師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 67卷(2022) - 【教育科學研究期刊】67(4)十二月刊

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「高等教育的教學卓越」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/09/30) 《教育科學研究期刊》「社會情緒學習｣專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/10/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「高齡教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/12/31)

期刊目錄列表 - 67卷(2022) - 【教育科學研究期刊】67(4)十二月刊

回上一頁

教師協作在校長教學領導對教師自我效能影響的多層次中介效果研究：兼論教育階段的調節效果作者:國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系張存真、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系宋曜廷、國立臺灣師範大學企業管理學系邱皓政

卷期：67卷第4期
日期：2022年12月
頁碼：35-72
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0001

摘要：
校長教學領導是發展優質教育和使學校成功的關鍵因素，校長若能營造可使教師成功合作的工作環境並藉以促進教師協作，則此支持性的學校環境可提高教師自我效能並能提升教學成效。本研究旨在探討學校層次之校長教學領導與學校教師協作，以及教師層次之教師協作，對於教師自我效能的影響，除瞭解校長教學領導與教師協作對教師自我效能的直接效果之外，更進一步分析教師協作的跨層次中介效果。由於不同教育階段（國小、國中和高中）的學校文化與學生特性並不相同，因此本研究將檢視教育階段在校長教學領導與教師協作之間的調節效果。本研究使用2018年教學與學習國際調查（TALIS）之臺灣地區553所國小、國中與高中校長及10,129位教師資料進行多層次中介效果模式分析，其中，學校教師協作同時作為學校層次的脈絡變數與教師層次解釋變數，利用分效模式來檢視不同層次變數對教師自我效能的中介影響。研究結果顯示，教師層次的教師協作對教師自我效能具有顯著的正向影響，學校層次的學校教師協作對教師自我效能有顯著的脈絡效果。其次，校長教學領導會透過教師協作的完全中介對教師自我效能產生間接影響。第三，國小和國中教育階段在校長教學領導與學校教師協作之間具有正向調節效果。最後，本研究依據研究結果進行理論與實務的討論，並提出未來研究之建議。

關鍵詞：分效模式、校長教學領導、教師自我效能、教師協作、教學與學習國際調查

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

丁一顧（2014）。教師專業學習社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學季刊，17（1），209-232。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201401_17(1).0008【Ding, Y.-K. (2014). A study of teachers’ professional learning communities focusing on students’ achievement. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 17(1), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201401_17(1).0008】
吳清山（2002）。當前教育改革的迷思與省思。學校行政，17，2-9。https://doi.org/10.6423/ HHHC.200201.0002【Wu, C.-S. (2002). Myths and reflections on current educational reform. School Administrators, 17, 2-9. https://doi. org/10.6423/HHHC.200201.0002】
李安明（2012）。校長教學領導之改善、學生學習成就及學生學習測驗成績之研究。教育行政研究，2（1），21-67。https://doi.org/10.3966/222350002012060201002 【Li, A.-M. (2012). A study of the improvement of principal instructional leadership, student academic achievement, and student test score. Journal of Education Administration Research, 2(1), 21-67. https://doi.org/10.3966/　222350002012060201002】
李安明（2016）。國民小學校長教學領導運作之責任探究：以新竹縣市3所國小為例。教育行政論壇，8（1），1-33。【Li, A.-M. (2016). A field study on the practice of accountability of three elementary school principal instructional leadership in Hsinchu City and County. Forum of Educational Administration, 8(1), 1-33.】
李安明、謝傳崇（2011）。書評－《校長教學領導：理論與實踐》。當代教育研究，19（3），161-175。【Li, A.-M., & Hsieh, C.-C. (2011). A book review on Militello, M., Rallis, S. F., & Goldring, E. B., leading with inquiry & action: How principals improve teaching and learning. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 19(3), 161-175.】

