烏來和汶水泰雅語語法比較 作者:黃美金(國立臺灣師範大學英語學系)

摘要：

泰雅語（Atayal）是台灣原住民語言之一，日本學者Tsuchida（1980）依據音韻、構詞和詞彙將所有方言分類為二：，賽考利克（Squliq）和澤敖利（C'uli'）。本論文將提供一些語法特性以之稱該分類。
本論文將比較台北縣烏來鄉的泰雅語（署賽考利克，以下簡稱賽）和苗栗縣泰安鄉汶水的泰雅語（屬澤敖利，以下簡稱澤）語法結構上的一些特色，分述如下：
1.代名詞系統：賽有四套代名詞（及主格、所有格、位格和中性代名詞）但澤只有三套（缺位格代名詞）。另外，兩個方言代名詞的分佈和語意亦有差異。
2.格位符號系統：澤每個句子名詞前均需有格位符號，但賽則極少會有格位符號的出現，是故在賽中，詞序扮演很重要的角色。
3.時貌系統：澤長利用動詞詞綴和重複來標示時貌系統，但賽則常利用動詞詞綴和助動詞，而不用重複。
4.否定結構：賽和澤的陳述句均有兩個否定詞；但在命令句結構中，澤有兩個否定詞，但賽兼併成為一個。
如上所述，賽和澤語法結構上有相似性，也有相異性，連同Tsuchida（1980）所提的音韻、構詞和詞彙的特色，共同支撐了彼等為同一語言的兩個方言。

關鍵詞：代名詞、否定結構、格位符號、時貌、泰雅後谷、澤敖利、賽考利克

《詳全文》

The syntactic structure of Wulai and Mayrinax Atayal:a comparison Author: Lillian M. Huang(Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University)

Abstract：

Nietzsche's Zarathustra embodies modern man's endogenous quest, instead of an exogenous one, to rediscover his self as a dynamic balance between opposites, an in-ternal-external dialectic. On a deeper and more psychological level, Zarathustra not on-ly provides a genuine insight into the dilemma of the human condition but also portrays an exorcising power, helping us overcome the ontological predicament of our own hu-man existence.
The first section of this paper will deal with the spiritual dilemma of modern man and the fundamental contradictions lying in the self. The second section will be con-cerned with Nietzsche's use of parody as a reflection of the self dialectic. The third section will delineate Zarathustra as the rediscovered self, an exorcising power on the ontological predicament of human existence. As a matter of fact, Zarathustra embodies an integration/reconciliation of Apollonian and Dionysian perspectives, that is, the op-posites within the self. In other words, Zarathustra represents a dynamic organism, an internal-external dialectic.

Keywords：Pronouns, negation, case, tense/aspect, Atayal, C'uli', squliq