword. In A. Maljers, D. Marsh, & D. Wolff (Eds.), Windows on CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in the European spotlight (pp. 7-9). European Platform for Dutch Education.
- Martínez-Agudo, J. (2019). To what extent can CLIL learners’ oral competence outcomes be explained by contextual differences? Updated empirical evidence from Spain. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 37(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614. 2019.1598878
- McGarr, O., O’Grady, E., & Guilfoyle, L. (2017). Exploring the theory-practice gap in initial teacher education: Moving beyond questions of relevance to issues of power and authority. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1256040
- Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL, content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.
- National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. Teachers College Columbia University Press.
- Nieto Moreno de Diezmas, E. (2016). The impact of CLIL on the acquisition of the learning to learn competence in secondary school education in the bilingual programs of Castilla-La Mancha. Porta Linguarum, 25, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53886
- Ogbuanya, T. C., & Onele, N. O. (2018). Investigating the effectiveness of desktop virtual reality for teaching and learning of electrical/electronics technology in universities. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 35(3), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1492283
- Oxbrow, G. (2020). Addressing the language challenge in monolingual CLIL contexts: Stakeholder perspectives in the Canary Islands. The Language Learning Journal, 48, 99-114. https://doi. org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1657486
- Pan, H.-L., & Hung, C.-W. (2020). Effects of teacher education reform in the standard-based policy context: Analysis of a teacher education program by applying the action model/change model schema. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 73-104. https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202006_65(2).0003
- Reitbauer, M., Fürstenberg, U., Kletzenbauer, P., & Marko, K. (2018). Towards a cognitive-linguistic turn in CLIL: Unfolding integration. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.5
- Risan, M. (2020). Creating theory-practice linkages in teacher education: Tracing the use of practice-based artifacts. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101670
- Rogers, J., & Révész, A. (2019). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 133-142). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-12
- Rots, I., Aelterminologyan, A., Vlerick, P., & Vermeulen, K. (2007). Teacher education, graduates’ teaching commitment and entrance into the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.012
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps. 1999.1020
- Sager, J. (1997). Term formation. In S. E. Wright & G. Budin (Eds.), Handbook of terminology management (Vol. 1, pp. 25-42). John Benjamins.
- Salamanca, C., & Montoya, S. I. (2018). Using CLIL approach to improve english language in a Colombian higher educational institution. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 19-30. https:// doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p19
- Seikkula-Leino, J. (2007). CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21(4), 328-341. https://doi.org/10.2167/le635.0
- Smith, R. G. (2007). Developing professional identities and knowledge: Becoming primary teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 377-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600 701391937
- Ünver, G. (2014). Connecting theory and practice in teacher education: A case study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1402-1407. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.4.2161
- Walker, E. (2010). Evaluation of a support intervention for senior secondary school English immersion. System, 38, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.005
- Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice Scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167-202
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Wright, J. D. (2015). International encyclopedia for social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon Press.
- Wu, M.-L. (2006). SPSS statistics applied learning practice: Questionnaire analysis and applied statistics. Acore Digital Technology.
- Yin, J. (2019). Connecting theory and practice in teacher education: English-as-a-foreign-language pre-service teachers’ perceptions of practicum experience. Innovation and Education, 1(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0003-z
- Zeichner, K. M. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
Journal directory listing - Volume 67 (2022) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【67(2)】June (Special Issue: Revolution and Prospect of Personnel System in Higher Education)
Content and Language Integrated Learning for Teaching the Theoretical Language of Sociology of Education to Preservice Teachers: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Author: Jia-Li Huang (Institute of Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University), Chia-Ying Wu (Department of Education, Chinese Culture University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 67, No. 2
Date：June 2022
Pages：243-268
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0009
Abstract：
In this study, the principles of content and language integrated learning (CLIL), used for teaching a foreign language, were applied to teaching a theoretical language and the sociology of education (SOE). A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent group was employed, and 118 students aged 20-24 years were recruited from a teacher education program at a Taiwanese university and assigned to one of two groups: the experimental group comprised 58 students, and the control group comprised 60 students. The experimental group taught SOE integrating CLIL principles, including strengthening the connection to specific terminology, mind mapping involving communication and problem solving, interactive response systems, and team discussions on the terminology in context. The preservice teachers’ final examination was used to establish validity, and a self-developed questionnaire was collected and analyzed to understand the participants’ perceptions of SOE learning and the integration of CLIL into teaching. A t test and correlation analysis were applied to the examination scores. The t test verified that the scores for the two groups differed significantly (t = -2.383, p = .019), and the mean of the score for the experimental class (= 79.81) was higher than that of the control class (= 75.08). Moreover, the mean total score of the self-developed questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale was 3.86. The factor analysis results demonstrated that three factors had eigenvalues > 1: “enhancing knowledge” (Cronbach’s α = .92), “learning recognition” (Cronbach’s α = .91), and “acceptance attitude” (Cronbach’s α = .73). A Pearson r analysis demonstrated moderate correlations among the three factors. The results revealed that integrating the principles of CLIL into the teaching of SOE had a significant effect on preservice teachers’ learning of the theoretical language. Moreover, they positively perceived the enhancement of SOE knowledge, recognition, and acceptance through CLIL. This study highlights that CLIL can be applied to the teaching of a theoretical language and contribute to our understanding of SOE learning.
Keywords：content and language integrated learning, preservice teachers, sociology of education, Taiwan, teacher education