» 展開更多

丁一顧（2014）。教師專業學習社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學季刊，17（1），209-232。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201401_17(1).0008【Ding, Y.-K. (2014). A study of teachers’ professional learning communities focusing on students’ achievement. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 17(1), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201401_17(1).0008】
吳清山（2002）。當前教育改革的迷思與省思。學校行政，17，2-9。https://doi.org/10.6423/ HHHC.200201.0002【Wu, C.-S. (2002). Myths and reflections on current educational reform. School Administrators, 17, 2-9. https://doi. org/10.6423/HHHC.200201.0002】
李安明（2012）。校長教學領導之改善、學生學習成就及學生學習測驗成績之研究。教育行政研究，2（1），21-67。https://doi.org/10.3966/222350002012060201002 【Li, A.-M. (2012). A study of the improvement of principal instructional leadership, student academic achievement, and student test score. Journal of Education Administration Research, 2(1), 21-67. https://doi.org/10.3966/　222350002012060201002】
李安明（2016）。國民小學校長教學領導運作之責任探究：以新竹縣市3所國小為例。教育行政論壇，8（1），1-33。【Li, A.-M. (2016). A field study on the practice of accountability of three elementary school principal instructional leadership in Hsinchu City and County. Forum of Educational Administration, 8(1), 1-33.】
李安明、謝傳崇（2011）。書評－《校長教學領導：理論與實踐》。當代教育研究，19（3），161-175。【Li, A.-M., & Hsieh, C.-C. (2011). A book review on Militello, M., Rallis, S. F., & Goldring, E. B., leading with inquiry & action: How principals improve teaching and learning. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 19(3), 161-175.】
李懿芳、江芳盛、喬麗文（2010）。國小校長領導行為、學校氣氛與學習成就之關聯性研究。教育研究月刊，191，39-54。【Lee, Y.-F., Chiang, F.-S., & Chaio, L.-W. (2010). A study on the correlation between primary school principals’ leadership behavior, school climate and learning achievement. Journal of Education Research, 191, 39-54.】
邱皓政（2017）。多層次模式與縱貫資料分析。五南。【Chiou, H-J. (2017). Multilevel modeling and longitudinal data analysis. Wu-Nan.】
柯華葳、陳明蕾、李俊仁、陳冠銘（2019）。2018教學與學習國際調查臺灣報告：綜整報告。國家教育研究院。【Ko, H.-W., Chen, M.-L., Lee, J.-R., & Chen, K.-M. (2019). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 Taiwan report: Elementary, junior high, & senior high educations. National Academy for Educational Research.】
秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。【Chin, J. M.-C. (2010). The theory and application of educational leadership. Wu-Nan.】
秦夢群、吳勁甫（2011）。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育心理與研究，34（2），1-31。【Chin, J. M.-C., & Wu, J.-F. (2011). Exploring the relationship among instructional leadership, school knowledge management, and teaching effectiveness: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Education & Psychology, 34(2), 1-31.】
梁金都、林明地（2015）。國小校長領導專業學習社群以發展學校集體智慧的策略。教育研究集刊，61（3），1-46。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082015096103001【Liang, C.-T., & Lin, M.-D. (2015). A study on principals’ leading strategies to develop the school collective wisdom in the professional learning communities. Bulletin of Educational Research, 61(3), 1-46. https://doi.　org/10.3966/102887082015096103001】
陳木金、吳堂鐘、吳慧蘭（2016）。學校學習環境指標建構對校長推動教學領導的啟示。學校行政，104，15-38。https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002016070104002【Chan, M.-J., Wu, T.-J., & Wu, H.-L. (2016). The study of constructing learning environment indicators for principals’ instruction leadership. School Administrators, 104, 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3966/1606830020160　70104002】
陳文彥、潘慧玲（2019）。校長領導對教師學習領導的影響：檢視信任關係與學業強調的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，64（1），119-147。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1). 0005【Chan, W.-Y., & Pan, H.-L. (2019). The effect of principal leadership on teacher leadership for learning: How trust and academic emphasis moderate?. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(1), 119-147. https://doi.org/　10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0005】
陳玉娟（2021）。學校管理模式與學生偏差行為關係之研究：以教師教學投入與教學支援為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，66（3），1-30。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_ 66(3).0001【Chen, Y.-C. (2021). Relationship between school management and student deviant behavior: Pedagogical input from teachers and teaching support as mediating variables. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0001】
黃易文、湯家偉（2019）。國中社會領域初任教師知覺組織支持、教師同僚共享氛圍和自我效能之關係。教育實踐與研究，32（1），33-70。【Huang, I.-W., & Tang, C.-W. (2019). Perceived organizational support, collegiality, and teacher efficacy of novice social studies junior high school teachers: The problems they faced and solutions. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 32(1), 33-70.】
溫福星、邱皓政（2009）。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果；以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報，26（2），189-211。https://doi.org/10.6504/ JOM.2009.26.02.05【Wen, F.-H., & Chiou, H.-J. (2009). Multilevel moderated mediation of organizational study: An empirical analysis of organizational innovation climate, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Management, 26(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2009.26.02.05】
鄭淑惠（2017）。校長學習領導與學校願景落實。教育研究月刊，274（1），69-84。https://doi. org/10.3966/168063602017020274006【Cheng, S.-H. (2017). Principal leadership for learning and school visions implementation. Journal of Education Research, 274(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017020274006】
鄭進丁（1986）。國民小學校長角色之分析。復文。【Zheng, J.-D. (1986). An analysis of the role of the principal in elementary schools. Fu Wen.】
魏韶勤、張德銳（2006）。教學觀察與回饋對國小初任教師教學效能影響之研究。課程與教學季刊，9（2），89-103。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200604.0089【Wei, S.-C., & Chang, D. (2006). The impact of observation and feedback on teaching effectiveness for beginning teachers in elementary schools. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 9(2), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ. 200604.0089】
羅寶鳳、陳麒（2020）。初任教師工作困擾、教學效能與專業表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），37-71。https://doi.org/0.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0002【Lo, P.-F., & Chen, Q. (2020). Beginning teachers’ job problems, teaching effectiveness, and professional performance. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 37-71. https://doi.org/0.6209/JORIES.202006_ 65(2).0002】
Abu-Tineh, A. M., Khasawneh, S. A., & Khalaileh, H. A. (2011). Teacher self-efficacy and classroom management styles in Jordanian schools. Management in Education, 25(4), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020611420597
Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. OECD iLibrary. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/799337c2-en.pdf? itemId=%2Fcontent%2Fpaper%2F799337c2-en&mimeType=pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6. 1173
Battersby, S. L., & Cave, A. (2014). Preservice classroom teachers’ preconceived attitudes, confidence, beliefs, and self-efficacy toward integrating music in the elementary curriculum. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 32(2), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/　8755123314521033
Beatty, B. R. (2000). Teachers leading their own professional growth: Self-directed reflection and collaboration and changes in perception of self and work in secondary school teachers. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(1), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200102
Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2017). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2015-0116
Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608
Bridges, E. M. (1967). Instructional leadership: A concept re-examined. Journal of Educational Administration, 5(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009614
Brieve, F. J. (1972). Secondary principals as instructional leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 56(368), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263657205636802
Bruce, C. D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate. 2010.06.011
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi. org/10.7208/chicago/9780226078014.001.0001
Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302
Çalık, T., Sezgin, F., Kavgacı, H., & Kilınç, A. Ç. (2012). Examination of relationships between instructional leadership of school principals and self-efficacy of teachers and collective teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2498-2504.
Cawelti, G. (1999). Improving achievement. American School Board Journal, 186(7), 34-37.
Chang, I.-H. (2011). A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.614945
Chapman, C., & Muijs, D. (2013). Collaborative school turnaround: A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(3), 200-226. https://doi. org/10.1080/15700763.2013.831456
Chen, W.-L., Elchert, D., & Asikin-Garmager, A. (2018). Comparing the effects of teacher collaboration on student performance in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(4), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925. 2018.1528863
Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.edurev.2015.02.001
Choi, J., Lee, J.-H., & Kim, B. (2019). How does learner-centered education affect teacher self-efficacy? The case of project-based learning in Korea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.005
Chong, W. H., & Kong, C. A. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 263-283. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00220973.2011.596854
Çoban, Ö., Özdemir, N., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020, October 28). Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: Testing a multilevel mediation model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 95-115. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1741143220968170
Cogaltay, N., Yalcin, M., & Karadag, E. (2016). Educational leadership and job satisfaction of teachers: A meta-analysis study on the studies published between 2000 and 2016 in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(62), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016. 62.13
Dalin, P. (1996). Towards schooling for 21st century. A&C Black.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi. org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 003172171109200622
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
De Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2019). School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102925
Dembo, M. H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1086/461441
Devos, G., Tuytens, M., & Hulpia, H. (2014). Teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the mediating effects of distributed leadership. American Journal of Education, 120(2), 205-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/674370
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (3rd ed.). Solution Tree.
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 700-719. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJEM-09-2012-0107
Fackler, S., & Malmberg, L. E. (2016). Teachers’ self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002
Fancera, S. F., & Bliss, J. R. (2011). Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 349-370. https://doi.　org/10.1080/15700763.2011.585537
Ford, T. G., & Youngs, P. A. (2018). Creating organizational structures to facilitate collegial interaction among teachers: Evidence from a high-performing urban Midwestern US district. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 424-440. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1741143216682501
Forte, A. M., & Flores, M. A. (2014). Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: A study of Portuguese teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.763791
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406-427. https://doi.org/10. 1086/593940
Glanz, J., & Zepeda, S. J. (Eds.). (2016). Supervision: New perspectives for theory and practice. Rowman & Littlefield.
Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501-530. https://doi.org/10. 1086/681925
Goddard, Y. L., & Kim, M. (2018). Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000102
Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., Bailes, L. P., & Nichols, R. (2019). From school leadership to differentiated instruction: A pathway to student learning in schools. The Elementary School Journal, 120(2), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1086/705827
Goddard, Y. L., Neumerski, C. M., Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. J., & Berebitsky, D. (2010). A multilevel exploratory study of the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional support and group norms for instruction in elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 336-357. https://doi.org/10.1086/656303
Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 109(4), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900401
Graham, P. (2007). Improving teacher effectiveness through structured collaboration: A case study of a professional learning community. RMLE Online, 31(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19404476.2007.11462044
Griffin, P., Murray, L., Care, E., Thomas, A., & Perri, P. (2010). Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.516628
Gumus, S., Bulut, O., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis. Education Research and Perspectives, 40, 1-29.
Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15700760500244793
Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10383412
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191. https://doi.org/10. 1080/0924345980090203
Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, N., & Kouhsari, M. (2018). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 800-819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217700283
Hansen, B., & Lárusdóttir, S. H. (2015). Instructional leadership in compulsory schools in Iceland and the role of school principals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(5), 583-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.965788
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1741143204039297
Hausman, C. S., & Goldring, E. B. (2001). Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of professional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930 pje7602_3
Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 227-249. https://doi. org/10.1108/09578230910941066
Hendriks, M. A., & Scheerens, J. (2013). School leadership effects revisited: A review of empirical studies guided by indirect-effect models. School Leadership and Management, 33(4), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.813458
Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
Honingh, M., & Hooge, E. (2014). The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499256
Hughes, J. N., Grossman, P., & Barker, D. (1990). Teachers’ expectancies, participation in consultation, and perceptions of consultant helpfulness. School Psychology Quarterly, 5(3), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090611
Isa, N. I., Mansor, A. N., Wahab, J. L., & Alias, B. S. (2018). Principals’ instructional leadership towards teachers’ self-efficacy. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.3), 449-452. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18349
Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.4.85
Jamentz, K. (2002). Isolation is the enemy of improvement: Instructional leadership to support standards-based practice. WestEd.
Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159651
Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(2), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4454
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev. 2014.06.001
Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476-500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 23(4), 418-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9902300404
Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/　tea.21031
Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school English learners’ science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987-1011. https://doi.org/10.　1002/tea.21031
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/157007　60500244769
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/136324　30701800060
Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035
Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2020). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
Lockton, M. (2019). Chasing joint work: Administrators’ efforts to structure teacher collaboration. School Leadership & Management, 39(5), 496-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.　1564269
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M., & Mascall, B. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning (Vol. 42). Wallace Foundation.
Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership (pp. 81-100). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_5
McGuigan, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600805816
McGuire, B. D. (2011). Exploring the influence of teacher collaboration on teacher self-efficacy: A single case study of a charter high school. Walden University Press.
McHenry, A. N. (2009). The relationship between leadership behaviors, teacher collaboration, and student achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern Mississippi.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement (Vol. 45). Teachers College Press.
Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 483-491. https://doi.　org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491
Moradkhani, S., Raygan, A., & Moein, M. S. (2017). Iranian EFL teachers’ reflective practices and self-efficacy: Exploring possible relationships. System, 65, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.　2016.12.011
Muijs, D. (2015). Improving schools through collaboration: A mixed methods study of school-to-school partnerships in the primary sector. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1047824
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Ngang, T. K. (2011). The effect of transformational leadership on school culture in male’ primary schools Maldives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2575-2580. https://doi.org/10.　1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.503
Nias, J. (1993). Changing times, changing identities: Grieving for a lost self. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Educational research and evaluation: For policy and practice? (pp. 149-166). Falmer Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). School leadership for developing professional learning communities. Teaching in Focus, 15. https://doi.org/10. 1787/5jlr5798b937-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report (Preliminary version). http://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf
Ozdemir, N. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of research on principal leadership and student achievement. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(7), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v6i7.4512
Poulos, J., Culberston, N., Piazza, P., & D’Entremont, C. (2014). Making space: The value of teacher collaboration. The Education Digest, 80(2), 28-31.
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209-233. https://doi.org/10. 1037/a0020141
Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475-514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562
Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L’éducation, 29(3), 798-822. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054196
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0924345900010106
Scheerens, J. (2000). Improving school effectiveness [Fundamentals of Educational Planning, No. 68]. Unesco International Institute for Educational Planning.
Schwartz, G. (2017). The relationship between teacher job satisfaction and principal leadership styles [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Carson-Newman University.
Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology, 57, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-　0597.2008.00359.x
Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463-488. https://doi.org/10.　1080/09243453.2017.1319392
Sehgal, P., Nambudiri, R., & Mishra, S. K. (2017). Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0090
Shachar, H., & Shmuelevitz, H. (1997). Implementing cooperative learning, teacher collaboration and teachers’ sense of efficacy in heterogeneous junior high schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0924
Shahzad, K., & Naureen, S. (2017). Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 48-72. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1050
Sheng, Y. P., Pearson, M., & Crosby, L. (2003). Organizational culture and employees’ computer self-efficacy: An empirical study. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(3), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003070103
Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896042
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/　j.tate.2008.12.006
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
Stoll, L., & Kools, M. (2017). The school as a learning organisation: A review revisiting and extending a timely concept. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2016-0022
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. Psychology Press.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66-92. https://doi. org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.　org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Voelkel, R. H., Jr. (2019, November 19). Causal relationship among transformational leadership, professional learning communities, and teacher collective efficacy. Talor & Francis Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1690699
Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005
Woods, A. M., & Weasmer, J. (2004). Maintaining job satisfaction: Engaging professionals as active participants. The Clearing House, 77(3), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650409601242
Wu, H., Gao, X., & Shen, J. (2020). Principal leadership effects on student achievement: A multilevel analysis using Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 data. Educational Studies, 46(3), 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1584853
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695-719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450

中文APA引文格式	張存真、宋曜廷、邱皓政（2022）。教師協作在校長教學領導對教師自我效能影響的多層次中介效果研究：兼論教育階段的調節效果。教育科學研究期刊，67（4），35-72。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0002
APA Format	Chang, T.-J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chiou, H.-J. (2022). Exploring the multilevel mediation effects of teacher collaboration on the correlation between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy: Education level as a moderator. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 67(4), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0002

Journal directory listing - Volume 67 (2022) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【67(4)】December

Top

Exploring the Multilevel Mediation Effects of Teacher Collaboration on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy: Education Level as a Moderator Author: Tsung-Jen Chang (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Haw-Jeng Chiou (Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 67, No. 4
Date：December 2022
Pages：35-72
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0001

Abstract：
Background/Context
Principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration are key characteristics of effective schools (Scheerens, 1990; Teddlie & Reynolds, 2000) and the primary factors that influence teacher self-efficacy. On the basis of the definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2018), the present study defined principal instructional leadership as the process of supporting and developing high-quality instructional practices, developing and implementing policies that support student achievements, developing learning communities, providing feedback on instructions, modeling effective instructions, and supporting the use of assessment data. Teacher collaboration refers to the process through which teachers exchange information with their colleagues and learn from each other (Geijsel et al., 2009). The concept of self-efficacy is based on social cognitive theory proposed by Bandura (1977). In the present study, teacher self-efficacy was defined as the competence of teachers to effectively address problems in their classrooms and schools and improve the quality of their teaching, which could eventually improve the learning outcomes of their students (Ainley & Carstens, 2018; Battersby & Cave, 2014; Geijsel et al., 2009; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001).
Purpose
Principal instructional leadership is crucial for high-quality education and schools’ success. Principals are responsible for shaping the work environments of teachers; thus, they can strengthen and promote teacher collaboration. A supportive school environment can improve teachers’ self-efficacy. The aim of this was to elucidate the direct and indirect — through teacher collaboration — effects of principal instructional leadership on teacher self-efficacy. Because teaching is profoundly influenced by school culture and environmental factors, work pressure at different education levels may create different work environments and exert different effects on principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration. Therefore, we performed additional analyses regarding the contextual moderating effects of education levels (International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED).
Design/Methodology/Approach
This study performed a secondary data analysis by using the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (2018) dataset. The sample included principals and teachers from elementary (200 and 3,494, respectively), junior high (202 and 3,835, respectively), and high (151 and 2,800, respectively) schools in Taiwan.
Multilevel linear modeling was performed to investigate relationships between principal instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy in these schools. Teacher collaboration at the individual level and principal instructional leadership at the overall level were used as independent variables to evaluate the effects of both levels on teacher self-efficacy.
Findings/Results
1. Teacher Collaboration Exerts a Direct and Contextual Effect on Teacher Self-efficacy
The analysis results revealed a positive relationship between individual- and school-level teacher collaboration and individual-level teacher self-efficacy, indicating that a higher level of teacher collaboration is related to higher perceptions of self-efficacy among teachers; these results supported the study assumption. These two variables were related at both the individual and school levels, which suggests that the use of both individual- and school-level variables is a precise approach for evaluating collaboration.
2. Principal Instructional Leadership Exerts as a Significant Effect (p < .05) on Teacher Collaboration
Principal instructional leadership had a positive and significant direct effect on teacher collaboration. This demonstrates that principal instructional leadership encourages teachers to be productive in their classes, share their ideas with others, and create a cooperative culture.
3. Teacher Collaboration Significantly Mediates the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-efficacy
Principal instructional leadership exerted a signiﬁcant indirect eﬀect on teacher self-efficacy through teacher collaboration. Thus, principal instructional leadership may play a key role in teacher collaboration and indirectly enhance teachers’ self-efficacy through teacher collaboration.
4. Moderating Effect of Education Level on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Collaboration
Education level (ISCED) positively moderated the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration. The relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration was found to be significant in elementary and junior high schools but nonsignificant in high schools.
Originality/Significance
Studies have reported principal instructional leadership as an imperative predictor of teacher self-efficacy. However, few studies have focused on the indirect effects of mediating variables, such as teacher collaboration, on the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy. Accordingly, this study comprehensively analyzed various school and teacher factors by using a single model and evaluated the effects of teacher collaboration on the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy from a multilevel perspective. Principal instructional leadership was found to be associated with teacher self-efficacy, both directly and indirectly, through teacher collaboration.
Suggestions/Implications
1. Implications for Educational Practice
On the basis of the findings, this study proposes some recommendations for strengthening teacher collaboration, promoting teachers’ professional development, and creating a supportive work environment to enhance teacher self-efficacy. Principal instructional leadership is crucial; nevertheless, because principals in Taiwan are administrators and not teachers, they rarely have time to invest in the professional development of teachers. Furthermore, to engage more strongly in instructional and staff development, principals must possess relevant skills. Policymakers should develop training and professional development programs for principals that are centered on the aforementioned topics.
2. Methodological Implications
Preacher et al. (2010) indicated that in a mediation model for 2-1-1 data, when the b effect (the effect of a mediator on a dependent variable) conflates the within and between effects, the indirect effect that necessarily operates between two groups is confounded by the within-group portion of the conflated b effect. This study compared the analysis results of the 2-1-1 unconflated and conflated models to determine the difference between the individual and overall mediating effects of teacher collaboration. The study findings support those of Preacher et al. (2010) in that the between and within effects of a mediator must be separated when a multilevel mediation model is used.

Keywords：unconflated model, principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, teacher collaboration, Teaching and Learning International Survey

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 67卷(2022) - 【教育科學研究期刊】67(4)十二月刊 回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 67 (2022) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【67(4)】December Top

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 67卷(2022) - 【教育科學研究期刊】67(4)十二月刊

回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 67 (2022) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【67(4)】December

Top